Applegreen to invest $750m in Massachusetts motorway service stations under 35-year deal
, the Irish fuel forecourt retail group, has been awarded a 35-year contract to operate 18 motorway service areas in Massachusetts.
Under the deal it will invest more than $750 million (€654 million) in the network.
The group, backed by US private equity giant
Blackstone
, will spend the money replacing buildings at nine plazas and carrying out major renovations of the others, US news media reported. This would make it the biggest spending project Applegreen has entered into in the US.
The company will have the contract to operate the restaurants, cafes and shops at the plazas and to sell fuel and operate electric-vehicle (EV) charging sites at each location.
READ MORE
It will pay up to $994 million in rent to the State of Massachusetts during the 35-year deal, reports said.
Of the 18 service stations, 11 are on the longest motorway in the state, known as the Massachusetts Turnpike, which spans 222km and was opened in 1957.
Applegreen beat two other final-round bidders for the contract. Fuel supplier Global Partners had been seen as the favourite to be selected by the Massachusetts Department of Transport (MassDOT).
'We're thrilled to have the opportunity to work with the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and MassDOT to improve the travel experiences of drivers across Massachusetts for years to come,' a spokesman for Applegreen said.
Applegreen entered US market in 2014 when it bought two sites in Long Island.
In 2020, the group was part of a consortium that signed a 33-year lease to refurbish and operate 27 motorway plazas on New York Thruway, a system of toll roads within the State of New York. It does not have the fuel sale element of that deal.
Applegreen runs more than 100 US motorway service areas, where it operates restaurant and cafe brands such as Burger King, Shake Shack, Chick-fil-A, Popeyes, Starbucks, Dunkin', Panera Bread and Panda Express.
The company was founded by Robert Etchingham in 1992 with one station in Ballyfermot, west Dublin. It now has almost 200 locations in the Irish market. The company typically invests more than €30 million a year in the Irish market on store openings, upgrades and improvement.
Applegreen was taken private from the stock market in March 2021 by Blackstone in a €718 million deal that saw Mr Etchingham and long-standing executive Joe Barrett retain a combined 42.5 per cent stake in the group.
The company's then independent directors decided unanimously to recommend the takeover bid for the group, arguing it faced borrowing constraints as a listed company as it faced large investments in electric car-charging facilities and US highway service areas.
Applegreen agreed this year to sell its UK filling station business to UK rival EG On The Move for an undisclosed sum. That business had 98 sites. The company said it would use the proceeds from the transaction to invest in its business in Ireland, the UK and US.
The deal did not affect Applegreen's Welcome Break motorway service business in the UK, which also has a network of 31 hotels.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
7 hours ago
- Irish Times
US government investment in Intel looks bad for Leixlip
Intel is getting the Donald Trump treatment. Two weeks ago, the president of the United States called for the resignation of Lip-Bu Tan , the recently appointed chief executive of America's flagship microchip maker. 'The CEO of INTEL is highly CONFLICTED and must resign, immediately. There is no other solution to this problem,' he blasted on his Truth Social account. The reason being the connections of Tan – a US citizen born in Malaysia – to China, including the sale of chip design products to a Chinese military university by one of his businesses, Cadence. The writing was on the wall for Tan, but four days later he was invited to the White House. All talk of his resignation evaporated and was replaced by the suggestion that the US government would take a direct stake in Intel as it tries to reinvent itself, having missed out on the boom in chips to power artificial intelligence. Depending on where you stand on Trump, the proposal is either further evidence of his business acumen and deal-making skills or more proof of his erratic temperament and general unsuitability for office. READ MORE Few details have emerged of the proposed investment, but Intel shares – which have lost half their value over the past couple of years – are up strongly on the news. It's hard to gauge what the consequences of the investment would be for Intel's Irish operation in Leixlip, which seems to have escaped the worst of the cost-cutting measures introduced by Tan when he took over in March (although it was reported in July that almost 200 mandatory redundancies would be implemented this year at the Leixlip plant). [ Trump administration in talks to take 10% stake in Intel Opens in new window ] The best guide is the deal that Trump made to allow Japan's Nippon Steel take over US Steel, the iconic American steelmaker. Trump insisted on the federal government getting a so-called golden share, which gives it the right to appoint an independent director and also a veto over some investment decisions. These include the transfer of production and jobs outside of the US as well as 'certain decisions on closure or idling of US Steel's existing US manufacturing facilities, trade, labour and sourcing outside of the United States'. There are cosmetic measures such as keeping the name US Steel, but the import of the agreement is clear. It is to safeguard US jobs and maintain domestic capacity in a strategic industry in the interest of national security. It is hard to see how a significant investment in Intel – which is also being promoted on national security grounds – could come without similar strings attached, which in turn would have to militate against significant new investment in Leixlip. If the rationale for the US government taking a significant stake in Intel is to ensure that the country boosts domestic chip-making capacity, why put money into Ireland? The ability of Intel to resist Trump's overture – even if it wanted to – is limited. The company is haemorrhaging cash and before Tan's appointment was