
Amid fossil fuel shift in U.S., hope emerges for India and Japan tie-up on solar
But at the International Solar Festival held at the Osaka Expo earlier this month, the focus wasn't on competition but rather how India and Japan can partner to grow solar capacity together.
The gathering, the second of its kind, was organized by the International Solar Alliance (ISA) and brought together business leaders, government officials and other representatives from Japan, India and ISA member nations. The goal was to tell the story of solar and its potential as a driver of economic growth to visitors from around the world.
'We wanted to have the International Solar Festival in Osaka because one of the key challenges is on getting the private sector to look at new frontier solar technologies, which is linked to the question of how Japan and India can collaborate meaningfully,' said Ashish Khanna, the director-general of the ISA.
The ISA, founded in 2015 at COP21 in Paris and based in India, has more than 100 member countries. Of those, India and Japan are two of the largest economies and are widely seen as leaders in global solar and solar-linked technologies.
In addition to promoting tech to the private sector, the alliance also seeks to address another challenge — the lack of progress on expanding solar generation and production in developing countries, despite massive potential. Case in point, the most recent analysis from the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) found that Asia, Europe and North America accounted for 90% of renewable capacity growth in 2024.
'Bridging the divide and closing the investment gap between countries and regions is critical,' said Francesco La Camera, IRENA's director-general, in an emailed statement.
Expanding partnerships
The ISF in Osaka was just the latest in a series of energy- and climate-related discussions between Japan and India. In 2022, the two countries launched a Clean Energy Partnership, with the goal of expanding cooperation on clean energy and energy security.
India also joined the Japan-led Asia Energy Transition Initiative (AETI) in 2023. More recently, talks are ongoing about India becoming the next country eligible to receive funds under Japan's joint crediting mechanism (JCM), one of the largest state-led carbon credit and offset programs in the world.
'The JCM is expected to generate employment opportunities in both nations by fostering investments in low-carbon technologies,' said Shamkant Mirashi, an India-based sustainability consultant. 'By subsidizing these technologies, Japan can help equalize the cost of clean energy with conventional polluting sources.'
The International Solar Alliance hosted a festival at the Osaka Expo, with collaboration in the key renewable energy source being the order of the day. |
Nithin Coca
Then, in 2024, the Japan Bank for International Cooperation (JBIC) provided funds to support Osaka Gas' joint investment in renewable energy projects with India's CleanMax.
Despite this, there's still much more to be done, says Khanna, as overall bilateral investment and trade in solar have been limited. That, he hopes, will soon change.
'All partnerships take time,' Khanna said. 'We want to see the R&D and manufacturing ecosystem of Japan marrying with the entrepreneurial talent and market of India, a harmonization of alignment. How this translates into concrete business opportunities is something that we would like to facilitate more.'
One challenge is that most major Japanese companies and financial institutions have yet to make large investments into solar technologies in India, which Khanna says is disappointing, as solar provides a safe, reliable investment opportunity.
'Japan has not exercised enough the financial muscle of its pension funds and institutional investors,' said Khanna. 'The time is now ... to create an ecosystem by which more concrete investment decisions are made.'
Part of that reluctance could be the fact that major players in Japan and the government itself are not exactly all-in on solar energy.
One criticism of Japan's approach, via entities such as AETI but also the Asia Zero Emissions Community (AZEC) has been a focus on pushing alternative Japanese technologies such as ammonia and biomass co-firing, hydrogen and carbon capture and storage. Critics say these alternatives are either not viable, short-term solutions or would have limited impact in reducing emissions. But Khanna did not necessarily see these efforts as distracting from solar.
'I think the answer for that is not either/or, but and,' said Khanna. 'Green hydrogen and ammonia have huge potential if the economics can be sorted out, and India can be a source of green hydrogen for Japan.'
The elephants in the room
Two notable countries were absent at the ISF — the United States and China. Despite their lack of engagement in the solar alliance, both countries, in their respective ways, cast a long shadow on the potential for Japan-India solar collaboration.
While the U.S. has the second-highest solar capacity in the world and, under the Inflation Reduction Act passed during the administration of U.S. President Joe Biden, has made strides in solar and cleantech manufacturing, the world's largest economy is seeing dramatic cutbacks in global climate support this year.
Employees carry solar panels at a plant in Aksu in China's Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region in 2012. |
Reuters
The main driver is the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump, whose recent budget reconciliation law passed by Congress would reduce solar tax credits, part of a sudden shift away from support for renewable energy projects.
