
California leaders approve budget to close $12bn deficit in blow to progressive causes
California lawmakers on Friday approved a budget that pares back a number of progressive priorities, including a landmark healthcare expansion for low-income adult immigrants without legal status, to close a $12bn deficit.
It's the third year in a row the nation's most populous state has been forced to slash funding or stop some of the programs championed by Democratic leaders. This year's $321bn spending plan was negotiated by legislative leaders and the Democratic governor, Gavin Newsom.
Newsom is expected to sign the budget. But it will be void if lawmakers don't send him legislation to make it easier to build housing by Monday.
The budget avoids some of the most devastating cuts to essential safety net programs, state leaders said. They mostly relied on using state savings, borrowing from special funds and delaying payments to plug the budget hole.
California also faces potential federal cuts to healthcare programs and broad economic uncertainty that could force even deeper cuts. Newsom in May estimated that federal policies – including on tariffs and immigration enforcement – could reduce state tax revenue by $16 bn.
'We've had to make some tough decisions,' Mike McGuire, the senate president pro tempore, said on Friday. 'I know we're not going to please everyone, but we're doing this without any new taxes on everyday Californians.'
Republican lawmakers said they were left out of budget negotiations. They also criticized Democrats for not doing enough to address future deficits, which could range between $17bn to $24bn annually.
'We're increasing borrowing, we're taking away from the rainy day fund, and we're not reducing our spending,' said Tony Strickland, a Republican state senator, prior to the vote. 'And this budget also does nothing about affordability in California.'
Here's a look at spending in key areas:
Under the budget deal, California will stop enrolling new adult patients without legal status in its state-funded healthcare program for low-income people starting in 2026. The state will also implement a $30 monthly premium in July 2027 for immigrants remaining on the program, including some with legal status. The premiums would apply to adults under 60 years old.
The changes to the program, known as Medi-Cal, are a scaled-back version of Newsom's proposal in May. Still, it's a major blow to an ambitious program started last year to help the state inch closer to a goal of universal health care.
A Democratic state senator, María Elena Durazo, broke with her party and voted 'no' on the healthcare changes, calling them a betrayal of immigrant communities.
The deal also removes $78m in funding for mental health phone lines, including a program that served 100,000 people annually. It will eliminate funding that helps pay for dental services for low-income people in 2026 and delay implementation of legislation requiring health insurance to cover fertility services by six months to 2026.
But lawmakers also successfully pushed back on several proposed cuts from Newsom that they called 'draconian'.
The deal secures funding for a program providing in-home domestic and personal care services for some low-income residents and Californians with disabilities. It also avoids cuts to Planned Parenthood.
Lawmakers agreed to let the state tap $1bn from its cap-and-trade program to fund state firefighting efforts. The cap-and-trade program is a market-based system aimed at reducing carbon emissions. Companies have to buy credits to pollute, and that money goes into a fund lawmakers are supposed to tap for climate-related spending.
Newsom wanted to reauthorize the program through 2045, with a guarantee that $1bn would annually go to the state's long-delayed high-speed rail project. The budget doesn't make that commitment, as lawmakers wanted to hash out spending plans outside of the budget process. The rail project currently receives 25% of the cap-and-trade proceeds, which is roughly $1bn annually depending on the year.
Legislative leaders also approved funding to help transition part-time firefighters into full-time positions. Many state firefighters only work nine months each year, which lawmakers said harms the state's ability to prevent and fight wildfires. The deal includes $10m to increase the daily wage for incarcerated firefighters, who earn $5.80 to $10.24 a day currently.
The budget agreement will provide $80m to help implement a tough-on-crime initiative voters overwhelmingly approved last year. The measure makes shoplifting a felony for repeat offenders, increases penalties for some drug charges and gives judges the authority to order people with multiple drug charges into treatment.
Most of the fund, $50m, will help counties build more behavioral health beds. Probation officers will get $15m for pre-trial services and courts will receive $20m to support increased caseloads.
Advocates of the measure – including sheriffs, district attorneys and probation officers – said that's not enough money. Some have estimated it would take around $400m for the first year of the program.
Newsom and lawmakers agreed to raise the state's film tax credit from $330m to $750m annually to boost Hollywood. The program, a priority for Newsom, will start this year and expire in 2030.
The budget provides $10m to help support immigration legal services, including deportation defense.
But cities and counties won't see new funding to help them address homelessness next year, which local leaders said could lead to the loss of thousands of shelter beds.
