logo
AI: A new lab partner in biotech

AI: A new lab partner in biotech

Politico30-05-2025
THE REGULATORS
Biotech companies are using a new set of artificial intelligence products to hasten drug discovery and other scientific research, and they're energized by the Food and Drug Administration's apparent embrace of generative AI tools, said biotech leaders at a virtual Google Cloud AI roundtable Thursday.
What they said: Generative AI tools can absorb some tedious work that scientists would normally perform, like extracting novel insights from large datasets, including scientific literature or the human genome, the latter of which could take 'thousands of years' to comb through manually, said Ben Mabey, chief technology officer at Recursion, a pharmaceutical company.
'We can have [generative AI] agents do that and save the really hard problems for humans,' he said.
The remarks come as the FDA looks to universalize AI use in-house. Earlier this month, FDA Commissioner Marty Makary mandated the agency's divisions to use AI to conduct scientific reviews by the end of June.
Mabey and other biotech executives, including Girish Naganathan, chief technology officer of glucose monitoring tech company Dexcom, said that's a good sign for health AI's future as the FDA looks to build a regulatory framework for the technology. Now, companies like Dexcom are 'engaged in providing feedback to and seeking input from the FDA as we take steps to incorporate gen-AI into our products,' Naganathan said.
Artificial intelligence could help the FDA achieve other goals it set earlier this year, particularly one that aims to phase out animal testing with 'more effective, human-relevant methods,' Mabey said. 'We can replace [animals] with [AI] models that are more predictive, not just of the animals but of the humans we care about,' he said. 'It's a great North Star to work towards.'
Why it matters: Biotech companies are sizing up the FDA's relationship with AI to understand how the agency might regulate those tools. Regulations will likely influence their bottom line and dictate, for example, how many hurdles a company must clear to bring a drug borne out of AI to market.
WELCOME TO FUTURE PULSE
This is where we explore the ideas and innovators shaping health care.
Scientists have developed gene delivery 'trucks' that can target specific brain cells, which could lead to therapies for neurodegenerative diseases like Parkinson's and Alzheimer's, The Washington Post reports.
Radiologists are skeptical about how well AI can detect and diagnose cancer, even as the Food and Drug Administration clears the technology to analyze mammograms and imaging centers adopt these programs, STAT reports.
Share any thoughts, news, tips and feedback with Danny Nguyen at dnguyen@politico.com, Carmen Paun at cpaun@politico.com, Ruth Reader at rreader@politico.com, or Erin Schumaker at eschumaker@politico.com.
Want to share a tip securely? Message us on Signal: Dannyn516.70, CarmenP.82, RuthReader.02 or ErinSchumaker.01.
Researchers at the National Institutes of Health used machine learning to identify an early biomarker of aggressive breast cancer and help predict which patients could be at high risk of recurrence or death from the disease.
The findings: The researchers used machine learning to detect minute changes in more than 9,000 samples of connective breast tissue, called stromal tissue, and found that significant abnormalities were associated with more aggressive forms of breast cancer and greater mortality, particularly in women with invasive forms of the disease.
An analysis of the stromal tissue samples — from healthy women, women with benign breast disease and women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer — suggested that so-called disruptive tissue might be tied to common risk factors for aggressive breast cancer, such as being Black, obese or young.
The study also found that significantly abnormal tissue was linked to higher risks of aggressive cancer and faster progression from benign breast disease to cancer than tissue with little to no stromal disruption.
Those disruptions can be influenced by chronic inflammation and wound healing, but according to Dr. Mustapha Abubakar, one of the study authors, 'We don't know which one comes first: inflammation [and wound healing] or stromal disruptions.' It's also not yet clear how people can prevent stromal anomalies from occurring.
Why it matters: The findings come as breast cancer incidence is rising in young women. A 2024 study by the American Cancer Society found that breast cancer incidence among women under 50 was increasing at 1.4 percent a year — about twice as fast compared with women older than 50. The disease is the second-leading cause of cancer death in women — only behind skin cancers.
These findings, if replicable and transferable, could offer scientists a therapeutic target. It also gives women another reason to get biopsies, Abubakar said; stromal disruptions don't manifest in anything we can see with our naked eye and can only be detected under a microscope.
It could take years for these findings to yield tangible impacts for women in clinical settings, Abubakar added. But scientists are moving faster than ever by using machine learning to identify patterns or anomalies in images of tissue, sequences of genomes and other data sets.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

AleraCare and PURE Healthcare Announce Intent to Merge
AleraCare and PURE Healthcare Announce Intent to Merge

