Advocating for yourself: Tips, support, and resources
Some people face challenges and barriers when seeking healthcare, such as discrimination or feeling that doctors dismiss their concerns.
Certain groups, such as Black people, women, those with obesity, and LGBTQIA+ communities, may encounter additional healthcare barriers due to discrimination.
Self-advocacy may be helpful to individuals who feel that healthcare professionals dismiss their concerns or fail to provide adequate or equitable care.
This article offers tips for self-advocating at the doctor's office and discusses a person's rights. It also discusses a person's options when they feel a doctor is not listening to their healthcare concerns and offers support and resources. Maskot/Getty Images
Gathering information about their condition, treatment options, and rights as patients may help them feel more confident in a healthcare setting. By learnin g as much as they can, they may feel more empowered to communicate with healthcare professionals and participate in decisions about their healthcare.
Before making an appointment, a person may also want to do some research to determine whether a healthcare professional is the right fit for them. It may be helpful to visit the doctor's website and read online reviews.
A person may find it helpful to prepare for an appointment by writing down or memorizing the questions they would like to ask a healthcare professional.
Planning ahead may help an individual avoid feeling overwhelmed during the appointment. It may also help them feel more confident if they are worried that a healthcare professional might rush them or dismiss their concerns.
It is important for a person to understand their health circumstances and healthcare plan as a self-advocate.
One of an individual's rights as a patient is to be able to ask questions about their health and the treatments a healthcare professional recommen ds. A person should feel comfortable asking their doctor for clarification until they fully understand their health status and healthcare plan.
Self-advocacy involves actively participating in decision making about one's healthcare. This can include asserting certain healthcare preferences, including diagnostic methods and treatment options. requesting specific, relevant, evidence-based treatment options
questioning the treatment options a doctor suggests to understand the potential risks and benefits, and enquiring about relevant alternatives
asking the doctor to use diagnostic methods or treatment plans that accommodate certain preferences, such as preferring not to give an unnecessary weight measurement
A person may want to ask a friend or family member to accompany them to a healthcare appointment. This can help them feel supported, confident, and less overwhelmed.
A companion may support a person during the appointment by: taking notes
asking clarifying questions
helping to assert preferences
voicing dissatisfaction
Keeping detailed records of their medical history can help a person communicate with healthcare professionals more effectively. It may also help prevent a healthcare professional from dismissing concerns or making assumptions.
A person may want to record: the dates and outcomes of previous appointments
their ongoing symptoms or symptom progression
other healthcare professionals and specialists they have met with
medical tests they have undergone
prior medications and other treatments
A person's rights as a patient include the right to obtain a second opinion.
An individual may want to contact another doctor for various reasons. These include: wanting to confirm their doctor's advice
not clearly understanding their doctor's assessment or recommendations
feeling uncomfortable with their doctor's methods or recommendations
wanting to explore alternative treatment options
wanting treatment from a healthcare professional who is more understanding of their needs
Self-advocacy in a healthcare setting can help a person understand, communicate, and assert their patient rights.
When individuals can communicate with healthcare professionals effectively and participate in making decisions, they may receive more satisfactory, equitable care.
If a person is unaware of their patient rights, they may feel as if they're overstepping boundaries or causing an inconvenience by self-advocating. However, self-advocacy goals align closely with patient rights. ask questions about their health status and recommended treatment, and have their questions answered
make decisions about the care that a doctor recommends, and have those decisions respected
obtain copies or summaries of their medical records
receive information from their doctor and have the opportunity to discuss the risks and benefits of appropriate treatment alternatives
receive timely, responsive treatment for their needs
be treated with courtesy, dignity, and respect
obtain a second opinion
If a person feels their doctor is dismissive of their health concerns, and self-advocacy techniques like asking for clarification and expressing preferences are not effective, they may want to switch to a different healthcare professional.
Individuals can do some quick research online to try and find healthcare professionals and settings that may be able to better meet their needs. This can involve checking websites, reviews, and intake forms. They can also speak to trusted friends, family, or support groups and ask them to suggest doctors with whom they have had good experiences.
A person may also want to contact a healthcare facility before making an appointment to discuss any concerns and ask questions about the care they provide.
If a person has a negative experience with a healthcare professional, they can ask the medical office to record their concerns. They may also be able to help others decide whether to seek care from a health professional by submitting a review of their experience online.
Some people may face additional challenges in healthcare due to discrimination. These include: people of color
women
LGBTQIA+ communities
those with obesity
The following resources may help people find support: The Association of Black Women Physicians (ABWP): The ABWP provides programs and information that support the mental health and well-being of Black people and support African American women in medicine.
The ABWP provides programs and information that support the mental health and well-being of Black people and support African American women in medicine. White Coats for Black Lives (WC4BL): WC4BL provides information and various resources that aim to improve health equity for Black people and people of color.
