Oklahoma lawmakers were trying to finish for the year. Then everything stopped over this bill
A stalemate dominated what was expected to be the final day of the 2025 session of the Oklahoma Legislature, with a Senate vote to override the governor's veto of a House bill taking five hours and delaying action on 49 other attempted veto overrides.
Both legislative chambers remained in session well into the night of Thursday, May 29, and early Friday morning, to handle those overrides – all but two of them eventually succeeded, and those could be considered when the House returns for a final session later Friday morning. Both chambers also voted to approve a resolution to oust state mental health commissioner Allie Friesen.
The Senate adjourned sine die, ending its 2025 session, at 12:25 a.m. Friday. By law, the Legislature has to adjourn by 5 p.m. Friday.
The marathon Thursday was due to the fact that work in both chambers stalled for hours — from the afternoon until 9:13 p.m. — and only resumed after a Republican legislator in the Senate switched his vote to complete a successful override of House Bill 2769.
The measure, authored by Rep. Chris Kannady, R-Oklahoma City, would create a financial assistance program for Oklahoma guard members who enroll in a technology center. It also would create a fund to pay members when they become eligible for retirement benefits from the Defense Finance Accounting Service.
It was the first measure the House voted on earlier Thursday when both chambers were voting to override Gov. Kevin Stitt's vetos of bills that had originated in their chambers. Once bills passed their original chambers, the measures moved across the Capitol rotunda to the other chamber.
But the tradeoff turned into a stalemate over HB 2769. The House did not act on any vetoed bills until the Senate approved the measure, a process that took hours.
What to know: Oklahoma governor signs income tax cut deal
It's common practice late in a legislative session for one chamber to not act on a priority of the other chamber until the first chamber's priority is dealt with. Apparently, HB 2769 was such a priority for the Republican-led House.
To override a veto, a bill must receive a two-thirds majority vote in both chambers, and a three-quarters majority in both chambers if it has an emergency clause attached that would make it take effect immediately.
At 4:11 p.m., the Senate opened its override vote for HB 2769, which needed 32 Senate votes to succeed. An initial vote was 30-16, without the votes of two senators – Sen. Adam Pugh, R-Edmond, and Sen. Dana Prieto, R-Tulsa. Pugh was out of state on personal business, a Senate spokesman said – although he arrived in time for the post-midnight votes. Prieto's whereabouts were unknown, although he had been present during a morning session.
The margin was just short of the bar needed to pass HB 2769 into law.
Bargaining over votes occupied the ensuing hours. About 5:50 p.m., Sen. Nikki Nice of Oklahoma City, one of two Democratic senators who initially had voted no, re-entered the Senate chamber and changed her vote, pushing the tally to 31-15. But about 6:30, Sen. Casey Murdock, R-Felt, switched his vote from 'yes' to 'no.'
Sen. Regina Goodwin, D-Tulsa – at that point her party's lone 'no' vote – came back into the chamber but soon left again without changing her vote. Murdock could be seen conferring in the rotunda with legislative leaders. But as the bell that summons legislators to their chambers echoed through the Capitol for hours, the 30-16 vote remained posted on the electronic board inside the Senate.
Murdock then switched his vote back to 'yes', and then Sen. Roland Pederson, R-Burlington, switched his vote. Sen. Brent Howard, R-Altus, who was presiding over the session, quickly closed the vote when the tally reached 32-14.
Shortly after 9 p.m., the House voted to suspend its rules to allow food on the floor and to be able to work past midnight. The Senate later did the same.
