
UPDATED: Strategists examine alternatives to Gaza displacement plan in Cairo - Foreign Affairs
The event, hosted by the Egyptian Council for Strategic Studies (ECSS) and the Egyptian Council for Foreign Affairs (ECFA), kicked off earlier on Wednesday to explore proposals for dismantling efforts to displace the Palestinians from Gaza.
In the first session, titled International Approaches to Conflict Resolution and Reconstruction, Ahmed Aml, head of the African Studies Unit at the ECSS, spotlighted the African experience in post-conflict reconstruction, explaining that it focuses on the return of displaced people and refugees, rebuilding, and establishing lasting peace.
Aml referred to Article 11 of the African Union Convention for the Protection and Assistance of Internally Displaced Persons, which outlines states' obligations regarding "sustainable return, local integration, or resettlement."
He noted that the convention endorses return, resettlement, and involving local communities in reconstruction. He also pointed out that the return of refugees and displaced people after a conflict is crucial for lasting peace, indicating that the African experience suggests a direct link between their return, their role in reconstruction, and the achievement of sustainable peace.
Tewfick Aclimandos, head of the European Studies Unit at the ECSS, asserted that there is no one-size-fits-all approach to reconstruction, as the circumstances surrounding donors and internal authorities vary.
Aclimandos stated that each reconstruction effort is characterized by its unique circumstances, which are influenced by factors such as the extent of the destruction, how it occurred, the donors' profiles, and the national authorities' characteristics.
Before reconstruction, it is essential to assess the impact of destruction on the effectiveness of public authorities and the private sector and determine whether institutions and businesses require rebuilding.
Additionally, he indicated that the reconstruction process is inherently political, necessitating careful consideration of the political framework within which it occurs. He stressed that coordination with international bodies, such as the World Bank, and efforts to broaden beneficiaries' scope and uphold social justice principles are vital.
Meanwhile, Aclimandos stressed that the reconstruction process should be incorporated into ceasefire agreements, ensuring that no party can obstruct it.
A slew of politicians, diplomats, academics, and media professionals are in attendance to examine the illegality of displacement under international and humanitarian law and explore ways to rebuild conflict and war zones without displacing their native populations.
Discussions will address the risks of demographic shifts on Middle East security internally and between states, as well as their impact on the Palestinian cause, particularly in light of Israeli far-right policies.
According to a framework paper issued before the event kickoff, the symposium aims to dismantle and refute the American vision of forcibly displacing Palestinians from Gaza and highlight regional and international experiences in post-conflict reconstruction without displacing populations.
Earlier in February, US President Donald Trump proposed that Washington take control of Gaza, forcibly displace its native Palestinian population, and build a 'Middle East Riviera' sparked global outcry.
The US president had cited Egypt, Jordan, and other Arab countries as possible destinations for the Palestinians.
Egypt, Jordan, and other Arab nations immediately rejected the idea, considering it a dismissal of Palestinians' historical rights and a threat to regional stability.
Egypt is preparing a comprehensive plan for rebuilding the heavily devastated Gaza Strip without displacing the Palestinians, which will be presented on 4 March at the Cairo emergency Arab summit on the Palestinian cause.
Speaking at the symposium's opening session, Khaled Okasha, the ECSS's general manager, said that despite the United States's long-standing history of supporting the Middle East peace process, it has recently shifted its stance, providing unconditional support for Israel and aligning with its right-wing perspective.
He noted that this approach represents an unprecedented violation of international law and relevant resolutions affirming the Palestinian people's right to self-determination, return to their homeland, and live securely on their land. It also contradicts all international norms and laws, which prohibit the crime of "ethnic cleansing," entailing the forced displacement of local populations.
"The American proposals seek to impose a fait accompli policy in line with Israel's expansionist ambitions regarding Arab territories while overlooking Israeli expansion in the West Bank as well as in Syria and Lebanon," he said. "The American proposal carries numerous adverse repercussions that could push the region into a chronic state of instability, potentially leading to widespread and open-ended wars."
Okasha explained that the displacement approach reflects the policy of "imposing power" under the pretext of achieving peace, warning that this may ignite further internal conflicts — whether sectarian, social, or regional — especially in some Middle Eastern countries experiencing fragile demographic conditions.
He emphasized that implementing this scenario could significantly reshape the Middle East's balance of power and influence, creating opportunities for other regional powers to extend their geopolitical reach, potentially at the expense of certain Arab states.
He stated that the US is expected to base its efforts for the reconstruction of Gaza on actively involving the strip's residents, considering them a key player in ensuring the sustainability of reconstruction efforts and building peace and stability.
"We also expect the US to support and strengthen Arab efforts and visions regarding Gaza's reconstruction, particularly those proposed by Egypt and Jordan," he added.
