Syria orders full body swimwear for women on public beaches
The tourism ministry decision issued this week marks the first time the Damascus authorities have issued guidelines related to what women can wear since Bashar Al Assad was toppled in December.
During the Assad family's rule of Syria, which was shaped by a secular Arab nationalist ideology, the state imposed no such restrictions, though people often dressed modestly at public beaches, reflecting conservative norms.
The new requirements were set out in a wider decree dated June 9 and which included public safety guidelines for beaches and swimming pools ahead of the summer, such as not spending too long in the sun and avoiding jellyfish.
It said that beachgoers and visitors to public pools should wear "appropriate swimwear that respects public decency and the feelings of different segments of society," requiring "more modest swimsuits" and specifying "the burkini or swimming clothes that cover the body more."
Women should wear a cover or a loose robe over their swimwear when moving between the beach and other areas, it said.
Men should wear a shirt when not swimming, and are not allowed to appear bare-chested "in the public areas outside the swimming areas - hotel lobbies or ... restaurants", it said.
The decree added that "in public areas outside the beaches and swimming pools", it was preferable to wear loose clothing that covers the shoulders and knees and to avoid transparent or very tight clothing.
It offered an exception for hotels classed as four stars or above, and for private beaches, pools and clubs, saying "normal Western swimwear" was generally permitted, "with adherence to public morals and within the limits of public taste."
Since Sunni Islamist-led rebels overthrew Assad, fliers have appeared urging women to cover up, but the government has issued no directives ordering them to observe conservative dress codes.
A temporary constitution passed earlier this year strengthened the language on the role of sharia (Islamic law) in Syria.
Interim President Ahmed Al Sharaa, who led an al Qaeda group before cutting ties with the jihadist network, has sidestepped interviewers' questions on whether he thought Syria should apply sharia, saying this was for experts to decide.
Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
19 minutes ago
- Middle East Eye
What is 'Greater Israel'?
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said he 'very much' identifies with the vision of Greater Israel during an interview on Tuesday, as he accepted an amulet of the 'promised land' from former right-wing MP Sharon Gal. His comments have sparked condemnations from many Arab states, who viewed his words as a threat to their sovereign territory. The concept of Greater Israel, which has various interpretations, has long been invokved by ultra-nationalist Israelis. It is often understood as a vision of territorial expansion to encompass Palestine, Lebanon and Jordan, along with significant parts of Syria, Iraq, Egypt and Saudi Arabia. It has also sometimes been used more narrowly to refer to the territories occupied by Israel in 1967: the Palestinian territories, the Golan Heights in Syria, and Egypt's Sinai Peninsula. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters While Netanyahu's remarks are recent, the idea of Greater Israel is neither new nor clearly defined, and for some, it now appears increasingly relevant in light of Israel's ongoing genocide in Gaza. Where did it start? The concept of Greater Israel was explored by Theodor Herzl, the father of political Zionism, who wrote in his diaries that the Jewish state should stretch 'from the Brook of Egypt to the Euphrates'. The phrase is taken from Book of Genesis, where God grants Abraham and his descendants a vast expanse of land stretching "from the Brook of Egypt to the Euphrates." Some Israelis refer to a narrower vision mentioned in the Book of Deuteronomy, where God instructs Moses to lead the Israelites in taking possession of Palestine, Lebanon, and parts of Egypt, Jordan and Syria. Others invoke the Book of Samuel, which describes lands secured by Kings Saul and David, including Palestine, Lebanon, and sections of Jordan and Syria. For those who hold this belief, the pursuit of Greater Israel is not merely political, it is the fulfilment of a divine mandate, a reclamation of land they see as rightfully theirs. How has Greater Israel changed? Following the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948, the country's borders remained undefined. In 1967, during the Six-Day War, Israel occupied the Gaza Strip and the West Bank, along with the Golan Heights in Syria and the Sinai Peninsula in Egypt. It was the first major military effort by Israel to expand its territorial control. Sinai was later returned to Egypt as part of a peace treaty, while the Golan Heights were formally annexed by Israel. The war brought renewed attention to the idea of Greater Israel, particularly among religious Zionists. By the late 20th century, the term had become political shorthand, embraced by some Israelis as the realisation of a historical and religious destiny. The "Movement for Greater Israel", a political party founded in the aftermath of the Six-Day War, was active until the late 1970s. It advocated for retaining the captured territories and settling them with Jewish citizens. How does the current government view the vision? Since the current Israeli gonvment was sworn in in 2022, refernce to Greater Israel became more common. Last year, in a documentary, Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich was filmed advocating for the expansion of Israeli borders to include Damascus. He suggested that Israel would gradually grow to encompass not only all Palestinian territories but also parts of Jordan, Lebanon, Egypt, Syria, Iraq and Saudi Arabia. 'It is written that the future of Jerusalem is to expand to Damascus,' he said, invoking the 'Greater Israel' ideology. Smotrich had previously raised similar ideas during a 2023 memorial service for a Likud activist in Paris. Speaking from a podium adorned with a map of Israel that included Jordan, he controversially stated that 'there is no such thing' as the Palestinian people. Other ministers and MPs have opennly advocated for "taking land" from Palestinians in in the Gaza Strip. During the ongoing genoicde, an Israeli soldier was pictured with a patch of map of Greater Israel in on his uniform. The latest incident came earlier this week, when Netanyahu explicitly reaffirmed his commitment to the vision. His comments came amid ongoing Israeli military occupation of the West Bank, Gaza Strip and parts of southern Lebanon and southern Syria.