contemplating splitting off its chip-making arm to focus on chip design. This is the model adopted by more successful rivals who have wiped it eye on AI chips. Tan seems committed to staying in the chip-making business although he has made this contingent on finding customers for its two latest chip-manufacturing processes known as 18A and 14A. Both processes are based in domestic plants in Oregon and Arizona, which received billions of dollars' worth of investment under the Chips Act brought in by the Biden administration. The Act aimed to bolster domestic chip manufacturing. Leixlip has been touted as a possible site for 18A manufacturing but there does not seem to be any progress in that regard. To date, Intel has failed to find enough third-party customers for its new manufacturing processes and remains its own biggest customer. Unless it can find more customers, its business model is simply not viable, hence the weakness of its share price over the past two years. The presumption is that once the US government is on board as a shareholder – a 10 per cent stake worth about €10 billion has been touted – Trump will pressurise other US companies such as Apple and Qualcomm to become customers of Intel. They currently source chips from manufacturers in Japan and Taiwan. The jump in Intel's share price and the decision by Softbank to take a 2 per cent stake in the business on Monday reflects the obvious short-term benefits of the Trump administration bullying other US firms to become its customers. More red-blooded capitalists have warned that the US will fall into the nationalisation trap whereby a government decision to prop up an uncompetitive national champion weakens the economy long term. But if things continue to unfold in this way, it looks likely that Intel's Leixlip plant will, at best, be left to wither on the vine as future investment is focused on boosting manufacturing capacity in the US. Alternatively, Trump could change his mind in the morning.
Irish Times
a day ago
- Irish Times
Short sellers ridicule fund managers' vanishing attention spans
A new study of short sellers paints an unflattering portrait of the professional investors entrusted with others' money . The study, Short Sellers' Information Acquisition, interviews nine prominent short sellers and analyses 820 short reports. It confirms shorts are informed and skilled, yet much of their work simply re-examines public filings overlooked by other professionals, exposing how often investing experts miss the obvious. Their edge lies less in uncovering new facts than in presenting evidence clearly. 'The best points come first', says Blue Orca Capital's Soren Aandahl. READ MORE 'The collective attention span of market participants is horrible and has gotten worse over time. A few years ago, I would write an 80-page short report. Today, I laugh at that. No one gives a flying rat's ass about 80 pages.' Concurring, another interviewee says less powerful information 'dilutes the powerful information. Let's say there's evidence of fraud, but then you add some minor issues – it makes the fraud evidence less powerful'. Reports must be concise, their points distilled to survive a skim-happy readership. Muddy Waters Capital's Carson Block describes his audience as 'hostile … They want you to be wrong'. Shorts must 'break through this hostility and make them realise they've been misled by the company's management'. For short sellers, the challenge is less uncovering fraud than navigating a market that can be lazy, inattentive, and too quick to trust company claims.
Irish Times
2 days ago
- Irish Times
Trump administration in talks to take 10% stake in Intel
The Trump administration is in discussions to take a stake of about 10 per cent in Intel, according to a White House official and other people familiar with the matter, in a move that could see the US become the beleaguered chipmaker's largest shareholder. The US government is considering a potential investment in Intel that would involve converting some or all of the company's grants from the US Chips and Science Act into equity, said the people, who asked not to be identified because the information is confidential. Intel has been slated to receive a combined $10.9 billion in Chips Act grants for commercial and military production. That figure is roughly enough to pay for the targeted holding. At Intel's current market value, a 10 per cent stake in the chipmaker would be worth roughly $10.5 billion. The exact size of the stake, as well as whether the White House chooses to move ahead with the plan, is still in flux, the people said. Intel shares dropped as much as 5.5 per cent after Bloomberg reported on the talks Monday. They had climbed 23 per cent last week for their best weekly gain since February. White House spokesman Kush Desai declined to comment on the specifics of the discussions, saying only that no deal is official until it's announced by the administration. Intel didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. The White House official also floated the possibility that the administration could convert other Chips Act awards into equity stakes. It's not clear whether that idea has gained traction broadly within the administration or whether officials have broached the possibility with any companies that could be affected. Last month, in an unprecedented move, the Defense Department said it will take a $400 million preferred equity stake in the little-known US rare-earth producer MP Materials – a deal that would make the Pentagon the company's largest shareholder. News of a potential government investment in Intel kicked off a rally in the company's shares after Bloomberg News first reported the discussions among US officials and company representatives last week. As is the case for all Chips Act winners, Intel's grant money was originally designed to be disbursed over time as the company hits negotiated project milestones. Intel had received $2.2 billion in grant disbursements as of January. It's unclear whether that $2.2 billion would be included in the possible equity stake, whether the company has received additional tranches of its award since President Donald Trump took office, and on what timeline Intel would receive money under a possible equity stake. – Bloomberg
