
On The Doctors Strike
About 5,500 doctors held a 24-hour nationwide strike in New Zealand on May 1 in protest against a pay offer of just 1.5 percent, spread over two years. This would be a major pay cut in real terms, with annual inflation at 2.6 percent for the year to March.
It was the first ever full-day strike by senior doctors in the country's public hospitals, called by the Association of Salaried Medical Specialists (ASMS). It follows strikes last year by thousands of junior doctors and by tens of thousands of nurses, and repeated strikes this year by medical laboratory workers.
The doctors' strike coincided with strikes by 370 perioperative nurses at Auckland City Hospital, in protest over understaffing, and by nearly 1,000 home support workers employed by Access Community Health, who have received no pay increase for nearly two years. The unions involved—the New Zealand Nurses Organisation (NZNO) and the Public Service Association (PSA)—limited these strikes to just two hours.
These actions reflect widespread opposition to the right-wing National Party-led coalition government's intensifying assault on the public health system.
The day before the doctors' strike, Health NZ confirmed that it has axed 540 jobs from its IT department, reducing its staffing by about a third. This will place further pressure on public hospitals' antiquated computer systems.
Hospitals are being instructed to find hundreds of millions of dollars in cost savings and are leaving vacant positions unfilled. According to the ASMS, the vacancy rate for senior medical officers across the country is 12 percent, but in some areas it is more than 40 percent.
Health Minister Simeon Brown said he was 'disappointed' with the strike. He cynically told the media that 'an estimated 4,300 procedures such as hip operations, knee operations, cataract removals and critical specialist assessments would be delayed as a result of this strike.'
In fact, the austerity measures imposed by his government—and the previous Labour Party-led government—have produced the crisis of unmet need. According to Newsroom, 'The waitlist for elective procedures sat at 76,677 at the end of September, with 30,173 waiting for more than four months and 2,159 waiting for more than a year.'
One News reported that 200,000 people are currently waiting to receive a specialist assessment, with long wait times often leading to serious harm. Doctor Allan Moffitt told the outlet: 'I have a patient who had cancer and I could tell that it was a serious type of cancer. Her referral took over six months to be seen.'
Emergency departments are frequently filled above capacity, resulting in significant delays for urgent cases. Newsroom reports that data for 2024 shows ambulances 'waited 35 minutes, on average, to hand patients over to hospitals.'
One doctor wrote in the r/newzealand Reddit forum that, for them, the strike was 'about retaining colleagues so that work isn't utter misery. We are haemorrhaging specialists at our hospital, and with each resignation, there's more strain on those who stay.'
Striking Wellington physician Andrew Davies told Radio NZ the staffing crisis was the major issue: 'We've got vacant jobs that we're not allowed to advertise. It's lies that they're not getting rid of front-line staff.'
In response to the crisis, the government is outsourcing thousands of procedures to private hospitals, further undermining the public system and paving the way for privatisation.
More budget cuts are being prepared. Finance Minister Nicola Willis revealed on April 29 that in response to the deteriorating economic outlook—the US trade war targeting China could trigger a global recession—the government will slash new spending in this year's budget from the previously announced $NZ2.4 billion to just $1.3 billion.
This will be the smallest spending increase in a decade. Treasury officials previously stated that $2.5 billion in new spending was the minimum required just to meet the growing cost of delivering services.
The opposition Labour Party's criticism of the government's cuts is thoroughly hypocritical. The previous Labour-led government oversaw a worsening crisis in the health system, including expanding waiting times for surgery and an effective wage freeze, which prompted strikes by nurses, midwives, doctors and other workers. Labour's decision in 2022 to remove all restrictions on the spread of COVID-19 led to thousands of deaths and tens of thousands of hospitalisations, placing extraordinary pressure on hospitals.
Labour supports the government's plan to double military spending from 1 to 2 percent of gross domestic product, which will be funded at the expense of health, education and other essential programs. The government has pledged an extra $12 billion for defence over four years to further integrate New Zealand into US-led imperialist war plans.
Workers also confront a trade union bureaucracy that is enforcing government cuts and preventing an effective, unified struggle against austerity. The various health unions have ensured that different sections of workers remain isolated from each other, with strikes limited to a day or less.
It has been more than five months since more than 30,000 nurses struck after rejecting a 1.5 percent pay offer, with the dispute still unresolved. The NZNO is seeking to wear down its members and persuade them to accept a sellout.
The PSA is demanding that even more money be spent on the military, while the union collaborates in imposing redundancies across multiple government departments.
