logo
Hong Kong needs to better understand and balance ‘one country, two systems'

Hong Kong needs to better understand and balance ‘one country, two systems'

Jiang Enzhu , the first head of the central government's liaison office in post-handover Hong Kong, famously likened understanding the city to reading a challenging book – one that demands serious attention and effort. At the time, his words served as a cautionary note to mainland officials.
Now, Hong Kong having marked the
28th anniversary of its return to Chinese sovereignty, Jiang's analogy remains apt, though with a significant caveat. The city may still be a book that is difficult to decipher, but today's Chinese officials may not share Jiang's eagerness to truly grasp its complexities.
The metaphor applies both ways: for many Hong Kong residents, the intricacies of Chinese politics have proven to be just as challenging to interpret. Fully appreciating this dynamic in cross-border relations is essential to understanding what has gone awry in Hong Kong and to contemplating its future.
The stakes are high. The city stands at a critical juncture. The 'one country, two systems' principle guarantees Hong Kong a high degree of autonomy and a capitalist system for 50 years. With just 22 years remaining, the city has come under increasing
international scrutiny
We can lay to rest an enduring myth from the early years: that physical proximity, coupled with the daily flow of people, goods and investment, would naturally foster deeper understanding between Hong Kong and the mainland. This assumption presumes that Hong Kong residents should possess a sophisticated grasp of Chinese politics, while Beijing should, in turn, appreciate Hong Kong's unique cultural and economic identity.
The years have shown that reality is far more complex. Mutual understanding has arguably not deepened. If anything, misunderstandings, misjudgments and missteps by both sides have further complicated the relationship.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hong Kong's necessary step forward on same-sex partnerships
Hong Kong's necessary step forward on same-sex partnerships

South China Morning Post

timean hour ago

  • South China Morning Post

Hong Kong's necessary step forward on same-sex partnerships

Feel strongly about these letters, or any other aspects of the news? Share your views by emailing us your Letter to the Editor at letters@ or filling in this Google form . Submissions should not exceed 400 words, and must include your full name and address, plus a phone number for verification Two years after the Court of Final Appeal's landmark ruling, the government has finally unveiled its proposal to recognise same-sex partnerships. While this represents a welcome, though cautious, step forward, it falls short of the comprehensive equality envisioned by the court. The proposal's limitations are glaring. It grants only a narrow set of rights, such as the right to make medical decisions. Most puzzling is the requirement that couples must have registered their union overseas. This stipulation is both arbitrary and counterproductive. The government has already laid out specific criteria for recognition; adding a foreign registration requirement serves no real purpose, except to invite further legal disputes. Despite these shortcomings, the proposal is a necessary first step. Yet it has already drawn criticism from conservative lawmakers, who said it would threaten traditional family values. Such claims are misleading. The government is not introducing same-sex marriage, but establishing a separate partnership registry in compliance with the court's ruling. This is about fulfilling a legal obligation, not redefining marriage. Since decriminalising homosexuality, Hong Kong has made meaningful strides towards greater inclusion. At its heart, this issue is about fairness. Regardless of the ongoing debate over specific rights, the principle is clear: same-sex couples deserve legal protection of their human dignity. It is time for both the government and society to meet that responsibility.

Listed Chinese companies to shell out US$419 billion in dividends this year: Goldman Sachs
Listed Chinese companies to shell out US$419 billion in dividends this year: Goldman Sachs

South China Morning Post

timean hour ago

  • South China Morning Post

Listed Chinese companies to shell out US$419 billion in dividends this year: Goldman Sachs

Advertisement That would represent a 10 per cent increase from 2024, when more than 4,300 companies listed in Hong Kong, the US and on the mainland paid out a record 2.7 trillion yuan in dividends, according to a report published on Sunday by the American investment bank. The improvement was largely driven by a push from Beijing last year requiring listed companies to pay dividends multiple times a year to improve investor confidence. Following a prolonged slump in the stock market, the State Council released policy guidelines in April 2024 to strengthen the oversight of new listings, restrict share sales by major shareholders and encourage long-term capital inflows into the market. Authorities also restricted major shareholders from selling stakes if their companies failed to meet dividend payout requirements. As a result, more than 200 companies initiated dividend payments for the first time since 2020 and 1,080 companies listed on the mainland paid midterm or special dividends in 2024, Goldman said. A total of 5,420 companies were listed in Shanghai, Shenzhen and Beijing at the end of April, according to the latest data from the China Association for Public Companies. Advertisement The dividend payout ratio reached 39 per cent, up from 37 per cent in 2023 and a 10-year average of 31 per cent, the bank said.

Li Qiang urges Brics collective action against backdrop of Trump tariff threats
Li Qiang urges Brics collective action against backdrop of Trump tariff threats

South China Morning Post

timean hour ago

  • South China Morning Post

Li Qiang urges Brics collective action against backdrop of Trump tariff threats

'As the leading bloc of the Global South, Brics countries should … strive to be a pioneering force in advancing the reform of global governance,' Li said in a speech during a plenary session at the 17th Brics summit on Sunday. The premier said member states should uphold independence, show a sense of responsibility and take greater action to build consensus and pool their strengths, the premier said. Li said Brics nations must also stand firm in upholding justice while preserving global peace and stability, championing the peaceful settlement of disputes through solutions that consider the unique aspects of each issue and address underlying causes. 01:33 Following US-Vietnam agreement, China says it opposes deals that hurt its interests Following US-Vietnam agreement, China says it opposes deals that hurt its interests Widely perceived as a direct challenge to the Western-led world order, Li called for improving global governance amid a countdown to the end of a temporary tariff truce with the US, which runs out on Wednesday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store