Anyone flying with Jet2 and Ryanair this week issued warning ahead of departure
The Met Office has put two weather alerts in place for Monday, August 4, with the ferocious wind and rain threatening to put a dampener on school holiday getaways, reports MirrorOnline.
An amber wind alert has been issued, with it running for 13 hours from 10am on Monday today across northern and central Scotland.
READ MORE: Storm Floris alert sees Met Office urge everyone to carry three items today
Get breaking news on BirminghamLive WhatsApp, click the link to join
Gusts are expected to reach 50 or 60mph.
A yellow alert has also been declared for Northern England, Northern Ireland, North Wales and Scotland with winds of 40 to 50mph forecast, while exposed coastal regions and elevated areas could see gusts reaching 70mph.
The alert took effect at 6am today and runs until midnight.
The alert has been issued as Brits are urged to keep their windows closed today.
The Met Office cautions that transport, including air travel, may be disrupted by the conditions, "with longer journey times and cancellations possible."
Jet2 has confirmed that services should run as planned, but urged customers to allow extra time for airport arrival.
In a statement posted online, Jet2 warned: "The Met Office has advised that Storm Floris is expected to bring adverse weather conditions, including strong winds to Northern parts of the UK.
"All Jet2.com flights are expected to operate as scheduled, so please ensure you leave plenty of time to arrive at your departure airport.
"Our check-in opens 2 hours before this time and will close 40 minutes prior to departure time.
"If your flight is affected, we will have the later updates here and also via SMS, email and the Jet2 app.
"You can log into Manage my Booking to ensure your details are correct.
"We look forward to welcoming you on board."
Ryanair has stated that it is "monitoring potential disruptions to flights" and will notify any passengers who may be affected.
In a notice posted on its website, Ryanair advised: "Please be advised that we are monitoring potential disruptions to flights to/from the UK on Monday August 4 due to storm Floris.
"Affected passengers will be notified and any passengers travelling to/from the UK on Monday August 4 should check their Ryanair app for the latest updates on their flight.
"We regret any inconvenience caused to passengers by these weather conditions, which are outside of Ryanair's control and affect all airlines operating to/from the UK on Monday, August 4."
If you are unsure if your flight will be delayed or cancelled, check with your airline.
For those travelling within the UK today, or taking a train to the airport, there may be disruptions on the rails.
Several train operators have issued 'do not travel' notices because of the risk of disruption caused by debris on the line, fallen trees and flooding.
Hundreds of trains have been cancelled so fast today, including all services north of Edinburgh and Glasgow from midday. Dozens of ferries have also been cancelled.
In Scotland, where the storms are expected to be the strongest, a nationwide speed limit of 50mph has been imposed, which will extend journey times and cause cancellations.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Skift
33 minutes ago
- Skift
IndiGo's Next International Stop: Service to London Heathrow Has a Date
IndiGo doubles down on global ambitions with new London Heathrow flights, more Dreamliners, and a bold business-class debut. IndiGo has announced that it will be commencing its direct daily flights to London Heathrow on October 26. The airline will be operating the route on a Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner aircraft, it said. IndiGo said it will be receiving five additional Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner aircraft during the ongoing financial year under its damp-lease arrangement with Norse Atlantic Airways. This, it said, 'will enable the airline to launch new international routes while strengthening its existing long-haul network.' Speaking at the earnings call last week, CEO Pieter Elbers had said the airline would be launching London and Copenhagen in the coming months. The airline has not clarified from which Indian city it would be flying to London Heathrow. IndiGo already operates flights to Manchester from Mumbai. More IndiGoStretch Routes: IndiGo has also announced its plans to launch its business class product IndiGoStretch on flights operating on Delhi-Singapore and Mumbai-Singapore routes starting August 9. The airline will operate its two-class A321 aircraft on the routes. Apart from this, IndiGo will also introduce the business class product on Delhi-Dubai route starting August 30, and on the Mumbai-Dubai route next month. IndiGo's Global Bet: In its earnings IndiGo had also said it would increase flights to Europe starting Se
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Huge investment in storm overflow reduction for village
Hamble is set to benefit from a new storm overflow reduction scheme. Southern Water is to spend up to £2.42m on solutions to reduce storm overflows from the School Lane outfall near Hamble Copse. Before the work begins, engineers are surveying the network to find the best strategies. The improvements in Hamble will involve investment in technology, including the use of artificial intelligence for real-time control of flows between the pumping stations. READ MORE: Oil refinery warns of flaring and 'elevated noise' in coming days Overflow reduction part of Southern Water's £1.5bn environmental plan (Image: Supplied) This will include utilising storage within the network. Southern Water's clean rivers and seas task force engineering lead, Keith Herbert, said: "We're excited to start this work which will utilise technology and other solutions to help reduce storm overflows in this area. "Hamble is a picturesque village that attracts many visitors and we want to play our part in ensuring the rivers and seas around it are clean, especially as they're a crucial habitat for shellfish." The scheme is part of Southern Water's wider £1.5bn clean rivers and seas plan.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
