logo
This Minnesota couple was charged with running a $15M medical fraud scheme out of their suburban home

This Minnesota couple was charged with running a $15M medical fraud scheme out of their suburban home

Yahoo22-04-2025

After a six-year investigation, a Minnesota couple has been charged in a $15 million fraud scheme that has left the community of Eden Prairie reeling.
The pair, 39-year-old Gabriel Luthor and 42-year-old Elizabeth Brown, allegedly defrauded Medicare, Medicaid and private insurers out of millions through a neurofeedback therapy business.
I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 5 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast)
Nervous about the stock market in 2025? Find out how you can access this $1B private real estate fund (with as little as $10)
Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how
"The whole thing, you couldn't make it up," neighbor Sue Donkersgoed, who lives across the street from Luthor and Brown, told KARE 11 News.
Luthor and Brown were reported to have lived an extravagant lifestyle that involved wild parties at their 9,000-square-foot home. Neighbor complaints got law enforcement's attention, which led them to dig deeper.
It turned out that Luthor and Brown, who ran a business called Golden Victory Medical, providing neurofeedback therapy and other medical services, had allegedly been overbilling insurers and pocketing the difference since 2018.
Brown, the company's founder, at one point claimed to serve more than 451 patients a day, according to one search warrant, reports KARE 11.
Golden Victory also allegedly submitted claims repeatedly to insurers using medical codes that did not cover the neurofeedback services the company provided. According to court documents, the business also combined billing codes that could not be combined and used codes indicating that patients were treated for a longer period of time than they actually were.
In addition to wild parties, neighbors say Luthor and Brown drove luxury cars, all paid for by the fraudulent funds they collected, according to an analysis by KARE 11 of hundreds of pages of search warrants recently made public. Those warrants also showed that in just one month, Luthor spent almost $100,000 at various nightclubs in the Minneapolis area. He also spent more than $32,000 at restaurants during that same month-long period.
Luthor did share the wealth a bit — but in the form of allegedly sending about $5,000 during that same month to various women on Tinder.
Luthor and Brown are also alleged to have used some of the fraudulent $15 million they collected to purchase their Eden Prairie mansion and cover the living expenses of other girlfriends of Luthor's who lived with the couple and, according to the indictment, helped them carry out the fraud scheme by submitting insurance claims. However, they didn't benefit financially from it and therefore haven't been charged.
As KARE 11 reports, Luthor also has a criminal past, having been convicted of credit card fraud 15 years ago under a different name. He was later allowed to legally change his name.
Luthor and Brown were arrested in Las Vegas and released on bond. The couple is scheduled to appear in federal court on April 30.
Read more: The US stock market's 'fear gauge' has exploded — but this 1 'shockproof' asset is up 14% and helping American retirees stay calm. Here's how to own it ASAP
Health care fraud is problematic on the basis of it being illegal. But the issue here goes beyond that. The other problem is that when medical providers defraud insurers, everyone loses out.
'Defrauding critical healthcare [sic] programs like Medicaid and Medicare burden systems designed to serve patients and puts them at risk,' said Special Agent in Charge Alvin M. Winston Sr. of FBI Minneapolis in a press release.
'The FBI and our partners will not tolerate those who abuse the healthcare [sic] system for personal gain and will pursue justice on behalf of taxpayers and patients.'
The FBI reports that health care fraud can take on different forms. It can mean double billing, billing for services not provided, submitting multiple bills for the same services or billing for more expensive procedures than what patients actually receive.
The United States Sentencing Commission says that, in 2023, 9.2% of fraud cases were health care fraud. The National Health Care Anti-Fraud Association (NHCAA), meanwhile, estimates that financial losses from health care fraud amount to tens of billions of dollars each year.
The more criminals that are able to get away with health care fraud, the more it's apt to cost Americans on a whole in the form of higher insurance premiums. Plus, health care fraud has the potential to put patients' health at risk. Providers might subject patients to needless, and in some cases, risky, procedures just to inflate their bills and receive more money from insurers.
That's why it's important for patients to be vigilant about health care fraud, and to loop their insurers in if they suspect it. Reviewing all health care bills carefully and questioning procedures or billing codes that don't look right could open the door to further investigation. Patients can also report health care fraud individually and flag issues to their insurance companies.
Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich in America — and that 'anyone' can do it
Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead
Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you?
This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why nonalcoholic beer is on track to become the world's second-largest beer category
Why nonalcoholic beer is on track to become the world's second-largest beer category

USA Today

time2 hours ago

  • USA Today

Why nonalcoholic beer is on track to become the world's second-largest beer category

