logo
Michigan couple held in Mexican jail for a month over a timeshare dispute say the judicial system was weaponized against them

Michigan couple held in Mexican jail for a month over a timeshare dispute say the judicial system was weaponized against them

Independent19 hours ago
A Michigan couple held in a Mexican jail for a month over a timeshare dispute at a Cancun resort claim the judicial system was weaponized against them.
Paul, a Navy veteran, and Christy Akeo were released in early April after being arrested soon after their plane touched down in Cancun in early March.
They allege Palace Resorts LLC began a 'secret lawfare campaign' against them after they disputed more than $100,000 in credit card charges, according to a lawsuit filed by the couple in Miami-Dade County Circuit Court on Friday.
The New York Post, which first reported on the lawsuit, said the couple had bought timeshares for the resorts' Cancun location starting in 2016. The couple were 'wholesale customers' and would resell the resort bookings to others, according to the lawsuit.
The terms of the Akeos' agreement with Palace Resorts changed in November 2021, and after, the resort claimed the couple 'breached their membership,' the suit says.
The resort later went back on bookings the Akeos had set up for others, so the couple successfully disputed the credit card charges since the 'product or services had not been received,' according to the suit.
Everything came to a head this past March when the couple was arrested by Mexican authorities at the Cancun International Airport after the resort accused them of 'fraudulently' disputing the credit card charges, court documents obtained by The Independent show.
The couple spent a month in a maximum security prison in Quintana Roo, separate from each other, where they slept 'alongside drug dealers and violent criminals,' according to the documents.
The conditions in the prison were deplorable, with 'no working shower and no flushable toilet,' the Akeos alleged.
Lindsay Hull, Christy's daughter and Paul's stepdaughter, told the New York Post her mom lost 25 pounds in her first two weeks in prison because the food she was given had fish in it, even though she told the prison she was allergic.
The couple was eventually taken to court and told by their lawyer and Michigan Congressman Tom Barrett, who went to Mexico to help get them home, they needed to sign a settlement that included a non-disclosure agreement to get out of prison, according to court documents.
'Palace Resorts coerced the Akeos under duress to affix their signatures' on the agreement, while next to men carrying machine guns, the Akeos claim.
'It's not fair that my parents are not able to speak about their story,' Hull told the New York Post. 'They deserve to advocate for themselves.'
The resort has rejected the Akeos' claims through attorney David Orta, who said, per the New York Post, that his client will 'defend against them and otherwise take appropriate legal action to enforce the Palace Company's rights.'
'Mr. and Mrs. Akeo have unfortunately proceeded with additional litigation against the Palace Company and affiliated entities and individuals in violation of the parties' resolution of their disputes,' Orta said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump sends shockwaves with secret plan to use unauthorized 'lethal strikes' against Mexican cartels
Trump sends shockwaves with secret plan to use unauthorized 'lethal strikes' against Mexican cartels

Daily Mail​

time3 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Trump sends shockwaves with secret plan to use unauthorized 'lethal strikes' against Mexican cartels