'It guts clean energy tax credits, kills American jobs and ships them overseas, raises electricity bills for families and small businesses, and weakens our energy independence,' said Andrew Reagan, president of the nonprofit Clean Energy for America, in a press release.
Efforts set up under the Biden administration, like a partnership with Japan focused on expanding technology and supply chains for floating offshore wind, look unlikely to continue.
Instead, amid trade tensions between the two countries, the U.S. has been pushing Japan to buy more of its liquefied natural gas. In fact, new trade tariffs also could limit the export of solar components and panels to the U.S., while the Trump administration prioritizes the domestic expansion of planet-warming fossil fuels such as coal and natural gas.
China, meanwhile, has been praised for its rapid domestic expansion of solar, adding more capacity than the rest of the world combined in 2024. But the industry has numerous ethical concerns, including well-documented links to forced labor and human rights violations in the Uyghur homelands in the far-western region of Xinjiang, where many solar components are produced.
'There is a significant risk that that solar panels are being built with Uyghur forced labor, potentially across every stage: from quartz mining and polysilicon refinement to module construction and the development of the plant itself,' said Elfidar Iltebir, president of the nonprofit Uyghur American Association.
A solar power plant in Solapur, India, in March. In 2024, the country overtook Japan to become the country with the third-largest solar capacity in the world. |
Reuters
Chinese companies, backed by state subsidies and access to cheap energy and labor, have been able to undercut solar manufacturing in Europe and Japan. Even India's attempts to expand domestic production have run into issues, and the country remains reliant on Chinese components.
Exploring new technologies
With those issues plaguing the industry in the world's top two economies, tie-ups between countries such as India and Japan become all the more important.
For Khanna, one path forward might be developing alternatives to photovoltaics, the most common solar technology used today.
'If the industry is disrupted, that can itself become a source of diversification,' said Khanna. 'Perovskite, for example, doesn't need silica or ingots, and solid state batteries may not need lithium. The current supply chain can become a new supply chain if these technologies can be commercialized, and there is clearly a role for India, Japan and other countries to collaborate.'
A model already exists, says Khanna. One of India's leading foreign collaborators is Shizuoka Prefecture-based Suzuki, which partnered with India's Maruti to build the country's largest automaker, and have even released an electric car together.
'What will be the Suzuki for solar in India,' asked Khanna. 'Suzuki transformed the automobile sector, by taking a bet. Who will take that bet, that private sector leadership, for solar?'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

an hour ago
Japan Releases Guidelines for IT Giants on Smartphone Apps
News from Japan Technology Jul 29, 2025 22:22 (JST) Tokyo, July 29 (Jiji Press)--The Japan Fair Trade Commission on Tuesday released guidelines for information technology giants, such as Google LLC and Apple Inc., regarding smartphone apps, ahead of the full implementation in December of a new law to promote competition in the app market. The guidelines prohibit these companies from using data obtained through their operating systems to develop products with competitive advantages and hampering the use of other companies' payment systems in apps. They are also urged to allow customers to choose from among multiple search engines when buying new devices. The law, which will take full effect on Dec.18, covers smartphones using the operating systems of Apple and Google and bans excluding other companies' app stores from the platforms. It also requires OS functions necessary for developing apps to be made openly available. To draw up the guidelines, the commission accepted public comments until June 13. Apple voiced concern that the law could force it to share confidential technology and user information with third parties. [Copyright The Jiji Press, Ltd.] Jiji Press


NHK
4 hours ago
- NHK
US survey: 35% of Americans say US atomic bombings justified
A recent US survey has found that Americans have mixed views about whether their country's use of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was justified. Pew Research Center surveyed about 5,000 people aged 18 or older between June 2 and 8, ahead of next month's 80th anniversary of the bombings of the two Japanese cities. The results were released on Monday. Thirty-five percent of the respondents said the bombings were justified, while 31 percent said they were not. Thirty-three percent said they were not sure. The approval rate was higher for older Americans. Among respondents aged 65 or older, 48 percent said the bombings were justified. The figure was 40 percent for those aged 50 to 64, followed by 29 percent for those aged 30 to 49, and 27 percent for those 18 to 29. By contrast, the number of respondents who said the bombings were not justified was higher among younger age groups, including 44 percent for those aged 18 to 29. The survey also asked Americans whether the development of nuclear weapons has made the world safer. Sixty-nine percent of respondents said it has made the world less safe, far exceeding the 10 percent who said the world has become safer.


