
Long-term vision essential for NZ's infrastructure future
But infrastructure isn't about individual assets, it's about a network of platforms that allow people to live their lives and go about making a living.
Infrastructure enables economic growth, social cohesion and environmental resilience. Every dollar spent is a down payment on the kind of country we want our children and grandchildren to inherit.
Nick Leggett is the chief executive of Infrastructure NZ
To get this right, we need more than planning and funding. We need a national vision.
Some politicians roll their eyes at the word 'vision', seeing it as too abstract or ideological. But in fact, the absence of vision is what gets us into trouble.
Without long-term thinking, we get short-term decisions. Projects chopped and changed with political cycles, reactive funding decisions, stop-start pipelines that waste money and talent.
The fact that politicians don't like it is a clue as to why a vision is so valuable. They don't like it because they can't control it.
With a shared vision, we gain direction and clarity. We can prioritise, align investment and policy, make the hard calls about what's most important – and importantly keep successive governments on track when they try to deviate and cut projects.
For a country like New Zealand that is geographically isolated, fiscally constrained and with a small, ageing population, that's not just idealism. It's survival.
New Zealand has gone from being one of the most trade-intensive economies per capita to now exporting a smaller share of GDP than the OECD median.
Compared to countries like Ireland, Singapore and Denmark – similar in size, but far more focused on strategic infrastructure and economic positioning, we are massively underperforming.
That matters. The roads we drive on, the schools our kids attend, the hospitals we rely on, and the green energy we need – all depend on the income we earn from offshore.
Infrastructure isn't just about what's visible on our streets. It's about building the foundations for a modern, outward-facing, productive economy.
We are seeing real signs of progress. The Government has introduced some of the most significant system changes in recent memory.
Reforms to resource management, water services and regional planning are laying the groundwork for more integrated thinking.
The Labour Party has expressed some level of cooperation in response, which is promising.
The creation of Invest New Zealand is a critical step. We won't meet our infrastructure needs with public money alone.
Private and offshore investment must be part of the picture; however, it must be well-targeted, guided by public interest, and attract genuinely new capital.
The model must be credible and transparent, with clear rules and strong public support.
The Infrastructure Priorities Programme is also promising, giving us a framework to assess and prioritise the most urgent and valuable projects.
Alongside it, the first-ever National Policy Statement for Infrastructure sets the tone for future planning and delivery, which will embed infrastructure as a core part of national development.
But plans alone are not enough. A vision brings these threads together and gives them meaning.
To be successful it must also drive action and give business and communities the confidence to invest. It helps us stay the course.
A clear, long-term pipeline of infrastructure work isn't just efficient, it's financially smart.
Analysis by Infometrics shows that by reducing uncertainty and creating a stable delivery environment, New Zealand could save between $2 billion and $4.7b each year.
That's money we're currently wasting through cancellations, delays, duplicated effort and poor coordination.
Our obsession with short-term cost-cutting – the 'nickel and dime' approach – has undermined long-term value. We panic about cost over runs but rarely ask what the cost is of not building at all.
We celebrate the cancellation of projects but don't adequately even monitor the work we have in the market or the projects in the pipeline.
Growing, productive nations build good systems for funding and delivery. They also understand that infrastructure costs what it costs and that the benefits compound for generations.
One of the most overlooked aspects of New Zealand's infrastructure deficit is how poorly we've maintained what we already have. We need to stop chasing only the shiny and new, and start respecting, renewing and better using existing assets.
That means smarter asset management. It means investing in good data and decision-making. And it means changing our political mindset from one of celebrating project cancellations to championing long-term results from better services delivered by our infrastructure.
We need to stop chasing only the shiny and new, and start respecting, renewing and better using existing assets. Nick Leggett
None of this is possible without a steady, well-supported workforce. The infrastructure industry cannot keep scaling up and down with the political tides.
It causes burnout, skills loss and inefficiency. We need a pipeline of skilled workers and leadership across engineering, construction, planning and asset management, backed by education and immigration policies that match.
