Man offering cattle sales online accused of theft
Several victims say Garrett Hill, also known as Jared Smith, advertised cattle for sale, required victims to pay a deposit through Cash App or an online transfer and then never delivered the cattle.
According to Georgia Agriculture Commissioner Tyler J. Harper, more people could have been victimized in the case.
Hill, who authorities accuse of cattle theft by deception, was arrested by the Franklin County Sheriff's Office on May 7.
Georgia Department of Agriculture Law Enforcement said they are coordinating with Franklin County's Criminal Investigations Division and the Arkansas Department of Agriculture Law Enforcement on this investigation.
[DOWNLOAD: Free WSB-TV News app for alerts as news breaks]
Officials encourage anyone who may have fallen victim to the scheme to reach out to Georgia Department of Agriculture Law Enforcement or the Franklin County Sheriff's Office.
The Georgia Department of Agriculture offered a warning to people buying pets over the internet, saying it's a good idea to exercise similar caution when buying cattle, too.
'Many of these criminals operate overseas,' the department's website cautions. 'Finding and prosecuting them could be extremely difficult; maybe impossible. Research the seller thoroughly. Only purchase from sellers you can validate.'
Those seeking to buy cattle can find them at auction. The U.S. Department of Agriculture has a list of feeder cattle auction sites.
[SIGN UP: WSB-TV Daily Headlines Newsletter]
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
3 days ago
- New York Post
New York sues Zelle, says security lapses led to $1 billion consumer fraud losses
Zelle was sued on Wednesday by New York Attorney General Letitia James, who said the electronic payment platform's refusal to adopt critical safety features enabled fraudsters to steal more than $1 billion from consumers. The lawsuit in a New York state court in Manhattan followed the US Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's decision in March to drop a similar case. That agency has ended most enforcement activity following President Donald Trump's return to the White House. Advertisement 4 New York State Attorney General Letitia James speaks during a press briefing on Feb. 16, 2024. AP Zelle was launched in 2017, and competes with apps such as PayPal's Venmo and Block's Cash App. Its parent, Early Warning Services, is owned by seven large US banks: Bank of America, Capital One, JPMorgan Chase, PNC, Truist, US Bank and Wells Fargo. Advertisement James said Zelle's parent and the banks knew for years that the platform was vulnerable to fraudsters but resisted basic safeguards, with the banks sometimes ignoring customer complaints while Zelle let fraudsters stay on the platform. The result was 'rampant' fraud that Zelle sometimes refused to address even after it occurred, despite its assurances it was a safe alternative to cash and checks and 'backed by the banks, so you know it's secure,' the complaint said. In a statement, Zelle said scams start when criminals trick people into sending money, rather than on the platform itself, and holding it liable could lead to higher fees for consumers. 4 Consumer options to send and request money via Zelle on a mobile banking app. AP Advertisement Zelle also said more than 99.95% of transactions it handles are completed without reported fraud, leading the industry. 'This lawsuit is a political stunt to generate press, not progress,' Zelle said. 'The Attorney General should focus on the hard facts, stopping criminal activity and adherence to the law, not overreach and meritless claims.' Early Warning Services is based in Scottsdale, Arizona. The seven banks were not named as defendants. PUPPY, UTILITY BILL SCAMS Advertisement James said typical scams involved hacking into users' accounts and making unauthorized transfers, convincing users to send money for nonexistent goods and services, and impersonating banks, government offices and utilities. According to the complaint, one victim was told his electricity would be shut off unless he paid Con Edison $1,477 via Zelle, to an account named 'Coned Billing.' 4 JP Morgan Chase is one of the large US banks that owns Zelle parent company, Early Warning Services. Christopher Sadowski Another victim said Chase and Zelle wouldn't help him after he sent $2,600 in two installments via Zelle to buy a puppy, and realized he had been scammed when the purported seller demanded more money. James said it wasn't until 2023, after the CFPB and several members of Congress began probes, that Zelle adopted 'basic' safeguards it had proposed four years earlier. While reported fraud losses plummeted, the safeguards were 'too little too late' for consumers who had lost money, and despite those safeguards Zelle still facilitates 'substantial fraudulent activity,' the complaint said. 'No one should be left to fend for themselves after falling victim to a scam,' James said in a statement. Advertisement 4 Wells Fargo Co. headquarters in San Francisco, California. REUTERS The lawsuit seeks to require Zelle to beef up anti-fraud protections, and pay restitution and damages to defrauded New Yorkers. James sued Capital One in May for allegedly cheating savings depositors out of millions of dollars in interest, and in June settled claims against MoneyGram over remittance transfer lapses. The CFPB abandoned similar cases earlier in the year.
