Vauxhall Mokka vs Hyundai Kona: small hybrid SUVs in a big battle
Today, the popularity of compact SUVs makes them the family car of choice. But while electrification is the end goal for brands and legislators, hybrid drive is growing in stature. Advertisement - Article continues below
One family-focused machine that has made regular appearances in the new-car top 10 is the Vauxhall Mokka. While it was originally offered with petrol, electric and diesel options, a recent update has seen the latter succeeded by a new hybrid model that should deliver low emissions and decent efficiency.
Another model that offers a choice of petrol, electric or hybrid power, but has done so since its launch, is the Hyundai Kona. A previous Auto Express Car of the Year, the Korean SUV has also been revised with a new electrified powertrain that's designed to deliver a better balance of performance and efficiency.
So which model makes the most sense as family transport? And does hybrid drive reap the benefits when it comes to running costs? Model Vauxhall Mokka 1.2 Hybrid Ultimate Price: £31,855 Powertrain: 1.2-litre 3cyl hybrid, 143bhp 0-62mph: 8.2 seconds WLTP efficiency: 58.9mpg Annual VED: £195
The Mokka's hybrid powertrain is new, but it's actually based on the Stellantis Group's ubiquitous 1.2-litre turbocharged PureTech three-cylinder petrol engine that has been part of the line-up since launch. A 48-volt motor and a modest battery have been added, while the only gearbox offered is a six-speed twin-clutch automatic. This is the only petrol auto model now available in the Mokka line-up, but it's offered in all four trims (Griffin, Design, GS and Ultimate), with prices starting from £28,335.
As with most new cars, you can set up a driver profile in the Mokka that can load your favourite settings every time you get behind the wheel. One highlight is the range of avatars that are available to choose from to personalise your experience. The pop art-style images are a snapshot of some of Vauxhall and Opel's greatest hits, so you can either choose a picture of the Mokka, or pick from icons such as the classic Nova or original Opel GT and Manta coupés, plus a selection of long-forgotten concept cars. Model Hyundai Kona 1.6 Hybrid N Line Price: £32,390 Powertrain: 1.6-litre 4cyl hybrid, 127bhp 0-62mph: 12.0 seconds WLTP efficiency: 60.1mpg Annual VED: £195
Recent revisions to the Kona Hybrid see the existing direct-injection 1.6-litre turbocharged four-cylinder unit lose some power, down from 139bhp to 127bhp, yet this doesn't come with the benefit of added fuel efficiency, because those figures remain unchanged. They are still better than the claims made by the Vauxhall, but there's a higher price to pay to get behind the wheel. The Kona Hybrid line-up starts from £30,890, and runs through Advance, N Line, N Line S and Ultimate trims.
Different drive modes are designed to boost performance or efficiency, but most of the time the standard setting is perfectly acceptable. Eco mode makes the Kona feel sluggish, and you tend to overcompensate for the delayed throttle response. In Sport mode the steering wheel paddles switch from adjusting braking energy to offering sequential shifts for the six-speed gearbox. But the Kona's overall character isn't that sporty – N Line trim doesn't bring any suspension upgrades, so it's more about looks than anything else.
The Mokka is pretty smooth, because the electrics fill in gaps in the power band as the engine and gearbox sort themselves out. But the Kona feels better integrated. At lower speeds the Vauxhall is fine, but it's more unsettled at motorway pace, while the Kona delivers a fidgety ride in N Line guise; the Advance's smaller 18-inch wheels should help with this. Neither car is quick, but the Mokka feels more responsive.
Neither car demands any compromises to make the most of its hybrid powertrain; simply drive them as you would any conventional auto and let the electronics do the work. Both rivals feature a twin-screen dashboard set-up, but the Kona has the larger layout, with two 12.3-inch displays positioned side-by-side. The Kona has plenty of buttons, too, while the Mokka benefits from separate climate controls.
While the Mokka is cheaper to buy, the Kona will likely cost less to run. Its hybrid powertrain was more efficient in our hands to the tune of around 5mpg, but it has a smaller fuel tank, so both cars offer a similar range. Emissions are closely matched as well, so the Vauxhall's lower list price benefits business users, although poorer residual values mean the Hyundai is the better option for private buyers.