The real reason weather forecasters (like me) often appear to get it wrong
Sometimes I'll be walking around a supermarket, and a shopper will approach me in the aisle. "I hosted a barbecue on Saturday and you told me it was going to rain," they will say. "And it didn't. Why did you get it wrong?". Or the opposite: they planned for a day of sunshine, only to be disappointed by grey skies. Or a parent might ask me in March what the weather might be like for their son's wedding - in September. Those people are always delightfully friendly, and the conversations are part of what makes presenting the weather - which I've been doing for the last three decades - such a joy. But they also shed light on a strange fact. Over my career, forecasting has improved almost beyond recognition. We can now predict the weather with much higher accuracy, and in more granular detail, than when I began presenting in the mid 1990s. Liz Bentley, a professor of meteorology at Reading University and chief executive of the Royal Meteorological Society, says that a one-day forecast is correct over 90% of the time. But despite those strides, there are still gaps in public trust. When YouGov asked British adults last summer whether they trusted the weather forecast, a substantial minority - 37% - said they didn't trust it "very much" or "at all." (Reassuringly, 61% said they did trust forecasters like me.) Jokes about the forecast are widespread. The 2012 Olympics opening ceremony included a clip of the moment from 1987, when the weather forecaster Michael Fish told viewers not to worry because there wouldn't be a hurricane - only for a storm to hit hours later. (As it happens, Michael was correct: hurricane-strength winds did strike southeast England that night, but it wasn't technically a hurricane.) Still, the incident became a byword for forecaster error. So why, with our wealth of knowledge and our powerful forecasting technology, do some people still perceive the weather as incorrect? And do we really get it wrong or is something more complicated at play around how we share forecasts? Great accuracy - and great expectations Part of the challenge is around expectations, which have risen in our world of round-the-clock access to information. We can tweak the temperature of our fridge or identify a problem in our car from our smartphones in a fraction of a second. So why can't we find out whether it's going to rain on our street at 2pm on Sunday with 100% accuracy - surely, an easier feat? Another part of the challenge is how that wealth of information is boiled down and communicated. Meteorology produces an overwhelming amount of data; it's difficult to condense it into a snappy, TV or digital app-friendly prediction. It means that even when we are technically correct, some viewers might still end up confused. But the answer also lies in the tricky nature of meteorology. It's a delicate science, and any tiny inaccuracy in the data can skew things - or knock it out of shape. Every day, across the British Isles, forecasters collect "observations" (or data) on things like temperature and wind speed, through a network of more than 200 "weather stations" run by the Met Office. The data is then plugged into mathematical models run by powerful machines, or "supercomputers". Earlier this year the Met Office unveiled a new supercomputer, switching for the first time from a physical machine to cloud-based software. The new device will deliver "better forecasts and help scientists advance important climate research around the world", the Met Office says. But as with any science, there are weaknesses. Chaos Theory: when weather goes wrong The atmosphere is known as a "chaotic system", meaning that a slight error - even as small as 0.01C - in the initial observations can produce a drastically different result. "It's called Chaos Theory," explains Prof Bentley. "Or the Butterfly Effect. The analogy is that if a butterfly flaps its wings in Brazil, it could have an impact on the atmosphere across northern Europe, six days later." There's also a particular challenge when predicting the weather over small geographic areas. In the 1990s, a weather event needed to be larger than about 100 miles (161km) before it could be fully observed - now, the UK-wide weather model used by the Met Office can map weather events as small as 2 miles (3km), Prof Bentley says. But zooming in beyond that size remains difficult, so predicting weather like heavy fog - which might affect only a 1km space - is particularly tricky. And even with huge improvements in the science, technology glitches still happen - though these are mercifully rare. Last autumn, the BBC Weather website briefly showed impossibly fast winds of over 13,000mph in London, as well as temperatures of 404C in Nottingham. The BBC apologised for "an issue with some of the weather data from our forecast provider". The trouble with boiling down data The biggest challenge of my job is synthesising this data so it fits into a tight television segment. "There's no other science as tested, checked and judged by the general public," says Scott Hosking, a director of environmental forecasting at the Alan Turing Institute. "It's as complex as nuclear fusion physics, but most of us don't experience that day to day, and so we don't have to come up with a way to communicate that science to the public." It's also easy to forget that forecasting is just that - predicting. Over the years, we've gotten a lot better at this subtle art of "communicating uncertainty". Meteorologists now produce "ensemble forecasts", where they might run 50 different