A medical marijuana dispensary could soon be opening at this Lexington location
A former Frisch's Big Boy in Lexington's popular Hamburg shopping district could soon be the site of a medical marijuana dispensary complete with a drive-thru and knowledgeable budtenders ready to answer questions.
That's according to Casey Flippo and Sean Clarkson, the two Arkansas entrepreneurs behind the project, who spoke to the Herald-Leader in a June 3 interview. In 2021, the two founded Dark Horse Cannabis, where Flippo is the CEO, and Clarkson, the chief financial officer.
The establishment comes as the private sector mobilizes following Kentucky's launch of a medical marijuana program earlier this year. The state's Office of Medical Cannabis has awarded limited but transferable licenses for production and sales, and as of Jan. 1, qualifying Kentuckians can apply for a medical cannabis card.
Recreational marijuana use remains illegal in Kentucky.
Flippo said the process for demolishing the interior of the former restaurant, situated in a shopping center between Sir Barton Way and Man O' War Boulevard, has already begun. It's located at 1849 Alysheba Way.
'We have been seeking permitting approval with the city of Lexington,' Flippo told the Herald-Leader, adding the plan is to 'open the doors mid-November at that facility.'
The 5,500-square-foot dispensary wants to offer 'compassionate care' discounts to qualifying patients, Flippo said. There's also potential to accept online orders for pick up via the drive-thru, so patients 'never have to get out of the car,' Clarkson added.
'It's a quick and easy process for our patients, especially those that are handicapped in some way, or elderly,' Clarkson said.
Clarkson anticipates patients will likely want to meet with dispensary staff in-store at least initially after its opening for questions about products and their use.
'As they're getting familiar with the product availability, they're going to want to talk to budtenders,' Clarkson said.
'I believe that we will probably end up employing somewhere between 30 and 40 individuals,' at the site, Flippo added.
The idea is for staff to be 'extremely knowledgeable about the medicinal applications and appropriate use of the cannabis that's being dispensed,' Flippo said.
That said, there will likely be many obstacles to clear before the business can open its doors to the public.
'It's historically pretty challenging to prop up cannabis markets' quickly, Flippo said.
Chief among the obstacles: finding a supplier who can stock the dispensary's shelves with products.
Kentucky's medical cannabis program only allows for edibles, oils, tinctures, vapes and raw plant material. State law requires the plant material, which must be produced and tested in the commonwealth, to be vaped — not smoked. Raw plant material packaged in Kentucky must be labeled 'not intended for consumption by smoking.'
State rules also require medical marijuana cultivators to stand up secure, indoor facilities for growing, cultivating and harvesting the plants. The state's first medical cannabis cultivator broke ground on a facility in Monticello this spring.
In Winchester, Cresco Labs cut the ribbon in April on a cultivation facility that promises to be the one of the state's largest. Phase one construction on that facility, which includes a 5,000-foot plant canopy, is expected to be completed by the fall.
'We believe … that the market should be set to open sometime in late Q4 of this year,' Flippo said, adding his dispensary is targeting an opening during that window.
KYLX Acquisition Company LLC now holds the state license for the dispensary planned at 1849 Alysheba Way in Lexington. KYLX recently acquired it from ZenLeaf LLC, which was the original licensee awarded via a state lottery held last year.
Kentucky held series of state-run lotteries last fall to award medical cannabis business licenses. The lottery to award Fayette County's two dispensary licenses was held in December.
In April, Kentucky Auditor Allison Ball announced a probe into the lottery process amid ongoing concerns out-of-state companies with deep pockets were able to flood it with applications, thus tilting it in their favor.
Dark Horse was identified as one of those companies in a series by Louisville Public Media, which also found Clarkson had ties to 350 of the new businesses created in the month leading up to the application deadline.
Asked for his response to concerns about too few Kentucky hemp farmers being awarded licenses, Flippo said he was 'very sympathetic' to those who did not win, especially given the application fees were thousands of dollars and were not refundable.