The budget also doesn't act on Newsom's proposal to streamline a project to create a massive underground tunnel to reroute a big part of the state's water supply.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE The unthinkable accessory that's upended the fashion industry and left brands struggling to keep up
Claudia Chisholm was representing the luggage company she inherited from her father at a 2008 hunting and outdoors trade show when the business took a turn she never saw coming. Customers kept strolling in, looking at the high-end briefcases and leather goods, including wallets and bags 'with embroidered critters' she'd expected to be a surefire hit at an event filled with hunters. 'Nobody bought a thing,' she laughs. 'But we had so many people ask [us] to do conceal carry handbags.' The child of two Holocaust survivors, Chisholm was raised with no knowledge of firearms – but she was 'overwhelmed' by request after request from women who wanted purses for their guns. 'We walked away with about 200 enquiries,' she tells the Daily Mail, adding: 'Back in that time, there was nothing for women in this particular industry.' Chisholm dove headfirst into it with a handbag line called Gun Tote'n Mamas (GTM Originals), named for a joke she and her Chicago-based team shared after the trade show. When she entered the industry, there weren't even products available for 'both left- and right-handed [female customers], for God's sake.' She's watched, though, as options for female firearm carriers have leapt from bags and holsters to everyday staples like leggings and sexy pieces like corsets. 'What's happening is, conceal carry accessories used to be kind of a novelty,' Joelle Orem, who runs an Indiana-based business making firearm-adapted jeans, tells the Daily Mail. Industry insiders say manufacturers previously had a 'shrink it and pink it' mentality but now build conceal carry products specifically for women from scratch, mirroring mainstream fashions and catering to a growing customer base 'In the past, we've had ... maybe the gun manufacturers tell us what they think we want and need. But I think what's up and coming is you have actual ... influencers, women, who are out living the lifestyle, and they're creating their own products to fit that lifestyle.' Around 26.2 million people bought their first firearm between January 2020 through December 2024, according to the National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF). The number of women gun owners has skyrocketed in recent years; a study by Northeastern University found that half of the 5.4 million new gun owners from January 2020 to April 2021 were female. The largest increase occurred in 2020 when 8.4 million Americans armed themselves – with 40 percent of purchasers citing pandemic uncertainty and social unrest in the US as their reasoning. In 2024, women made up 29.1 per cent of permit holders in the 14 states that provide data by gender, according to a report published last year by the Crime Prevention Research Center. Seven states had data from 2012 to 2023/2024, and permit numbers grew 111.9 per cent faster for women than for men. There are also 29 states that have adopted some form of permitless carry, or Constitutional Carry, meaning the real number of women conceal carriers is likely far higher. Claudia Chisholm, 69, knew nothing about guns when she represented the luggage and leather company she took over from her father at a 2008 shooting and outdoors trade show - but she was 'overwhelmed' by requests for conceal carry purses and began GTM Originals And that reality is crossing over into women's retail – with an explosion of companies and entrepreneurs cropping up to cater to the growing market. Around the same time as Chisholm was learning about firearms and safety for her conceal carry handbags, a costumer designer was learning how to shoot a few states away in Nevada – at the urging of her then-husband, 'one of those survivalist dudes,' says Darlene Wallster. 'All the concealed carry holsters were giving me bruises,' she tells the Daily Mail. 'So I thought: I'm going to come up with something better than this … and try to make it feminine.' She launched Can Can Concealment in 2013, eventually branching out from holsters to conceal carry corsets, garters and other apparel; by 2020, she says, so many offshore manufacturers had started copying her that she had to shut down the company. Jen O'Hara, who lives on 18 acres in Northern California, was another early pioneer benefiting from the explosion in popularity. 'There wasn't a plan for us to do this full-time or ever even get paid,' O'Hara, who co-founded Girls With Guns Clothing (GWG) with her friend and future sister-in-law, Norissa Harman, in 2010. They began with casual clothing for female hunters before branching into rangewear and, just a few years ago, conceal carry everyday apparel – such leggings. Their diversification, mother-of-two O'Hara says, stemmed from a combination of identifying untapped markets and following trends. 'Now everybody has jumped on that trend,' she tells Daily Mail. 'There are so many more options out there than there were in 2008, when we very first started bringing the company together.' It's a phenomenon that hasn't really ever been seen before, says fashion historian Sonya Abrego. 'I'm looking at these leggings and stuff; it's very mainstreamized,' she says. 'These aren't avant-garde on-trend fashions … these are very typical Midwestern mom fashions.' An expert in Westernwear history and fashion, she says that nothing like this existed even back in frontier days. 