Okasha reiterated Cairo's preparation of a three-phase reconstruction plan, which initially focuses on early recovery operations and subsequently rebuilds the sector's infrastructure. He clarified that the plan then progresses towards the political track as a prelude to the two-state solution, with the Palestinian people remaining on their land as a fundamental pillar of the reconstruction process.
In this context, he underscored that the war in Gaza had reinforced the notion that a comprehensive and just resolution of the Palestinian issue — rooted in the two-state solution — is essential for establishing lasting peace and security in the Middle East.
"Any approach that excludes the Palestinians while focusing on providing further security guarantees to Israel and allowing its expansion at the expense of Palestinian rights is unacceptable, whether by Palestinians, Arabs, or internationally, as it risks reigniting regional escalation,' he said.
Okasha stated that the Middle East remains burdened by many challenges, with unresolved and ongoing conflicts and crises fuelling successive waves of refugees and displacement.
Also during the session, Mohamed Orbi, former minister of foreign affairs and chairman of the ECFA, warned that the Palestinian issue is being dismantled and redefined under concepts straying from the aspirations of Palestinians, Arab nations, and those seeking peace.
He noted that the displacement proposals contradict international law, the United Nations (UN) Charter, and global norms. Additionally, he highlighted the dangerous situation in the West Bank, saying Israel had "gone beyond the limits of the region.'
He emphasized that the symposium aims to generate rapid and decisive ideas in line with Egypt's plans to rebuild Gaza with Palestinian, Arab, and international support.
The symposium will feature three other sessions: Displacement Projects and the Palestinian Cause, The American Position on the Gaza War and its Regional Repercussions, and Repercussions of Displacement and Resettlement Projects on Regional Security.
Devastation in Gaza
A joint UN, World Bank, and European Union (EU) report estimates that rebuilding Gaza will cost over $50 billion.
The Interim Rapid Damage and Needs Assessment (IRDNA) reported that over 292,000 homes were destroyed or damaged, and the local economy has contracted by 83 percent. Additionally, 95 percent of hospitals were destroyed and are now inoperable.
=
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Al-Ahram Weekly
an hour ago
- Al-Ahram Weekly
Claims Egypt blocking aid to Gaza are ‘a big lie': FM Abdelatty to CNN - Foreign Affairs
Egypt's foreign minister Badr Abdelatty has rejected accusations that Cairo is obstructing humanitarian aid to Gaza as a 'big lie', insisting that Israel alone controls the Palestinian side of the Rafah crossing and is responsible for blocking relief supplies. The foreign minister's statements came in an exclusive interview with CNN's Becky Anderson on board a plane on the way to an international press conference on the Egyptian side of the Rafah crossing on Monday. Abdelatty explained to Anderson that the Egyptian terminal of the Rafah border crossing between Egypt and Gaza remained open, while the Palestinian terminal on the other side 'was destroyed by Israel four times by Israel.' 'The Israelis are physically there, preventing any truck or person from moving in. Israel is the main country blocking and putting restrictions on the flow of humanitarian and medical aid,' he said. Abdelatty also warned against attempts to forcibly displace Palestinians through Rafah, describing displacement as a 'red line.' He said: 'There is no moral, ethical, legal, or political justification for displacement. Those people are attached to their homeland. Displacement is a one-way ticket … it means only one objective: the liquidation of the Palestinian cause.' Asked by Anderson about the usefulness of a peace treaty that 'cannot be negotiated,' Abdelatty defended Egypt's 1979 treaty with Israel, calling it 'the main pillar of stability in our neighbourhood.' He stressed that Cairo maintains security and intelligence contacts with Israel, but said the real obstacle is 'the lack of political will' to reach a political settlement. In Rafah, on the Egyptian side, during a joint press conference with Palestinian prime minister Mohamed Mustafa at Rafah, Abdelatty reiterated Cairo's rejection of 'Greater Israel' illusions and any attempt to displace Palestinians, a position Mustafa praised as 'an impregnable barrier' to Israeli plans. On Sunday, Cairo urged other states not to become complicit in any ethnic cleansing efforts as they constituted a war crime under international law. Since 27 July, Egypt has dispatched 17 aid convoys, in collaboration with the UN and its humanitarian partners, to stem famine conditions in Gaza amid a five-month-old Israeli blockade on the strip. However, Israel has prevented the entry of hundreds of aid truck into Gaza by imposing endless inspections of content and arrestining truck drivers. Follow us on: Facebook Instagram Whatsapp Short link:


Al-Ahram Weekly
an hour ago
- Al-Ahram Weekly
‘Ball now in Israel's court' after Hamas approval of Gaza truce proposal: Egypt FM Abdelatty - Foreign Affairs
Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty said on Tuesday that "the ball is now in Israel's court" after Hamas announced it has approved a 60-day truce proposal. Minister Abdelatty made these remarks during separate phone calls with UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy, Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan, European Union foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas, and Palestinian Vice President Hussein Al-Sheikh. The calls were part of Egypt's intensified diplomatic outreach to support ceasefire efforts in Gaza, according to a foreign ministry statement. During the phone calls, Abdelatty highlighted the progress made in recent ceasefire talks held in Cairo with the Palestinian delegation. He added that this round focused on a proposal from US Special Envoy Steve Witkoff, according to the statement. Egypt's top diplomat called for increased international pressure on Israel to accept the ceasefire proposal to help alleviate the severe humanitarian crisis in Gaza. He also outlined preparations for the Gaza reconstruction conference, which Egypt intends to host immediately upon a ceasefire being declared. In response, the foreign officials praised Egypt's central mediating role alongside Qatar and the US, affirming their full support for Egypt's efforts to promote regional security and stability. Multiple rounds of indirect negotiations – mediated by Egypt and Qatar throughout the two-year Israeli war in Gaza – have failed to secure a lasting ceasefire amid the insistence by Israel, backed by Washington, on continuing the war. On 19 March, Israel unilaterally ended a truce agreement, mediated by Egypt, Qatar, and the US in January, to resume its war on the strip. Tel Aviv and Washington backed off from ceasefire talks in July, claiming that Hamas was not negotiating in good faith. The new ceasefire plan, accepted by Hamas after fresh talks in Cairo, proposes an initial 60-day truce, a partial release of captives, the freeing of some Palestinian prisoners, and provisions for the entry of humanitarian aid. The new proposal also counters a recent Israeli plan to occupy all of Gaza City and ethnically cleanse nearly one million Palestinians to the south of the strip. On Monday, speaking in a joint press conference with Palestinian Prime Minister Mohammed Mustafa during their visit to the Egyptian side of the Rafah crossing, FM Abdelatty reiterated Cairo's condemnation of the war and blockade on the Gaza Strip. 'The Israelis are physically there, preventing any truck or person from moving in. Israel is the main country blocking and putting restrictions on the flow of humanitarian and medical aid,' he said. Abdelatty also warned against attempts to forcibly displace Palestinians through Rafah, describing displacement as a 'red line.' He said: 'There is no moral, ethical, legal, or political justification for displacement. Those people are attached to their homeland. Displacement is a one-way ticket… it means only one objective: the liquidation of the Palestinian cause.' Hamas's acceptance of the proposal comes amid growing regional and international condemnation of the Israeli war on Gaza and its starvation policies against 2.3 million people in the strip. The Israeli genocidal war on Gaza has killed more than 62,000 Palestinians, most of them women and children, while starvation-related deaths in the strip have risen to 263, including 112 children. The Palestinian group's acceptance of the proposal also scales up domestic pressure on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to end the war. On Sunday, tens of thousands took to the streets in Tel Aviv to call for the end of the Gaza war and a deal to free the remaining captives in the strip. Around 50 out of the 251 captives taken by the Palestinian factions on 7 October 2023 remain in Gaza, with at least 30 believed killed by Israeli bombardment of the strip. Netanyahu has yet to comment on the plan publicly. Follow us on: Facebook Instagram Whatsapp Short link:


Al-Ahram Weekly
3 hours ago
- Al-Ahram Weekly
UN slams Israel's block on bringing tents to Gaza - Region
The United Nations took aim Tuesday at Israel's months-long block on bringing tents into the Gaza Strip, despite continual displacement orders issued to civilians in the devastated territory. Jens Laerke, spokesman for the UN humanitarian agency OCHA, said shelter items had been banned from entering Gaza for about five months -- a period when more than 700,000 people had been displaced or re-displaced. "They may have been provided with a tent and then they are displaced again and they have no possibility of taking the tent with them," he told a press briefing in Geneva. He said the Israelis could classify tents as "dual use" because they considered tent poles to have a potential military purpose. Israel announced earlier this month that it intended to take over Gaza City and issued another displacement order to residents on Saturday. Laerke said the order had not changed the situation on the ground and tents were still not being allowed into the territory. Separately, the UN human rights office accused Israel of sending Palestinians to areas where strikes were continuing. Spokesman Thameen Al-Kheetan said "hundreds of thousands" were being told to go to south to Al-Mawasi, which he said was still under bombardment. He said Palestinians in Al-Mawasi had "little or no access to essential services and supplies, including food, water, electricity and tents". Follow us on: Facebook Instagram Whatsapp Short link: