US clears way for $8bln Paramount-Skydance merger
The deal will put well-known entertainment properties including the CBS broadcast television network, Paramount Pictures, and the Nickelodeon cable channel under the ownership of tech scion David Ellison.
Paramount this month paid $16 million in a controversial move to settle a lawsuit Trump filed against the company and CBS News, sparking accusations it effectively had paid for approval of the merger.
The Federal Communications Commission approved the deal in a partisan 2-1 vote that allows the transfer of CBS television stations. FCC Chairman Brendan Carr, an appointee of Republican Trump, said the agency had received assurances from the incoming owners that they were committed to unbiased journalism.
Democrat Anna Gomez, the FCC's dissenter, accused Paramount of "cowardly capitulation" to the Trump administration. She also said the FCC was imposing "never-before-seen controls over newsroom decisions."
CBS News was one of several news organizations Trump attacked for what he viewed as unfavorable coverage. Paramount paid Trump to end a lawsuit he filed over CBS' editing of a "60 Minutes" interview with his Democratic opponent, Kamala Harris.
Trump, who often accuses media outlets of liberal bias and "fake news," argued that the editing was designed to make Harris look good. First Amendment lawyers said the suit was without merit.
Carr has said the agency's review of the proposed merger was not connected to the lawsuit.
Senators Edward Markey of Massachusetts and Ben Ray Luján of New Mexico said the merger "reeks of the worst form of corruption," coming on the heels of Paramount's settlement.
The commission received pledges from Skydance that it would appoint an ombudsman to evaluate complaints of editorial bias or other concerns about CBS. Skydance also told the FCC it would not establish any diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives, which Trump believes are discriminatory.
"These commitments, if implemented, would enable CBS to operate in the public interest," Carr said, who also hailed "another step forward in the FCC's efforts to eliminate invidious forms of DEI discrimination."
"The Late Show" host Stephen Colbert had called Paramount's settlement "a big fat bribe." His show was canceled days later in what Paramount called a financial decision unrelated to politics.
It marks the end of an era for the family of the late Sumner Redstone, who transformed the family's chain of drive-in movie theaters into a media empire that once spanned broadcast and cable television, film, radio and publishing. His daughter Shari Redstone became chair of Paramount in 2019.
At the time, she hoped to better position the company to compete with the world's entertainment giants. Paramount has since shed billions of dollars in market valuation as it struggled to navigate an entertainment business upended by the streaming video revolution.
The FCC approved the transaction after a review of more than 250 days, longer than the commission's target of completing such reviews within 180 days.
Skydance CEO David Ellison, son of Oracle co-founder Larry Ellison, is poised to become chair and chief executive of the new Paramount. Jeff Shell, former chief executive of Comcast's NBCUniversal, will be its new president.
Chris McCarthy, one of Paramount's current trio of CEOs has decided to depart the company once the merger is completed, a source with knowledge of the matter said.
Paramount's stock rose about 1.4% in after-hours trading to $13.45.
(Reporting by Akash Sriram in Bengaluru and Dawn Chmielewski in Los Angeles; Editing by Devika Syamnath, David Gregorio, Lisa Shumaker and Shri Navaratnam)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
15 minutes ago
- Middle East Eye
Iranian press review: US-brokered Azerbaijan-Armenia deal a 'great betrayal'
'A graveyard for Trump's mercenaries' The agreement reached at the White House between the leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan to secure peace in the South Caucasus has provoked fury among Iranian conservatives, with one saying the region will be turned into a 'graveyard for Trump's mercenaries'. Iranian politicians have hit out at the plan to create the Zangezur corridor – a proposed land link between Azerbaijan and its autonomous exclave, Nakhchivan – with the involvement of US forces. The plan also involves the corridor being developed by American companies and rebranded the Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity (Tripp). Ali Akbar Velayati, international affairs adviser to Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, said: 'Is the South Caucasus an unclaimed area that Trump can rent? The Caucasus is one of the most sensitive regions in the world. This passage will not become a corridor owned by Donald Trump, but a graveyard for Trump's mercenaries.' New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters The Kayhan daily echoed Velayati, writing: 'Finally, both Armenia and Azerbaijan have agreed to this great betrayal! They have opened the path to create a military and intelligence base for the United States and Israel in the north of our country.' Kayhan, which is run by hardline groups close to Iran's supreme leader, also called for the Strait of Hormuz to be closed to US and Israeli ships. Ali Bagheri Kani, a member of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, also condemned the deal, saying, 'This is not an issue Iran can easily ignore… Foreigners, especially the United States, wanting to enter the Caucasus region is unacceptable to Iran.' Tensions between Tehran and Baku had already worsened before the agreement, when Iran accused Israel of using Azerbaijani airspace during the 12-day Iran-Israel war. Israel branded 'world's number one water thief' In response to a video from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu about Iran's water crisis, Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf called Israel 'the world's number one water thief'. Netanyahu has released several videos addressing the Iranian people since the start of Israel's attacks on Iran. In his latest message, he referred to the country's water and electricity shortages and urged Iranians to rise up against their government. Israel counts high cost of Iran war as censorship masks full damage Read More » He also said that if Iran's government falls, Israel would be ready to share its expertise to solve the water crisis. Qalibaf responded on X, accusing Israel of stealing water from neighbouring countries and comparing its policies to those of the Nazis in World War Two. Referring to Israeli strikes during the 12-day war that hit a water treatment facility in northern Tehran, he wrote: 'The 21st century Nazis struck the main water artery of northern Tehran in Tajrish Square with missiles in broad daylight to cut off water to the city. 