Dubai Eye
3 hours ago
- Dubai Eye
Trump will seek to squeeze Ukraine ceasefire deal out of Putin at Alaska summit
Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin will hold talks in Alaska on Friday, focused on the US president's push to seal a ceasefire deal on Ukraine but with a last-gasp offer from Putin of a possible face-saving nuclear accord on the table too. The meeting of the Russian and US leaders at an air force base in Alaska will be their first face-to-face talks since Trump returned to the White House. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who was not invited to the talks, and his European allies fear Trump might sell Kyiv out and try to force it into territorial concessions. Trump is pressing for a truce in the 3-1/2-year-old war that would bolster his credentials as a global peacemaker worthy of the Nobel Peace Prize. For Putin, the summit is a big win before it even starts as he can use it to say that years of Western attempts to isolate Russia have unravelled and that Moscow has been returned to its rightful place at the top table of international diplomacy. He has also long been keen to talk to Trump face-to-face without Ukraine. The White House said the summit will take place at 11 am Alaska time (1900 GMT). Trump, who once said he would end Russia's war in Ukraine within 24 hours, conceded on Thursday that the conflict, Europe's biggest land war since World War II, had proven a tougher nut to crack than he had thought. He said that if his talks with Putin went well, quickly setting up a subsequent three-way summit with Zelenskyy would be even more important than his encounter with Putin. One source close to the Kremlin said there were signs that Moscow could be ready to strike a compromise on Ukraine. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, a veteran of Russian diplomacy and part of its Alaska delegation, said Moscow never revealed its hand beforehand. Ukraine and its European allies were heartened by a call on Wednesday in which they said Trump had agreed Ukraine must be involved in any talks about ceding land. Zelenskyy said Trump had also supported the idea of security guarantees for Kyiv. Putin, whose war economy is showing some signs of strain, needs Trump to help Russia break out of its straitjacket of ever-tightening Western sanctions, or at the very least for him not to hit Moscow with more sanctions, something the US president has threatened. The day before the summit, the Russian president held out the prospect of something else he knows Trump wants - a new nuclear arms control agreement to replace the last surviving one, which is due to expire in February next year. TRUMP SAYS PUTIN WILL DO A DEAL ON UKRAINE Trump said on the eve of the summit that he thought Putin would do a deal on Ukraine, but he has blown hot and cold on the chances of a breakthrough. Putin, meanwhile, praised what he called "sincere efforts" by the US to end the war. The source close to the Kremlin told Reuters it looked as if the two sides had been able to find some common ground. "Apparently, some terms will be agreed upon... because Trump cannot be refused, and we are not in a position to refuse (due to sanctions pressure)," said the source, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the matter's sensitivity. They forecast that both Russia and Ukraine would be forced to make uncomfortable compromises. Putin has so far voiced stringent conditions for a full ceasefire, but one compromise could be a truce in the air war. Analysts say Putin could try to look like he's giving Trump what he wants while remaining free to escalate. "If they (the Russians) are able to put a deal on the table that creates some kind of a ceasefire but that leaves Russia in control of those escalatory dynamics, does not create any kind of genuine deterrence on the ground or in the skies over Ukraine... that would be a wonderful outcome from Putin's perspective," said Sam Greene, director of Democratic Resilience at the Center for European Policy Analysis. TRUMP SUGGESTS LAND TRANSFERS WILL BE NEEDED Zelenskyy has accused Putin of playing for time to avoid US secondary sanctions and has ruled out formally handing Moscow any territory. Trump has said land transfers could be a possible way of breaking the logjam. Putin, whose forces control nearly one fifth of Ukraine, wants to start reviving the shrunken economic, political and business ties with the US and, ideally, for the US to decouple that process from Ukraine. But it is unclear whether Putin is willing to compromise on Ukraine. In power for a quarter of a century, the Kremlin chief has staked his legacy on securing something he can sell at home as a victory. Chief among his war aims is complete control over the Donbas region in eastern Ukraine, which comprises the Donetsk and Luhansk regions. Despite steady advances, around 25 per cent of Donetsk remains beyond Russian control. Putin also wants full control of Ukraine's Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions; NATO membership to be taken off the table for Kyiv; and limits on the size of Ukraine's armed forces. Ukraine has said these terms are tantamount to asking it to capitulate.
Middle East Eye
5 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Hezbollah chief warns Lebanon faces chaos if government confronts group
Hezbollah leader Naim Qassem has warned that the group will not disarm while Israel continues its attacks and occupation of Lebanon. Speaking on Friday, Qassem said the Lebanese government would bear responsibility if the country's internal situation deteriorates, Reuters reported. There would be "no life" in Lebanon if the government tries to confront the group said Qassem, emphasising the potential for widespread instability if the government continues to attempt to disarm it, as the US and Israel have demanded.