Ultimately though, Flippo defended the process for awarding the business licenses.
'Our experience with the [Office of Medical Cannabis] and the governor's office was nothing short of spectacular. I think that they put a phenomenal program together,' Flippo said.
In working with the Office of Medical Cannabis, Flippo said, 'I would argue that it's probably one of the most successful cannabis market launches in the U.S.'
Herald-Leader reporter Janet Patton contributed to this story.
Do you have a question about Lexington or Kentucky for our service journalism team? We'd like to hear from you. Fill out our Know Your Kentucky form or email ask@herald-leader.com.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
a day ago
- Forbes
The Hype Gap: Why Most Organisations Aren't Ready For AI At Scale
Most companies I speak to about AI leadership are stuck in what I call pilot purgatory: an endless loop of small AI experiments that never seem to scale. This feels weird because the AI hype is loud. While the headlines promise transformation, inside many organisations, there is little more than isolated sparks of innovation Recently, I spoke to a senior leader at a global manufacturer with cutting-edge capabilities and a generous R&D budget. On paper, this was precisely the kind of organisation you'd expect to be leading the AI charge. In reality: no strategy, no governance, no roadmap. AI activity was fragmented, driven by curious employees running unsanctioned experiments in corners of the business. Top leadership was interested in the benefits, but ROI was unclear, and it wasn't a priority. Even industries in AI's direct line of fire are holding back. Take the law. Legal work runs on words - drafting, reviewing, interpreting - exactly what generative AI does best. Yet uptake is slow. Recent research shows 47% of private practice lawyers say their firm is slow or very slow to adopt new tech, with only 18% calling themselves fast movers. A quarter of law firm employees believe failing to embrace AI could harm their career; 1 in 10 would consider leaving over it. Restraint is understandable. Powerful technologies have always taken time to transform the economy. James Watt patented his steam engine in 1769, but steam didn't overtake water power until the 1830s. Electricity took decades to replace steam in factories. I suspect leaders are waitng for others to blaze a trail they might follow more easily. But AI is moving far faster. It's advancing at speed and organisational readiness - strategy, governance, skills, culture - is lagging badly. Market leadership can be built in this gap, while laggards are left behind. Hype vs. reality Like a badly dubbed movie, Silicon Valley's instant-value promises don't match the real story on the ground (that AI will take time, effort and skilled change leadership): The hidden revolution: shadow adoption A Gallup poll shows 33% of senior leaders use AI frequently, compared to 16% of individual contributors. But McKinsey's data tells the other side of the story: employees are using AI far more than their bosses know. Microsoft and LinkedIn report that 75% of knowledge workers now use AI daily - half starting in the past six months - many without telling their managers. Some even pay for premium tools out of their pocket: BYOAI (Bring Your Own AI). Without leadership recognition and guidance, much of that learning stays locked in individuals. Worse, it creates compliance, security, and reputational risks. That's why I urge leaders I'm working with, especially mid-career ones who may feel a confidence gap, to experiment personally. Using AI yourself builds credibility, gives you a tangible example of change, and offers first-hand insight into how teams can use the technology. The real bottleneck: trust, not tech As with much digital transformation, the most significant friction isn't the technology. It's trust. Even the most accurate AI will be ignored if its outputs aren't understood or believed. Employees hesitate because they distrust the black box, lack transparency on data, or fear for their jobs. Without trust, adoption stalls. Why boldness wins History favours the early movers: • Retail: Tesco's Clubcard launched in 1995, locking in loyalty before Sainsbury's and others caught up. • E-commerce: Amazon went online in 1995; established retailers hesitated and fell away. • Cloud computing: Netflix moved to the cloud in 2008; Blockbuster stayed tied to physical infrastructure and collapsed. The LEAD framework: from hype to value Here is a simple checklist for moving from pilots to scaled impact: L — Locate the Power Users Find the people already experimenting with AI. Learn what's working.E — Experiment Yourself Use the tools personally. Run small pilots with clear measures. Learn alongside your team.A — Acknowledge and Reward AI Talent Recognise those driving results. Promote them, learn from them, and make them role models.D — Define New Performance Measures Shift metrics from volume and speed to quality, originality, and strategic value. Right now, most organisations are still at the AI starting line. Those who adopt early - with strategy, governance, skills, and trust - will build compounding advantages in productivity, innovation, and market insight. The leaders who close the hype gap will be the ones who treat AI not as a plug-in technology, but as a culture shift they lead from the front.
