Putin, Macron discuss Iran, Ukraine in first phone call in nearly three years
In Paris, Macron's office said the call lasted two hours and that the French leader had called for a ceasefire in Ukraine and the start of negotiations on ending the conflict.
A French diplomatic source said Macron had talked to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy before and after his call with Putin to brief him on the talks. Macron also talked to U.S. President Donald Trump about the exchange.
According to the Kremlin press service, Putin said it was necessary to respect Iran's right to the peaceful development of nuclear energy as well as its continued compliance with its obligations under the nuclear nonproliferation treaty.
The French president's office said Macron, who sees the Iranian nuclear threat as sufficiently serious to justify the involvement of all five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council, had also stressed the need for Iran to cooperate fully with the International Atomic Energy Agency.
Iran's parliament approved a bill last month to suspend cooperation with the IAEA, the U.N.'s nuclear watchdog, after Israel and the United States bombed Iran's nuclear sites, aiming to prevent Tehran from acquiring a nuclear weapon. Iran has denied seeking one.
Macron "expressed his determination to seek a diplomatic solution that would lead to a lasting and rigorous resolution of the nuclear issue, the question of Iran's missiles, and its role in the region," his office said, adding that the two leaders had decided to "coordinate" their efforts.
France and Russia are both permanent members of the U.N. Security Council.
On Ukraine, Putin reiterated his position to Macron that the war was "a direct consequence of the West's policy," which he said had "ignored Russia's security interests" over the past few years.
Any possible peace agreement between Russia and Ukraine should have a "comprehensive and long-term character" and be based on "new territorial realities," the Kremlin quoted Putin as saying.
Putin has previously said Ukraine must accept Russia's annexation of swaths of its territory as part of any peace deal.
Macron has said Ukraine alone should decide on whether or not to accept territorial concessions.
During Tuesday's call, Macron's office said, "the president emphasised France's unwavering support for Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity."
Macron and Putin aim to continue their discussions on Ukraine and Iran, the French president's office said.
Macron and Putin held regular discussions around the start of Russia's invasion of Ukraine, which was criticised by some European allies, with Macron also visiting Putin in Russia shortly before the invasion in February 2022.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
In Gaza we watched Iranian missiles go by, heading for Israel. That war is over – it seems ours will never end
Last Tuesday night, Donald Trump announced on social media that Iran and Israel had agreed to a ceasefire, ending what he called a '12-day war'. It was the second war this year, after India and Pakistan's four-day conflict, to start and end under Trump's watch. They followed another, earlier conflict between Lebanon and Israel during President Joe Biden's term. Here in Gaza, all eyes were fixed on the Iran-Israel conflict. Even cut off from the internet, people found ways to follow the news – on the radio, or by catching weak phone signals by climbing to high rooftops or walking near the sea, or just by staying up all night watching the sky, where some of the missiles launched from Iran could be seen from Gaza. Many wondered if Trump, the man who once promised to stop 'endless wars', would seize the moment to stop not only war on Iran but also the genocide in Gaza. For 12 days, we finally witnessed a real power in the world enter a war with Israel, the same country that has starved us, bombed us and killed us. But does that really make any difference for us in Gaza? Even if Israel were bombed by Iran until the last day of our lives, nothing would bring back our beloved ones, our homes, our warm city. Two years of our lives have passed like decades. But in just 12 days, that war was over. Trump declared the strikes a complete success against a 'nuclear threat', even as international inspectors disagreed. The assault on Iran has ended. The assault on Gaza, the tiny coastal strip with no army and no air force, hasn't. Trump has brought no change for us. No relief. Only escalation. In just six months, he has failed – or rather, never even tried – to end the war in Gaza. On the contrary, he has become one of its main enablers, sending Israel all the weapons it needs to keep it going. And yet, he offers statements of optimism, claiming that 'I think great progress is being made on Gaza' and that his special envoy Steve Witkoff had told him 'Gaza is very close.' Similar optimism was expressed one month ago, when Witkoff spoke of having 'very good feelings' about the chances for reaching a temporary ceasefire. A ceasefire that, ultimately, never materialised. I remember the early months of the