Four months after elections, MCG House yet to meet in Gurgaon
Om Birla
on Thursday spoke about the importance of regular meetings among elected representatives in municipal corporations.
Ironically, this was being said when one of the two municipal corporations of the city — MCG — failed to conduct its inaugural House meeting since the election results were announced on March 12, although a special budget meeting took place on April 8.
The LS speaker — while addressing national conference of urban local bodies (ULBs) in Manesar — said he saw in several municipalities that House meetings "did not happen for a year".
You Can Also Check:
Gurgaon AQI
|
Weather in Gurgaon
|
Bank Holidays in Gurgaon
|
Public Holidays in Gurgaon
Birla said meetings should occur every one to two months to discuss the city's challenges. Regular meetings hold the officials accountable and bring more transparency, he said.
"When elected officials pose questions during these sessions, it enhances transparency and accountability within municipal corporations.
Through observations across various municipal corporations, it is evident that meetings are either not conducted for extended periods, sometimes up to a year, or when convened, they are disrupted, leading to agenda approvals without proper deliberation. It is crucial to maintain regular meeting schedules, preferably every one to two months.
The meetings should incorporate a zero hour. Moreover, proper discussion should be held on the budget," the LS speaker said.
MCG mayor Raj Rani Malhotra could not be reached despite repeated attempts.
The councillors told TOI they have been regularly enquiring about the House meetings. However, the meeting schedule has not been fixed yet. Councillor Kuldeep Yadav, who was present at the ULB conference, said, "Every councillor wants the House meetings to happen every month. A meeting of the councillors with the city mayor should happen every fortnight.
However, nothing is being done about it. A special budget meeting was held for budget approval.
The councillors are keen to address ward-specific concerns through regular House meetings."
Councillor Pardeep Padam said, "After the national conference of the ULB gets over, some of the councillors have decided to meet the mayor and MCG officials to push for the House meeting. It has been more than three months since we were elected, but a House meeting to discuss our ward issues has not taken place yet."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
20 minutes ago
- Mint
IT Act simplification to cut down litigation in a big way, to aid future reforms: Baijayant Panda
New Delhi: Simplification of the Income Tax Act for which a select committee of the Lok Sabha made over 330 recommendations will cut down tax litigation significantly and aid future tax reforms, the panel's chairperson Baijayant Panda told Mint in an interview. The select committee was set up for the purpose of scrutinizing the bill. The first draft of the bill tabled in the House in the Budget session of the House this year had sought to reduce the volume of words by nearly half while the Select Committee wanted to make sure the simplification exercise does not lead to wordings that are open to different interpretations, Panda said. The number of words has been lowered from over 500,000 to about 260,000. Override access code proposal accepted The chairperson said that the committee accepted the proposal in the draft bill regarding tax officials' powers to override access code in computers in the case of non-cooperating assesses under certain circumstances, as this did not entail any change in the law as it exists today, including judicial pronouncements and internal circulars of the Income Tax Department. The provision allowing tax officials to access computers and digital systems, even overriding their access code, when request for information is not complied with, in certain cases of undisclosed income or foreign assets, had caused concern among professionals. 'New India deserves a simple, easy-to-comprehend, easy-to-comply Income Tax Act and this is the first big step of simplifying the Act as it exists. The draft which the government had introduced in Parliament had already seen a huge simplification in terms of reduced word count, better clarity in language and removal of obsolete language in favour of more modern and concise wordings and tables and formulas to clarify certain aspects rather than describing them in words," Panda said. Also read | Income Tax Act revamp: Govt to set up panel to make law simpler for taxpayers Panda explained that the bill was not meant to make substantive changes to the law and the committee's mandate was to vet it for simplification. 'Our mandate was to make the Act as it exists, clear, simple and easy to comply," he said, adding that the committee received a lot of suggestions which were beyond the scope of its mandate and were seeking policy changes. Those could be taken up in different forums such as the annual Finance Bill every year. 'But what we have achieved is within our mandate." Panda explained that a lot of liberal and pro-taxpayer policy changes were being introduced from time to time by the government but many such measures were getting caught up in the complications of the tax law. 'Now, when this bill becomes a law and replaces the old Act, it will reduce ambiguity and it will reduce litigation dramatically because complexity is reduced vastly." 'The existing Act had become so complex that sometimes even very senior professionals with decades of experience could not give you a clear answer about the taxability of certain items. In the new bill, it becomes far simpler to understand what is taxable, what is not taxable and what is taxable at what rate," Panda said. 'Our mandate was to ensure that simplifying of the Act is internally consistent to avoid inadvertent errors that can creep in while language is changed." Examined extensively He explained that confusion about the search and seizure powers of tax officials as provided for in the bill was on account of 'misinformation". The committee had examined it extensively, he said. 'Let me make it very clear, there is no change in the law," Panda said, adding that some people were comparing the wordings in the existing law and the wording in the draft bill and thought there is a difference. 'The Income Tax Act dates back to 1961. On the issue of privacy and on the issue of search and seizure, there have been several judgments of High Courts and the Supreme Court. There have also been internal circulars about checks and balances; search and seizure cannot be subjective, cannot be whimsical. When you take the existing Act and court judgments leading to circulars--that is the existing law and that has been faithfully reproduced in the new bill." The law was written when there were no computers and when they came, accounts became electronic documents, Panda explained, adding that the same principle of search and seizure was extended and courts have ruled on it and the department has issued internal circulars on it. Also read | Redo the Income Tax Act not just to simplify but rationalize taxation Tax officials' powers to access documents of non-cooperating assessees under certain circumstances are the same whether these are digital or otherwise. 'To sum it up, the wording in the new draft bill faithfully reproduces the Act as it has been modified by court judgments and internal circulars. One thing is very clear, there is no policy change," said Panda. The committee held interactions with a wide range of stakeholders including large as well as small and medium enterprises, industry associations—not just the big ones, but even regional ones—lawyers and chartered accountants representing big and small firms and individual practitioners as well as taxpayers' associations and nonprofit organizations. "I will emphasize this point that this is a huge step for simplification, clarity, ease of compliance, reduced litigation, and it will make possible many more ongoing reforms in the years to come," Panda said. Also read | Nirmala Sitharaman reviews Income Tax Act 1961
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Cash-at-home row: Justice Varma removal notices handed; LS may initiate
MPs submit notices for removal of Justice Varma to LS Speaker NEW DELHI: Notices for the removal of Justice Yashwant Varma of Allahabad HC were submitted in both Houses of Parliament on Monday in what could potentially result in the first instance of a judge being benched for alleged misconduct. While 145 LS members, cutting across party lines, signed the notice, 63 members belonging to different parties made an identical move in RS. Sources said that both the Houses are on the same legal footing in this regard and proceedings are likely to be launched in Lok Sabha. 'Removal of judge will not be completed in current session' According to the Judges (Inquiry) Act, when notices of a motion are submitted on the same day in both Houses, a committee to examine the charges levelled against the judge will be constituted by LS Speaker and RS Chairman. The notable signatories to the LS notice, submitted to Speaker Om Birla, included leader of the opposition Rahul Gandhi, BJP MPs Ravi Shankar Prasad and Anurag Thakur, NCP-SP's Supriya Sule, Congress's K C Venugopal and K Suresh, DMK's T R Baalu, RSP member N K Premachandran and IUML member E T Mohammed Basheer. The notice signed by 63 opposition RS members was submitted to Upper House chairman Jagdeep Dhankhar who, before his shock resignation as vice-president, said he had received a notice for the removal of Justice Varma. 'It has been signed by more than 50 members of the council of states. Thus, it meets the numerical requirement of signing by MPs for setting in motion the process of removal of an HC judge,' Dhankhar said. On law minister Arjun Ram Meghwal's confirmation that a notice has also been submitted in LS, Dhankhar asked the RS secretary general to 'take necessary steps in this direction'. Hours after the opposition move, BJP also collected signatures of its RS members and those from its allies to file a notice. BJP sources said the opposition-sponsored notice in RS prompted the party to act as it did not want to be left out of the exercise in the Upper House. Party sources said they had no idea about the opposition's unilateral move as they cited their own bipartisan exercise in LS seeking signatures from all parties. Govt sources, however, confirmed that the matter will be taken up in LS first. Sources also confirmed that since the petition is set to be referred to a committee, the removal of the judge will not be completed in the current session. According to the Act, no committee shall be constituted unless the motion has been admitted in both Houses. The committee comprising a senior SC judge, a sitting HC chief justice and a distinguished jurist will then probe the charges levelled against Justice Varma and will be asked to come out with a report in three months. As sources indicated that LS is set to witness the motion first, this is the second time that a motion for the removal of a judge is being brought in the House after 32 years. In 1993, Justice V Ramaswami, an SC judge, faced a removal motion in LS.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Shock exit: Dhankhar quits as VP on first day of Parl session
Jagdeep Dhankhar NEW DELHI: It was business as usual till around 4pm for Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar. He presided over the opening day of the monsoon session of Rajya Sabha and attended a meeting of the business advisory committee of the House. At 3.53pm, a govt statement said the VP would be visiting Jaipur on Wednesday. Such a trip, while Parliament is in session, would have raised eyebrows. A few hours later, Dhankhar dropped a bombshell, abruptly announcing his resignation with immediate effect two years before his tumultous term was to end. "To prioritise health care and abide by medical advice, I hereby resign as Vice-President of India, effective immediately, in accordance with Article 67(a) of the Constitution," he wrote in his letter to President Droupadi Murmu. A shock exit The move immediately set off speculation about the real trigger, with many wondering as to the nature of the medical condition that necessitated his quitting the constitutional position, second only to the President in protocol. Few were convinced about the health explanation, particularly given that those who visited him in recent months detected signs that he was less than happy, even as he made it a point to swear by the present political leadership. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like This Could Be the Best Time to Trade Gold in 5 Years IC Markets Learn More Undo He underwent a cardiac procedure at AIIMS in March after he complained of uneasiness. On June 25, he had fainted while delivering a speech at Nainital. But he seemed to be in fine fettle on Monday, making his trademark interventions and betraying no sign of the graveness he invoked to explain his exit. Dhankhar, 74, assumed office in Aug 2022 and his tenure was till 2027.