UPI
3 days ago
- UPI
N.Y. AG Letitia James sues parent company of Zelle for allowing fraud
1 of 2 | New York Attorney General Letitia James filed suit Wednesday against the parent company of Zelle, the banking transfer app. The company is partially owned by Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, Capital One and Wells Fargo. File Photo (2012) by John Angelillo/UPI | License Photo Aug. 13 (UPI) -- New York Attorney General Letitia James filed suit Wednesday against the parent company of Zelle, a bank transfer app, for "failing to protect its users from massive amounts of fraud," a press release said. An investigation by the Office of the Attorney General revealed that parent company Early Warning Services designed Zelle without critical safety features, allowing scammers to target users and steal more than $1 billion between 2017 and 2023, the release said. "No one should be left to fend for themselves after falling victim to a scam," James said in the statement. "I look forward to getting justice for the New Yorkers who suffered because of Zelle's security failures." EWS knew from the beginning that key features of the Zelle network made it uniquely susceptible to fraud, and yet it failed to adopt basic safeguards to address these glaring flaws or enforce any meaningful anti-fraud rules on its partner banks, the press release alleged. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau filed a similar suit in December 2024, but it was dropped after the President Donald Trump administration took power. James seeks restitution for damages for affected New Yorkers and a court order mandating that Zelle maintain anti-fraud measures. The app is partially owned by Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, Capital One and Wells Fargo, and it was launched in 2017 to compete with other payment apps like Venmo or CashApp, which are not owned by banks. James alleges that those banks tasked EWS with hastily launching an electronic payment platform. In their rush to launch, EWS prioritized attracting new users through a simple registration process and quick transfers that left consumers vulnerable to scammers. James' complaint alleges: EWS and its partner banks knew for years that fraud was spreading on Zelle and failed to take meaningful action to stop it. When participating banks got complaints from Zelle users about fraud, EWS allowed banks to report that fraud to EWS long after it happened, which enabled bad actors to scam more consumers. When Zelle launched, EWS did not require banks to report scams. When EWS did get reports of fraud, it failed to promptly remove the fraudsters from the Zelle network or require banks to reimburse consumers for scams. EWS developed basic safeguards to address these issues as early as 2019, but failed to adopt them. EWS failed to meaningfully enforce even the limited anti-fraud rules that it did have in place against banks despite knowing of widespread violations of those rules. In one example James' department explained, a New York user received a call from someone impersonating a Con Edison employee saying that the consumer was delinquent on his energy bills and that his "electricity was going to be shut off that day" unless he paid Con Edison via Zelle. The fraudster identified "Coned Billing" as the name associated with the account. The consumer transferred $1,476.89 to a Zelle account named "Coned Billing," but after realizing the call was a scam, was told by their bank, JPMorgan Chase, that the bank "can't get [him] that money back."