In recent years, Infrastructure New Zealand has led delegations to Denmark, Ireland and Canada. These countries face similar constraints to ours, yet they're achieving greater infrastructure productivity through one key difference – cross-party political consensus anchored by a better shared sense of where they are going as respective nations.
They debate priorities, but they don't debate the need for progress.
This year's Draft Infrastructure Plan lays out scenarios for New Zealand's population reaching nearly eight million by 2050.
That's a big shift in demand, especially as we age. We can't pretend that today's systems will stretch to meet tomorrow's needs. We must start planning now, guided by shared goals and not fragmented politics.
So, let's start the hard conversation. Let's challenge ourselves to commit to a national vision. It will provoke discussions of identity and of cultural mindset of how we make choices together – and how we get things done.
Let's imagine a New Zealand that's more connected, more productive, more inclusive and more resilient. Decent infrastructure is a means to that end.
· Infrastructure New Zealand is the peak body of the New Zealand infrastructure sector and is hosting the upcoming Building Nations Conference.
· Infrastructure New Zealand is an advertising sponsor of the Herald's Infrastructure report.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

1News
33 minutes ago
- 1News
What we know about new road user charges and end of petrol tax
The Government made it official this week that the petrol tax is on the way out, to be replaced by electronic road user charges, or RUCs, for everyone. Drivers of all light vehicles – petrol, hybrid, diesel and electric – will now pay for road use based on distance travelled and vehicle weight, instead of an extra charge at the pump. Right now, Road User Charges (RUC) only apply to vehicles not powered wholly by petrol, and all vehicles weighing more than 3.5 tonnes. An awful lot of the specifics around the new system remain uncertain, as the government considers how to implement the plan. But here's what we know so far. The petrol tax will go, but what's replacing it? ADVERTISEMENT All of Aotearoa's 3.5 million light vehicle owners will need to pay RUC fees to help pay for road upkeep and maintenance. But exactly how the fees will be set and collected are still a work in progress. In making the announcement, Transportation Minister Chris Bishop said it was "the biggest change to how we fund our roading network in 50 years". It comes as more and more drivers use hybrids, electric vehicles or other technology. Bishop said the number of fuel-efficient petrol hybrid vehicles has jumped from 12,000 in 2015 to 350,000 today. "As our vehicle fleet changes, so too must the way we fund our roads. It isn't fair to have Kiwis who drive less and who can't afford a fuel-efficient car paying more than people who can afford one and drive more often. "This is a change that simply has to happen. The government has recognised reality and is getting on with the transition." Replacing fuel excise taxes with electronic road user charging was part of National and ACT's coalition agreement. The government's been signalling this move for some time and last year scrapped an Auckland regional fuel tax of 11.5 cents per litre. AA principal policy adviser Terry Collins said while the association thinks the changes are good in principle, "we need to see the detail". ADVERTISEMENT How much will all this cost drivers? AA principal policy advisor Terry Collins discussed the "pros and cons" of replacing petrol tax with electronic road user charges. (Source: Breakfast) That's one of the big question marks right now. Under the system, all vehicles would be paying for road use based on distance and their vehicle's weight, Bishop said, but no detail on the weight limits was given. The current RUC for light vehicles – under 3500kg – are $76 per 1000km. The average Toyota Corolla weighs between 1200-1500kg. Charges can widely vary for larger vehicles under the current RUC, according to NTZA's website. There's also an administration fee of $12-$13 per transaction. ADVERTISEMENT No costs or parameters for the new system have been announced, but just as an example under the current RUC setup, a small electric vehicle would pay more than $760 including fees for 10,000km worth of credits. Will this bring petrol prices down? Again, answer unclear. Bishop said currently, petrol drivers pay a tax of about 70 cents per litre. However, the AA says that the full cost of fuel excise, duties and taxes such as GST altogether was over $1.20 per litre as of mid-2024. There's no real way of knowing yet if the changes would automatically drop 70 cents or more from fuel prices. When will it take effect? ADVERTISEMENT Chris Bishop said paying for RUC would be similar to paying an electricity bill at the