The U.S. military has privately been making plans to conduct attacks on drug cartels in Mexico that could be ready as soon as September, a shocking new report claims. The Trump administration requested that the military prepare 'lethal strike' options against cartel targets inside Mexico, three military sources revealed to investigative journalist Ken Klippenstein. Issued in late Spring, the directive ordered U.S. Northern Command (NORTHCOM) to begin planning attack contingencies. Those strike options should be ready by the middle of September. Any U.S.-backed attacks against America's southern neighbor would be certain to roil tensions between the two cooperative nations, which have deep economic and cultural ties. The Pentagon did not confirm or deny the potential operations when pressed by the Daily Mail. 'The Department of Defense will not comment on future operations considering operational security,' a Defense Department spokesperson said in a statement. The White House did not immediately return the Daily Mail's request for comment. Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum pushed back on reports of Trump-approved plans for the U.S. military action in her country earlier this month. 'The United States is not sending its military to Mexico,' she said at a news conference. 'We cooperate, we collaborate, but there will be no invasion. We're ruling this out, absolutely.' The White House's order was reportedly discussed at a NORTHCOM meeting in July and was led by Colby Jenkins, the acting Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low Intensity Conflict. Days later, NORTHCOM commander Gen. Gregory Guillot set up a meeting with two top-ranking Mexican military officials, Adm. Raymundo Pedro Morales Ángeles, Secretary of the Navy, and Gen. Ricardo Trevilla Trejo, Secretary of National Defense, Klippenstein reports. 'Today, more than ever, the challenges we face demand a joint, coordinated, and adapted response,' Morales later said of the meeting. But intelligence sources disclosed that the U.S. military may conduct operations without the help or consent of the Mexican government. 'Not only is Donald Trump uniquely focused on TCOs [transnational criminal organizations, the official name for cartels], having designated them terrorists in one of his first Executive Orders, but he has shown himself to be willing to take unilateral action despite potentially negative political ramifications,' one senior intelligence source shared. The Pentagon seems keen on keeping its options open, too. 'These cartels have engaged in historic violence and terror throughout our Hemisphere—and around the globe-- that has destabilized economies and internal security of countries but also flooded the United States with deadly drugs, violent criminals, and vicious gangs,' Chief Pentagon Spokesman Sean Parnell told the Daily Mail in a statement. 'The Department of Defense will undoubtedly play an important role towards meeting the President's objective to eliminate the ability of these cartels to threaten the territory, safety, and security of the United States and its people,' he added. 'These cartels have engaged in historic violence and terror throughout our Hemisphere—and around the globe-- that has destabilized economies and internal security of countries but also flooded the United States with deadly drugs, violent criminals, and vicious gangs,' Chief Pentagon Spokesman Sean Parnell told the Daily Mail in a statement. Under Trump, the CIA increased its drone reconnaissance missions over Mexico, a sign that tensions between the U.S. and cartels are rising. According to the report, NORTHCOM has requested that its special operations unit begin 'operational preparation of the battlespace' within Mexico. The special operations unit has also been asked to identify cartel 'target packages' for potential 'direct action' against the gangs. 'Direct action,' in this case, could mean special operator missions, airstrikes or drone attacks, according to the report. Specifically, the Sinaloa Cartel and the Jalisco New Generation Cartel are prime targets. When asked by Senate Armed Services Committee Chair Roger Wicker if the military's increased surveillance and reconnaissance of the cartels was permitted by Mexican authorities during a hearing earlier this year, NORTHCOM commander Guillot said 'no.' 'But we do have intelligence sharing with Mexico to show them what we see,' he responded. 'And we have increased cooperation with Mexico to go address the cartel violence in terms of sending more troops.' Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., later put out a statement condemning any unilateral U.S. military action in Mexico. '[S]igning a secret directive to potentially send U.S. servicemembers into harm's way — without consulting Congress, notifying the American people, or any legal authority to launch strikes within the sovereign territory of our neighbors — is shortsighted and lawless, and will destroy the critical relationships we need to effectively address this challenge,' he wrote. In January, a group of suspected cartel members exchanged fire with Border Patrol agents, marking an escalation in hostilities between the two. Footage of the gunfight shows a small group of rifle-bearing cartel members crossing from Mexico onto an island in the Rio Grande River. Dressed in black or in camouflage outfits, the gangsters can be seen swinging their weapons around and pointing them at American drones patrolling the area. They can also be seen walking along the riverbank in a separate clip before they are joined by a few other gang members.

Lucy Connolly should never have been imprisoned. She has become a symbol of the silent majority who will be silent no more: SARAH VINE
Lucy Connolly should never have been imprisoned. She has become a symbol of the silent majority who will be silent no more: SARAH VINE

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Lucy Connolly should never have been imprisoned. She has become a symbol of the silent majority who will be silent no more: SARAH VINE

Lucy Connolly's early release from jail is a travesty. Because she should never have been imprisoned in the first place. There are far more dangerous, nasty and genuinely hateful people walking the streets of Britain than this young mother who allowed her emotions to get the better of her in the heat of the moment and said some things she ought not have said.

Trump scores major win as court tosses $500 million fraud penalty
Trump scores major win as court tosses $500 million fraud penalty

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Trump scores major win as court tosses $500 million fraud penalty

Donald Trump will no longer need to pay a $464 million fraud penalty he was ordered to dish over last year. A New York appeals court struck down the 'excessive' penalty on Thursday, but upheld his liability in the civil case claiming he enriched himself through fraudulent asset valuation. The ruling puts fresh pressure on New York Attorney General and Trump foe Letitia James amid questions over whether her lawsuit violated the president's legal rights. Earlier this month, the Justice Department convened a grand jury in Albany, New York and sent subpoenas to James' office in relation to a federal probe into her lawsuit against Trump, those familiar told Bloomberg . Last February, Manhattan Judge Arthur Engoron ruled that Trump illegally enriched himself for decades by inflating the value of his assets on financial documents with the intent of securing better loan terms. But it immediately wipes clean one of the president's biggest outstanding financial liabilities as most of his legal woes dissipated in the months after his reelection. But it immediately wipes clean one of the president's biggest outstanding financial liabilities. The total amount ordered to be paid on February 16, 2024 was $354.9 million, but the interest accrued at a rate of more than $110,000 per day – putting the total wiped clean at nearly $500 million. Thursday's decision was handed down by a five-judge panel, deciding to toss out the massive fine while still maintaining the charge. The case against Trump was initiated by AG James in September 2022 after a three year investigation into the Trump Organization's business practices. The lawsuit alleged that the president, his adult sons Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump, and their company misrepresented the value of assets to gain favorable loan conditions and tax breaks. One example of this was Trump overstating by hundreds of millions of dollars on his financial statements the value of his Florida property Mar-a-Lago and Manhattan property Trump Tower. James' office argued that the practices were not rare errors, but part of a decade-long pattern of deceptive behavior by Trump and his family and business starting in 2011.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store