iQOO Z10 vs iQOO Z9: India price, specs and features compared
The flat display from the Z9 is also gone. The iQOO Z10 gets a slightly larger 6.77-inch quad-curved display, which strikes the perfect balance between a flat and a curved panel. While it is still a 120Hz AMOLED display with a FHD+ resolution, the Z10 gets a big bump in peak brightness — from 1,800 nits on the Z9 to 5,000 nits. The bezels, too, while not uniform, appear almost symmetrical on the iQOO Z10 due to the slight curves on all sides. Overall, the newer model should be able to provide better screen legibility along with a more immersive viewing experience compared to the iQOO Z9.iQOO Z10 vs iQOO Z9: Performance and batteryThe iQOO Z10 gets a significant upgrade when it comes to the chipset and RAM. While the iQOO Z9 was powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 7200 SoC, the Z10 features the Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 processor — the same chip that powers more expensive devices such as the Nothing Phone 3a series. Similarly, while the storage options on the Z10 go up to 256GB (same as the Z9), you now get the option of 12GB RAM in the top-tier version. Expect to see better performance and efficiency courtesy of the new chip.advertisementSpeaking of efficiency, the iQOO Z10 gets a massive 7,300mAh battery under the hood — a 46 per cent increase over the 5,000mAh battery of the iQOO Z9. The wired charging is also faster, with 90W support for the Z10 versus 44W on the Z9.In terms of software, the iQOO Z10 boots Funtouch OS 15 atop Android 15, and just like previous Z-series devices, it gets support for 2 years of OS updates and 3 years of security patches. Additionally, the latest software also brings a slew of AI features, such as AI Eraser and image cutouts, AI Super Document, AI Circle to Search, and AI Note Assist.iQOO Z10 vs iQOO Z9: CameraBoth the iQOO Z10 and Z9 offer a dual-rear camera setup led by a 50-megapixel Sony IMX882 OIS sensor paired with a 2-megapixel depth sensor. However, the front camera has been upgraded from a 16-megapixel sensor on the Z9 to a 32-megapixel sensor on the iQOO Z10.iQOO Z10 vs iQOO Z9: Price in IndiaWhen it comes to pricing, there is a slight difference between the iQOO Z10 and Z9. The iQOO Z9 was effectively available for Rs 17,999 and Rs 19,999 for the 8GB + 128GB and 8GB + 256GB storage variants, respectively. The iQOO Z10, on the other hand, comes in three variants and starts at Rs 19,999 for the 8GB + 128GB storage option. The 8GB + 256GB storage variant is effectively available for Rs 21,999, while the top-tier 12GB + 256GB storage variant is effectively available for Rs 23,999.advertisementThe iQOO Z10 comes in Stellar Black and Glacier Silver colours. It is exclusively available for purchase via Amazon.iQOO Z10 vs iQOO Z9: Final thoughtsThe iQOO Z10 brings substantial upgrades over the Z9, particularly in battery capacity, display brightness, and overall performance. With a sleek new design, a much larger 7,300mAh battery, faster charging, and a significantly brighter display, the Z10 feels like a step-up in all the right areas. The improved front camera and AI-powered software features also add to its appeal. If you're using the iQOO Z9 and want longer battery life, a better screen, and a more refined user experience, the iQOO Z10 is a worthy upgrade.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scroll.in
9 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
India's embrace of dangerous facial recognition technology is great for AI, terrible for privacy
In February, India, along with France, co-hosted the AI Action Summit held in Paris. At the end, it was announced that the next edition will be held in India. In its naming, priorities, and focus, the summit witnessed a clear shift from 'safety' to 'innovation' as the principal theme in artificial intelligence discourse. This move aligns with India's lax regulatory stance on AI governance, even in high-risk areas like healthcare and surveillance-driven technologies such as facial recognition technology. In the upcoming summit, this shift will enable the Indian government to steer discussions toward innovation, investment and accessibility while avoiding scrutiny over its weak legal protections, which create an environment conducive to unregulated technological experimentation. Shortly after the introduction of Chinese start-up DeepSeek's R1 model – which upended assumptions about large language models and how much it might cost to develop them – the Indian Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology announced plans to develop indigenous foundation models using Indian language data within a year and invited proposals from companies and researchers under its IndiaAI Mission. While local development in these areas is still in the early phase, the domain of AI that has already seen widespread adoption and deployment in India is facial recognition technology. As India contemplates a sustained push toward AI development and will likely seek to leverage its hosting of the next AI Summit for investments, it is instructive to look at how it has deployed and governed facial recognition technology solutions. Understanding Facial Recognition Technology Facial recognition technology is a probabilistic tool developed to automatically identify or verify individuals by analysing their facial features. It enables the comparison of digital facial images, captured via live video cameras (such as CCTV) or photographs, to ascertain whether the images belong to the same person. Facial recognition technology uses algorithms to analyse facial features, such as eye distance and chin shape, creating a unique mathematical 'face template' for identification. This template, similar to a fingerprint, allows facial recognition technology to identify individuals from photos, videos, or real-time feeds using visible or infrared light. Facial recognition technology has two main applications: identifying unknown individuals by comparing their face