Indian FM starts week-long EU trip in new cooperation push
NEW DELHI: India's External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar has embarked on Sunday a week-long trip for talks with the top diplomats of the EU, France and Belgium in a new push for cooperation with Europe, his office said.
Jaishankar is set to meet his French counterpart, Jean-Noel Barrot, Belgian Deputy Prime Minister Maxime Prevot, and 'will be holding a Strategic Dialogue with the EU High Representative and Vice President Ms. Kaja Kallas, and will engage with the senior leadership from the European Commission and the European Parliament,' the Ministry of External Affairs said in a statement.
'The visit of EAM is expected to further deepen India's friendly relations with the European Union, France and Belgium and give renewed momentum to ongoing cooperation in diverse areas.'
The foreign minister will also inaugurate the first edition of the Mediterranean Raisina Dialogue in Marseille.
The Raisina Dialogue is a premier multilateral conference on geopolitics and geo-economics held annually in New Delhi and organized by the Observer Research Foundation in collaboration with the Ministry of External Affairs.
The dialogue in Marseille 'is a new initiative involving both government and non-government officials from both from India and various parts of the world to converge and talk about issues pertaining to the Mediterranean,' Prof. Harsh V. Pant, vice president of the Observer Research Foundation, told Arab News.
During EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen's New Delhi visit in February, India and the EU committed to conclude negotiations on a comprehensive free trade agreement in December.
During last week's talks in Paris, nearly half the agenda — covering areas like customs, trade facilitation, rules of origin, and intellectual property — has been agreed on.
'The partnership between India and France, and India and the EU continues to evolve dramatically,' Pant said, adding that Jaishankar's trip is also about conveying 'how India feels about the changing strategic realities, as well as what has happened with Pakistan.'
Last month, India and Pakistan engaged days-long cross-border fire. Indian forces launched a series of strikes across the Line of Control — the de facto border that separates the Indian-controlled and Pakistani-controlled parts of the disputed Kashmir territory. They also hit other sites on the Pakistani mainland, targeting what New Delhi claimed were militant positions.
Pakistan retaliated with strikes on Indian military targets before a US-brokered ceasefire took effect on May 10. According to the Pakistani military, its forces had downed six Indian warplanes, including several French aircraft Rafale and a Mirage 2000.
The escalation between the nuclear-armed neighbors took place as India blamed Pakistan for a deadly militant attack, in which 26 tourists were killed in Indian-administered Kashmir — Islamabad denied any involvement.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
an hour ago
- Al Arabiya
France has approached Renault on drone production, carmaker says
France's defense ministry has approached Renault about the possibility of helping to manufacture drones, the automaker said on Sunday, after the ministry last week floated the idea French companies could help with production in Ukraine. 'We have been contacted by the defense ministry about the possibility of producing drones. Discussions have taken place, but no decision has been taken at this stage, as we are awaiting further details on this project from the ministry,' Renault said in a statement to Reuters. Earlier on Sunday, French news website Franceinfo reported the French carmaker was expected to produce drones in Ukraine. Asked about the report, the ministry told Reuters it was up to the carmaker, without naming it, to say whether it would participate. Also without naming any companies, Defense Minister Sebastien Lecornu told French news channel LCI on Friday that France would set up a partnership between a major French carmaker and a small defense firm to equip production lines in Ukraine for building drones. Drones have played a significant role in Ukraine's defense since Russia's full-scale invasion of the country in 2022, providing surveillance and strike capabilities that have shaped battlefield tactics against Russian forces.
Arab News
4 hours ago
- Arab News
Indian FM starts week-long EU trip in new cooperation push
NEW DELHI: India's External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar has embarked on Sunday a week-long trip for talks with the top diplomats of the EU, France and Belgium in a new push for cooperation with Europe, his office said. Jaishankar is set to meet his French counterpart, Jean-Noel Barrot, Belgian Deputy Prime Minister Maxime Prevot, and 'will be holding a Strategic Dialogue with the EU High Representative and Vice President Ms. Kaja Kallas, and will engage with the senior leadership from the European Commission and the European Parliament,' the Ministry of External Affairs said in a statement. 'The visit of EAM is expected to further deepen India's friendly relations with the European Union, France and Belgium and give renewed momentum to ongoing cooperation in diverse areas.' The foreign minister will also inaugurate the first edition of the Mediterranean Raisina Dialogue in Marseille. The Raisina Dialogue is a premier multilateral conference on geopolitics and geo-economics held annually in New Delhi and organized by the Observer Research Foundation in collaboration with the Ministry of External Affairs. The dialogue in Marseille 'is a new initiative involving both government and non-government officials from both from India and various parts of the world to converge and talk about issues pertaining to the Mediterranean,' Prof. Harsh V. Pant, vice president of the Observer Research Foundation, told Arab News. During EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen's New Delhi visit in February, India and the EU committed to conclude negotiations on a comprehensive free trade agreement in December. During last week's talks in Paris, nearly half the agenda — covering areas like customs, trade facilitation, rules of origin, and intellectual property — has been agreed on. 'The partnership between India and France, and India and the EU continues to evolve dramatically,' Pant said, adding that Jaishankar's trip is also about conveying 'how India feels about the changing strategic realities, as well as what has happened with Pakistan.' Last month, India and Pakistan engaged days-long cross-border fire. Indian forces launched a series of strikes across the Line of Control — the de facto border that separates the Indian-controlled and Pakistani-controlled parts of the disputed Kashmir territory. They also hit other sites on the Pakistani mainland, targeting what New Delhi claimed were militant positions. Pakistan retaliated with strikes on Indian military targets before a US-brokered ceasefire took effect on May 10. According to the Pakistani military, its forces had downed six Indian warplanes, including several French aircraft Rafale and a Mirage 2000. The escalation between the nuclear-armed neighbors took place as India blamed Pakistan for a deadly militant attack, in which 26 tourists were killed in Indian-administered Kashmir — Islamabad denied any involvement.