The ASMS returned to negotiations with Health NZ the day after the doctors' strike. The government agency has requested facilitated bargaining by the Employment Relations Authority.
The union's Sarah Dalton signalled that the union leadership is backing away from its claim for a 12 percent pay increase. She told the New Zealand Herald: 'It may not be that we achieve 12 percent, but if we can't achieve better than what is on offer at the moment, we will not be able to settle this.'
The Socialist Equality Group warns that a sellout is being prepared. Doctors, nurses and other healthcare workers can only fight back against the government's cuts and privatisation plans if they take matters out of the hands of the union bureaucracy. Rank-and-file committees, controlled by workers themselves, should be established in every hospital to coordinate their struggle.
The crisis in the health system also raises the need for a socialist political perspective. Workers must reject the fraud that well-funded, properly staffed and freely available public healthcare is 'unaffordable' and that they have to be 'realistic' and accept pay cuts.
The billions of dollars hoarded by the super-rich should be used to vastly expand the public health system and put an end to poverty and inequality. Workers must also demand an end to military spending, with the money redirected into health and other vital social programs.
By Tom Peters, Socialist Equality Group
3 May 2025
Original url:
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsroom
5 hours ago
- Newsroom
The electricity evangelist spreading the solar message
Mike Casey is an electricity evangelist, spreading the word from his fossil-fuel-free cherry orchard in Cromwell. He's the CEO of Rewiring Aotearoa, which has just released two reports – the first is a machine count of all the household items people could (and, the organisation says, should) convert to electricity; the second is a policy manifesto which sets out 59 ways to move towards an electrical utopia. In a political world where climate change issues don't appear to have a high priority, Rewiring Aotearoa's efforts could have fallen on deaf ears. However, says Newsroom senior political reporter and climate change writer Marc Daalder, the new Energy Minister Simon Watts has confirmed he's open to adopting the policy marked as the most important – making electrification loans accessible to everyone. The idea would be to use the high credit ratings of councils to leverage low-interest loans to install home solar panels. Daalder says such a scheme wouldn't put the debt on council balance sheets, and it would mean the Government wouldn't have to put up much money to do it either. 'Central government would only have to stump up for the set-up costs which would be two to six million dollars, so for someone like Simon Watts who really does want to see a deployment of solar, it's a great cost-of-living policy because it helps people reduce their energy bills, and that's one of the big growing aspects of our household bills at the moment.' Daalder says not directly having to subsidise solar but still giving the industry a big boost is pretty appealing for the Government. It doesn't need to plough billions into it because it's being consumer-driven and the economic case for the change is transparent as it is – there are just smaller failures around financing. He says it's fair to say this Government doesn't have a great record on climate policy. 'I think that Rewiring [Aotearoa] has done a good job of finding a niche where actually maybe there can be some progress from the Government.' And he detects a change of heart in coalition politicians over what some of them have described as 'woke' or 'left-wing' technologies, particularly after it was revealed that solar energy mitigated about $20 million in damages and losses after the toppling of a power pylon that causes outages to 88,000 Northland homes last year. 'I think having Simon Watts as the energy minister makes a big difference as well. There was a sense in the sector that Simeon Brown, the previous energy minster, was somewhat ideologically opposed to some of these clean and green technologies … although, even that sounded like it was starting to shift as the benefits became apparent.' Mike Casey says the Machine Count project was a case of 'you can't change what you can't measure'. The report bridges the gap between big, complicated climate policy that's hard to understand, and the sort of discussions people have in their homes – should they buy an electric lawn mower to replace the old one, or when is it best to get an EV, or put solar on the roof. If Kiwi households upgraded six million of the most easily electrifiable machines, they'd save the country about $8 million a day. And ditching those fossil-powered gadgets and old cars would slash 7.5 million tonnes off carbon emissions each year. Some things are too hard to go after. Getting farmers to swap out their tractors, or unglue people's hands from their barbeques, or get rid of their jet skis just yet is off the immediate agenda. 'When you're talking about electrification, especially with a reasonably traditional Kiwi bloke, then the immediate thing that the conversation moves to is 'I've got no option to electrify my 200 horsepower diesel tractor', or 'electrification of international aviation is still a long way away',' says Casey. 'So it's really important to quantify … you know we've 10 million machines in New Zealand … 8.5 million of them, the technology exists within New Zealand to electrify them right now. A million of them, the technology exists somewhere in the world but for whatever reason they're difficult for us to electrify. And there's about 700,000 machines in New Zealand that the technology just doesn't exist to electrify yet. 'And it's a way of breaking that conversation open to make it less about the 200 hp tractors and more about all the small machines that exist in the home where there's a significant economic and emissions opportunity for our country.' One of the big changes is likely to be gas cookers, both because the price of gas is going up as the resource gets more scarce, and because the toxins released when cooking with gas inside can be dangerous for children. But Casey is quick to point out they're not going after the 1,316,620 gas barbecues in the country – not only are electric versions not really up to speed yet, but they're not used often enough for it to be a priority. 'The other thing we've learnt in this whole electrification discussion is that we don't really want to look at banning things or removing things because it actually creates an allergic reaction from a certain section of society which is unproductive for the overall electrification message.' Check out how to listen to and follow The Detail here. You can also stay up-to-date by liking us on Facebook or following us on Twitter.