template to a database (often used by law enforcement) and verifying the identity of a known person, such as unlocking a phone. Modern facial recognition technology utilises deep learning, a machine learning technique. During training, artificial neurons learn to recognise facial features from labeled inputs. New facial scans are processed as pixel matrices, with neurons assigning weights based on features, producing labels with confidence levels. Liveness checks, like blinking, ensure the subject is real. Still, facial recognition technology faces accuracy challenges – balancing false positives (wrong matches) and false negatives (missed matches). Minimising one often increases the other. Factors like lighting, background and expressions also affect accuracy. Over the past seven years, facial recognition technology has seen widespread adoption in India, especially by the government and its agencies. This growth has coincided with debates surrounding Aadhaar (the national biometric ID system), frequent failures of other verification methods, a rise in street surveillance, and government efforts to modernise law enforcement and national security operations. In this review, I have surveyed the range of facial recognition technology deployment across sectors in India, both in public and private service delivery. This adoption tells the story of an exponential rise in the use of FRT in India, with barely any regulatory hurdles despite clear privacy and discrimination harms. Locating India's regulatory approach While efforts toward regulating AI are still in their infancy, with a handful of global regulations and considerable international debate about the appropriate approach, regulatory discussions about facial recognition technology predate them by a few years and are a little more evolved. Facial recognition technology systems can produce inaccurate, discriminatory, and biased outcomes due to flawed design and training data. A Georgetown Law study on the use of facial recognition technology in the US showed disproportionate impacts on African Americans and tests revealed frequent false positives, particularly affecting people of color. In 2019, the UK's Science and Technology Committee recommended halting facial recognition technology deployment until bias and effectiveness issues are resolved. The UK government countered the report by stating that the existing legal framework already offered sufficient safeguards regarding the application of facial recognition technology. Civil society organisations have been demanding bans or moratoriums on the use and purchase of facial recognition technology for years, most notably after a New York Times investigation in 2019 revealed that more than 600 law enforcement agencies in the US rely on the technology provided by a secretive company known as Clearview AI. An impact assessment commissioned by the European Commission in 2021 observed that facial recognition technology 'bear[s] new and unprecedentedly stark risks for fundamental rights, most significantly the right to privacy and non-discrimination.' The European Union and UK offer regulatory models for facial recognition technology in law enforcement. The EU's Law Enforcement Directive restricts biometric data processing to strictly necessary cases. While initial drafts of the EU's AI Act banned remote biometrics – such as the use of facial recognition technology – the final version has exceptions for law enforcement. In the UK, the Data Protection Act mirrors Europe's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), and a landmark court ruling deemed police facial recognition technology use unlawful, citing violations of human rights and data protection, and the technology's mass, covert nature. The EU's AI Act, while not explicitly banning discriminatory facial recognition technology, mandates data governance and bias checks for high-risk AI systems, potentially forcing developers to implement stronger safeguards. The GDPR generally bans processing biometric data for unique identification, but exceptions exist for data made public by the subject or when processing is for substantial public interest. In Europe, non-law enforcement facial recognition technology often falls under these exceptions. As per EU laws, facial recognition technology use may be permitted under strict circumstances in which a legislator can provide a specific legal basis regulating the deployment of facial recognition technology that is compatible with fundamental rights. US Vice President JD Vance's rebuke against ' excessive regulation ' of AI at the Paris Summit in February telegraphed a lack of intent for the current US federal government to regulate AI. However, there are numerous state-level regulations in operation in the US. Canada's Artificial Intelligence and Data Act (AIDA) follows the EU model of risk regulation. Countries like South Korea have taken a more light-touch approach, with Seoul's AI Basic Act including a smaller subset of protections and ethical considerations than those outlined in the EU law. Japan and Singapore have explored self-regulatory codes rather than command and control regulation. The Indian Supreme Court's Puttaswamy judgment, which upheld a right to privacy, outlines a four-part test for proportionality to test whether state actions violate fundamental rights: a legitimate goal, suitable means, necessity (meaning there are no less restrictive alternatives), and balanced impact on rights. Facial recognition technology applications, like those that use the technology to mark attendance and carry out authentication, often have less intrusive alternatives, suggesting they fail the necessity test. Street surveillance using facial recognition technology inherently involves indiscriminate mass surveillance, not targeted monitoring. India's newly legislated Digital Data Protection Act, whose rules are currently being framed, permits the government to process personal data without consent in certain cases. Section 17(2) grants a broad