Smaller overall dimensions mean that the Mokka is at a disadvantage when it comes to carrying passengers and stuff, with a narrower rear seat and a smaller boot (350 litres to the Kona's 466 litres). If you often only travel two-up, this shouldn't be an issue, while the Vauxhall's compact size boosts its manoeuvrability around town. Both hybrids have the same boot capacity as their petrol counterparts.
Both cars earned a four-star Euro NCAP rating, with the Vauxhall tested in 2021 and the Hyundai in 2023. The Mokka has been updated with additional kit since the test, and we'd hardly call either car unsafe.Vauxhall provides a shortcut button to access the screen where the safety systems are set up, while the Kona's distracted-driving sensor is a bit too keen to beep if you take your eyes off the road.
Vauxhall leapt from 26th place to fourth in the 2025 Driver Power brands survey, while Hyundai dropped from 17th in 2024 to 20th out of 31 manufacturers in this year's poll. Advertisement - Article continues below Skip advert Advertisement - Article continues below
The Kona hasn't garnered enough feedback to appear in our model poll, yet the Mokka finished 18th this year, with owners liking its looks, low running costs, performance and infotainment, but not the car's cramped rear space and small boot.
While the Kona has higher list prices than the Mokka, you get what you pay for, with more space, better fuel efficiency, a longer list of standard kit and a more grown-up driving experience than its Vauxhall rival offers. The Hyundai isn't without its foibles, however. It's not very exciting to drive, especially with the new lower-powered hybrid system, while the styling might be a little too futuristic for some people. But overall it's still a strong package in the small SUV class.
Latest Hyundai Kona deals
The Mokka is a solid performer, but it doesn't really excel in any area to give it an advantage in this test. The Hybrid is the pick of the line-up, courtesy of its smooth power delivery and decent efficiency, although the electric version is more comfortable at a cruise – keep to lower speeds and the Hybrid is fine, though.Then there are the compromises in terms
of rear-seat space. Yet if you have a small family that won't be an issue, while the car's compact dimensions make it a doddle to drive in town. Advertisement - Article continues below Skip advert Advertisement - Article continues below
Latest Vauxhall Mokka deals Model tested Vauxhall Mokka 1.2 Hybrid Ultimate Hyundai Kona 1.6 Hybrid N Line Price from/price as tested £25,740/£31,855 £30,590/£32,390 Powertrain and performance Engine 3cyl in-line turbo/1,199cc 4cyl in-line turbo/1,580cc Peak power/revs 143bhp/5,500rpm 127bhp/5,700rpm Peak torque/revs 230Nm/1,750rpm 265Nm/4,000rpm Transmission Six-speed auto/fwd Six-speed auto/fwd 0-62mph/top speed 8.2 seconds/129mph 12.0 seconds/103mph Fuel tank/battery capacity 42 litres/0.89kWh 38 litres/1.32kWh MPG (WLTP) 58.9mpg 60.1mpg Test MPG/range 47.2mpg/436 miles 53.7mpg/449 miles Dimensions Length/wheelbase 4,150/2,557mm 4,385/2,660mm Width/height 1,791/1,534mm 1,825/1,585mm Rear knee room 525-765mm 610-875mm Rear headroom/elbow room 930/1,395mm 940/1,460mm Boot space (seats up/down) 350/1,105 litres 466/1,300 litres Boot length/width 675/1,015mm 835/1,045mm Boot lip height 755mm 615mm Kerbweight/payload/towing weight 1,287/463/1,200kg 1,410/540/1,010kg Turning circle 10.9 metres 10.6 metres Costs/ownership Residual value (after 3yrs/36k, via CDL) £11,544/44.9% £17,296/53.4% Depreciation £20,311 £15,094 Insurance group/AA.com quote/VED 23/£652/£195 16/£953/£195 Three-year service cost £720 £719 Annual tax liability std/higher rate £1,698/£3,396 £1,725/£3,450 Basic warranty (miles)/recovery 3yrs (60,000)/1yr 5yrs (unlimited)/1yr Driver Power manufacturer position 26th 17th NCAP Adult/child/ped./assist/stars 73/75/58/64/4 _ (2021) 80/83/64/60/4 _ (2023) Equiptment Metallic paint/wheel size £650/18 inches £650/18 inches Parking sensors/camera Front & rear/rear Front & rear/rear Spare wheel/Isofix points Repair kit/three Repair kit/two Keyless entry & go/powered tailgate Yes/no Yes/yes Leather/heated seats Part synthetic/yes No/front & rear Screen size/digital dashboard 10.0/10.0 inches 12.3/12.3 inches Climate control/panoramic sunroof Single-zone/no Two-zone/no Number of USBs/wireless charging Three/yes Four/yes Wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto Yes/yes Yes/yes Blind-spot warning/head-up display Yes/no No/no Adaptive cruise/lane-keep assist Yes/yes Yes/yes
Our car's Tropical Green paint looks smart, while Carbon Black metallic is the standard shade. The 18-inch wheel design is the same on GS and Ultimate models, while the electric Mokka gets a different 'Aero' design.