end of each month. (Source: Breakfast) Legislative work toward the changes will begin next year, with the government eyeing 2027 for the new system to take place. "At this stage, no date has been set for the full transition of the light vehicle fleet," Bishop said. "That's a deliberate choice, as we're focused on getting the system right rather than rushing its rollout." The legislative plans include: Removing the requirement to carry or display RUC licences, allowing for digital records instead; enabling the use of a broader range of electronic RUC devices, including those already built into many modern vehicles; supporting flexible payment models such as post-pay and monthly billing; separating NZTA's roles as both RUC regulator and retailer to foster fairer competition; and allowing bundling of other road charges like tolls and time of used based pricing into a single, easy payment. "The changes will support a more user-friendly, technology-enabled RUC system, with multiple retail options available for motorists," Bishop said in announcing the changes. "Eventually, paying for RUC should be like paying a power bill online, or a Netflix subscription. Simple and easy." ADVERTISEMENT Bishop told ThreeNews that users could possibly pay road RUCs through an app, and log in and pay what they owed at the end of each month. The next step for the plan is changes to the Road User Charges Act 2012, and a bill will be introduced to Parliament and referred to a Select Committee for public input. "I expect to pass legislation in 2026, followed by an updated Code of Practice for RUC providers," Bishop said. "We will also engage with the market in 2026 to assess technological solutions and delivery timelines. In parallel, NZTA and Police will upgrade their systems to support enforcement in a digital environment." How do RUCs work now for those who pay them? Bishop called the current setup for light vehicles a "clunky" system. You keep track of your odometer readings, pay for RUC in 1000km chunks and put a sticker on your windscreen that shows how many km they are good for. Once your odometer passes the number you've paid for in RUC, you need to pay for more. "We're not going to shift millions of drivers from a simple system at the pump to queues at retailers," Bishop said. "So, instead of expanding a clunky government system, we will reform the rules to allow the market to deliver innovative, user-friendly services for drivers." ADVERTISEMENT The AA's Martin Glynn told RNZ's Morning Report that it's not the easiest system for users. "The biggest problem with it, people need to keep an eye on their odometers and see if they've used up their RUC and need to buy more. That's probably the biggest problem with it." However, the Government said it wants to shift away from the "outdated" system and replace it with greater use of electronic RUC, or eRUCs. What are eRUCs, anyway? Basically, instead of having to keep track of your odometer readings and paying as you go for km credits, it's a device that does that work automatically. There are a variety in place now for current requirements. There are several approved eRUC providers for the heavy vehicle fleet of vehicles over 3.5 tonnes. "EROAD's system automatically records the distance each vehicle travels on-road and accurately records all off-road travel with its intuitive GPS-tracking capability," the website of one of the providers, EROAD, states. ADVERTISEMENT Infrastructure New Zealand chief executive Nick Leggett applauded the change and said it could work well with other transport charges. "User-charging is a fair, proven way to fund infrastructure. ERUC will make it easier to apply that principle consistently across all vehicles, whether petrol, diesel, electric or hybrid, and as our transport system evolves. "We also see the use of flexible payment methods and the integration of eRUC with other transport charges such as tolling and congestion pricing as sensible moves." However, there's still a lot of questions around the costs of implementing eRUCs for everyone. Would all cars be fitted with new devices or would some kind of self-monitoring system be in place for those with older vehicles? And what does that eRUC technology mean for privacy? There's also been a fair bit of talk doing the rounds on social media about the idea of electronic records on vehicle travel and worries about the government tracking people. In a statement to RNZ, Bishop said there were privacy protections in place and it would remain a concern in developing the new systems. ADVERTISEMENT "The Road User Charges Act 2012 has existing provisions that protect privacy by limiting what RUC electronic information the RUC collector can access. "Location data can only be accessed to verify where the driver is owed a refund for off-road use. "Officials will be engaging with the market and stakeholders (including the Office