war when my little sister asked: 'Why do their wars end so quickly? Why is Gaza the exception?' These questions echo through every household in Gaza. Back then, we believed it was just a matter of time; that international law would step in. But over more than 600 days we have seen the same pattern repeat again and again – destruction, death, then negotiations, ceasefire talks, 'breakthroughs', then more deaths. Delegations fly to Doha and return empty-handed. This isn't because peace is impossible. This is because the genocide in Gaza doesn't inflict real political or economic costs on those in power. Unlike Iran, Gaza poses no strategic threat; it cannot block trade routes such as the strait of Hormuz, nor does it have the means to inflict meaningful damage on Israel. The international pressure is weak, mostly limited to statements rather than sanctions, and thus easily ignored. For Israel's leadership, peace in Gaza simply isn't profitable. In fact, continued assault serves political interests, especially those of the prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, who is doing everything he can to avoid early elections while he faces corruption charges, which he denies. We've come to understand the bitter truth: our lives are conditional. Our dreams, our futures – all worthless unless they serve geopolitical interests. Our suffering is tolerated. Our justice, indefinitely delayed. Famine and malnutrition are now widespread. Electricity has been cut for nearly two years. Generations of students have lost access to education. Municipalities have collapsed. The healthcare system is overwhelmed. Daily life has disintegrated. Gaza's streets, once calm, are now haunted by fear. Bombings are no longer the only threat: at night, people face theft, assault or even murder. Lawlessness is growing. Gangs operate openly. Israel shows no interest in restoring order. Chaos serves it better. Look into people's eyes. In everyone, from the smallest child to the oldest grandparent, you'll see blank stares, hollow gazes. Eyes stripped of light. Waiting. Not necessarily for death, but for something to end. Gaza longs for what all people long for – to breathe, to live, for peace. But real peace cannot be declared from podiums while bombs fall from planes. It cannot be promised in speeches while crossings stay closed. It cannot exist without an immediate, unbroken ceasefire. A ceasefire that would allow Gaza's sky at sunset to be dotted with children's kites floating gently over the rubble. For a moment, they would watch them fly and think: maybe not everything up there means death. Maybe, just maybe, there's an angel, too. All we want is what all people want: for this nightmare to end. For warplanes to leave. For tents to become safe, warm homes again. For the soft coastal breeze to blow away the smell of blood. And maybe justice is not scheduled for today. But I still believe: one day, we will see it. Hassan Abo Qamar is a Palestinian writer and journalist based in Gaza Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.
Telegraph
5 hours ago
- Telegraph
Migrants could be barred from asylum in Britain under deal with France
Channel migrants could be barred from claiming asylum in the UK under plans for a 'one-in, one-out' returns deal with France. The two countries are preparing to announce a deal where the French take back migrants who have illegally crossed the Channel in small boats, while the UK accepts a similar number of asylum seekers from France. This so-called 'one-in, one-out' agreement is an attempt to break the business model of the people-smuggling gangs by showing that migrants will be returned to France once they reach UK shores. In order to return the migrants to France, however, immigration advisers say that ministers will be required to deny them the right to claim asylum in the UK. It comes as the number of migrants crossing the Channel this year passed the 20,000 mark, a new record for the first half of the year. On Tuesday, the Home Office confirmed 19,982 migrants had arrived by the end of June, 48 per cent higher than the same point last year. One option for returning migrants would be to use the Tories' 2022 Nationality and Borders Act, which allows the Government to declare a Channel migrant's asylum claim inadmissible, specifically when a person has a connection to a safe third country, according to legal experts. This means that the UK could deem a claim inadmissible if the migrant had travelled through France, a safe country to which they could be returned. Under the deal, there would be a parallel process in France where a joint UK-French system would be set up to identify asylum seekers who could come to the UK. Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, is thought to believe migrants in France with a family connection in the UK should be prioritised. Some experts, however, believe that the process confirming family links could be complex and have suggested it would be more practicable to target migrants from countries with high rates of asylum grants. The scheme is said by sources to be 'evolving' and 'a work in progress', but there are hopes it could be trailed at next week's Anglo-French summit from July 8 to 10, when President Emmanuel Macron comes to London for his state visit. It would be a major breakthrough after Brexit killed off a previous returns agreement with the EU. The Government is proposing to pilot the scheme to iron out any problems. It is unclear how long it could take to declare Channel migrants' asylum claims inadmissible and give them an opportunity to make any appeals against their return. The Tories only removed 23 migrants whose claims were deemed inadmissible. Migrants are likely to be returned to locations across France, away from its northern coasts. Any that tried to re-enter would be identified through their biometric details and sent back once again. The European Commission has contacted the UK because of concerns among other countries, including Italy, Spain and Greece, that the one-in, one-out deal could mean they face an influx of deported migrants. Under the EU's Dublin agreement, migrants can be sent back to the EU country where they first landed. 'We are in contact with the French and the UK authorities to ensure the necessary clarifications are made,' a European Commission spokesman said. France has also agreed to start intercepting migrant 'taxi boats' at sea for the first time after previously refusing to do so for fear of breaching maritime safety laws. The policy change will see elite French police officers authorised to stop boats within 300 metres of shore and is expected to be confirmed at the summit. Two major resettlement routes that brought Afghan refugees to the UK are to be closed, the Government announced on Tuesday. More than 30,000 Afghans have been brought to the UK, but charities warned that it closed a 'lifeline' to thousands more who could seek to flee the Taliban. 'Four years on from the Taliban takeover, people in Afghanistan are still in need of protection, and this sudden closure comes with no clear plan for people at real risk and in need of safety,' said Enver Solomon, chief executive of the Refugee Council.
Reuters
9 hours ago
- Reuters
Putin, Macron discuss Iran, Ukraine in first phone call in nearly three years
MOSCOW/PARIS, July 1 (Reuters) - Russian President Vladimir Putin had a "substantial" phone call with French President Emmanuel Macron on the Iran-Israel conflict and Ukraine, the Kremlin said on Tuesday, the first such exchange between the two leaders since September 2022. In Paris, Macron's office said the call lasted two hours and that the French leader had called for a ceasefire in Ukraine and the start of negotiations on ending the conflict. A French diplomatic source said Macron had talked to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy before and after his call with Putin to brief him on the talks. Macron also talked to U.S. President Donald Trump about the exchange. According to the Kremlin press service, Putin said it was necessary to respect Iran's right to the peaceful development of nuclear energy as well as its continued compliance with its obligations under the nuclear nonproliferation treaty. The French president's office said Macron, who sees the Iranian nuclear threat as sufficiently serious to justify the involvement of all five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council, had also stressed the need for Iran to cooperate fully with the International Atomic Energy Agency. Iran's parliament approved a bill last month to suspend cooperation with the IAEA, the U.N.'s nuclear watchdog, after Israel and the United States bombed Iran's nuclear sites, aiming to prevent Tehran from acquiring a nuclear weapon. Iran has denied seeking one. Macron "expressed his determination to seek a diplomatic solution that would lead to a lasting and rigorous resolution of the nuclear issue, the question of Iran's missiles, and its role in the region," his office said, adding that the two leaders had decided to "coordinate" their efforts. France and Russia are both permanent members of the U.N. Security Council. On Ukraine, Putin reiterated his position to Macron that the war was "a direct consequence of the West's policy," which he said had "ignored Russia's security interests" over the past few years. Any possible peace agreement between Russia and Ukraine should have a "comprehensive and long-term character" and be based on "new territorial realities," the Kremlin quoted Putin as saying. Putin has previously said Ukraine must accept Russia's annexation of swaths of its territory as part of any peace deal. Macron has said Ukraine alone should decide on whether or not to accept territorial concessions. During Tuesday's call, Macron's office said, "the president emphasised France's unwavering support for Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity." Macron and Putin aim to continue their discussions on Ukraine and Iran, the French president's office said. Macron and Putin held regular discussions around the start of Russia's invasion of Ukraine, which was criticised by some European allies, with Macron also visiting Putin in Russia shortly before the invasion in February 2022.