RNZ News
9 hours ago
- RNZ News
Labour keeps door open for Te Pāti Māori, but urges focus on 'core areas'
Chris Hipkins. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone Chris Hipkins says Te Pāti Māori needs to focus on important issues such as jobs, health and homes, like Labour is, keeping the door open to working with them despite three of their MPs being suspended from Parliament. Labour Māori development spokesperson Willie Jackson told Te Pāti Māori not every Māori supported them after three of its MPs disrupted a vote on the Treaty Principles Bill last year with a haka. The party could have responded differently after the three representatives - co-leaders Debbie Ngarewa-Packer and Rawiri Waititi, and first-term MP Hana-Rawhiti Maipi-Clarke - were referred to the Privileges Committee, and suspended , Jackson said last week. "They love you, I love you, but some of the stuff is not going down well," Jackson said . Labour Party said last month while it agreed the actions met the criteria of contempt, it was concerned that the penalties were "unduly severe". Labour's own Peeni Henare took part in the haka, but was not suspended after apologising . Hipkins told Morning Report on Monday the feedback he was getting from around the country was that Māori wanted to see Labour focused on the issues that bring New Zealanders together and lead the country forward. "That includes focusing on things like jobs, health, homes, the sorts of things that New Zealanders all want to see their government focused on." He said while his party worked in co-operation with Te Pāti Māori, they were also in competition for votes. "We have previously held all the Māori electorates, we'd like to do so again. We're gonna, you know, we're gonna go out there and contest those vigorously at the next election, but we can also work together on areas where we have common ground." The most recent RNZ-Reid Research poll found Labour could lead the next government, but it would need both the Greens and Te Pāti Māori. Hipkins said Labour would look to have a similar relationship with Te Pāti Māori as it had with the Green Party and "set out clear parameters for a working relationship". "I think that's one of the things that Christopher Luxon hasn't done with ACT and with New Zealand First to say, 'Look, these are the areas where we think we can work together. These are the areas where we're not willing to compromise.' "And, you know, I think that includes setting clear standards of expectation around ministerial behaviour - so anyone who's going to be a minister in any government that I lead will be expected to behave like a minister, and that doesn't vary by party. "So unlike Christopher Luxon who seems to think that Winston Peters and David Seymour are subject to different rules to everybody else; I think all ministers should be subjected to the same rules." Hipkins rejected a suggestion that Jackson was appeasing pākeha with his comments. "Ultimately, if you want to be part of the government, then you need to follow the rules of the government." Asked how Labour could work with a party whose MPs broke those rules, Hipkins said it was "ultimately" down to voters. "We're going to be going out there competing vigorously for every vote we can get for Labour. If people believe in the sorts of things that the Labour Party believes in, they want to see a government that's focused on core areas like jobs, health, and homes, then they need to vote for Labour in order to achieve that." Willie Jackson. Photo: VNP / Phil Smith Hipkins said he would prefer to have an "environment where the government of the day, whomever that was, always had a majority". "That would be great, but that's not the reality. That's not what New Zealand voters have chosen for our electoral system. They've chosen a system in which we have to work with other political parties. "I think unlike the current government though, I'll be clear that, you know, there are some areas where, we, we will have standards and everybody will have to follow them." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.


NZ Herald
11 hours ago
- NZ Herald
California sues Trump over National Guard deployment to Los Angeles
California has sued the Trump Administration over its order to deploy 2000 California National Guard troops to Los Angeles without the Governor's consent, a move with little precedent. It has dramatically increased tensions between the federal Government and the Democratic-led state, America's most populous. The lawsuit argues that Trump overstepped