of the Privacy Commissioner) on the features of potential solutions, such as cost, privacy and ease of use." The AA's Collins said it would be important to see the detail of "who has that information and what's done with it". "Everybody in the trucking industry wants to have that technology fitted. I don't think that's the case in the light fleet." Collins noted that our phones – which almost everyone has with them in their cars – are also packed with tracking technology. Other countries have managed similar systems, he said, but "it's what the data will ultimately be used for in the future that's the biggest concern". ADVERTISEMENT Private firms will be in charge of collecting the new fees In their announcement, the Government also said that private firms will take over the collection and administration of charges from NZTA, "to foster fairer competition". Tax Justice Aotearoa said they were concerned about that change and taking the responsibility away from the Government. "We are deeply concerned by this initiative as using the power of the state to require citizens to pay charges decided by the state is a core function of government," chairman of Tax Justice Aotearoa Glenn Barclay said in a statement. "It should not be for the profit of anyone and it means that the details of thousands of road users will be held and managed by private organisations with no accountability back to the public." "Putting RUC in the hands of private companies, who will need to make a profit on the transactions, is a recipe for higher fees for drivers," the Public Service Association union's national secretary Fleur Fitzsimons said. Will all this actually save people money? ADVERTISEMENT It's unclear. Petrol could in theory be cheaper, but will be somewhat offset by RUCs all vehicle owners must pay. "This is a once-in-a-generation change," Bishop said. "It's the right thing to do, it's the fair thing to do, and it will future proof how we fund our roads for decades to come." Collins said the distance-based changes could benefit certain drivers, such as those who own multiple vehicles that aren't actually travelling much, or boat users. "Nothing's going to be cheaper, we know that," he said. "It's like saying do you think that your cars are going to be cheaper in three years' time?" "Realistically, we want to be building a modern safe roading network and that's not cheap. All of us as road users need to contribute to that." By Nik Dirga of

RNZ News
5 hours ago
- RNZ News
Treasury briefing points finger at government spending during Covid-19 pandemic
The Treasury briefing said the Covid-19 response showed the challenges of using fiscal policy to respond to shocks and cycles. Photo: FANATIC STUDIO / SCIENCE PHOTO L The previous government spent too much during the Covid-19 pandemic, despite warnings from officials, according to a briefing released by the Treasury. The Treasury's 2025 Long Term Insights Briefing said debt had risen in recent decades, partly because responses to adverse shocks were not met by savings between those shocks. The higher debt meant less capacity to respond to future shocks, like natural hazards, weather-related risks and biosecurity risks. Treasury estimated the total cost of the pandemic was $66 billion over the 2020-26 financial years and about 20.4 percent of GDP. The IMF and OECD estimated it was among the largest Covid-19 responses globally. The agency releases a briefing every three years, with this one looking at the role of fiscal policy through shocks and business cycles. The briefing said the Covid-19 response showed the challenges of using fiscal policy to respond to shocks and cycles. Initially, Treasury recommended "strong fiscal stimulus" at the start of the pandemic, which was cited as "perhaps" causing the economy to be much stronger than expected by the end of 2020. The wage-subsidy scheme in particular was seen as making an important contribution to the strong initial recovery, limiting the increase in the unemployment rate and enabling economic activity to resume when restrictions relaxed. Treasury then moved away from recommending broad-based stimulus, preferring more targeted and moderate support. Its post-election advice to the then-Finance Minister in late 2020 highlighted "the importance of controlling ongoing spending and ensuring it was high value to meet the medium-term fiscal challenge." By August 2021, with the Delta lockdowns coming in, Treasury recommended any decisions to provide support to businesses "should take account of macroeconomic trade-offs". It recommended against any further stimulus from Budget 2022 onwards. Wage subsidies and similar schemes during lockdowns made up about 35 percent of the costs of the response. A further 18 percent came from health-system costs, like vaccination, contact tracing, and managed isolation and quarantine. The remaining "nearly half" was made