Half of SME housebuilders ‘to be bust by next election', report to warn
Half of Britain's 2,500 remaining smaller housebuilders could crash into insolvency by the end of this parliament as a consequence of the cost of industry regulations, a report will warn this week.
Sky News has seen a document to be published on Tuesday - ahead of the government's spending review - which will refer to "a perfect storm of costs" that threatens to wipe out the profits of SME housebuilders.
The bleak forecast is the principal conclusion of a report produced jointly by the public affairs firm WPI Strategy and ChamberlainWalker, an economics consultancy specialising in housing and planning.
It casts a fresh shadow over the government's target of building 1.5m homes during the course of this parliament - one of its most important manifesto commitments ahead of last year's landslide victory.
Money latest:
On Monday, ministers said the use of a new artificial intelligence tool would facilitate the acceleration of planning permissions by reducing the reliance on paper documents.
"For too long, our outdated planning system has held back our country- slowing down the development of vital infrastructure and making it harder to get the homes we need built," Sir Keir Starmer said.
"This government is working hand in hand with business to change that. With [new AI tool] Extract, we're harnessing the power of AI to help planning officers cut red tape, speed up decisions, and unlock the new homes for hard-working people as part of our Plan for Change.
"It's a bold step forward in our mission to build 1.5 million more homes and deliver a planning system that's fit for the 21st century."
The WPI/ChamberlainWalker report will warn, however, that at the current rate of failure among SME builders, as many as 75,000 fewer homes would be built by smaller housebuilders before the next general election is due to be held in 2029.
It will say that recently introduced regulations such as the Building Safety Levy have added close to £5bn of annual costs to housebuilders.
The Future Homes Standard, Biodiversity Net Gain, accessibility rules and electric vehicle charging requirements are among the other incremental costs facing the sector.
Labour and materials costs are also rising, while house prices have flatlined, adding to the pressure on the industry, with smaller players disproportionately affected, the report will add.
Sean Worth, a director at WPI Strategy, said: "A diverse range of housebuilders is important to ensuring the country is able to meet its headline housing target.
"It is also critical to maintaining a competitive market."
"The government has rightly acknowledged the importance of supporting small and medium sized builders.
"However, a perfect storm of costs inherited from the past few years as well as additional regulatory burdens means that without urgent assistance we could see half all of SME builders starting insolvency proceedings by the end of the parliament."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Times
36 minutes ago
- New York Times
NATO Chief Urges Members to Spend Far More on Military
The chief of NATO on Monday called on the alliance to make a 'quantum leap in our collective defense,' committing to increases in military spending that far outstrip what Britain and most other members have yet pledged. Speaking in London, Mark Rutte, NATO's secretary-general, laid bare the budget pressures that will face Britain and its European neighbors as they confront the aggression of Russia and the retrenchment of the United States. Mr. Rutte, a former prime minister of the Netherlands, is pushing for members to commit to spending 5 percent of their gross domestic product on military and defense-related activities, a target promoted by President Trump, who complains that the alliance has long unfairly burdened the United States. Mr. Rutte hopes to enshrine the new benchmark at a NATO summit meeting in The Hague on June 24 and 25. But he has yet to set a timeline for when members would be required to meet it — and the goal still seems elusive. Britain has pledged to increase military spending to 2.5 percent of gross domestic product by 2027, paid for by diverting funds from overseas aid. Prime Minister Keir Starmer has set a goal of 3 percent within a decade, though he has refused to give a more specific date without knowing where the money will come from. Ramping up to 5 percent, analysts say, would necessitate politically painful trade-offs for Britain, which is already dealing with straitened public finances. Britain currently spends 2.3 percent of its economic output on defense, more than France or Germany but less than the United States, at about 3.4 percent. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Nvidia Stock Gets Revived, Joins Others On Elite List
Nvidia stock is Monday's pick for IBD 50 Growth Stocks To Watch as the specialty chip designer is back on the elite list after a hiatus. Nvidia stock has inched its way into the last slot on the list of high-performing 50 names. Chief Executive Jensen Huang joined U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer in kicking off London Tech Week.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
What UK's Strategic Defense Review means for Ukraine
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced on June 2 that the United Kingdom is moving to "warfighting readiness," in large part in response to the full-scale invasion of Ukraine and the threat Russia poses to Europe. He made the comment as his government unveiled its latest Strategic Defense Review, which U.K. General Richard Barrons, one of the review's authors, described as the "most profound" change in U.K. defense in 150 years. The review sets out ambitious new targets, including at least 12 new attack submarines, fleets of drones and autonomous vehicles, as well as 7,000 new long-range weapons. Yet it also comes with urgent warnings. The review reveals that the U.K.'s Armed Forces are currently unprepared to fight adversaries such as Russia or China, nor could they conduct high-intensity warfare in a war like that in Ukraine. Insufficient munition stockpiles, low troop numbers, and ageing equipment are just a few of the weaknesses underpinning its assessment. "The speed of development in Ukraine is so far ahead of what countries like the U.K. is capable of." But as well as committing to bolstering its own defense capabilities, the U.K. must also manage the commitments already made to Kyiv, which it has vowed to support with a "100-year partnership." The U.K. has been one of Kyiv's closest supporters since the start of the full-scale invasion, and the review reiterates long-term support for Ukraine, committing 3 billion pounds ($4.06 billion) annually in military aid. "The bottom line is that all of this is about defending the U.K. after the conflict moves on from Ukraine primarily," Keir Giles, a senior consulting fellow at Chatham House, a U.K.-based think tank, told the Kyiv Independent. "Whether it's positive, negative, or catastrophic, either way, that's when the U.K. and its allies need to be ready for Russia's next move." The U.K. wants to create a more flexible procurement process, as demonstrated by that developed by Ukraine throughout the full-scale invasion, a dynamic it says would be vital should the U.K. deploy troops in support of a ceasefire. The review urges deeper defense industrial collaboration, including joint ventures and helping Ukraine access global markets, as well as rebuilding and sustaining its defense sector. This could include helping Ukraine service Soviet-era equipment still used abroad. The U.K. also aims to learn from Ukraine's experience in modern warfare, particularly in land combat, drones, and hybrid threats. However, the review highlights challenges — U.K. stockpiles of weapons such as Storm Shadow long-range missiles have been depleted through its support to Ukraine, and years of underinvestment have weakened domestic defense capacity. The U.K. has announced that it will build six new munition factories. This indicates a significant attempt to address one of the key criticisms of European defense, which is its lack of industrial base and reliance on U.S. support. While U.K. Defense Secretary John Healey has said that "we should expect to see new factories opening very soon," it is not clear how quickly this will translate into meaningful battlefield assistance for Ukraine's Armed Forces. "The speed of development in Ukraine is so far ahead of what countries like the U.K. are capable of, the best-case outcome for Ukraine would just be sending the money there to build stuff," Giles said. When asked how Ukraine could be best supported outside of the recommendations in the review, Giles said the "maximum support" should be given to Ukraine, without the hesitancy about doing damage to Russia." We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.