Option packs are only available on N Line S and Ultimate trims. The Lux Pack varies according to engine choice, but the £1,850 version adds a sunroof, memory driver's seat, comfort front seats and remote parking.
Looking for your next car? You can now search our nationwide dealer network for a choice of great cars on offer right now with new, used and leasing deals to choose from... Share this on Twitter Share this on Facebook Email New MG IM5 has the Tesla Model 3 beaten on price and range
New MG IM5 has the Tesla Model 3 beaten on price and range
The all-electric IM5 brings new technology and design to the MG line-up Ford Escort Mexico gets new lease of life with MST Sports
Ford Escort Mexico gets new lease of life with MST Sports
While not officially Fords, the MST Mk1 and Mk2 Sports should drive as sharply as they look New Mazda CX-5 revealed with fresh looks, more space and far fewer buttons
New Mazda CX-5 revealed with fresh looks, more space and far fewer buttons
The Mazda CX-5 has been revolutionised to take on the Nissan Qashqai, Kia Sportage and Hyundai Tucson
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Auto Blog
2 hours ago
- Auto Blog
Do You Have to Be an Off-Roader to Daily a 2025 Toyota 4Runner TRD Pro? My Thoughts After Reviewing It
By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. What does it take to tame the 4Runner? Off-road-ready SUVs are becoming increasingly popular, especially after the revival of the Ford Bronco, Toyota Land Cruiser, Land Rover Defender, and the Scout Harvester or Traveler. Nissan quietly revealed it's developing a new XTerra and Toyota's reportedly bringing back the FJ Cruiser, only adding more fire to the off-road blaze. The Bronco, Land Cruiser, original 4Runner, and Land Rover were designed as part-time 4WD passenger cars with a comfy ride, acceptable fuel economy, and cargo space–so if you didn't take them strictly off-road, they'd still be suitable to drive every day. The Ford Mach 4 could be the brand's first sedan since 2020 Watch More Then, Toyota made the 4Runner hybrid-only for 2026, packed with the company's i-FORCE MAX 'performance' hybrid setup, made to enhance a vehicle's ability to tow or handle off-road. It does this by enhancing torque in the low end to give it an extra edge when more power is needed. The TRD Pro trim level, which is a step below the Trailhunter (but oddly the same price), is designed for desert running, rock crawling, and pretty much anything you can throw at it. Source: Kristen Brown Before I dive too deeply, I need to preface this by saying that I've been an avid off-roader for a very long time, before I even got my driver's license. If it wasn't dirt bikes, it was ATVs, and if it wasn't ATVs, it was going for long drives with my dad in his old 4x4s. My husband and I each have our own dedicated off-roader, so it's very much a part of my identity. I became comfortable with the 4Runner's ride quality, features, and off-road prowess pretty quickly. However, not everyone buys a 4Runner for its rock-crawling capabilities. Others buy it for its reliability, cargo space, and 4WD system for just-in-case reasons. So, what if you bought it for looks? Could you drive it every day comfortably, without ever shifting the transfer case? Let's dig in. The interior is off-road-centric, but not in an intimidating way With a name like the 4Runner TRD Pro, you'd think opening the driver door would lead to a militaristic, bare-bones SUV. But that's not the case at all. Historically, I'd critiqued Toyota interiors for their cheap-feeling all-black plastic layouts that didn't seem to change unless you bought the top-of-the-line, but this one was different. There were contrasting colors, camo-patterned leather seats, plenty of textured grab handles, a plethora of buttons and switches, and a gorgeous 10-inch infotainment screen. Stepping into the 2025 Toyota 4Runner TRD Pro almost felt luxurious, which was such a welcome change from the previous generation. Autoblog Newsletter Autoblog brings you car news; expert reviews and exciting pictures and video. Research and compare vehicles, too. Sign up or sign in with Google Facebook Microsoft Apple By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. Source: Kristen Brown The user interface was easy to decipher, settings were just as simple to locate and customize, and the digital gauges were just like those in other Toyotas I've tested–nothing confusing, complicated, or difficult to access. I did encounter the typical connectivity issues that come with new Toyotas and Android Auto, but I believe those can be fixed with an update. Otherwise, the JBL sound system—mine had a dedicated subwoofer—was crisp and adaptable. No matter what I was listening to, it was a great overall sound. For a body-on-frame