'In the occupied territories and in Gaza, these same criminals have been the world's number one water thieves for years, using thirst as a weapon to kill Palestinians,' he said. 'Their crimes are always louder than their nonsense.' Rice hoarding scandal highlights corruption The discovery of 4,000 tonnes of hoarded rice, worth about $1m, has again fuelled debate in Iran over economic corruption and rent-seeking. The rice was uncovered at a time when prices for some basic goods had been rising in the days following the 12-day war with Israel, and local media had reported shortages of certain items. 'The Iranian economy is caught in a cycle of state control, rent-seeking, and institutional corruption' – Arman daily newspaper The Arman daily wrote that the hoarding of essential goods was not linked to the war with Israel, but was instead the result of deep-rooted corruption and Iran's closed economy. 'The Iranian economy is caught in a cycle of state control, rent-seeking, and institutional corruption,' the daily wrote. Economist Mehdi Pazuki told the newspaper: 'We now have a rent-seeking class that is waging a full-scale economic war against Iran. This group controls the economy through income from a closed system.' Former nuclear negotiator rejects US talks Saeed Jalili, the supreme leader's representative on the Supreme National Security Council, has criticised moderators who support resuming nuclear talks with the United States and other western countries, calling President Masoud Pezeshkian's policies ineffective. Jalili, a politician close to Iran's hardliners and a former senior negotiator with the West, pointed to the recent Iran-Israel war as a victory for Iran and said that restarting talks would be a mistake. 'You have defeated that arrogance that used all its power. You have reached a new stage, and then, only a few days later, some of you say let's go back to the same path [of negotiations],' Jalili said. He also attacked moderate groups that claim that talks with the US would remove the threat of war and bring economic benefits. 'You said several trillion dollars of capital would come. But in this recent round of talks, in the middle of the negotiation, you see America and its offspring, with all the shamelessness it has, attacking you,' he said.
Sharjah 24
34 minutes ago
- Sharjah 24
Zelensky in London to meet PM ahead of US-Russia summit
Zelensky was to arrive at 9:30 am (0830 GMT) at Downing Street, the prime minister's office said, after Starmer on Wednesday maintained there was now a "viable" chance for a Ukraine ceasefire. US President Donald Trump and Russia's Vladimir Putin will meet Friday at an air base in the far-northern US state, the first time the Russian leader has been permitted on Western soil since his February 2022 invasion of Ukraine which has killed tens of thousands of people. Near the front line Thursday, Ukraine fired dozens of drones at Russia overnight into the early morning, wounding three people and sparking fires including at an oil refinery in the southern city of Volgograd. Kyiv calls the strikes fair retaliation for Moscow's daily missile and drone barrages on its own civilians. With such high stakes, all sides were pushing hard in the hours before Friday's meeting. Three-way meeting? Zelensky, who has refused to surrender territory to Russia, spoke by telephone Wednesday with Trump, as did European leaders who voiced confidence afterward that the US leader would seek a ceasefire rather than concessions by Kyiv. Trump has sent mixed messages, saying that he could quickly organise a three-way summit afterward with both Zelensky and Putin but also warning of his impatience with Putin. "There may be no second meeting because, if I feel that it's not appropriate to have it because I didn't get the answers that we have to have, then we are not going to have a second meeting," Trump told reporters on Wednesday. But Trump added: "If the first one goes okay, we'll have a quick second one," involving both Putin and Zelensky. Zelensky, after being berated by Trump at a February meeting in the White House, has publicly supported US diplomacy but has made clear his deep scepticism. "I have told my colleagues -- the US president and our European friends -- that Putin definitely does not want peace," Zelensky said. As the war rages on in eastern Ukraine, Zelensky was in Berlin Wednesday joining Chancellor Friedrich Merz on an online call with other European leaders, and the NATO and EU chiefs, to show a united stance against Russia. Starmer on Wednesday said Ukraine's military backers, the so-called Coalition of the Willing, had drawn up workable military plans in case of a ceasefire but were also ready to add pressure on Russia through sanctions. "For three and a bit years this conflict has been going, we haven't got anywhere near... a viable way of bringing it to a ceasefire," Starmer told Wednesday's meeting of European leaders. "Now we do have that chance, because of the work that the (US) president has put in," he said. NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte declared: "The ball is now in Putin's court."