Japan Times
5 hours ago
- Japan Times
Who buys the F-150s, and more Japan deal mysteries
The long-awaited trade deal between the U.S. and Japan has investors celebrating after months of uncertainty. But as the song goes, nagging questions always remain. Who is going to buy the "cars, SUVs and trucks' that U.S. President Donald Trump has promised to sell? Who is going to purchase the 100 Boeing jets? And what possible structure could the $550 billion fund, allegedly financed by Tokyo with 90% of profits going to U.S., actually take? Answers are sorely needed, not just because of an already growing comprehension gap between the countries over what was actually agreed, but to inform South Korea, the European Union and other close U.S. allies who are trying to wrap up similar deals before Aug. 1. Let's start with autos, long the main source of Trump's dissatisfaction with Tokyo, as well as the largest single cause of the trade deficit. The White House fact sheet (if indeed it can so be called) declared that "long-standing restrictions on U.S. cars and trucks will be lifted, granting U.S. automakers access to the Japanese consumer market.' Of course, U.S. carmakers have enjoyed unlimited access to the Japanese market for decades. As I noted in April, the problem is that U.S. cars just aren't good enough for the local consumer — and Detroit largely isn't interested in trying to muscle its way into a hyper-competitive market dominated by domestic players. Tokyo can try making it a little easier to import U.S. vehicles, such as simplifying inspection procedures. But it can't rebuild cities to fit the bloated models U.S. automakers favor. Around 84% of streets in Japan are municipal roads with an average width of just 3.7 meters (about 12 feet). Even if Tokyo gave everyone a Ford F-150 pickup, its 2.4-meter width would prevent two from passing on narrow streets. Hence cute minivans and kei-cars dominate while, as my colleague Liam Denning said this week, "U.S. automakers do not, in general, make an adorable little anything.' In any case, Japan's auto market has been shrinking for years, with new cars sold down about 20% from a 1990s peak. Automakers constantly fret that young people are losing interest in learning to drive, while the growing numbers of elderly citizens are encouraged to return their licenses. But more significant is what form the $550 billion investment fund will take. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said that the "innovative financing mechanism' was the key to Tokyo getting a deal at all. But neither side seems to agree on what it looks like. The idea first surfaced in May when the Financial Times reported that SoftBank Group founder Masayoshi Son had suggested a joint sovereign wealth fund. The White House calls it an "investment vehicle' that will "rebuild and expand core American industries.' Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, however, refers to a combination of equity, loans and guarantees that will be led by the Japan Bank for International Cooperation and guarantees by Nippon Export and Investment Insurance. That sounds more like overseas development aid than a wealth fund — though few could argue American infrastructure might actually benefit from that. Trump now promises Japan will "give us 90% of $550 billion!' Tokyo is saying that applies to projects where 90% of investment is from the U.S. — in other words, profits are proportional. Does the figure include funding already pledged, such as SoftBank's promised $100 billion? Who knows?! Indeed, a leaked photo from the talks shows what looks like a proposal from Japan for a $400 billion fund, crossed out with $500 billion handwritten on top. That proposal also suggested a 50% profit share. Is this just repackaged existing spending into a simple PowerPoint slide? After all, Japan already invested $783 billion in the U.S. in 2023 and Ishiba pledged in January to boost that to $1 trillion in the future. The problem is that at some stage, this needs to be worked into actual policies. And this is where Ishiba's rush to agreement might come back to bite, especially if he's no longer in the job when the talks get down to details — something that, despite his denials, still seems all but certain after the drubbing his Liberal Democratic Party took in recent Upper House elections. There are plenty of parts of the deal that do make sense. The 100 Boeings can find a home at the country's airlines, though Japan has admitted the number includes at least some already-planned purchases. As the world's largest buyer of liquid natural gas, Tokyo's participation in the Alaska project always seemed logical. Even if the two sides don't seem to agree on what they decided on defense, Japan needs to spend more and the U.S. is the logical seller. Above all, it's encouraging to see the White House, after all these months of tense relations, again describe its ally as the "cornerstone of peace in the Indo-Pacific.' But with all these questions — and Washington continuing to hold the threat over Japan's head with a quarterly evaluation of its compliance with the deal — the market's sigh of relief might still be premature. Gearoid Reidy is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Japan and the Koreas.