Time Business News
3 days ago
- Time Business News
cardable website
In the underground world of cybercrime, certain terms have become part of the dark web's vocabulary. One such term is 'cardable website' — a phrase often discussed in the same breath as 'Verified Carders Shop CVV Fullz Bank Logins EMV Software Dumps+Pin Leaked Database ATM Skimmers Cash App PayPal Bank Transfer and much more.' While it may sound technical, a cardable website simply refers to an online store or platform that criminals believe can be exploited for purchases using stolen payment information. Understanding this concept is crucial for anyone who shops online or runs an e-commerce business. A cardable website is not a legitimate service, nor is it a term used in any lawful business. Instead, it is a label given by cybercriminals to sites they believe can be tricked into accepting fraudulent transactions without proper verification. Criminals operating on carding forums or black-market communities often compile lists of such sites, claiming they can be 'carded' successfully with stolen: CVV codes – Security numbers from credit or debit cards. – Security numbers from credit or debit cards. Fullz data – Complete sets of personal and banking details. – Complete sets of personal and banking details. Bank logins – Credentials for direct account access. – Credentials for direct account access. PayPal and Cash App accounts – Digital wallet information for unauthorized transfers. – Digital wallet information for unauthorized transfers. Dumps + PINs – Magnetic stripe data and ATM PIN numbers for cloning cards. Cardable websites are not inherently criminal — many are legitimate businesses — but vulnerabilities in their payment systems can be abused. Here's how the exploitation process works in the criminal world: Finding a Target – Fraudsters share or sell lists of supposed 'cardable' sites on underground forums. Testing Stolen Data – They attempt small purchases using stolen credit card numbers to see if the site's security will flag it. Scaling Up – If successful, larger and more expensive items may be purchased and shipped to drop addresses or intermediaries. Covering Tracks – Transactions are routed through VPNs, proxies, or the Tor network to hide the perpetrator's identity. These actions are illegal and carry severe criminal penalties, but the term 'cardable website' persists as a coded way for criminals to discuss potential targets. For online merchants, unknowingly being labeled a 'cardable website' can be disastrous. It means their platform is seen as vulnerable, which may lead to: Increased chargebacks from fraudulent transactions. from fraudulent transactions. Loss of trust from customers whose data may be compromised. from customers whose data may be compromised. Legal liability if security standards like PCI DSS are not followed. if security standards like PCI DSS are not followed. Targeted attacks from organized fraud groups. Even if you've never heard the term before, your financial information could still be targeted by criminals exploiting cardable websites. Here are key safety measures: Use secure payment methods – Credit cards often have better fraud protection than debit cards. – Credit cards often have better fraud protection than debit cards. Enable transaction alerts – Many banks and payment apps allow instant notifications for purchases. – Many banks and payment apps allow instant notifications for purchases. Avoid storing card details on multiple websites. on multiple websites. Check for HTTPS – Ensure websites use SSL encryption before entering payment information. – Ensure websites use SSL encryption before entering payment information. Monitor accounts regularly – Early detection of suspicious activity can limit losses. E-commerce owners can take steps to protect both themselves and their customers: Implement strong fraud detection systems that flag unusual orders. that flag unusual orders. Use AVS (Address Verification System) and CVV checks for all card transactions. and CVV checks for all card transactions. Adopt 3D Secure authentication for added security. for added security. Regularly update and patch e-commerce software to close vulnerabilities. e-commerce software to close vulnerabilities. Conduct penetration testing to find weaknesses before criminals do. Authorities worldwide, including the FBI, Europol, and Interpol, monitor cybercrime networks for illegal activity involving cardable websites. Many high-profile cases have shown that: Lists of 'cardable websites' often serve as evidence in criminal trials. Undercover agents infiltrate carding forums to track down offenders. Entire networks promoting fraudulent purchases have been dismantled. Phrases like 'Verified Carders Shop CVV Fullz Bank Logins EMV Software Dumps+Pin Leaked Database ATM Skimmers Cash App PayPal Bank Transfer and much more' are used in the criminal underground as marketing hooks. They promise illegal goods and services to potential buyers — but in reality, they're not only illegal, they're also rife with scams where criminals steal from each other. No matter how 'verified' they claim to be, engaging with these marketplaces can lead to arrest, financial loss, and reputational damage. A cardable website is not something you want to be associated with — whether you're a consumer or a business owner. For shoppers, it's a reminder to remain vigilant when entering payment details online. For businesses, it's a warning to invest in strong fraud prevention and cybersecurity measures. By understanding how criminals misuse the concept, we can reduce the opportunities for fraud and keep the digital marketplace safer for everyone. TIME BUSINESS NEWS