exemption from its provisions for personal data processing, exempting state entities designated by the Indian government for reasons as broad as sovereignty, security, foreign relations, public order, or preventing incitement to certain offenses. In India, the primary policy document on facial recognition technology is a Niti Aayog paper, ' Responsible AI for All,' which anticipates that India's data protection law will handle facial recognition technology privacy concerns. However, it lacks detailed recommendations for ethical facial recognition technology use. It suggests the government should not exempt law enforcement from data protection oversight. It remains to be seen whether this recommendation will be followed, but this alone would be insufficient protection. Data minimisation, a key data protection principle that recommends the collection only of such information as is strictly necessary, restricts facial recognition technology by preventing the merging of captured images with other databases to form comprehensive citizen profiles. Yet, tenders for Automated Facial Recognition Systems (AFRS), to be used by law enforcement agencies, explicitly called for database integration, contradicting data minimisation principles. India's lenient approach toward facial recognition technology regulation, even as there is widespread adoption of the technology by both public and private bodies, suggests a pattern of regulatory restraint when it comes to emerging digital technologies. Rest of World recently reported on an open-arms approach that India has taken to AI, with a focus on 'courting large AI companies to make massive investments.' As a prime example, both Meta and OpenAI are seeking partnerships with Reliance Industries in India to offer their AI products to Indian consumers, which would be hosted at a new three-gigawatt data center in Jamnagar, Gujarat. These investments in India need to be seen in the context of a number of geopolitical and geoeconomic factors: data localisation regulations under India's new data protection law, the negotiating power that the Indian government and the companies close to it possess by leveraging the size of its emerging data market, how these factors facilitate the emergence of domestic BigTech players like Reliance, and most importantly, the Indian government's overall approach toward AI development and regulation. It was earlier reported that the much-awaited Digital India Act would have elements of AI regulation. However, the fate of both the legislation or any other form of regulation is, for the moment, uncertain. As recently as December 2024, Ashwini Vaishnav, the Indian minister of electronics and information technology, stated in the Indian Parliament that a lot more consensus was needed before a law on AI can be formulated. This suggests that the Indian government currently has no concrete plans to begin work toward any form of AI regulation, and despite the widespread use of AI and well documented risks, will stay out of the first wave of global AI regulations.
India.com
9 minutes ago
- India.com
After Rafale, India receives 16 of the world's most versatile, efficient multi-role tactical airlifter from…, has flight endurance up to 11 hours, set to replace…
India is enhancing its defence capabilities through the diversification of military partners. While maintaining its long-standing relationship with Russia and building ties with France, India is also expanding its arsenal with strategic acquisitions across nations such as Spain. These actions indicate India's resolve to establish a more powerful and self-reliant military. Indian Ambassador to Spain, Dinesh K Patnaik, along with other senior officials, received the last of the 16 Airbus C-295 military transport aircraft at the Airbus Defence and Space assembly line in Seville. The Indian embassy in Spain on Saturday said that the delivery was two months ahead of schedule, marking an important milestone in Indian defence capabilities. Sharing a post on X(formerly Twitter), the embassy stated,' Indian Ambassador to Spain, Dinesh K Patnaik, along with senior officials from Indian Air Force, received the last of the 16 Airbus C-295 military transport aircraft at the Airbus Defence and Space assembly line in Seville. The delivery, two months ahead of schedule, marks an important milestone in strengthening India's defense capabilities.' The Airbus C295 is a robust, reliable and highly versatile tactical transport aircraft designed for missions ranging from troop and cargo transport, maritime patrol, airborne warning, surveillance and reconnaissance, to signals intelligence, armed close air support, medical evacuation, VIP transport and airborne firefighting. It is the world's most versatile and efficient multi-role tactical airlifter, reported news agency ANI. With more than 300 aircraft under contract, the C295 has an outstanding reliability record and proves itself to be a highly efficient aircraft every day. The C295 is the perfect workhorse, offering unparalleled versatility and proven reliability to meet the needs of armed forces, governments and NGOs. Bilateral partnership in defence sector between the countries has witnessed rapid growth in recent years. The procurement of 56 C295 aircraft from Airbus Spain in a USD 2.5 billion contract, 40 of which will be made in India by Tata Advanced Systems, represents the first Make in India project in the defence aircraft sector. According to the statement by the MEA, the Chief of Indian Air Force ACM VR Chaudhari presided the handing over of the first C295 Aircraft to the Indian government on September 13, 2023, in Seville. The C-295, a transport aircraft of 5-10 tonne capacity with contemporary technology, is set to replace the ageing Avro aircraft of the IAF. The aircraft, with a flight endurance of up to 11 hours, is a versatile and efficient tactical transport aircraft. India signed a contract with Airbus Defence & Space, Spain, for acquisition of 56 C-295MW transport aircraft for IAF in Sep 2021.
