logo
HAMISH MCRAE: New Trump tariffs spoil the party

HAMISH MCRAE: New Trump tariffs spoil the party

Daily Mail​15 hours ago
Donald Trump has proved a bit of a party pooper. There we were last week, celebrating strong results from Microsoft and other members of the 'magnificent seven' clan, plus some decent figures here from several of our biggest enterprises, and pretty spectacular ones from Rolls-Royce.
The S&P 500 and FTSE 100 indexes of leading shares touched all-time highs. Trade negotiations seemed to be plodding along, with a decent deal between the US and the EU, even if businesses on the Continent were upset that it wasn't as good as the agreement that we in the UK got.
Then, bang, the full list of tariffs was announced, coming into effect on Thursday for any country that had not closed a trade deal with the US. It includes some beefy figures. Switzerland was stunned to discover that it would be hit by a 39 per cent levy.
You may not feel sorry for what is one of the richest countries in the world but it's rough on others. For example, South Africa gets 30 per cent and India 25 per cent.
These figures will almost certainly be negotiated down and there are all sorts of exceptions. But meanwhile there is huge disruption. Until the end of last week the view of the markets was that global business was nimble enough to cope. Now they are not so confident. And it isn't only the Swiss enterprises that are being hit; it is also American ones.
You see that best in the impact on Amazon. It produced some stunning results on Thursday and the shares were trading around their all-time high, valuing the company at well over $2.5 trillion (£1.9 trillion). Then came the details of the tariffs. Its share price fell by more than 7 per cent.
It's silly to read too much into one day's market movement, but it's a useful reminder that Americans are being hit by Trump's trade policy, not just foreigners.
We don't know how the cost of the tariffs will be carried. Some may be absorbed by exporters. But they can only do that for a while as we have seen when there are sharp currency movements.
If the dollar suddenly weakens and they therefore receive less money in their own currency, exporters to the US eventually will have to increase their prices.
What we do have is a feel for the extra revenue the US expects to receive. Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, estimates it will be an extra $300 billion a year. That's equivalent to about 1 per cent of national output. If a third of that ends up being paid by importers squeezing their margins and two-thirds by consumers in higher prices, that's a noticeable dent on living standards. Some items will go up by a big amount, and while many won't, the headlines will shock.
The tax revenue will be useful, of course, but as the US federal budget deficit is running at 6 per cent of national output, it doesn't go far towards closing the gap.
What happens next? Disruption is never good and even if, as seems realistic, world trade does settle down, there will be lasting costs from the tariff war.
What will matter even more is whether, irrespective of all this, the US economy continues to grow at a decent clip. It managed to do so in the second quarter, at an annual rate of 3 per cent.
But there are worries. Every time there's a weak number, as there was on Friday with jobs growth, the markets wobble.
The housing market has gone soft in many areas. Consumer sentiment is fragile, though up a little in recent months thanks to booming share prices. So markets need to stay strong to maintain consumer confidence – and vice versa. It's a virtuous circle, but as we all know, that could flip.
You can see why Trump is so hostile to the Federal Reserve chairman, Jerome Powell. The one thing that might ensure the boom continues a while longer would be a cut in interest rates.
The Fed didn't move last week, while here the Bank of England is widely expected to reduce rates on Thursday. It was a stunning July for British investors and shares here remain solid value compared with US markets.
The UK will probably gain from US tariffs, given the favourable deal we negotiated.
But August will, I am afraid, be a less comfortable month.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Greenpeace targets Starmer and Lammy over Gaza with ‘wanted' posters
Greenpeace targets Starmer and Lammy over Gaza with ‘wanted' posters

The Independent

time10 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Greenpeace targets Starmer and Lammy over Gaza with ‘wanted' posters

Greenpeace activists plastered Westminster tube station in London with anti-Sir Keir Starmer and David Lammy stickers and 'Wanted' posters on Saturday. The protest accused the prime minister and the foreign secretary of 'fuelling genocide' in Gaza. Greenpeace UK called on the government to stop selling weapons to Israel. The action follows Sir Keir's statement that the UK will recognise a Palestinian state in September unless Israel agrees to a ceasefire and takes steps towards long-term peace. Watch the video in full above.

India signals it will keep buying Russian oil despite Trump tariff threat
India signals it will keep buying Russian oil despite Trump tariff threat

The Independent

time10 minutes ago

  • The Independent

India signals it will keep buying Russian oil despite Trump tariff threat

India has suggested it will continue purchasing oil from Russia despite US president Donald Trump 's threats to hit Delhi with new tariffs over the imports. Foreign ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal told reporters on Friday that India 's energy decisions were based on market availability and global conditions, adding that ties with Moscow were 'steady and time-tested' and should not be seen through the prism of a third country. Mr Trump said earlier this week that he plans to impose a 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods along with an additional import tax in response to Delhi 's continued buying of Russian crude. The US president has stepped up warnings against nations doing business with Moscow as Washington seeks leverage over Russia 's war in Ukraine. India bought about 68,000 barrels of crude oil a day from Russia in January 2022, but this rose to 1.12 million barrels per day by June that year, peaking at 2.15 million barrels a day in May 2023, according to data from analytics firm Kpler cited by Press Trust of India. Russian supplies at one point made up nearly 40 per cent of India's total oil imports, making Moscow its biggest crude supplier. While the Indian government may not be deterred by Mr Trump's threats, Reuters news agency earlier reported that Indian state refiners stopped buying Russian oil after July discounts narrowed to their lowest since 2022 - when sanctions were first imposed on Moscow - due to lower Russian exports and steady demand. Indian Oil Corp, Hindustan Petroleum Corp, Bharat Petroleum Corp and Mangalore Refinery Petrochemical Ltd have not sought Russian crude in the past week or so, four sources told Reuters. Reacting to the reports, Mr Trump told reporters: 'I understand that India is no longer going to be buying oil from Russia. That's what I have heard. I don't know if that's right or not. That is a good step. We will see what happens.' He added that despite his tariff announcement, trade deal talks with India were progressing. India consumes around 5.5 million barrels of oil a day, importing roughly 88 per cent of its needs. The world's third-largest crude buyer after China and the US shifted sharply towards Russian supplies after the invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, taking advantage of steep discounts as Western nations turned away from Moscow's energy exports.

