Cyclist jailed a week over collision with jogger who suffered serious injuries
Edmund Kwek Jun Wei, 34, was given a week's jail on Friday (Jun 20), after he pleaded guilty to a charge of causing grievous hurt through a negligent act.
The incident happened in the early morning of Oct 22, 2024.
At around 6.20am, Kwek was riding at about 22kmh along a cycling path with a speed limit of 25kmh. The lights were still lit.
Kwek was looking down at one point and failed to see the jogger, 48-year-old Tan Jo-Ann. When he looked up, he saw Ms Tan's back before colliding into her.
Kwek was flung off his bicycle, while Ms Tan fell to the ground. When Kwek attended to the victim, she was unable to respond to his questions.
He called for emergency services.
Ms Tan was taken to Changi General Hospital where she was found to have serious injuries, including fractures on her right skull, the base of the skull and a possible fracture behind her nose.
She was discharged on Nov 6, 2024, 16 days later.
The injuries affected her sense of smell, taste and left ear hearing, and Ms Tan reported experiencing vertigo when bending forward.
An examination showed that she had partial hearing loss in her left ear. Her sense of smell was still lacking as of January this year.
Ms Tan attended around 19 sessions of speech therapy until March this year and her speech has improved, with no residual motor deficits, court documents stated.
Kwek's lawyer Bozy Lu from Han & Lu Law Chambers told the court that her client had been training for a marathon when the incident occurred.
Ms Lu said Kwek tried to offer compensation to Ms Tan, but she declined.
The defence lawyer added in mitigation that Kwek was remorseful and pleaded guilty at the earliest opportunity he had.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
42 minutes ago
- CNA
‘Something was amiss': How two DBS staff stopped a S$70,000 scam in progress
Withdrawals are a routine part of banking, but one elderly woman's request to take out S$70,000 in cash raised concerns for assistant service manager Yu Chunmei. As part of the bank's standard procedure for withdrawals, Ms Yu, who works at DBS' Thomson Plaza branch, asked the customer about the purpose of the transaction. The woman replied that it was to pay for a home renovation – but could not name the company she had engaged. 'I asked if she had supporting documents, like an invoice, or if she was in talks with a specific contractor,' recalled Ms Yu. 'She said she hadn't yet decided on one.' SPOTTING THE WARNING SIGNS Ms Yu noticed that the customer's account held just over S$70,000 – and she was about to withdraw the entire amount for a home renovation that had not even been confirmed. What also stood out was the woman's demeanour. Most customers marking major milestones, such as buying a home or carrying out a renovation, tend to be upbeat. But this woman, who appeared to be in her 60s, seemed subdued, recalled Ms Yu, who has 15 years of customer service experience. While most scams begin remotely – through phishing, fake websites or scam calls – not all unfold entirely online. Some involve face-to-face encounters, such as tenancy scams where victims are misled at property viewings by individuals posing as agents or their assistants. Others, like this elderly customer, are instructed to withdraw cash in person as part of the deception – a tactic that adds a layer of urgency and credibility while bypassing fraud detection systems that might flag unusual online transfers. Ms Yu tried persuading the customer to first confirm a renovation provider and consider a safer payment method, such as PayNow or a bank transfer. Carrying such a large amount of cash was risky, she warned. But the customer – who did not use internet banking – insisted on withdrawing the cash. Sensing something was amiss, Ms Yu called in her colleague, deputy service manager Beatrice Ng, for support. 'With so many scams these days, we're a last line of defence for our customers,' said Ms Yu. 'It's our job to protect their savings.' Ms Ng attempted to engage the customer, speaking gently and without pressure. But the woman began to tear up, even as she stood her ground about withdrawing the money. As they spoke, her husband – who had been waiting nearby – approached Ms Ng and discreetly passed her a handwritten note asking if they could speak privately. After confirming the husband's identity, Ms Ng and Ms Yu ushered him into a room, where he revealed that his wife had received a call the night before from someone claiming to be from an insurance company. When the woman said she had never bought insurance from the company, the scammer changed tack, telling her he would connect her to the police. Another person then came on the line, claiming to be an officer. He told her that her bank account had been hacked, and she was under suspicion for money laundering. To prevent her savings from being confiscated as part of the supposed investigation, the scammer told her to withdraw the entire sum and hand it over to an 'official from the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS)'. The money would be returned to her later, she was assured. It is important to note that government officials will never ask for bank log-in credentials or request money transfers over the phone – and banks will never make such requests either. Anyone who receives such calls should verify their legitimacy by calling the 24/7 ScamShield helpline at 1799. SAFEGUARDING THE CUSTOMER'S SAVINGS After hearing the husband's account, Ms Ng and Ms Yu acted quickly. As they spoke to the customer, Ms Yu and Ms Ng noticed her phone was on and placed face-up on the counter throughout – raising the possibility that the scammers were listening in. They asked the woman to hang up on the scammers and turn off her phone. Reassuring her that they had spoken to her husband, they told her there was no need to be afraid – her money was safe in her DBS account. The pair had foiled a government official impersonation scam – a ruse that typically begins with unsolicited calls from individuals claiming to be from agencies such as the police or MAS. Victims are told their bank accounts have been compromised and are pressured into handing over cash, personal information or banking details. These scams are not uncommon. Last September, a spate of such cases led to a loss of at least S$6.7 million. Experts say scammers exploit Singapore's low-crime environment, where trust in authority is high, to convince victims to part with their savings. Once the elderly customer calmed down, Ms Yu and Ms Ng helped her secure her savings. DBS provides an ideal solution for such a situation – DBS digiVault, a 'money lock' feature that prevents unauthorised digital transfers while allowing funds to continue earning interest. 'After she locked her funds, she looked visibly relieved,' said Ms Ng. 'And when she realised it was a scam, she started smiling.' Before the couple left, Ms Ng and Ms Yu advised them to file a police report. Scams are evolving rapidly, and customer-facing staff often find themselves having to defuse high-stress situations with agitated customers. Staff vigilance – exemplified by Ms Ng and Ms Yu – is a key part of DBS' broader anti-scam strategy, which includes the use of technology, banking tools, customer education and close collaboration with industry partners and the authorities. 'DBS has trained us to be vigilant and proactive – to spot warning signs, stay calm under pressure and handle sensitive situations with care,' said Ms Yu.
Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
Do Kwon may plead guilty in US case over $51 billion collapse of Singapore-based Terraform
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Police officers escort South Korean cryptocurrency entrepreneur Do Kwon (centre) at the exit of a court in Podgorica, Montenegro, on March 23, 2024. NEW YORK – Terraform Labs co-founder Do Kwon may plead guilty in a US criminal fraud case tied to the US$40 billion (S$51 billion) collapse of the TerraUSD stablecoin in 2022. US District Judge Paul Engelmayer in New York scheduled a change of plea hearing for Aug 12. The judge said in an order on Aug 11 that Kwon should be ready to explain how he violated the law if he pleads guilty. Kwon, 33, pleaded not guilty in January following a two-year extradition battle over whether he would first face prosecution in the United States or his native South Korea. A call to Kwon's lawyer was not immediately returned. Kwon was charged in both countries in connection with the implosion of Singapore-based Terraform's TerraUSD, which shook the crypto world in the spring of 2022. The downturn that followed played a role in the collapse of cryptocurrency exchange FTX. Kwon had been a fugitive from the South Korean charges for months when he and Terraform's former chief financial officer were caught trying to board a Dubai-bound private jet at the airport in Montenegro's capital, Podgorica, with fake passports in March 2023. Kwon, who owned 92 per cent of Terraform, was held in Montenegro for months as officials in the Balkan nation spent most of two years battling over whether he should be extradited to the US or South Korea. Meanwhile, Terraform and Kwon were found liable for civil fraud in a 2024 suit by the US Securities and Exchange Commission. A jury in New York, at the end of a two-week trial, determined that Kwon and Terraform misled investors. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. World Trump signs order extending China tariff truce by 90 days, White House says World Trump seizes control of Washington police, deploys National Guard Opinion For Singapore, the AI revolution is coming just in time Asia Death of student in Sabah raises hurdle for Malaysian PM Anwar as he faces tough state polls soon Opinion Sumiko at 61: Hearing loss is linked to dementia risk. Here's what you risk by ignoring it Business S'pore start-up among 5 global picks for Japan construction group Kajima's mentorship and funding Business Lower-wage retail workers to receive up to 6% pay bump from Sept 1 Singapore ST Explains: Who owns Simba, the company that is buying M1? Jurors found that Terraform and Kwon falsely claimed that Chai, a popular Korean payment application, was using Terraform's blockchain technology to make transactions. The jurors also found investors were misled about the stability of the UST stablecoin, which Kwon and Terraform claimed was algorithmically pegged to the US dollar. Terraform and Kwon later agreed to pay the US US$4.47 billion to resolve the case. The deal required Kwon to wind down the business and use any remaining assets to pay off the company's creditors. BLOOMBERG
Business Times
3 hours ago
- Business Times
Do Kwon may plead guilty in US case over US$40 billion Terraform collapse
[NEW YORK] Terraform Labs co-founder Do Kwon may plead guilty in a US fraud case tied to the US$40 billion collapse of the TerraUSD stablecoin in 2022. US District judge Paul Engelmayer in New York scheduled a change of plea hearing for Tuesday (Aug 12). The judge said in an order on Monday that Kwon should be ready to explain how he violated the law if he pleads guilty. Kwon, 33, pleaded not guilty in January following a two-year extradition battle over whether he would first face prosecution in the US or his native South Korea. A call to Kwon's lawyer was not immediately returned. Kwon was charged in both countries in connection with the implosion of Singapore-based Terraform's TerraUSD, which shook the crypto world in the spring of 2022. The downturn that followed played a role in the collapse of cryptocurrency exchange FTX. Kwon had been a fugitive from South Korean charges for months when he and Terraform's former chief financial officer were caught trying to board a Dubai-bound private jet at the airport in Montenegro's capital, Podgorica, with fake passports in March 2023. Kwon, who owned 92 per cent of Terraform, was held in Montenegro for months as officials in the Balkan nation spent most of two years battling over whether he should be extradited to the US or South Korea. Meanwhile, Terraform and Kwon were found liable for civil fraud in a 2024 suit by the US Securities and Exchange Commission. A jury in New York, at the end of a two-week trial, determined that Kwon and Terraform misled investors. Jurors found that Terraform and Kwon falsely claimed that Chai, a popular Korean payment application, was using Terraform's blockchain technology to make transactions. The jurors also found investors were misled about the stability of the UST stablecoin, which Kwon and Terraform claimed was algorithmically pegged to the US dollar. Terraform and Kwon later agreed to pay the US US$4.47 billion to resolve the case. The deal required Kwon to wind down the business and use any remaining assets to pay off the company's creditors. BLOOMBERG