Fast Company
2 days ago
- Fast Company
You know what you need to do, but you keep not doing it. Here's why and what to do about it
The secret? Make peace with failure. [Photo: snowing12/Adobe Stock] BY Listen to this Article More info 0:00 / 5:52 Most people have goals to get ahead and even know, in principle, what steps to take to achieve them, but just keep not taking those steps. For instance, a successful designer does beautiful art on the side and wants to put it 'out there' to see if he has something people will buy. Or a corporate leader has left her role to be an independent consultant and needs to communicate with more people about the value she brings. Both the artist-entrepreneur and the budding consultant know about the steps involved in marketing and sales, but they just keep not taking those steps, at least not enough of them. Something is holding them back. In my experience coaching entrepreneurs and training leaders I find that very often they know what steps they should be taking. One more hack or pep talk isn't going to do much for them. There is, however, a counterintuitive process— teach me how to fail —that can make a huge difference regardless of their specific skill set, goal, or context. Failure is an option Typically, people tend to avoid thinking about failure. Failure is something many people fear. And research does support what most people would probably suspect—that fear of failure really can hold us back, even the entrepreneurial-minded. To avoid thinking about failure can be a way to try to avoid fear of failure. You know— Stay positive. However, research has long shown that it's exposure to our fears, rather than avoiding them, that can help us move past them. And the more fully we can manage to safely revisit the contexts and emotions involved, the better. Findings reveal that when people expose themselves to the fear of failure, and let themselves explore that fear of failure mindfully, it can lead to breakthroughs in how they approach their task. Failure as a strategy Teach me how to fail is a powerful way to flip the script on failure and expose yourself in a safe and thoughtful way to the context and emotions connected with that failure. The process also reveals a wealth of actionable information quickly, that can precisely address what holds someone back. It points them toward what to do differently in their unique context. With this process we view failure as a strategy, and moreover as a successful one. It is not successful at getting to the goal, but successful at meeting some other important need. That shift alone is often an eye-opener for people. Consider a situation of your own where you are not taking action that you think you should. Now reflect on this question: 'How is it serving you to not act?' This is a way of reframing the meaning of failing-to-act in a more positive, often accurate, and adaptive light. Neuroscience shows that reframing the meaning of something in this way can change your emotional state and how strongly the brain may be triggering fight-or-flight mode. In this process, moreover, we try to learn how to fail in the specific ways a person fails to act. Case study Let's consider Tim, the successful designer now looking to expand as an artist-entrepreneur, who took part in a group coaching series I co-facilitate. Trying to move himself to act, Tim said 'I just need to put my art out there and see what happens.' When asked, 'how is it serving you to not put your art out there?' Tim owned up to the fact that it allowed him to avoid finding out whether people would say 'no.' That helped him keep hope alive that his art could find customers. With this we learned what his strategy was helping him succeed with—to keep hope alive. Then we explored further what someone would need to do if they wanted to fail to put their art out there exactly as Tim does. We knew one piece already, which was to value keeping hope alive. His strategy included certain behaviors, beliefs, emotional states, imagining particular reactions from other people, focusing attention on the wrong things, and so on. For instance: 1) we should justify waiting by telling ourselves the product was not ready. 2) We should imagine the letdown we would feel if there was no interest. 