'It was a gun belt, okay?' she says. 'You could have something built to your size and specifications; you could have something built according to your style.' But such large-scale production and variation in choice is a recent development – reflecting the number of women who feel the need to carry weapons at all times. Natalie Strong, 39, began a conceal-carry fashion-focused blog and boutique after getting her own permit around 2017, the first time she found herself living alone. 'I really just wanted to be able to ask a girlfriend' how to carry stylishly, she tells the Daily Mail - but next to nothing existed online at the time addressing such a niche audience. So she began Elegant & Armed, offering tips and products as she watched the industry start to wake up from a 'shrink it and pink it' mentality. 'They were taking products that were not necessarily great quality and just making it pink and saying, "A woman will like this,"' Strong says. 'There has definitely been more of a shift to companies designing products from scratch, specifically with women in mind.' 'I couldn't even tell you how many outfits and different ways that I carry, because it's just like the functionality of: How am I going to accessorize my firearm?' says O'Hara, 45, who'd worked in real estate before GWG. 'Because I don't leave home with out it. So it just kind of became a lifestyle.' A firearms instructor, as well, she teaches women conceal carry basics such as 'how to go to the bathroom with leggings so you don't drop your gun.' Wallster developed 'a garter so that women wearing dresses and skirts, real estate agents, teachers, safety patrol at church, those women could have a gun on the inside of their thigh that nobody could see unless they needed it.' In Ohio, Natalie Strong developed products as solutions to problems she was encountering herself. 'I like to dress business casual and wear blouses,' she says. 'Time and time again, when I stepped outside, just even a little bit of wind would blow that flimsy blouse material over my firearm and show the outline of it through my blouse. 'So that's why I developed a concealment camisole - it has panels on the underside, and it's made of thick satin, so even if the wind pushes against you, it will shield ... for women who carry in the small of their back, sometimes, if you bend over to get something like a purse or a child, your shirt will then tuck behind the gun when you stand back up. The camisole is designed to slide right back over.' Joelle Orem, who 'married into' farm life in Indiana, began modifying her own jeans after her husband gave her a gun as a 2017 Christmas present - a gift she admits she was initially 'afraid of.' 'I had basically cut up my jeans and tried to figure out a way to integrate a holster into my own jeans that I knew I liked already - and that quickly turned into, "Well, maybe if I move the pocket over here, it works a little better."' After she'd mastered adapting her own denim, it occurred to her that other women might also want conceal-carry jeans; she began an Etsy shop and was so bolstered by the response that she found a manufacturer in Arizona and debuted her first 'batch' for Dark Alley Denim Co. at the 2019 NRA show in Indianapolis. The driving motivation these fashion entrepreneurs hear from all of their customers is desire for protection, they say. 'We also sell accessory pouches where you put a taser in there or pepper spray,' says Diana West, who owns Colorado-based Lady Conceal, selling handbags and related conceal carry products. 'It does not have to be a firearm.' A retired teacher, she'd tried selling purses out of her husband's feed and tack store only to repeatedly field questions about conceal carry handbags. So she decided to stock them, then design and sell her own. 'I think a lot of it is the fear factor,' says West, 67. 'People just want to feel safe, and women want to protect their children … all those factors come into play. 'It's very popular now … it's just a growing trend. I have a lot more competition these days.' O'Hara, now married to her co-founder's brother, says that she 'carried my firearm maybe five to six times out of 10 times pre-children and pre-Covid, pre all the things that have changed. 'And I feel like we live in a little bit of a different America.' That difference has translated to dollar signs and demand, undeniably – with Chisholm of the belief that major outdoors retail chains could profit from entire sections dedicated to women's conceal carry. She's seen not only huge increases in women clamoring for such products but also changes in the demographics. 'We're seeing even the Gen Zs coming in,' she tells the Daily Mail. 'They're coming in highly educated. They've done their homework. They've done their research.' Standing just 4'8 and 69 years old, Chisholm became a gun owner herself as she threw herself into the industry. She expects the financial world of female financial fashion to only continue to grow, mirroring social and commercial trends. 'Many of the retailers are still not quite on board and understand how women can carry their business through ups and downs of the industry,' she says. 'But the companies that do, they have been doing extremely well – and they understand that they need more. 'Women want more … the last statistic I gave at a talk was like 83 per cent of all retails sales are done by women. Now, as a retailer, you should be paying attention to those statistics. 'The trend is still very much an upward trajectory,' she says. 'It is not going away.'