SUV with all-terrain tires and stiffer TRD-tuned suspension, the ride in the cabin was quiet enough for my toddlers to sleep peacefully. The sunroof was small compared to other SUVs of its size, but it was big enough to let in some natural light to open everything up a bit. My favorite part was the driver's seat. It was way more comfortable than you'd assume at first glance. There was always a place to put my elbow, and thankfully, the armrest on the center console was soft and a great size, not firm and small like other off-roaders. The steering wheel was large, but my husband had issues with the ridges around the 'TRD' logo, since it cut into his hands (which are admittedly sensitive) while he was driving it off-road for me to photograph. The passenger seat was just as comfortable, and I really appreciated the large windows, high seating position, and legroom. I scooted my seat far enough for my toddler not to be able to kick the back of it, without cutting into my overall legroom. Source: Kristen Brown Based on the interior quality, seat comfort, visibility, creature comforts, and design, I could easily see myself making grocery runs in this instead of trail trekking. Mileage isn't great, but it's better than most As I mentioned before, the i-FORCE MAX hybrid system isn't going to get you stellar MPG ratings. It's meant to increase performance in the lower range of the power band, particularly when towing or going off-road. It helps get better mileage around town, but the only time the engine wasn't used during my test drive was when I was stopped or slowing to a stop. Otherwise, it seemed like the engine was always on. Source: Kristen Brown Therefore, I was averaging around 17 mpg around town, which isn't the worst for a 5,455 lbs SUV with a 2.4-liter turbocharged four-cylinder as the gas engine. But it's also not the greatest. I fear many will fall for the 'hybrid' label and then be shocked when it doesn't perform as well as their dad's RAV4 hybrid. So, just don't go into buying one thinking the mileage is going to be stellar. For the sake of comparison, my sister's 2023 4Runner TRD Sport with the 4.0-liter V6 gets the same MPG. Take that as you may. When we compare it to the SUVs it competes against, though, it's right on par. The Jeep Wrangler and Ford Bronco get notably worse mileage. My Jeep is from 2006, so we don't talk about how horrible my mileage is. It's our household's Fight Club. Cargo space was perfect for everyday needs If you aren't packing the trunk, backseats, or stock roof basket full of camping gear, there's plenty of space for other items. I had no problem packing it full of my camera gear, children's toys, a stroller, and a diaper bag. When I had my husband in the car and he carried his filming gear, we both appreciated how large the center console is and how many different options both the driver and passenger had to store items. Every door–even the rear doors–had dedicated water bottle holders and storage pockets. Everyone had a charging port, too. It was easy to see that the 4Runner was made to be comfortable, on tarmac or otherwise. Source: Kristen Brown The only thing I had a mild gripe with was the added height the hybrid battery added to the trunk. It eats up a few inches of vertical space, and loading things required a little more effort because the trunk's floor was higher up. During my loan, my husband wanted me to swap his winter tires for his summer tires and asked me to bring them to the shop where he works. All four tires fit just fine; I didn't even have to use the factory tubular roof rack. However, those few extra inches I had to clear to get them in the trunk were a tad annoying. That said, this would definitely be something I'd get used to over time. Source: Kristen Brown The integrated compressor that my husband loved so much was built into the right wall beautifully, taking up no space, and the hose for it was hidden under the carpet towards the tailgate. Off-roaders and overlanders would benefit the most from that feature, but it can come in handy any time. If you're not an off-roader, the TRD Pro trim is an expensive choice The Toyota 4Runner is expensive, no matter how you slice it, unless you start with the base trim. The base SR5 trim starts at $41,270, and while it still comes with the things that make the TRD Pro a nice truck, like a 9-inch touch screen and 4WD, it doesn't come with leather seats or a fancy sound system. You'd essentially be getting a sugar-free version of the 4Runner, which still isn't a bad choice. The TRD Pro and the Trailhunter are both $67,400, which is quite a bit more expensive because they're purpose-built instead of generally built like the SR5. So, if you buy it specifically for the way it looks and don't intend on taking it off-road, that's