Middle East Eye
2 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Cowardice and complicity: Washington's 'special relationship' with Israel
Even the most basic history of US global interventionism - always aimed at preserving its own economic hegemony - undermines the notion that Washington could suddenly become a force for good in the world, regardless of who is in power. From the firebombing of Tokyo to the atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki; from the destruction of Dresden to the napalming of Southeast Asia; from the dismantling of the Iraqi state through 'shock and awe' to myriad other coups, assaults and wars, the US has used all manner of weaponry and methods to achieve its goals. But while political analysts and historians have traditionally examined events taking place on the ground, too few have explored the deeper structural policies that set certain mechanisms and modes of legitimacy in place. The CIA operations that recruited former Nazi military, intelligence and scientific figures into the US orbit are a prime example. Such operations, if even mentioned, are typically presented as curiosities of 'spycraft', rather than structural precedents undergirding the behaviour and policies of many US intelligence, military, academic, and corporate institutions. Similarly, the US's embrace of Zionism - and the economic, political and ideological cover it provides for Israeli impunity - enables Tel Aviv to act as the tip of the American imperial spear in the Middle East and elsewhere in the world. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters It was a self-described Zionist, former President Joe Biden, who played a key role in embedding this view in US policy, when he declared in 1986: 'It's about time we stop … apologising for our support for Israel.' Washington's financial support for Israel, he added, is 'the best $3bn investment we make. Were there not an Israel, the United States of America would have to invent an Israel to protect her interests in the region'. That $3bn figure has continued to rise over the years. And under the Trump administration, which has done away with pretence, it is more evident than ever before that Israel is essentially a US base in the region. Layers of obfuscation Given the above, the idea that any single political candidate could cut through all the layers of power, funding and historical obfuscation to attain high office in the US - while still maintaining truly independent positions - is both ludicrous and unrealistic. The range of permissible opinions remains extraordinarily limited, expanding mainly in culture-war areas and narrowing again when it comes to foreign policy. But we forget, at our own peril, that foreign policy is always domestic as well. Thus, no matter how issues are presented, and no matter how unyielding party allegiances might be, most US citizens find themselves completely removed from any form of actual political power, except at a local level - and even there, options can be severely compromised. In a just world, various corporate executives, editors and university administrators could all find themselves culpable for complicity in genocide Exposed to decades of Hollywood propaganda and lacking any direct experience of a foreign military occupation or war on American soil, the American public is largely ignorant of these concepts. Bludgeoned by corporate and state forces that dictate the terms of military interventionism, they seldom connect the dots. While many people - particularly those who benefit less from the status quo - understand the raw machinations of power all too clearly, there is very little they can do to move the needle. It is only in critical times, such as the Vietnam War or the current genocide in Gaza, that broader segments of the population - disgusted by what their taxpayer dollars are supporting - begin to construct a more coherent picture of what is taking place and whose interests are being served. This is the context in which western policies transform fundamental issues of economics, law, morality, and justice into grotesque 'culture wars', enabling severe repression alongside the curtailment of constitutional and civil rights. The role of mainstream media and academia in all of this cannot be understated. In a just world, various corporate executives, editors and university administrators could all find themselves culpable for complicity in genocide. Elaborate mea culpas Today, as myriad countries and mainstream institutions perform elaborate mea culpas - no longer able to hide from images of wounded and starving Palestinians - the rage felt by more and more people around the world is palpable. We would do well to recall the suffocating silence and denials that have accompanied the assassinations of journalists; the abduction, torture and killing of doctors and health workers as their hospitals were destroyed by Israeli troops; the erasure of whole families and communities; the wholesale destruction of Gaza's universities and cultural institutions; and myriad other atrocities and cruelties shielded by US vetoes, propaganda and military funding. We must also remember, first and foremost, that all of this has taken place with hardly a ripple of dissent due to the complicity and cowardice of influential people who had the ability - at least in theory - to take a meaningful stand. Israel's meltdown over western recognition of Palestinian statehood reveals its deepest fears Read More » Could politicians and policies have been held in check, even slightly, if the media had done its job, university administrators had issued condemnations, and healthcare professionals had organised in defence of their counterparts in Gaza? The truth is, in a world where there is little to no real political representation, these people and institutions were actually doing their jobs - and quite well - by serving their corporate, institutional and political masters. Amid this backdrop, direct action has become the mode of choice for those willing to put their safety, freedom and livelihoods on the line in order to disrupt the smooth operations of the genocide machine. We can see this in both spontaneous outbursts and well-planned actions, from Greek citizens preventing Israeli tourists from disembarking, to Egyptian embassies being locked shut by activists, to Palestine Action's work in the UK and its recent designation as a 'terrorist' group. In the US, activists recently descended upon the offices of The New York Times, which has long faced criticism for producing content supportive of Israel, to spray-paint the message 'NYT lies, Gaza dies' on the windows. The upcoming start of the new academic year promises to be filled with novel security measures, surveillance, and the imposition of ever-new forms of punishment. We can only hope that protest movements across myriad sectors continue to gain traction, perhaps inspired by the bravery of former security contractor Anthony Aguilar, who blew the lid off the evils of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. At the same time, we must work to see that more Israeli war criminals are brought to justice; that plans to remake the region's geography are met with fierce resistance; and that Israel's impunity and its apartheid regime will be relegated to the dustbin of history. For that to happen, citizens in the 'belly of the beast' - the US - must play a much more significant and risky role. The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.