BreakingNews.ie
an hour ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Senate pushes ahead on Trump's tax break and spending cut plan
Capping a tumultuous night, the Republican-controlled US Senate advanced President Donald Trump's package of tax breaks, spending cuts and increased deportation money, with more weekend work ahead as Congress races to meet his Fourth of July deadline for passage. By a 51-49 tally and with vice president JD Vance at the Capitol to break a potential tie, the Senate cleared a key procedural step on Saturday as midnight approached. Advertisement Voting had come to a standstill, dragging on for more than three hours, with holdout senators huddling for negotiations and taking private meetings off the Senate floor. In the end, two Republicans opposed the motion to move ahead on Mr Trump's signature domestic policy plan, joining all 47 Democrats. 'Tonight we saw a GREAT VICTORY in the Senate,' Mr Trump said in a social media post afterwards. Republicans are using their majorities in Congress to push aside Democratic opposition, but they have run into a series of political and policy setbacks. Advertisement Not all Republicans are on board with proposals to reduce spending on Medicaid, food stamps and other programmes as a way to help cover the cost of extending some 3.8 trillion dollars (£2.77 trillion) in Trump tax breaks. Mr Trump had threatened to campaign against one Republican, senator Thom Tillis, who had announced he could not support the Bill because of Medicaid cuts that he worried would leave many without health care in his state. A new analysis from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said the Senate version of the Bill would increase by 11.8 million the number of people without health insurance in 2034. Mr Tillis and senator Rand Paul voted no. Advertisement Renewed pressure to oppose the 940-page bill came from billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk, who called it 'utterly insane and destructive'. Ahead for senators now will be an all-night debate and amendments. If they are able to pass it, the Bill would return to the House for a final round of votes before it could reach the White House. With the narrow Republican majorities in the House and Senate, leaders need almost every lawmaker on board. Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer of New York said Republicans released the bill 'in the dead of night' on Friday and were rushing through before the public fully knew what was in it. Advertisement He forced a full reading of the text that began late on Saturday and continued into Sunday morning. At its core, the legislation would make permanent many of the tax breaks from Mr Trump's first term that would otherwise expire by year's end if Congress fails to act, resulting in a potential tax increase on Americans. The Bill would add new breaks, including no taxes on tips, and commit 350 billion dollars (£255 billion) to national security, including for Mr Trump's mass deportation agenda. But the cutbacks to Medicaid, food stamps and green energy investments are also causing dissent within republican ranks. Advertisement Senator Ron Wyden said the environmental rollbacks would amount to a 'death sentence' for America's wind and solar industries.


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Flint's still-unfinished lead pipe replacement serves as cautionary tale to other cities
Jeffrey Bell watched as crews dug up and replaced neighbors' lead water pipes, hoping his mother's house would be next. Workers told him it wasn't on their list but probably assigned to another contractor. With Flint 's lead pipe replacement program winding down this year, Bell and his elderly mother worried the home they share was forgotten. Betty Bell repeatedly called the city while continuing to buy bottled drinking water, as she had for years. Finally someone called to say the water line was fine — records indicate it was checked in 2017. But the Bells hadn't known that, exemplifying residents' confusion over a process marred by delays and poor communication. 'I have even more questions now,' Jeffrey Bell said. About a decade after Flint's water crisis caused national outrage, replacement of lead water pipes still isn't finished. Although the city recently said it completed work required under a legal settlement, the agreement didn't cover vacant homes and allowed owners to refuse, potentially leaving hundreds of pipes in the ground. The state agreed to oversee work on those properties and says it's determined to finish by fall. Flint's missteps offer lessons for municipalities that face a recently imposed federal mandate to replace their own lead service lines. The Trump administration is expected to soon tell a federal appeals court if it will stand by that mandate. 'I think other cities are racing not to be Flint,' said Margie Kelly, a spokesperson with the environmental nonprofit Natural Resources Defense Council, which reached a settlement with the city to force it to replace lead pipes. Flint falters Flint's crisis was set in motion in 2014, when a state-appointed emergency manager ended a contract with Detroit's water system and switched to the Flint River to save money. But the state didn't require treatment to prevent corrosion that caused lead to leach into the water. High levels of lead eventually were detected in drinking water and children's blood. Outbreaks of Legionnaires' disease that killed a dozen people were also linked, in part, to the city's water. In 2017, Flint entered into a settlement requiring it to replace all lead pipes and fix dug-up yards for free within three years. Funds were directed first toward homes with known lead lines at the NRDC's insistence, which meant workers couldn't tackle neighborhoods systematically. And finding those homes proved challenging because many records were missing or inaccurate — some handwritten on notecards dating to the early 1900s. 