an expensive choice. Especially when you can modify an SR5 to have similar looks to the TRD Pro for a lot less. Source: Kristen Brown If you want something rugged but fancy, consider the Limited or Platinum trims, because they still have off-road features, but the interior styling is geared towards those who appreciate the finer things in life. The Limited leans on a silver or chrome theme, with a silver grille, silver wheels, and silver badging, while the Platinum plays into the dark theme. Blacked-out grilles, black wheels, and black badging accentuate everything beautifully. Though, since I am an avid off-roader, the trim I'd pick is the Trailhunter, largely for those handsome model-specific bronze baja-inspired wheels. Final thoughts You can't go wrong with any trim level of the 4Runner. My little sister's 2023 4Runner TRD hasn't been off-road much, but it's come in handy for her many times, especially when she lived in the mountains. She loves the daily drivability and the choice she has to go off-road if the opportunity presents itself. Aside from people like my husband and me, a lot of buyers are like her, who want the option to go off-road but don't necessarily seek it out. I feel like it's a similar mindset to those who buy Subarus or any other AWD or 4WD car. Source: Kristen Brown To answer the original question: no, you don't need to be an off-roader to benefit from the features on the TRD Pro. But you would benefit the most as an off-roader. It's an expensive SUV to let rot in a parking lot or garage instead of using it as it was intended: to blaze trails, reach remote campsites, cross creeks, and rock crawl on the way back to the highway. The TRD Pro was my first 4Runner, and it was a great way to be introduced to the famed moniker. About the Author Kristen Brown View Profile
Auto Blog
2 hours ago
- Auto Blog
Will Mazda Face Buyer Backlash for the 2026 CX-5's Touchscreen Controls?
By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. The new CX-5's interior tech pivots hard Mazda's redesigned 2026 CX-5 is undoubtedly attractive, but it isn't exactly a dramatic change, the way the fifth-generation Hyundai Santa Fe was when it debuted in 2024. Yes, the 2025 CX-5 is bigger, especially between the wheels where it counts most, but its sheet metal is largely evolutionary, coupled with a fresh face and tail, slab doors like the CX-70/90, and a stronger resemblance to the rest of the brand's SUV lineup. Audi A5 replaces A4: So, what's changed? Watch More The cabin has been redone in excellent Mazda fashion, and the changes are more significant inside than outside. Materials quality and refinement both have improved, on top of what was already one of the best interiors in its class. The biggest change, however, might not be perceived as an improvement. The new infotainment touchscreen (12.9-inch standard, 15.6-inch optional) now incorporates climate and audio functions, replacing the excellent physical controls for which Mazda has been known. Will there be a sales backlash from would-be buyers of the new CX-5? Infotainment details The optional 15.6-inch center infotainment touchscreen is the biggest one ever fitted into a Mazda. The last CX-5's screen was a rather small 10.2 inches, so even the change to the standard 12.9-inch screen is a marked improvement. The new system is now Google-based rather than being a proprietary Mazda operating system, which was criticized as being overly simplistic and dated in its appearance. In addition to built-in Google Maps, the new system will utilize Google Assistant for voice commands, providing improved accuracy and a better user experience. Owners will also have access to the Google Play Store for car-friendly apps. A controversial change 2026 Mazda CX-5 — Source: Mazda Mazda owners, by and large, love the physical controls in their vehicles. My family owns two Mazda vehicles, and one of the reasons we chose our Mazda6 and CX-9 was because of their excellent switchgear. Mazda's physical controls are attractive, well-made, and easy to operate. The physical audio, infotainment, and climate controls from the 2025 CX-5 are nowhere to be seen in the 2026 CX-5. Their absence has already sparked controversy, not because on-screen controls are uncommon in the industry, but because Mazda has had a longstanding reputation for tactile, driver-focused interiors and controls. While some may view this as a necessary evolution to keep pace with tech-savvy competitors, others, especially brand loyalists, may view this as a move in the wrong direction. Autoblog Newsletter Autoblog brings you car news; expert reviews and exciting pictures and video. Research and compare vehicles, too. Sign up or sign in with Google Facebook Microsoft Apple By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. 