Richard Tice: Sack peer who smeared me in Manchester Airport police row
Richard Tice: Sack peer who smeared me in Manchester Airport police row

Telegraph

time10 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Richard Tice: Sack peer who smeared me in Manchester Airport police row

Richard Tice has demanded that a peer who suggested that he 'applauded' police brutality be sacked from her role advising ministers on the definition of Islamophobia. Baroness Shaista Gohir condemned the response of Reform UK's deputy leader to footage of the Manchester Airport attack which went viral last summer. The chief executive of Muslim Women's Network UK (MWNUK) appeared to suggest Mr Tice's comments in support of the police response would ' fuel further racism and Islamophobia '. Lady Gohir has since been appointed to the working group on Anti-Muslim Hatred, working to define Islamophobia for the Government. Ministers have faced criticism over the process of drawing up the definition, which has sparked concerns that the current proposals could have a 'chilling effect' on free speech. Mr Tice has now written to the chairman of the group to say her response to his remarks 'raises serious concerns' about her role, as well as the prospect of introducing a legal definition of Islamophobia. He has also sent a letter to the Law Commission, of which Lady Gohir is a non-executive director. The commission has said it would 'consider the letter from Mr Tice carefully'. Mohammed Fahir Amaaz, 20, was convicted last week of punching Pc Lydia Ward in the face, causing a broken nose, and also of assaulting Pc Ellie Cook. The assault happened on July 23 last year, when Amaaz and his brother, both from Rochdale, Greater Manchester, went to the airport to collect their mother. A fellow passenger who had been on the same flight reported being headbutted in the face by Amaaz during an altercation in a branch of Starbucks in the airport's Terminal 2. When three Greater Manchester Police (GMP) officers approached Amaaz to arrest him in connection with the incident, he lashed out before his brother allegedly intervened. A video of the altercation between the brothers and the police appeared to show Pc Zachary Marsden kicking and stamping on Amaaz during his arrest. He and another officer, who are under investigation over the way Amaaz was detained, face possible gross misconduct charges over the use of force and could be sacked if found guilty. When partial footage of the incident first emerged on social media, Mr Tice told TalkTV: 'Police officers do not use tasers unless they are genuinely concerned for the safety of the public and themselves. This is not distressing; this is reassuring.' Lady Gohir, in her capacity as head of MWNUK, said in a statement last July: 'What is further concerning is that on social media many have praised the police response, including Richard Tice MP of the Reform Party, who described it as 'reassuring'. 'When police brutality is applauded by influential public figures, it is likely to fuel further racism and Islamophobia.' Writing to Dominic Grieve, the chairman of the working group on Anti-Muslim Hatred, Mr Tice said: 'Following the Manchester Airport incident in July last year, I immediately questioned the initial narrative presented in the partial video that was released, noting the use of tasers by the police. 'I publicly defended the actions of the officers. Two days later, Baroness Gohir issued an aggressive press statement accusing the police of brutality, and accusing me of supporting such brutality and of fuelling racism and Islamophobia'. He added: 'Had a law on Islamophobia been in place at the time, it is entirely plausible that I could have been prosecuted, convicted and removed from my position as a Member of Parliament based on entirely false and erroneous accusations. 'Concerns about Baroness Gohir's credibility' 'This highlights not only the dangers of introducing an Islamophobia blasphemy law, but also raises serious concerns about Baroness Gohir's credibility and suitability to serve on your working group'. Concerns have been raised by opposition MPs to the process by which the Government is working to define Islamophobia. Claire Coutinho, the shadow equalities minister, claimed that the way in which it was being drawn up was insufficiently open and those working on it were 'activists with extreme views on how to define Islamophobia'. The communities department, headed by Angela Rayner, has insisted that the group is independent and will provide 'evidence-based advice' to ministers. Mr Tice demanded an apology from Lady Gohir in the wake of the verdicts last week, but Lady Gohir said: 'My remarks were grounded in principles of human rights and accountability – not in any defence of criminal behaviour. 'Given longstanding concerns about the disproportionate use of force against ethnic minorities, it is both appropriate and necessary to scrutinise police conduct, especially when a person is already restrained and poses no ongoing threat.' She also accused Mr Tice of spreading 'misinformation' after he accused her of having 'defended' Amaaz. MWNUK said it welcomed a guilty verdict in Amaaz's case, and that 'those who commit violent offences must be held accountable and face appropriate legal consequences'. A spokesman for the Law Commission said: 'We will consider the letter from Mr Tice carefully and will respond in due course.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store