WC4BL provides information and various resources that aim to improve health equity for Black people and people of color. The NAACP: The NAACP is an advocacy organization that aims to end racial inequality. The organization aims to provide health funding for African American people and advocates for resources to reduce health disparities.
The NAACP is an advocacy organization that aims to end racial inequality. The organization aims to provide health funding for African American people and advocates for resources to reduce health disparities. The OASH Office on Women's Health (OWH): The OWH is part of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The organization provides information, support, and resources for women's health.
The is part of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The organization provides information, support, and resources for women's health. The Alliance for Women's Health & Prevention (AWHP): The AWHP is an advocacy organization that aims to help women access healthcare and advance policy to drive equitable care.
The AWHP is an advocacy organization that aims to help women access healthcare and advance policy to drive equitable care. Gay and Lesbian Medical Association (GLMA): The GLMA offers a directory of LGBTQIA+-friendly healthcare professionals.
The GLMA offers a directory of LGBTQIA+-friendly healthcare professionals. Out2Enroll: Out2Enroll is an organization that offers various resources for LGBTQIA+ healthcare, including information about gender affirming care, help finding a doctor, and help managing discrimination.
Out2Enroll is an organization that offers various resources for LGBTQIA+ healthcare, including information about gender affirming care, help finding a doctor, and help managing discrimination. HAES Health Sheets: This website provides several resources that may be helpful for people with obesity, including weight-friendly health professionals, self-advocacy information, and healthcare research.
This website provides several resources that may be helpful for people with obesity, including weight-friendly health professionals, self-advocacy information, and healthcare research. The Obesity Action Coalition: This organization provides various resources for people with obesity.
This organization provides various resources for people with obesity. Solace: This organization is covered by most Medicare and Medicare Advantage plans. It can provide advocacy services and private practice advocates that a person can use and pay for out of pocket.
Self-advocacy can help people experience more satisfactory healthcare. Advocating can involve gaining knowledge, preparing for appointments, asserting preferences, and participating in decision making.
Self-advocacy aligns closely with people's patient rights, which include the right to clear information from healthcare professionals, the right to make healthcare decisions, and the right to be treated with courtesy, dignity, and respect.
Some groups of people may face additional healthcare challenges due to bias and discrimination. Self-advocacy may help empower people to question healthcare professionals and practices and gain access to equitable care. Medical News Today has strict sourcing guidelines and relies on peer-reviewed studies, academic research institutions, and medical journals and associations. We only use quality, credible sources to ensure content accuracy and integrity. You can learn more about how we ensure our content is accurate and current by reading our editorial policy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
.png%3Ftrim%3D0%2C0%2C0%2C0%26width%3D1200%26height%3D800%26crop%3D1200%3A800&w=3840&q=100)
The Independent
25 minutes ago
- The Independent
An 1800-foot bridge in Missouri is available for free. There's just one catch
The Missouri Department of Transportation is preparing to replace the mid-20th-century Theodosia Bridge, but rather than demolish it outright, officials are offering it up free of charge to any eligible entity willing to take it on. The catch? Whoever wants it must bear the cost of its relocation. Built in 1951, the over 1,800-foot-long structure spans Bull Shoals Lake along US Highway 160 and boasts a distinctive design of 10 riveted camelback through-truss spans, each about 181 feet in length. The bridge features concrete abutments, wingwalls, and column piers with web-walls, with a deck surfaced in concrete and topped with bituminous. If someone takes the bridge, they may have to agree to rules that protect its historic design and keep it in good condition. Eligible applicants, including government agencies, nonprofit organizations, and private individuals, have until January 9, 2026, to submit comprehensive proposals to MoDOT's Historic Preservation Section. These plans must outline how the bridge will be dismantled, relocated, and reused, including cost estimates and the intended future application. To ease the financial burden of relocation, MoDOT is offering reimbursement equivalent to the demolition costs, provided the recipient undertakes the removal themselves. However, this funding is not available if MoDOT removes and stores the bridge. Applicants must remove it themselves to qualify. Recipients are also encouraged to explore alternative funding sources, including the Recreational Trails Program through Missouri State Parks and MoDOT's Transportation Alternatives Program. Locally, interest in preserving and repurposing the bridge has been high, especially for use in low-water crossings, Ozark Radio News reports. However, Ozark County officials fear that relocation expenses could run into the millions, making such a project financially unfeasible under the current budget. The Independent has contacted MoDOT for comment. MoDOT plans to replace the bridge in the future, but construction is still years away. For now, the department is studying the land and environment to make sure the project is safe and practical. Preliminary site work, including surveys and data collection, is underway, with environmental surveys expected to conclude by August 2026. Preliminary cost projections estimate that the installation of a new bridge could approach $100.4 million. Interested entities can visit MoDOT's Free Bridges portion of its website for a proposal checklist.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