This article originally appeared on Oklahoman: This bill sparked a five-hour stalemate in the Oklahoma Legislature
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
20 minutes ago
- Politico
Nadler staffer briefly detained by DHS in altercation at lawmaker's Manhattan office
Officers with the Department of Homeland Security briefly detained a staff member in Rep. Jerry Nadler's (D-N.Y.) Manhattan office during an incident on Wednesday, as protests took place outside an immigration courthouse in the same federal facility as the representative's office. The incident, first reported by the news outlet Gothamist on Friday, was captured on video. In the recording, a DHS officer can be heard saying that members of Nadler's staff were 'harboring rioters' in their office while another officer cuffs a crying staffer. 'I'm a federal officer,' the DHS official said to a second staff member in the video posted by Gothamist, adding 'we have the right to check' the office. The second staff member, who can be seen initially blocking the officer's entry to a private area in the office, asked whether the officers had a warrant to search the space, to which the officer replied negatively. The staff member eventually acquiesced, allowing the officer to walk through the area. According to a statement from DHS, Federal Protective Service officers showed up at Nadler's office to 'conduct a security check' because they were 'concerned about the safety of the federal employees in the office' after hearing reports of 'incidents' nearby. The statement did not mention the issue of 'harboring rioters' that the officer referred to in the video. DHS officers identified themselves and entered the office, where they were met by four people who remained unnamed in the agency's statement. One of the individuals 'became verbally confrontational and physically blocked access to the office,' the statement to POLITICO read, prompting the officers to detain the person in the hallway as they proceeded with their search. According to the statement, all parties 'were released without further incident.' Robert Gottheim, Nadler's co-chief of staff, confirmed to Gothamist that there was no arrest but otherwise declined to comment. Gottheim acknowledged a Saturday email from POLITICO, and said a comment would be forthcoming. The rare altercation between federal officers and congressional staff in a legislator's office comes amid growing friction over President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown and mass deportation efforts, which have sparked protests across the country and embroiled the administration in a battle with the courts over the legality of the president's policies. The incident is not the first clash between federal authorities and Democratic officials or the judiciary over immigration policy. The FBI arrested Milwaukee County Judge Hannah Dugan last month for allegedly assisting a man who is in the country illegally evade immigration officials who were seeking his arrest in her courthouse. Dugan pleaded not guilty to the charges in federal court earlier in May. White House border czar Tom Homan also threatened the state's Democratic governor, Tony Evers, suggesting he could become the next target for the administration's wrath after Evers' office issued guidance to state employees on how to deal with immigration authorities. 'Wait till you see what's coming,' Homan told reporters about Evers' message earlier this month. 'If you cross that line of impediment or knowingly harboring and concealing an illegal alien, that is a felony. And we'll treat it as such.' The incident at Nadler's office, which shares a federal building with an immigration courthouse in lower Manhattan, took place the same day as significant protests against the arrest of a Bronx high school student by Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials the week prior. According to an NYPD spokesperson, 23 people were taken into custody during the Wednesday evening protests, while 18 people were given criminal court summonses and five were arrested and charged.
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Nadler staffer briefly detained by DHS in altercation at lawmaker's Manhattan office
Officers with the Department of Homeland Security briefly detained a staff member in Rep. Jerry Nadler's (D-N.Y.) Manhattan office during an incident on Wednesday, as protests took place outside an immigration courthouse in the same federal facility as the representative's office. The incident, first reported by the news outlet Gothamist on Friday, was captured on video. In the recording, a DHS officer can be heard saying that members of Nadler's staff were 'harboring rioters' in their office while another officer cuffs a crying staffer. 'I'm a federal officer,' the DHS official said to a second staff member in the video posted by Gothamist, adding 'we have the right to check' the office. The second staff member, who can be seen initially blocking the officer's entry to a private area in the office, asked whether the officers had a warrant to search the space, to which the officer replied negatively. The staff member eventually acquiesced, allowing the officer to walk through the area. According to a statement from DHS, Federal Protective Service officers showed up at Nadler's office to 'conduct a security check' because they were 'concerned about the safety of the federal employees in the office' after hearing reports of 'incidents' nearby. The statement did not mention the issue of 'harboring rioters' that the officer referred to in the video. DHS officers identified themselves and entered the office, where they were met by four people who remained unnamed in the agency's statement. One of the individuals 'became verbally confrontational and physically blocked access to the office,' the statement to POLITICO read, prompting the officers to detain the person in the hallway as they proceeded with their search. According to the statement, all parties 'were released without further incident.' Robert Gottheim, Nadler's co-chief of staff, confirmed to Gothamist that there was no arrest but otherwise declined to comment. Gottheim acknowledged a Saturday email from POLITICO, and said a comment would be forthcoming. The rare altercation between federal officers and congressional staff in a legislator's office comes amid growing friction over President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown and mass deportation efforts, which have sparked protests across the country and embroiled the administration in a battle with the courts over the legality of the president's policies. The incident is not the first clash between federal authorities and Democratic officials or the judiciary over immigration policy. The FBI arrested Milwaukee County Judge Hannah Dugan last month for allegedly assisting a man who is in the country illegally evade immigration officials who were seeking his arrest in her courthouse. Dugan pleaded not guilty to the charges in federal court earlier in May. White House border czar Tom Homan also threatened the state's Democratic governor, Tony Evers, suggesting he could become the next target for the administration's wrath after Evers' office issued guidance to state employees on how to deal with immigration authorities. 'Wait till you see what's coming," Homan told reporters about Evers' message earlier this month. "If you cross that line of impediment or knowingly harboring and concealing an illegal alien, that is a felony. And we'll treat it as such.' The incident at Nadler's office, which shares a federal building with an immigration courthouse in lower Manhattan, took place the same day as significant protests against the arrest of a Bronx high school student by Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials the week prior. According to an NYPD spokesperson, 23 people were taken into custody during the Wednesday evening protests, while 18 people were given criminal court summonses and five were arrested and charged.