up of a wide range of initiatives that Treasury said had "varied objectives". Some were aimed at directly responding to the impacts of Covid-19, others were aimed at providing fiscal stimulus or "achieving social or environmental objectives". They included "tax changes, training schemes, housing construction, shovel-ready infrastructure projects, increases to welfare benefits, the Small Business Cashflow Scheme, Jobs for Nature, additional public housing places and school lunches". Programmes within the fiscal response that were not tied to the shock were seen as having "a lagged impact on the economy and proved difficult to unwind in later years". The report suggested cyclical management was best left to monetary policy, run by an independent central bank. It also suggested governments set out clearly when fiscal policy will be used ahead of time, including pre-defining responses. Ideally, this would have cross-party agreement. An independent fiscal institution, which could scrutinise and report on the sustainability of fiscal policy, was also suggested. The previous government had considered setting up a watchdog to cost election policies, but it could not get cross-party support. National then changed its tune, with current Finance Minister Nicola Willis supporting such a measure, but New Zealand First and ACT were opposed to the idea. Willis jumped on the report's release, saying Treasury's language was "spare and polite", but its conclusions were "damning". She said the briefing showed the challenges of using "big spending measures" to respond to one-off shocks. Willis singled out the briefing's focus on the money spent on initiatives not directly tied to the Covid-19 response. "That is a very diplomatic way of saying New Zealanders are still paying the price of the previous government extending a big-spending approach, initially intended for a pandemic response," she said. RNZ has approached Labour for comment. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.


NZ Herald
6 hours ago
- NZ Herald
NZX steady as Eroad rallies on road user charge changes
'Of course, we have an earnings season starting next week, so you tend to see volumes a little lighter as people await the company announcements and guidance especially,' Sullivan said. 'US markets were positive, even though India has been hit with a higher tariff level than initially quoted. Our interest rates are buoying the market more than geopolitical instability and tariffs.' On the NZX, Eroad rallied by 26.42% today after the Government unveiled a raft of changes to the country's Road User Charges system in preparation for 3.5 million vehicles becoming liable for the charges. As has previously been signalled, the current Fuel Excise Duty is expected to be abolished in the coming years, with all vehicles moving to Road User Charges (RUCs). Eroad's share price lifted 42c to $2.01 after 3.1 million shares changed hands on turnover of $5.9m. 'Obviously they're seen as a potential frontrunner for being able to offer a solution in that area. Material uplift in volume and share price and their market cap would put them up as a NZX 50 constituent as well, so the potential to eventually be included in NZX indices.' Elsewhere, Radius Healthcare shares rose 3.90% to $0.40 on high volume of 10.4 million shares after it announced an upgrade to its projected underlying earnings before interest and tax. Sullivan said Radius doesn't seem to be able to put a foot wrong at the moment, noting its share price rose 22% in July, 22% in June and 25% in April. Chorus also had another positive day, with its share price lifting 1.21% or 11c to $9.20. Contact Energy, meanwhile, fell 0.76% to $9.10 after $11.1m in turnover was traded. US markets Wall Street stocks rose on Wednesday local time, with Apple and most other large tech companies rallying as markets largely shrugged off US President Donald Trump's latest tariff hikes. Apple piled on more than 5% after White House officials said the tech giant plans an additional US$100 billion ($168b) in capital spending in the United States. Amazon and Google parent Alphabet were among the other large tech names that also rose. 'By standing up and publicly announcing a domestic investment with President Trump, it reduces the likelihood of Trump imposing new tariff burdens on Apple,' said FHN Financial's Chris Low. The Dow Jones Industrial Average finished up 0.2% at 44,193.12. The broad-based S&P 500 gained 0.7% to 6,345.06, while the tech-rich Nasdaq Composite Index climbed 1.2% to 21,169.42, less than 10 points from an all-time record. Trump ordered an additional 25% tariff on Indian goods. The levy, which is expected to come into force in three weeks, is due to New Delhi's continued purchase of Russian oil. – Additional reporting AFP Tom Raynel is a multimedia business journalist for the Herald, covering small business, retail and tourism.