'The city's overall management of the program was ineffective,' and it could have better coordinated work geographically, said Sarah Tallman, an attorney with the NRDC. That stalled the program and, ultimately, the city had to check every pipe anyway. COVID-19 also slowed work. Flint Department of Public Works Director Kenneth Miller, who was hired last year, said the city didn't know how many homeowners had opted out of lead pipe replacement or how many properties had simply been missed as contractors came and went. 'Just like any other organization, people get lax, people stop doing things, people get laid off and the person that used to do it doesn't do it anymore,' he said. Because the city didn't keep accurate records of repairs, a judge ordered officials to visually check thousands of properties that had been excavated. Yards torn up by contractors sometimes sat that way for months or years. For months, Danyele Darrough's lawn was a mess and the sidewalk and driveway were covered, she said. Grass seed that workers applied never grew. Finally this spring, nearly three years later, she bought bags of topsoil and seed to fix her lawn herself. 'It was like, yeah, we knew it; we couldn't trust them,' said Darrough. Miller said the city now has robust data management, which he recommends to other communities tackling lead lines. Steep population loss left thousands of vacant homes that will require contractors to cap lead lines where they're found, said Eric Oswald, drinking water director at Michigan's Department of Environment, Great Lakes and Energy. 'The state and the city wanted to absolutely make sure that ... we leave no stone unturned,' he said. Trust is key In Flint, government at every level caused the lead crisis or delayed fixing it, according to an EPA inspector general report. The scandal damaged trust in government — nearly 700 Flint homeowners declined free lead pipe replacement, the NRDC said. Flint finally adopted an ordinance last year to prevent homeowners from opting out. 'It's very difficult to get across the finish line unless you've got something to enforce,' Oswald said. Benton Harbor, across the state, implemented a similar provision early on, helping its work move smoothly. Now officials are working from a list of more than 4,000 properties where there could be a lead line, sending letters and making in-person visits to homes, if needed. Miller said he hopes the outreach will show that customer service is now a priority, but it will take time to rebuild trust. Some also distrust the Environmental Protection Agency, which in May lifted a long-standing emergency order for Flint water. The agency said it's now safe to drink from the tap after years of tests showing sharply reduced lead levels. 'We don't know what to believe,' resident Aonie Gilcreast said at a recent community gathering. 'We don't trust the system' because officials have said 'time after time after time .... that everything was fine.' As other cities and towns start replacing their own lead pipes — there are roughly 9 million in the U.S. — one thing should be top of mind, experts say: Digging them up isn't just a construction job, but also a test of community trust. To replace the lines that connect the water main in the street to homes, workers usually must dig in the street and yard, and enter the home. When residents trust local government, they're more willing to grant that access. 'With lead, as with everything else, the first time people hear from their water utility can't be when there is a concern,' said Greg Kail, spokesperson at utility industry group American Water Works Association. Instead, it is important for utilities to reach out to residents about what they plan to do and enlist trusted community groups in the effort. Newark charges forward Newark, New Jersey, avoided Flint's pitfalls when facing its own lead crisis. In 2019, about two years after elevated levels were revealed and with funds available, the mayor said the city would replace more than 20,000 lead pipes at no cost to residents — and do it within three years. But a challenge soon emerged: Newark has lots of renters who couldn't approve the work. 'We couldn't get into the houses. We couldn't find the owners,' said Kareem Adeem, Newark's water and sewer director. 'They don't live there. They had no interest in taking care of the lead service line.' So the city passed an ordinance making lead pipe removals mandatory and giving renters permission to approve the work. Then contractors moved quickly through the city block by block — a lesson learned from Flint. For the most stubborn holdouts, officials told them when they'd start replacement work and said they'd turn the water off until the resident allowed them to complete it. The threat was enough. They never had to actually turn off anybody's water, Adeem said. Sometimes, people would recognize Adeem from TV and he could start a conversation — a crack in a resident's determination to say no. He worked with trusted community groups, too. And the decision that ensured people's property was cleaned up afterward? The contractors weren't fully paid until they finished the work and fixed any damage. ___