2025 Mazda CX-5 — Source: Mazda The 2025 CX-5's climate controls consisted of two knurled metallic knobs that flanked a digital screen. Above and below the screen were two rows of buttons. It was one of the easiest systems to use while driving, and none of the controls utilized haptic feedback. Its Commander rotary control knob between the seats made a touchscreen unnecessary since you could rotate, toggle, and press it to find and activate functions. The learning curve was easy, and you could operate the system quickly and easily. The Commander control knob is no longer available on the 2026 model, and only three physical buttons remain on the center stack for defrost, defog, and hazard lights. Instead of a central rotary knob, everything from audio settings to climate control is now managed through the center screen. It seems anti-Mazda, frankly. The potential backlash 2026 Mazda CX-5 — Source: Mazda Mazda's previous infotainment systems disabled touchscreen inputs while driving as a safety precaution, relying instead on the rotary controller and steering wheel controls. On some models, you could use a touchscreen only while phone mirroring. With the controller now removed in the 2026 model, only being able to use the touchscreen when parked could frustrate drivers who are forced to rely on voice commands or complex menus while in motion. Again, this seems at odds with Mazda's driver-centric cabins. Forums are already rife with criticisms from current Mazda owners who refuse to upgrade to the 2026 CX-5 until a refresh brings them back. We don't blame them. 2026 Mazda CX-5 — Source: Mazda Consumer studies and feedback from drivers reflect an overwhelming preference for physical controls over touchscreen controls. Touchscreens demand more attention than knobs or switches, which are typically easier to locate and use by feel. There is no muscle memory for non-tactile controls; you are forced to take your eyes off the road and onto the screen in order to find them, and there's no guarantee that you'll hit what you're aiming for. Mazda says that the new CX-5 continues the driver-centric focus by providing an enhanced voice command experience, but statistics show that only about 17 percent of American drivers use voice commands to execute vehicular functions. That number is sure to grow, but it doesn't represent the vast majority of drivers. 2026 Mazda CX-5 — Source: Mazda Mazda further justifies the shift as a way to offer better software integration, faster response times, and smarter features through Google's connected services. In doing so, the brand also aligns itself with competitors like Volvo, Honda, and GM, all of which have adopted Google-based infotainment systems in recent years. This trend could be upended by regulatory pressure, though. Case in point, beginning in 2026, Euro NCAP (the European car safety assessment program) will begin docking safety points for vehicles that fail to provide physical buttons for essential functions like climate control and hazard lights. Mazda may find itself forced to reintroduce some tactile elements just to maintain strong safety ratings in Europe and potentially North America. 2026 Mazda CX-5 — Source: Mazda Final thoughts While the 2026 CX‑5 is undoubtedly more connected and feature-rich, the tradeoff between elegant design and practical, everyday usability is already generating debate. On the upside, the interface looks clean and modern. It offers better voice control through Google Assistant, potentially allowing drivers to manage tasks hands-free. However, drivers will essentially have to learn a new system, lose tactile feedback, and take their eyes off the road more frequently. Many loyal Mazda owners who have stuck with Mazda because of its great physical controls may look elsewhere, as others, like Toyota, still have their latest models, like the 2026 RAV4, outfitted with switchgear. That said, younger, tech-forward customers may be drawn to the CX-5 for the same reasons Mazda loyalists may leave. For them, the CX‑5's digital dashboard and Google-native systems may have been a long time coming. The 2026 Mazda CX-5's interior comes as a bit of a surprise, as many automakers are shifting in the other direction by returning to physical controls. This new cabin philosophy for Mazda is unlike any of the brand's current models, and it could set the tone for the rest of the lineup. On the other hand, the fully digital experience might be short-lived for the brand with customer pushback, regulatory pressure, and safety concerns. We will have to give our assessment once we get to review the 2026 Mazda CX-5 for ourselves. About the Author Amos Kwon View Profile
Auto Blog
2 hours ago
- Auto Blog
Can the Hyundai Ioniq 6 N Dethrone the Tesla Model 3 Performance?