Why nonalcoholic beer is on track to become the world's second-largest beer category Show Caption Hide Caption Debate over limiting alcohol service on flights gains attention | Cruising Altitude Ryanair's CEO has sparked debate by suggesting a strict limit on alcohol service at airlines and airports. Could this policy really take off? Justin Brown purchased his first nonalcoholic beer last winter, after spotting a six-pack of Athletic Brewing Company cans on sale at his local grocery store in Salt Lake City. Brown leads an active lifestyle filled with rock climbing, trail runs and chasing after his two kids, but the 37-year-old craft beer fan said he's increasingly health conscious as he grows older. The Athletic Brewing Co. beer's low calorie count – just 45 per can – was a major draw, along with having the chance to enjoy the taste of beer for less than 0.5% alcohol by volume. Brown said he still enjoys his craft beers, but nonalcoholic beers have worked their way into the rotation. '(It) has been top of mind as I grow into my late 30s, going to 40s, making sure I'm here for my children and taking care of myself,' Brown told USA TODAY while at a public pool, sipping on a nonalcoholic beer and watching his kids swim. 'I think people, as millennials, we're all trying to stay young, stay fit, stay healthy, and the nonalcoholic beer trend kind of fits within that ethos.' It's a trend taking off across global markets. Beverage industry analysis firm IWSR found nonalcoholic beer volume jumped 9% in 2024 despite a 1% dip in global beverage alcohol volume. At this pace, nonalcoholic beer is forecast to surpass ale as the second-largest beer category by volume worldwide this year, behind only lagers. 'I would have expected that as alcohol holistically struggles in this current climate, this nonalcoholic beer at the very least would slow its growth. And yet we're not seeing that," Marten Lodewijks, President of IWSR U.S., told USA TODAY. As of 2024, nonalcoholic beer ranked No. 3 by IWSR by making up 2% of global volume, outranking wheat beers (1%) and stouts (1%). The beer faces a colossal gap below lagers, which is by far the largest beer category at 92% of global volume. Nonalcoholic beer sales are up Nonalcoholic beer sales have been on an upward trend since 2018, led by major markets like the U.S., Japan and Germany, according to IWSR data. Between 2019 and 2024, nonalcoholic beer volume in the U.S. grew 175%, propelling the country's ranking from the category's sixth-largest market to third-largest. It's gotten popular enough for Glen Fox, Anheuser-Busch endowed professor of malting and brewing sciences at the University of California, Davis, to add nonalcoholic beer to his teaching program this year. "We're brewing our own nonalcoholic beer for the students to look at, to get that experience," Fox said. "We want to be sure that we understand the process, educate the new brewers, so that they have a good understanding before they go and get a job in the industry." Why is nonalcoholic beer becoming more popular? Experts pointed to waning alcohol sales and growing health concerns as major drivers. Former U.S. Surgeon General Dr. Vivek Murthy in January released an advisory warning of the direct link between alcohol consumption and increased cancer risk. That same month, advertising and sales measurement technology firm NCSolutions released a survey that found 49% of Americans planned to drink less in 2025, up from 41% in 2024. With roughly 0.5% alcohol by volume among most brands, nonalcoholic beer has proved to be an appealing alternative. Especially as the messaging around nonalcoholic beer has shifted to broaden its appeal, according to Dave Williams, vice president of analytics and insight for Bump Williams Consulting, a Connecticut firm that specializes in the alcoholic beverage industry. No longer is the drink viewed as the humdrum option for people who can't consume alcohol, whether that's because they're in recovery or pregnant, he said. "They broke down the stigma surrounding holding a nonalcoholic beer or beverage. ... There is a whole crop of consumers out there that are showing interest in this nonalcoholic alternative," Williams said. 'Now, you can still enjoy beer, feel like you're part of the moment, part of the group, part of the occasion, without having to incorporate any of your perceived objections or obstacles to the alcoholic side of it.' What are Americans drinking in 2025? Consumers are chasing moderation. And unlike regular beer, Lodewijks noted nonalcoholic beers can be sipped during a lunch break at work or – as demonstrated by Brown – public settings that are typically alcohol-free. More variety has likely helped, with new entrants like Athletic Brewing Co., which launched in 2018, and nonalcoholic alternatives to most of the top beer brands, including Heineken 0.0 and Corona Non-alcoholic. Fox of the University of California, Davis, said the taste has also come a long way compared with nonalcoholic beers sold 50 years ago. 'The process at the time removed some flavor when they removed the alcohol,' he said. 'But with the engineering and the way we can brew these now, that's a thing of the past. There are really tasty, flavorsome, nonalcoholic beers.' Fox warned that if choosing nonalcoholic beer, it's better to buy canned or bottled. The alcohol in beer acts as a preservative that prevents the growth of microbes; with less alcohol, nonalcoholic beer served on draft can be more susceptible to spoilage and pathogens. 'You're relying on the pub to keep their lines clean,' he said. 'Be careful getting if you're getting it off the tap. Ask questions about how old it is, when they cleaned their line.'

