Palestinians must be given the chance to rebuild Gaza
https://arab.news/9446j
Does US President Donald Trump have a point? To an extent, maybe. Gaza is a 'hellhole.' In fact, it has been a hellhole for years as a result of previous Israeli bombardments. Rebuilding Gaza will be some challenge. The UN estimates there is about 50 million tonnes of rubble, intermingled with an array of unexploded ordnance. Technically, it would be easier to empty Gaza temporarily.
The trouble is that this was not what Trump was suggesting. Trump wants a Palestinian-free Gaza to indulge his real estate dreams. He made it clear Palestinians would not be allowed to return — a violation of international law constituting the forced displacement of a civilian population. This plan exhibits no understanding of the historical Palestinian experience, whereby 70 percent of the Palestinian population became refugees between 1947 and 1949, hundreds of thousands were displaced again in 1967 and, during the last 16 months, 90 percent of the population of Gaza was again forcibly displaced. This was no great humanitarian proposal, as the White House tried to make out.
Palestinians have long demonstrated a determination not to be forcibly displaced yet again. It is their right to stay on the land. They show no signs of leaving it.
Anti-Palestinian groups argue that Palestinians in Gaza could leave voluntarily. There can be nothing voluntary about leaving in a situation where they have already been bombed and starved into near-oblivion.
This dream was not an off-the-cuff moment. Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner made similar comments about cleaning up Gaza last year. Trump was shown ambitious plans for the Gaza riviera development that were devised by an economics professor at George Washington University, Joseph Pelzman.
Why can Palestinians not dream of their riviera on the Mediterranean in Gaza? Is this so outlandish?
Just as most of the world argued that any solution for the Syrian Arab Republic must be Syrian-led, any solution for Palestine has to be Palestinian-led. Gaza is for Palestinians and all designs on the future of the Strip must be devised by them, for them and with them. Pelzman's paper was decidedly not this and it reads as if it had been drafted by a committee of Israeli settler pogromists. It states that the administration of Gaza would be 'subcontracted to the selected investors and/or their representatives.' The education curriculum would be based on those from other states.
Gaza is for Palestinians and all designs on the future of the Strip must be devised by them, for them and with them
Chris Doyle
Arab states are hurriedly devising their own plans. This includes the state of Palestine. This is vital given the need to demonstrate that there is a workable alternative — and there certainly is — to the suggestions emanating from the White House.
The costs will be astronomic — the UN estimates about $50 billion. However, until a proper assessment is carried out, it is only educated guesswork.
No donor state will fund this, nor will private businesses invest unless there are cast-iron guarantees that Israel will not flatten Gaza again. Who would even dare to suggest that Israel pays compensation, let alone contribute to the reconstruction costs, as it should?
It should be understood that Gaza was not, as Trump described, a 'demolition site.' It has been bombarded into rubble as a deliberate Israeli strategy. Israel has a responsibility, though few suggest that Israel should offer temporary shelter to Palestinians with no homes.
Reconstruction requires the blockade to be lifted and the unimpeded entry of construction materials and equipment. The dual-use system Israel enforces has to be ditched, as it prevents the import of essential construction materials. The systematic Israeli destruction of the healthcare system means that hospitals need to be rebuilt. The Israeli-orchestrated scholasticide also saw the bombing of every single university site in Gaza, while 87 percent of schools have been damaged or destroyed. This means that the education system also needs to be rebuilt. The entire water, sanitation and power infrastructure has to be rebuilt. To encourage the return of proper economic life in Gaza, which has been throttled by decades of occupation and siege, it needs a port, an airport and safe passage to the West Bank, all of which were agreed to under the Oslo Accords.
The political system needs to be rebuilt too. It requires a Palestinian administration in Gaza that, first and foremost, has the support of Palestinians. It also has to attract the confidence of the international community. This is unlikely to be Hamas. So, who? A refreshed Palestinian political order is a medium- to long-term project for Palestinians, but a technocratic government would be a start.
Israel should not have a veto, nor should the US. If Israel wants security and not territory, then a thriving Gaza is definitely in its best interest.
Palestinians are capable of rebuilding Gaza themselves, if permitted, although genuine international assistance would be welcome. They have the skills, the motivation and the experience. But they cannot do this with the dead weight of the Israeli occupation blunting any endeavor.
• Chris Doyle is director of the Council for Arab-British Understanding in London. X: @Doylech
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
23 minutes ago
- Al Arabiya
Texas to deploy National Guard to ‘maintain order' after protests: Governor
Texas will deploy its National Guard in the US state to 'maintain order,' its Republican governor said late Tuesday, after protests against immigration arrests prompted President Donald Trump to send troops to Los Angeles to back federal law enforcement. 'Texas National Guard will be deployed to locations across the state to ensure peace & order. Peaceful protest is legal. Harming a person or property is illegal & will lead to arrest,' Governor Greg Abbott wrote on X. '@TexasGuard will use every tool & strategy to help law enforcement maintain order.'