News18
33 minutes ago
- News18
Qubo Dashcam Pro 2.7K Is A Not-So-Expensive Gateway To Dashcam For Your Car
Last Updated: Qubo dashcams are showing their worth with focus on affordable products that deliver good value with their features. Dashcams used to be a luxury earlier but the adventure on Indian roads mean these cameras have become somewhat a necessity. Qubo is one of the many brands looking to pick up the need for these products and its Dashcam Pro 2.7K is one of the affordable versions available in the market, if you purely want a no, non-sense front-facing camera that captures the visuals in front of the windshield. We decided to give the dashcam a shot over a long stretch of travel, both within the city and outstation, and these were our findings about the product and its overall value. Compact Yet Packing When you take the Dashcam Pro 2.7K out of the box, you might feel deceived by the marketing clips and its actual size. However, the compact design does not mean actual limitations, in fact, you get 2.7K resolution quality with its 144-degree field of view allowing you to capture the whole frame in front of you and some more. The details are mostly sharp and you can easily read the number plates when the lighting around the camera is sufficient. The camera features a box-like design with the controls on the side and the panel below the display. You get it with a USB C cable that connects via a 12W USB port that is offered inside the box. The Set Up Qubo is giving everything in the box with the Dashcam Pro 2.7K model. You get the camera, the 12V socket that plugs into the car console and the micro-USB cable that attaches to the camera. You also get a 3M tape that makes it easy to fix the camera on the windshield. Most people will find it easy to set up the dashcam themselves and if they are unsure, a local mechanic is the best alternative. Once you've got the dashcam started, install the Qubo Pro app on an Android or iOS device, pair it with the Dashcam Pro 2.7K model and sign in with your account. You need a microSD card to do anything with the camera and that you have to buy separately. How It Works The Dashcam Pro 2.7K goes about delivering on its promise to a good effect. The wide angle lens gives you more subject in the frame without leaving any black zones. The 2-inch screen might feel limiting but that's where the app lets you monitor all the recorded footage on the smartphone. The 5MP camera is able to give you the details when the lights are bright but the low-light effect of the sensor feels limiting, and you might have a hard time trying to read the plates if needed. The size of the dashcam also ensures it is not invading the view of the driver while driving. There are no ADAS or lane-departure alerts available with the model, so make sure you are aware of that. The camera to app pairing only works when you connect the latter to the Wi-Fi network of the camera. Only then you can access the stored/recorded files through the app on the smartphone. top videos View all Having the camera connected to the power means you don't have any battery issues to contend. The use of microUSB and USB ports in 2025 feels dated and the next Qubo model should ideally switch to USB C on both sides. The dashcam gets microSD card support but Qubo has made only select models compatible with the product. Make sure you check for the details on the product website before buying this camera. About the Author S Aadeetya S Aadeetya, Special Correspondent at News18 Tech, accidentally got into journalism 10 years ago, and since then, has been part of established media houses covering the latest trends in technology and helping More News18 Tech delivers the latest technology updates, including phone launches, gadget reviews, AI advancements, and more. Stay informed with breaking tech news, expert insights, and trends from India and around the world. Also Download the News18 App to stay updated! tags : dashcam view comments Location : Delhi, India, India First Published: August 04, 2025, 08:53 IST News tech Qubo Dashcam Pro 2.7K Is A Not-So-Expensive Gateway To Dashcam For Your Car Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