Jack Daniel's maker reveals surprising reason why Americans are drinking less whiskey
Jack Daniel's maker reveals surprising reason why Americans are drinking less whiskey

New York Post

time2 hours ago

  • New York Post

Jack Daniel's maker reveals surprising reason why Americans are drinking less whiskey

Executives from Jack Daniel's parent company, Brown-Forman Corp., warned that the business is seeing pressure from cannabis, weight-loss drugs and lackluster demand from Generation Z. Brown-Forman CEO Lawson Whiting told analysts on an earnings call that the 'same big three' is the reason that there has been lower demand for liquor. 'We've been saying that for 1.5 years now. And I know on the sell-side that the world seems to be a little bit split on the extent of the pressure that it's putting on our category. We'd be naive if we didn't say that there isn't some pressure coming from those,' Whiting told analysts. The economy is also playing a factor, with Whiting noting that consumers don't have as much dispensable income and are prioritizing vacations and lodging. They go to the grocery store, I think in some cases, spirits has fallen out of the basket a little bit. And that isn't obviously great,' Whiting said. Brown-Forman Corp. is Jack Daniel's parent company. AP However, he said that spirits are still taking market share from beer and wine. He also noted that while premiumization isn't the same as it was, 'it's been kind of stagnant a little bit,' which he said is mostly good news. 'I think the consumers – they haven't traded down necessarily,' he said. Brown-Forman CEO Lawson Whiting blamed lower whiskey demand on cannabis, weight-loss drugs and Gen Z. Brown Forman However, Brown-Forman CFO Leanne Cunningham said the company projected that the operating environment will remain volatile in fiscal 2026. 'We believe that through all of that continued kind of uncertainty that the consumer is going to remain at that sustained level that it is now,' Cunningham said.

Pharmaceutical company AstraZeneca sues Utah Attorney General over discount medication law
Pharmaceutical company AstraZeneca sues Utah Attorney General over discount medication law

Yahoo

time8 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Pharmaceutical company AstraZeneca sues Utah Attorney General over discount medication law

SALT LAKE CITY () — The pharmaceutical company AstraZeneca has filed a federal lawsuit against Utah Attorney General Derek Brown and Utah Insurance Commissioner Jon Pike over a recent law that is intended to allow more pharmacies to have access to drug discount programs. In a lawsuit filed May 23, AstraZeneca alleges that Utah SB 69 is unconstitutional. The law was introduced and passed in the 2025 General Assembly, and it went into effect on May 7. The law prohibits drug manufacturers from restricting pharmacies from working with 340B entities, which help pharmacies and patients access medications at a discounted price. Senator Lee responds to the Trump-Musk feud The 340B Drug Pricing Program is a that 'enables covered entities to stretch scarce federal resources as far as possible, reaching more eligible patients and providing more comprehensive services,' according to the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) website. It means that drug manufacturers participating in Medicaid agree to provide 'outpatient drugs to covered entities at significantly reduced prices.' All organizations need to be registered and enrolled in the 340B program in order to purchase discounted medications. The law that established the 340B Program, Section 340B(a)(4) of the Public Health Service Act, specified certain types of for the program, such as medical centers that serve rural and other underserved communities and clinics that specialize in particular diseases like HIV/AIDS. SB 69 expands the scope, requiring drug manufacturers to provide the discounts to third-party pharmacies that are contracting with 340B entities, and this is what AstraZeneca is claiming is unconstitutional in its lawsuit. Utah House Republicans elect new leadership members The lawsuit states that because price controls 'disincentivize innovation and destabilize markets,' Congress chose to specifically limit the types of organizations that are eligible in Section 340B. The suit notes that for-profit pharmacies like Walgreens or CVS were not included as eligible, and there have already been several federal court cases ruling that block efforts to require drug manufacturers to provide discounts to contracted pharmacies. AstraZeneca claims in its suit that SB 69 'requires pharmaceutical manufacturers to offer 340B-discounted pricing for sales at an unlimited number of contract pharmacies,' expanding 340B discounts to 'an entirely new category of transactions not covered by Section 340B itself.' The suit alleges that SB 69 directly conflicts with federal law requirements, and therefore, it cannot be enforced against Astrazeneca or other drug manufacturers. AstraZeneca is asking the court to declare SB 69 unconstitutional and to order that Utah AG Derek Brown and Insurance Commissioner Jon Pike not enforce the law against AstraZeneca. Musk floats 'The American Party' after Trump tiff Myths VS Facts: What health officials want you to know about the MMR vaccine Good4Utah Road Tour: Willard Bay State Park Lori Vallow Daybell back in court, charged with conspiracy to murder ex nephew-in-law Man charged with assault for allegedly attacking and strangling neighbor Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store