3) We should believe it would be bad to learn the answer was 'No,' and that if no one purchased any pieces that means the art is not good enough to be commercial. Difference makers After we had learned how to fail-to-act in precisely the way Tim did, it was much easier to see what might make the difference for him. Here were some of the shifts he made: His focus: Instead of putting energy into justifying waiting, he would put it into justifying not waiting His feelings: Instead of imagining the letdown feeling, he would imagine the exhilaration of the process His beliefs: Instead of worrying about hearing 'no,' he would try to hear 'no.' He would design every outreach so that people have to say yes or no to some step in his sales funnel. Then he would aim to find out why so he could make adjustments. His good intentions: He then reflected on the question: 'How can I keep hope alive better by putting my art out there?' Psychology and neuroscience research highlights how each of these kinds of shifts—focus, feelings, beliefs, serving your good intentions—can make a big difference in whether and how you act. In short, what is happening is that this paradoxical focus on failure as an adaptive strategy interrupts the pattern. It snaps you out of your stuck state of mind and puts you in a more resourceful state of mind. It also shines a light on the hidden assumptions, needs, and habits that have been getting in the way. For Tim, these shifts did make the difference. He put his art out there and is excited about the response. Teach me how to fail is a process I learned from NLP (neurolinguistic programming). It is one of many tools from NLP for quickly identifying the difference that will make the difference for someone to be able to make a desired change in a lasting way. The early-rate deadline for Fast Company's Most Innovative Companies Awards is Friday, September 5, at 11:59 p.m. PT. Apply today. ABOUT THE AUTHOR Josh Davis, PhD, is the coauthor of The Difference That Makes the Difference (St. Martins Essentials) coming July 8, 2025, author of the international bestseller Two Awesome Hours (HarperOne), and founder and director of the Science-Based Leadership Institute. More
Miami Herald
3 days ago
- Miami Herald
Miami-Dade checks to the A3 Foundation are under scrutiny. One was just returned
After the A3 Foundation secured more than $1 million from Miami-Dade, the county is getting some of that money back. A $200,000 check issued on July 8 to the politically connected charity was left at a front desk in County Hall last week, a top Miami-Dade administrator said Thursday. The check was never cashed. 'It came in an envelope with my name on it,' said David Clodfelter, Miami-Dade's budget director. The refunded dollars offer the latest mystery in the A3 saga, which started with a Miami Herald article on July 19 questioning how the obscure charity had managed to secure nearly $2 million in public money from the state of Florida and Miami-Dade County and was on the verge of getting millions more from a county parks contract. Formed in the fall of 2023, the A3 Foundation still lists its headquarters in a West Miami townhouse. As of Friday afternoon, its website had no contact information and non-working links on its projects page. While the website does not list A3's leadership, state records show the charity's president is Francisco Petrirena. He works full-time as chief of staff to Miami City Manager Art Noriega. The A3 Foundation first attracted public attention when the Herald reported on last-minute legislation that mandated a vendor give the charity $250,000 a year through 2045. The required payment came from a 20-year management contract giving events company Loud and Live control of a portion of Tropical Park, where the firm helps put on the annual CountryFest rodeo each year. Miami-Dade commissioners approved the contract a day after Levine Cava unveiled a 2026 county budget proposal that slashes about $40 million in nonprofit grants. Herald coverage of A3 prompted Miami-Dade Mayor Daniella Levine Cava to say that she'd block the planned payments to the charity in the Loud and Live contract and call for an audit of the charity's spending. County records show her budget office under Clodfelter pushed finance staff to process A3 checks, which were requested by the office of Miami-Dade Commission Chair Anthony Rodriguez. Rodriguez's staff used A3 as a clearinghouse for more than $1 million in tax dollars allocated to CountryFest, the springtime rodeo that's the signature event in his district. Loud and Live said it was paid by A3 for its CountryFest expenses in 2024 and 2025. Through records requests, the Herald obtained three bare-bones invoices that A3 sent to Miami-Dade requesting money for CountryFest expenses. The recently returned check suggests at least $200,000 of the taxpayer funds wasn't needed after all. But that wasn't the message from Rodriguez's staff in recent months as the chair's office pushed for the county bureaucracy to issue the check. 