Performance figures show the new Hyundai is more than a match for the Tesla Model 3 Performance Tesla arguably kicked off the introduction of performance EV models with the Tesla Roadster way back in 2008, but it's a wildly different landscape now, and you can purchase a very fast EV from automakers like BMW, Ford, and everything in between. One of the most competent performance EVs out there is the Hyundai IONIQ 5 N, and now, there's a sedan version in town. Sharing a powertrain but getting smaller and cheaper means the new IONIQ 6 N has the Tesla Model 3 Performance squarely in its sights. Hyundai IONIQ 6 N Tesla Model 3 Performance, poundage, and price: How much trouble is the Tesla Model 3 in? The IONIQ 6 N takes an early lead on the Tesla Model 3 Performance — on paper, anyway. The IONIQ 6 N shares a powertrain with its predecessor, the 5 N, which means up to 641 horsepower on tap when you click into N-Grin Boost mode, and 567 pound-feet of torque available whenever. Hyundai quotes a zero to 60 mph time of 3.2 seconds. Both the IONIQ 6 N and the Tesla rely on all-wheel drive and dual electric motors, but while the Tesla Model 3 Performance isn't a slouch, it loses the initial comparison. Base horsepower and torque figures sit at 510 and 554, respectively. Surprisingly, though, Tesla claims a quicker zero to 60 mph time, estimating the sprint takes just 2.9 seconds. One reason for the quicker sprint to 60 mph might be the Tesla's lower curb weight. The fastest Model 3 tips the scales at a fairly light 4,054 pounds. We don't have official numbers for Hyundai's IONIQ 6 N, but we can take a guess. Comparing the IONIQ 5 to the IONIQ 5 N reveals the standard all-wheel drive car weighs 4,608 pounds, while the N version weighs 4861 pounds. A regular IONIQ 6 with all-wheel drive weighs 4,462 pounds. Assuming the 6 N gains the same amount of weight from the full N treatment, we can guess the IONIQ 6 N's weight at around 4,715 pounds. That 700-pound disadvantage relative to the Model 3 Performance could cost it first place on the dragstrip. So, finally, there's the price. A bigger horsepower figure doesn't always mean a higher MSRP, but the IONIQ 6 N will start a little bit higher than the Tesla Model 3 Performance. Hyundai hasn't released pricing yet, but since the IONIQ 6 is around $5,000 less expensive than the IONIQ 5, the base MSRP should be right around $60,000. That's a $5,000 premium compared to the Tesla, which starts at $54,990. The Tesla also likely touts a longer range. The mechanically identical 5 N offers an estimated 221 miles, while the Model 3 Performance makes it 298 miles on a full charge. More money for identical performance? A deeper dive says otherwise On the surface, the IONIQ 6 N may look decidedly more like a sidegrade than an upgrade compared to the Tesla Model 3 Performance. However, there are also other key areas where the Hyundai sedan should excel. The Hyundai IONIQ 6 N gets massive brake rotors that dwarf the Tesla Model 3's, measuring 15.7 inches in the front and 14.1 inches in the rear. That's about an inch bigger in the back and nearly two in front. While both vehicles share 20-inch aluminum wheels, only the IONIQ 6 N offers 275-section tires on all four wheels. Finally, the IONIQ 6 N offers a lauded 'fake shift,' which allows drivers to 'change gears' via paddle shifters. These differences may seem small, but they could make a big difference, especially in the kind of driving situations the cars are ostensibly built for. IONIQ 6 N Tesla Model 3 Final thoughts The Hyundai IONIQ 6 N and Tesla Model 3 Performance are more similar than different, and both look to be incredibly competent performance sedans. Do we think the IONIQ 6 N is objectively superior to the Model 3 Performance? We'll have to drive it to find out. That said, it certainly has some clear advantages. At the very least, the competition will force Tesla to take notes. About the Author Steven Paul View Profile