US pediatric organization diverges from CDC in Covid-19 vaccine advisory for children
The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) is urging that children as young as six months and up to 23 months old receive the Covid-19 vaccine – a position that diverges from the current federal guidance given by the Trump administration's health agencies. The AAP released its updated childhood immunization schedule, which outlines recommendations for vaccines against Covid-19, influenza and RSV for individuals under 18. 'It differs from recent recommendations of the advisory committee on immunization practices of the CDC, which was overhauled this year and replaced with individuals who have a history of spreading vaccine misinformation,' the organization said in a statement. The announcement follows a decision from health and human services secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr in late May to halt CDC recommendations for healthy children to receive the Covid-19 vaccine. Previously, the CDC advised vaccination for everyone six months and older with the latest available dose. The CDC currently advises that Covid-19 vaccinations for children aged six months through 17 years should be determined through 'shared clinical decision-making'. The AAP recommends vaccination for anyone under 18 who is at higher risk of serious illness from Covid-19, resides in a longterm care or congregate living facility, has not previously been vaccinated, or shares a household with someone at elevated risk. 'The academy has been making pediatric immunization recommendations since the 1930s, that has not changed,' Dr Susan Kressly, president of the AAP, told ABC News. 'But what has changed is that this year, we're doing it in the environment of misinformation, which makes it more important than ever that we provide clear and confident guidance, because the majority of American families really depend on us for this guidance.' AAP says infants and toddlers between six and 23 months face the greatest risk for severe outcomes from Covid-19 and vaccination offers protection against serious illness. Even as medical groups continue to disagree with federal agencies, insurers often base coverage on guidelines from the CDC's advisory committee on immunization practices (ACIP). If ACIP declines to endorse a vaccine, families may have to pay out of pocket, and the shot may not be provided through the federally funded Vaccines for Children program. Kennedy's restructured vaccine panel has maintained support for annual flu shots but voted to limit them to single-dose formulations without the preservative thimerosal. The AAP, however, maintains that the preservative poses no risk and said physicians should administer any approved flu vaccine suitable for the patient.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
FDA issues urgent warning about possibly radioactive shrimp
Health regulators are urgently warning Americans to check their freezers after a radioactive substance was found in a popular bag of shrimp sold at Walmart. The FDA has told the public to avoid Great Value raw frozen shrimp due to contamination with Cesium-137, a radioactive isotope. Customs and Border Protection agents, who detected the radioactive isotope Cesium-137, or Cs-137, in shipping containers at four major US ports, sounded the alarm to the FDA. The FDA tested the contents of the shipping containers and confirmed on Tuesday that the shrimp, which came from a company in Indonesia called BMS Foods, was contaminated. CBP and the FDA are now working with Indonesian seafood regulators to pinpoint the precise source of the contamination. According to the agency, evidence suggests the shrimp was processed or stored in unsanitary conditions that likely led to the radioactive contamination, making it unsafe for people to eat. The risk of contamination from passing a contaminated shipping container is low, but that risk compounds if a person were to eat radioactive shrimp. Once inside your body, Cs-137 acts as a long-term, internal source of radiation that significantly increases cancer risk. The Do Not Eat warning is issued out of an abundance of caution, the FDA said, adding that testing to date has not confirmed the presence of contamination in any product currently being sold in stores. The contaminated shipping containers entered the ports of Los Angeles, Houston, Savannah, and Miami. The containers included three lots of Great Value brand frozen raw shrimp, all with best by dates of March 15, 2027. The FDA confirmed Cs-137 in one batch of breaded shrimp, but all contaminated shipments were prevented from entering the US. 'If you have recently purchased raw frozen shrimp from Walmart that matches this description, throw it away,' the FDA said. The FDA also instructed distributors and retailers to throw the product away. Anyone who believes they may have eaten it should consult their doctor. The agency added that it 'will continue working with industry to trace all implicated products processed by PT. Bahari Makmur Sejati through the supply chain to gather as much information about them as possible and take action as appropriate.' Low-level exposure to Cs-137 is common for everyone due to its persistent presence in the environment from past nuclear weapons testing in the 1950s and 60s, according to the CDC . The significant health risk, however, comes from highly concentrated sources found in medical and industrial equipment, where the material is sealed within protective shielding to prevent exposure. A serious danger emerges if this shielding is compromised, either accidentally or intentionally, allowing the release of the highly concentrated radioactive material. Significant external exposure to Cs-137 can result in severe health effects, including radiation burns, acute radiation sickness, and death. The high-energy gamma radiation it emits also elevates long-term cancer risk. If Cs-137 is ingested or inhaled, it disperses throughout the body's soft tissues, concentrating in the muscles, creating a persistent internal source of radiation.