models, all with slight variations. If all of those scenarios point to a similar outcome, meteorologists can be confident they've got it right. If they produce different outcomes, then their confidence is much lower. This is why, on a weather app, you might see a 10% chance of rain in your area. Time to rethink forecasts? Forecasters often think about this tricky issue of communication; how the weather can be more easily explained. Last week, the BBC announced a new partnership with the Met Office. It came eight years after they officially ended their relationship (since 2018, the Dutch MeteoGroup has provided the BBC's forecasts). The new deal aims to combine expertise of the two organisations and "turn science into stories," explained Tim Davie, the BBC's director-general. Certainly, some think more creativity is needed in communicating the weather. Dr Hosking of the Alan Turing Institute suggests forecasters could move away from giving a percentage chance of rain, and instead use the "storyline approach". In this style, forecasters could say things like, "What we're seeing now is similar to what we saw at a certain event a few years ago' - something within memory." This is partly why the Met Office, in 2015, decided to name storms. But Prof Bentley argues that numbers can be powerful - and perhaps it's better to arm consumers with the hard data they need. In the US, she says, the weather forecast has percentages "everywhere"; American consumers are told of everything from chance of rain, to the likely spread in temperature. "The public are comfortable [with it]," she says. "Because they've had that information given to them so often, they kind of get it." The new weather super predictor Weather forecasting could soon change dramatically with the advent of Artificial Intelligence (AI). The use of machine learning to predict the weather has developed rapidly in recent months. It's often said that forecasters have gained 24 hours of accuracy with each passing decade, meaning the Met Office can now release a weather warning seven days in advance. But AI models designed by Google DeepMind are already correctly predicting the weather 15 days in advance, Dr Hosking says. Earlier this year, a team of researchers at Cambridge University released a fully AI-driven weather programme called Aardvark Weather. The results were written in the Nature journal. Whilst traditional forecasting requires hours of use on a powerful supercomputer, researchers say, Aardvark can be deployed on a desktop computer in minutes. They claim this uses "thousands of times" less computing power, and that it can predict the weather in more granular detail. They also claim it will improve forecasts in west Africa and other poor regions (the best traditional forecasting models are mostly designed for Europe and the United States). "It could be transformational; it's super exciting," says Richard Turner, professor of machine learning at Cambridge University, who is one of the designers of the model. But Prof Bentley identifies a weakness in AI-driven weather models: they are fed with reams of historic data, and trained to spot patterns - which in her view makes it very difficult to predict events that haven't happened yet. "With climate change, we're going to see new records," she says. "We may see 41C in the UK. But if AI is always looking backwards, it will never see 41 because we've not had it yet." Prof Turner accepts that this is a challenge with AI models like his and says his team is working on remedies. The 'so what' factor In the future, analysts think, forecasts will go into more depth. Rather than just predicting rain, the forecast will increasingly tell you what effect that rain will have - on your travel, or on your garden plans. Prof Bentley calls this the "so what" factor. "Do you put something on [a weather app] that says, 'If you're planning a barbecue, then you might want to do it at lunchtime because the chances are you're going to get washed out in the afternoon'?" This chimes with a trend I've noticed from my own career: a growing interest in understanding the science behind the weather. Viewers are no longer just interested in knowing whether there'll be a heatwave; they want to know why. That's the reason we publish more content explaining the physics of the aurora borealis, or why climate change is leading to bigger hailstones. As for AI, it certainly could improve accuracy - but there's a risk, also, that viewers become deluged by information. Dr Hosking says that because AI is more nimble and can tweak weather models more quickly, users will soon have access to frequently-changing forecasts. They may also have "much more localised" information, he says (perhaps giving data not just on your town, but on your back garden, other analysts predict). This could lead to an overwhelming amount of data for those using the app, gluing users to their smartphones. And in that world, it will become even more important for human forecasters to communicate the weather in a clear, understandable way. But there are upsides too - not least the prospect of much longer-term, more accurate forecasts. Perhaps one day, when a mother asks me to predict weather at her son's wedding six months from now, I might be able to give a slightly better answer. Additional reporting: Luke Mintz More from InDepth Why plane turbulence is becoming more frequent - and more severe The sale of illegal cigarettes signals a deeper problem with UK high streets How the rise of green tech is feeding another environmental crisis BBC InDepth is the home on the website and app for the best analysis, with fresh perspectives that challenge assumptions and deep reporting on the biggest issues of the day. And we showcase thought-provoking content from across BBC Sounds and iPlayer too. You can send us your feedback on the InDepth section by clicking on the button below. Solve the daily Crossword