Business Wire

time17 minutes ago

  • Business Wire

AleraCare and PURE Healthcare Announce Intent to Merge

PHOENIX & TAYLORSVILLE, Utah--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- AleraCare, a leading provider of infusion and specialty pharmacy services across the U.S., and PURE Healthcare, a leading national medical group that delivers healthcare services for individuals with complex chronic conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn's disease, multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer's disease and other autoimmune conditions, today announced that the businesses have entered into a definitive merger agreement. Terms of the transaction were not disclosed. The proposed merger creates an unprecedented opportunity to provide high-quality patient care, improve clinical outcomes and enhance the availability of infusion services that lower the overall cost to the healthcare system overall. Founded in 2019, AleraCare's core lines of business include ambulatory infusion centers, home infusion therapy and specialty pharmacy. Administered at convenient, accessible, patient-first locations, AleraCare is focused on maintaining trusted-partner status with physicians, payors, drug distributors and pharmaceutical manufacturers. The company has rapidly expanded to over 30 ambulatory infusion centers across the country and is a provider-of-choice for infusion services to high-need and medically complex populations. Pure Healthcare, founded in 2018, is on a mission to transform the healthcare industry by making infusion therapy more affordable and accessible—while delivering a personalized, patient-centered experience. Pure specializes in treating chronic and autoimmune conditions such as Alzheimer's disease, multiple sclerosis, and rheumatoid arthritis, offering innovative, high-quality care tailored to individual needs. Its flagship offering, Pure Infusion Suites, has expanded to 43 locations across 14 states. These state-of-the-art suites prioritize patient comfort with private rooms, snacks, and entertainment, all while significantly lowering the cost of infusion services. Pure Healthcare also alleviates the administrative burden for referring providers by supporting patient authorizations and fostering strong partnerships with insurers, ensuring a seamless and efficient care journey from referral to treatment. The transaction is expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2025, and remains subject to customary closing conditions, including the expiration or termination of the applicable waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976. Holland & Knight is serving as legal counsel for AleraCare. Kunzler Bean & Adamson is serving as legal counsel and Cantor Fitzgerald is acting as financial advisor for PURE Healthcare. About AleraCare AleraCare is a leading provider of infusion treatments and pharmacy services for high-need and medically complex populations. The company's core lines of business include ambulatory infusion centers, home infusion therapy and specialty pharmacy. AleraCare provides care to patients in over 30 locations across six states throughout the U.S., including Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, New Mexico and Utah. For more information, please visit About PURE Healthcare Pure Healthcare, founded by BUILD Capital Partners in 2018, is a national medical group dedicated to reducing healthcare costs and improving outcomes for patients with complex chronic and autoimmune conditions like rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn's disease, multiple sclerosis, and Alzheimer's. As a market leader in infusion therapy, Pure Healthcare operates Pure Infusion Suites alongside specialty clinics in rheumatology and neurology, including Memory Treatment Centers and Montana Arthritis Centers. Through strategic payer partnerships, streamlined patient authorizations, and a commitment to personalized, high-quality care, Pure Healthcare delivers scalable value to patients, providers, and payers nationwide. Learn more at

FDA may pull authorization for Pfizer COVID shot for kids under 5
FDA may pull authorization for Pfizer COVID shot for kids under 5

The Hill

time17 minutes ago

  • The Hill

FDA may pull authorization for Pfizer COVID shot for kids under 5

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is considering revoking the authorization of Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine for healthy children under 5 years old, the company confirmed Wednesday. The move would add another barrier for parents who want to vaccinate healthy children, as shots from Moderna and Novavax were approved for more limited populations. In May, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) would no longer recommend COVID-19 vaccines for healthy children or pregnant women. The CDC then updated its immunization schedule to reflect that children with no underlying health condition 'may receive' COVID-19 vaccines after consulting with a health care provider — what's known as 'shared decision-making.' If FDA pulls its emergency use authorization, Pfizer's vaccine would no longer be available to any children younger than 5. Right now, Moderna and Novavax shots could be administered 'off label' to healthy children. 'We are currently in discussions with the agency on potential paths forward and have requested that the EUA for this age group remain in place for the 2025-2026 season,' a Pfizer spokesman told The Hill. 'It is important to note that these deliberations are not related to the safety and efficacy of the vaccine which continues to demonstrate a favorable profile,' the company added. The Guardian first reported on the FDA's potential move. In a statement to The Hill, HHS said it wouldn't comment on potential changes. 'The COVID-19 pandemic ended with the expiration of the federal public health emergency in May 2023. We do not comment on potential, future regulatory changes. Unless officially announced by HHS, discussion about future agency action should be regarded as pure speculation,' HHS spokesman Andrew Nixon said. Pfizer has had full FDA approval for its COVID-19 vaccine for individuals age 12 and older since 2022.