Miami Herald
28 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Video of People ‘Leaving Early' From Trump Rally Questioned
A viral video claiming to show attendees leaving early at a President Donald Trump rally in Pennsylvania on Friday has sparked debate online. On multiple occasions in the past, people have posted videos to X, formerly Twitter, claiming to show people leaving Trump rallies early. But the latest video has come under scrutiny, even from the president's critics. Trump has long been known for his tendency to exaggerate crowd sizes at his rallies and public events, a pattern that dates back to his very first days in office. The video, shared by the left-leaning account Patriot Takes, shows a group of four people appearing to exit Trump's rally in Pennsylvania on Friday before it had concluded. However, viewers and commenters on social media quickly pointed out that the footage captures only a tiny fraction of the audience. "I can't stand him, but come on, it was like four people," X user Rick Dorris wrote. Several other observers suggested that the individuals might simply be stepping out for a restroom break or refreshments rather than leaving altogether. Other images and videos from the same rally depict large crowds, reinforcing the notion that the majority of attendees stayed throughout the event. There have, however, been instances of larger numbers of people leaving early from Trump rallies in the past. Last year, there were multiple reports and videos of noticeable early exits at various Trump events. In one instance, a video posted to X appeared to show a small group of people leaving a Trump rally in November 2024. Washington Examiner reporter Samantha-Jo Roth, who posted the video, wrote, "In case anyone is wondering, there are in fact people leaving Trump's rally early. To be fair, many of them have been here since the AM." The post accumulated over 22,000 views. The host of ABC News' If You're Listening show Matt Bevan also shared videos from a Trump rally in Detroit, which he posted on November 1. He wrote, "Went to a little event in Detroit. Despite Trump's claim that nobody leaves early, many people left early. From about 25 minutes into his speech, there was a steady stream." In the comments, he added, "I should note, everyone in the room had been there for two hours before he came on." He also wrote that Trump was scheduled to come on at 4:30 and came on at around 4:45, and "people started leaving about 5:10-5:15." Meanwhile, in October 2024, former Vice President Kamala Harris' campaign shared a video on Truth Social of a Trump rally in Michigan, showing one crowded section and a larger empty area, mocking him over crowd size. "Trump: No one else can fill this place up (The room is mostly empty)," the Harris campaign wrote. Throughout the 2024 presidential campaign, rally crowd sizes and attendance were a point of contention between Trump and Harris, with the Republican frequently boasting about his turnout and jabbing Harris' while the then vice president countered by highlighting people leaving his rallies or empty sections. In September, The New York Times analyzed six rallies in August, finding that both candidates drew similar audience sizes. The Times analysis also found that of those six rallies, Trump spoke four times as long as Harris, writing that the longer duration of his rallies could contribute to the higher number of people leaving early, as based on photographs. The former president previously addressed the comments that supporters were appearing to leave his rallies early. At an event with broadcaster Tucker Carlson in Glendale, Arizona, in October, Trump said, "They don't leave and they're really well-attended, we can't get places big enough." In September, Trump also said to a rally crowd in Walker, Michigan, "The people that you see leaving-because nobody ever leaves, and when they do, I finish up quick, believe me." One X user commented: "Even as a Trump hater, I think these kinds of posts are useless, as evidenced in Nov. 24. You couldn't find him filling any arena, yet he won. Focus on the issues themselves and don't let the chuds pretend they care about working class." The White House has not yet commented on the video. Related Articles Bono Sparks MAGA Backlash After Joe Rogan AppearanceTrump's Approval Rating Hits Second-Term Low With Most Accurate PollsterDonald Trump Says He's Potentially Stopping 'Nuclear War' Through TradeSteve Bannon Says Elon Musk and Scott Bessent Had 'Physical Confrontation' 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