'Good morning David, per our conversation here is the invoice for A3 Foundation for CountryFest,' Aldo Gonzalez, a top Rodriguez aide, wrote in a May 14 email to David Livingstone, an assistant director of the county's Parks Department. 'Can you please process this invoice as soon as possible as we are trying to close out on CountryFest.' Six weeks later, the requested check still hadn't been cut, and Gonzalez pressed Clodfelter, the county's budget director, for the money. 'Need this paid,' Gonzalez emailed Clodfelter on July 3. Attached was the original A3 invoice for $200,000 — the bill that would later generate the check returned to Clodfelter's office last week. It had no receipts or details beyond: 'Payment for CountryFest 2025.' Gonzalez did not respond to a request for comment on Friday. Petrirena did not either. A lawyer for the A3 Foundation, John Priovolos, told the Herald on Friday he would look into questions about the returned check. While Clodfelter said the $200,000 check to A3 was issued and released last month, he did not provide information on who retrieved it originally, so it's not known if the $200,000 check ever physically made it to the A3 Foundation. County records show a staffer for the County Commission picked up at least one other A3 check this year, so it's possible the $200,000 check never left County Hall. County records show Miami-Dade issued about $1 million in checks to the A3 Foundation over the last two years. Paperwork behind the checks show the taxpayer funds were requested to pay for CountryFest. Behind the scenes, the administrator of the Parks Recreation and Open Spaces (PROS) Department's budget was questioning why the foundation was getting so much money for the Tropical Park event, according to emails released this week through a Herald records request. When the request for a $200,000 check to A3 got to Parks Budget Chief Angus Laney, he noted the charity had already been paid $300,000 for that year's CountryFest, held the last weekend in April. That was well over what Parks paid the charity in 2024. 'Please note that last year's payment to the A3 Foundation was $421,000. A 19% growth in compensation seems high,' Laney wrote in a May 14 email to the county budget office. Laney wasn't just managing A3 invoices for CountryFest. He wrote that Parks had also paid $200,000 to the Miami livestock company that put on the event's cattle show. If Parks paid A3 another $200,000 on top of that, the event's cost would hit $700,000 — well over the department's $500,000 budget for CountryFest. At the time, Parks was already under budget strain, with a mandate to cut costs as Levine Cava prepared a 2026 budget proposal that would cut back on department dollars for lifeguards, landscaping and athletic fields. 'PROS is currently under directive from the Mayor to come in $6.5M below our budgeted subsidy for the current fiscal year,' Laney wrote Gonzalez, the policy and legislative director for Rodriguez, on March 11. On Friday, Clodfelter, the county budget director, released a summary of how Miami-Dade paid for CountryFest this year. He said that in addition to money from Parks and allocations from county commissioners, Miami-Dade tapped promotional budgets for Miami International Airport and PortMiami. If the $200,000 check had been cashed, Clodfelter said, money from those county-owned facilities would have covered the expense. As a result, the check would not have impacted the Parks budget. When he sent the email raising budget concerns, Laney was pushing back on Gonzalez's request for the initial $300,000 check to A3. Laney said he only had $250,000 available for the charity's CountryFest expenses. 'If we were not under that mandate, I might be able to absorb the $50K in question (though my budget is already very lean), but under the current constraints, I cannot approve payment of the $300K invoice until I have access to $50K of additional funding,' Laney wrote. The emails released by Parks this week don't show how the $50,000 gap was resolved for the $300,000 check that was issued to A3 on April 4. County records show that check was cashed. Weeks later, pressure was building on Parks to OK the second A3 check for 2025. 'I need to know if you are going to be able to process this invoice,' Clodfelter, the county's budget chief, wrote in a May 14 email to Maria Nardi, then the Parks director. There's no record of a response from Nardi, but the $200,000 check wasn't issued until early July. On Thursday, Clodfelter said the un-cashed A3 check that was returned last week can no longer be cashed. 'It was returned,' Clodfelter said. 'And I have canceled it.'