Silicon Valley parents spend thousands to screen embryos in search of ‘baby geniuses': report
Silicon Valley parents spend thousands to screen embryos in search of ‘baby geniuses': report

New York Post

time17 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Silicon Valley parents spend thousands to screen embryos in search of ‘baby geniuses': report

Silicon Valley parents are shelling out as much as $50,000 to screen their embryos — to figure out which is most likely to grow into a 'baby genius,' according to a report. Some are even pushing a eugenics program to birth an entire generation of hand-picked brilliant babies in hopes they'll turn out clever enough to save humanity from the threat of artificial intelligence. It might sound like an episode of 'The Twilight Zone,' but high-performing babies are a growing obsession among wealthy tech executives – and they're willing to pay big bucks for it, according to the Wall Street Journal. Advertisement 4 High-performing babies are a growing obsession among wealthy tech executives in Silicon Valley. Getty Images/iStockphoto Startups Nucleus Genomics and Herasight charge $6,000 and up to $50,000, respectively, for their genetic testing of embryos – including IQ predictions – for couples using in vitro fertilization. 'Silicon Valley, they love IQ,' Kian Sadeghi, founder of Nucleus Genomics, told the Journal. 'You talk to mom and pop America…not every parent is like, I want my kid to be, you know, a scholar at Harvard. Like, no, I want my kid to be like LeBron James.' Advertisement Simone and Malcolm Collins, leaders of a pronatalist movement advocating for larger families, work in tech and venture capital and have four children through IVF. Simone said they used Herasight to choose the embryo she is currently pregnant with because of its low cancer risk – though they were also thrilled to learn that he was in 'the 99th percentile per his polygenic score in likelihood of having really exceptionally high intelligence.' They plan to give him the middle name Demeisen, after a character from the science-fiction novel 'Surface Detail' – who runs a warship called Falling Outside the Normal Moral Constraints. Advertisement A Bay Area couple have chosen to pursue IVF despite its costs and challenges in an attempt to root out the risk of Alzheimer's and cancer that runs in their families. 4 Startups Nucleus Genomics and Herasight charge thousands of dollars for their genetic testing of embryos. Getty Images But the couple, both software engineers who call themselves 'fairly typical for computer people,' also care about the IQ predictions. They used a Google spreadsheet to break down the results from Herasight, ranking the importance of each trait. Advertisement 'What percent additional lifetime risk for Alzheimer's balances a 1% decrease in lifetime risk for bipolar?' they wrote. 'How much additional risk of ADHD cancels out against 10 extra IQ points?' The embryo with the highest total score – which also had the third-highest predicted IQ – became their daughter. IQ testing has become the backbone of a new eugenics movement led by Tsvi Benson-Tilsen. Benson-Tilsen, the son of a rabbi and mathematician, said he spent seven years researching ways to keep AI from destroying humanity – before concluding it wasn't possible. 4 IQ testing has become the backbone of a new eugenics movement led by Tsvi Benson-Tilsen. – Now he's arguing that widespread genetic testing can be used to create a generation of geniuses to save humankind from AI. Advertisement 'My intuition is it's one of our best hopes,' said Benson-Tilsen, who co-founded the Berkeley Genomics Project, a nonprofit supporting the movement. He said he wants to 'enable parents to make genomic choices' – arguing that this element of choice is a key difference from the twisted history of government eugenics programs under Nazi Germany. Every morning, the NY POSTcast offers a deep dive into the headlines with the Post's signature mix of politics, business, pop culture, true crime and everything in between. Subscribe here! In Silicon Valley, it's already mainstream for tech executives to shell out thousands of dollars on professional matchmakers or send their kids to pricey preschools that require entrance exams. Advertisement 'Right now I have one, two, three tech CEOs and all of them prefer Ivy League,' Jennifer Donnelly, a high-end matchmaker who charges up to $500,000, told the Journal. 'They aren't just thinking about love, they're thinking about genetics, the educational outcomes and the legacy.' 4 It's questionable whether these IQ predictions are even accurate, according to experts. Getty Images/iStockphoto This obsession with 'genetic optimization' has sounded off alarm bells for bioethicists, who warn the testing is unfair. Advertisement 'It is a great science fiction plot: The rich people create a genetically super caste that takes over and the rest of us are proles,' Hank Greely, director of the Center for Law and the Biosciences at Stanford University, told the Journal. It's questionable whether these IQ predictions are even accurate – likely only able to make a three- or four-point difference in a child's IQ, according to Shai Carmi, associate professor at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. 'It's not going to be something to make your child a prodigy.' Advertisement Parents who turn to the technology could also face unintended consequences, like selecting other traits that come alongside the likelihood for high IQ. 'If you're selecting on what you think is the highest IQ embryo, you could also be, at the same time unwittingly selecting on an embryo with the highest Autism Spectrum Disorder risk,' said Sasha Gusev, a statistical geneticist at Harvard Medical School.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store