Arab News
27 minutes ago
- Arab News
Oil Updates — crude gains while markets assess US-China trade talks outcome
TOKYO: Oil prices softened on Wednesday as markets assessed the outcome of US-China trade talks, yet to be reviewed by President Donald Trump, with weak oil demand from China and OPEC+ production increases weighing on the market. Brent crude futures declined 15 cents, or 0.2 percent, to trade at $66.72 a barrel, while US West Texas Intermediate crude fell 10 cents, or 0.2 percent, to $64.88 at 9:44 a.m. Saudi time. US and Chinese officials agreed on a framework to put their trade truce back on track and resolve China's export restrictions on rare earth minerals and magnets, US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said on Tuesday at the conclusion of two days of intense negotiations in London. The two countries are world's two largest economies and oil consumers. 'The current (price) corrections can be attributed to a mix of technical profit-taking and caution leading up to the US-China (official) announcement,' said Phillip Nova, senior market analyst Priyanka Sachdeva. Trump will be briefed on the outcome before approving it, Lutnick added. 'In terms of what it means for crude oil, I think it removes some downside risks, particularly to the Chinese economy and steadies the ship for the US economy — both of which should be supportive for crude oil demand and the price,' said Tony Sycamore, a market analyst for IG. On the supply side, OPEC+, which includes the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries plus allies such as Russia, plans to increase oil production by 411,000 barrels per day in July as it looks to unwind production cuts for a fourth straight month, with some analysts not expecting regional demand to soak up these excess barrels. 'Greater oil demand within OPEC+ economies – most notably Saudi Arabia – could offset additional supply from the group over the coming months and support oil prices,' said Capital Economics' climate and commodities economist Hamad Hussain in a note. 'However, given that any boost to demand will be seasonal, we still think that Brent crude prices will fall to $60 (a barrel) by the end of this year.' Later on Wednesday, markets will be focusing on the weekly US oil inventories report from the Energy Information Administration, the statistical arm of the US Department of Energy. US crude oil stocks fell by 370,000 barrels last week, according to market sources who cited American Petroleum Institute figures on Tuesday. Analysts polled by Reuters on Monday expected that the EIA report will show US crude oil stockpiles fell by 2 million barrels in the week to June 6, while distillate and gasoline inventories likely rose.
Asharq Al-Awsat
an hour ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
US, Iran Agree to Hold 6th Round of Indirect Talks
US President Donald Trump said on Tuesday that Iran's recent posture in nuclear negotiations has grown 'much more aggressive,' just days before the sixth round of indirect talks is set to take place on Sunday in Muscat, Oman. While Trump said the next round of talks would take place on Thursday, a senior Iranian official and a US official said Thursday was unlikely. Iran and the US have already held five rounds of talks mediated by Oman. And while Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei said Tehran and Washington will hold the newest round of talks in Muscat next Sunday, Iran's top negotiator, Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, will be attending the annual Oslo Forum in Norway on Thursday, his office said. 'The US proposal is not acceptable to us. It was not the result of previous rounds of negotiations. We will present our own proposal to the other side via Oman after it is finalized. This proposal is reasonable, logical, and balanced,' Baghaei said. 'We must ensure before the lifting of sanctions that Iran will effectively benefit economically and that its banking and trade relations with other countries will return to normal,' he added. Trump said that the next round of talks could make it clear if a nuclear deal is possible to avoid military action. He told reporters at the White House on Monday that Iran appeared to have rejected a key element of an American proposal aimed at breaking the deadlock in the negotiations over the future of the country's nuclear program. 'They're just asking for things that you can't do,' Trump said at the end of an economic event with business and Wall Street leaders. 'They don't want to give up what they have to give up. You know what that is: They seek enrichment.' Trump also told reporters: 'We can't have enrichment. We want just the opposite, and so far, they're not there. I hate to say that, because the alternative is a very, very dire one.' At the same White House event, Trump said he had a telephone conversation on Monday evening with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. One day prior to his phone call with the Israeli PM, Trump and his entire top foreign policy team huddled in Camp David for hours on Sunday to discuss US strategy on the Iran nuclear crisis and the war in Gaza, two US officials and another source with knowledge told Axios. A senior US official told Axios the president sees both crises as intertwined and part of a broader regional reality he is trying to shape. Tehran has defended its right to enrich uranium as 'non-negotiable,' while Washington called any Iranian enrichment a 'red line.' Meanwhile, Washington's ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, told Bloomberg on Tuesday that Trump will not allow Iran to enrich uranium. Huckabee said 'there's nothing's off the table,' when asked whether military action was on the table if negotiations failed. On Tuesday, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi reiterated criticism of a plan by European powers (France, Germany, the UK) and the US to adopt a resolution at the IAEA meeting that would accuse Tehran of non-compliance with nuclear obligations. 'Any ill-considered and destructive decision in the Board of Governors against Iran will be met with an appropriate response,' Araghchi said during a phone call with Japanese Foreign Minister Takeshi Iwaya. The Japanese Foreign Ministry then said Iwaya and Araghchi had a candid exchange of views on Iran's nuclear issue. 'Iwaya emphasized that Japan strongly hopes for a peaceful resolution of the issue and that Iran should not miss the opportunity for an agreement between the United States and Iran,' the Ministry statement said. In Tehran, Iranian lawmakers said in a statement on Tuesday that the United States and Israel are seeking to turn nuclear talks into a 'strategic trap' for Iran. 'The US is not serious in negotiations at all. It has set the goal of talks as imposing its demands and has adopted offensive positions that are diametrically opposed to Iranians' inalienable rights,' the statement from parliamentarians said. 'The only acceptable deal is one that permanently lifts all sanctions with the aim of achieving economic benefits for Iran,' lawmakers added in their statement.