Asharq Al-Awsat
4 hours ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
On the UN Peace Conference in New York
In the lead-up to the UN conference on a two-state solution — scheduled for June 17–20 and co-chaired by Saudi Arabia and France — efforts to ensure its success have been intensifying. Ministerial meetings took place in Paris and Brussels late last month, alongside intensified efforts at the UN, with working groups set up and tasked with developing ideas and proposals that address all aspects of the conflict. These efforts have been met, however, with positions that hinder the conference, which is meant to 'lay the course for real change,' not merely adopt positions whose impact never extends beyond the conference. One such obstructive position is the United States' decision to use its veto power against a resolution that had been supported by the rest of the Security Council and called for an immediate ceasefire in the Gaza Strip and the unrestricted delivery of humanitarian aid. Vetoing the resolution effectively encourages Israel to maintain its position on the current negotiations, which remain open-ended and obstructed by Israel's terms. These negotiations aim to achieve what Israel has failed to achieve militarily on the ground: displacement of Gaza's population and Israel's reassertion of control over the Strip. This goal has been repeatedly stressed by Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, who has called for using extreme violence to take control of the Strip. In the same vein, Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz commented on the upcoming New York conference saying: 'They will recognize a Palestinian state on paper, and we will establish the Jewish Israeli state in the West Bank.' Several Israel watchers have said that a ceasefire would mean the 'collapse of the government.' The biggest loser would be Benjamin Netanyahu. Not only would he lose out politically, but he would also face legal prosecution regarding an array of domestic cases raised against him. All of these factors pose major challenges to launching the peaceful settlement process that the New York conference seeks to achieve. Yet these challenges are neither new nor unexpected for the architects, sponsors, and supporters of the conference. The history of 'conflict diplomacy' is rich with examples, lessons, and insights, even as circumstances evolve. What is primarily expected of the conference is to expand recognition of the State of Palestine, which already enjoys broad international recognition, particularly among European countries that still hesitate on the matter. Such recognition would lend greater credibility to the process that the conference aims to initiate and accompany. Moreover, contrary to the claims of those who oppose it or call for its postponement, this conference also reinforces the credibility of a comprehensive negotiation framework through an 'integrated solution package' that ties all elements together, even if the conflicting parties have divergent priorities. Legally and practically, this package amounts to the ultimate goal of the negotiation process, regardless of the difficulties, which the conference is at least seeking to address by launching the negotiation process. A holistic rather than discretionary approach must be a pillar of the 'roadmap' of the negotiations once they begin. It should be recalled, that there are many roadblocks along this path, particularly from the Israeli side. The conference must lay a 'triangular foundation' for the process: a binding negotiation reference framework, a roadmap (despite the many challenges it faces), and a timeline that strengthens the credibility of the negotiation process. Many observers believe that despite the American veto mentioned earlier, this 'dynamic diplomacy' that approaches issues case-by-case rather than sticking to rigid alliances, which we have seen under the Trump administration, leaves a possibility for shifts in US positions. Even if its movement is limited, there is a possibility that Washington could become convinced such shifts truly serve its interests. The New York conference is also expected to establish an open committee composed of active, influential, and committed parties working on achieving the conference's goals. This committee would supervise, facilitate, and support this effort during the preparatory phase, which is expected to begin the morning after the conference concludes, and eventually during the negotiation phase when the time comes, which is not likely anytime soon. One of the conference's primary responsibilities is to ensure that decisions are not merely statements. It must ensure that they are translated into effective diplomatic action despite the many barriers. That should begin with reinvigorated efforts in the Security Council to secure an immediate ceasefire in Gaza and to prevent Israel's annexation and Judaization efforts, which constitute blatant violations of Security Council Resolutions. Of course, these goals will not be easy to attain, as many episodes from our recent and distant history show. Nonetheless, they are more than necessary for the credibility, and thus the success, of the conference. Despite the many challenges ahead, this track remains the only path that can lead to meaningful security and stability in the region.
