logo
Tested: How Rooftop Boxes and Hitch Carriers Affect Fuel Economy

Tested: How Rooftop Boxes and Hitch Carriers Affect Fuel Economy

Car and Driver19-05-2025
In working to find the best hitch-mounted cargo carriers, we tested to see how roof boxes and hitch-mounted carriers affect fuel consumption
We ran back-to-back tests with our long-term Toyota Grand Highlander, first carrying a Yakima EXO SwingBase hitch carrier, then a Thule roofbox.
The hitch-mounted carrier was the clear winner, returning 25 mpg compared with 21 mpg for the rooftop carrier.
Welcome to Car and Driver's Testing Hub, where we zoom in on the test numbers. We've been pushing vehicles to their limits since 1956 to provide objective data to bolster our subjective impressions (you can see how we test here).
If you've ever looked at an electric car and wondered why so many of them have flush-mounted door handles, the reason is to reduce aerodynamic drag. It's the same reason you see cyclists wearing funny helmets and Olympic speed skaters wrapped in skin-tight spandex. It's also why hitch-mounted cargo carriers are generally viewed as a more fuel-efficient alternative to rooftop carriers. Since our Gear Team was already working on a test of the best hitch-mounted carriers, we decided to put the numbers to the test to see just how much more fuel a roof box burns.
See Long-Term Photos
Michael Simari
To keep things fair, we ran back-to-back highway fuel-economy tests on our long-term Toyota Grand Highlander. For the hitch-mounted test, we selected the Yakima EXO SwingBase carrier equipped with Yakima's GearLocker. The carrier and locker weigh 93 pounds combined and together measure 59.5 inches wide.
As for the roofbox, we pulled an older Thule model down from the storage rafters in our HQ garage and then mounted it to a set of Thule SquareBar Evo crossbars. The box itself weighed 42 pounds and measured 90.0 inches long.
The test results were clear: The Grand Highlander averaged 25 mpg with the hitch-mounted carrier but only 21 mpg with the rooftop box attached, a significant 4-mpg difference.
Michael Simari
Michael Simari
We ran a similar test on our long-term 2022 Kia Carnival back in 2023. After continuing to be disappointed by subpar fuel-economy figures, we decided to do some digging and test the Carnival with and without the factory crossbars. With the crossbars attached, our initial highway fuel-economy test returned 25 mpg. With the bars removed, that number jumped to 28 mpg.
Jack Fitzgerald
Associate News Editor
Jack Fitzgerald's love for cars stems from his as yet unshakable addiction to Formula 1.
After a brief stint as a detailer for a local dealership group in college, he knew he needed a more permanent way to drive all the new cars he couldn't afford and decided to pursue a career in auto writing. By hounding his college professors at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, he was able to travel Wisconsin seeking out stories in the auto world before landing his dream job at Car and Driver. His new goal is to delay the inevitable demise of his 2010 Volkswagen Golf. Read full bio
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Denso Sonoma Nationals Qualifying
Denso Sonoma Nationals Qualifying

Associated Press

time2 hours ago

  • Associated Press

Denso Sonoma Nationals Qualifying

Friday At Sonoma Raceways Sonoma, Calif. Qualifying after two rounds Top Fuel 1. Brittany Force, 3.645 seconds, 343.16 mph; 2. Doug Kalitta, 3.661, 335.73; 3. Clay Millican, 3.699, 335.15; 4. Antron Brown, 3.699, 332.18; 5. Tony Stewart, 3.727, 328.62; 6. Josh Hart, 3.737, 331.28; 7. Ida Zetterstrom, 3.754, 328.70; 8. Justin Ashley, 3.770, 323.19; 9. Ron August, 4.316, 194.38; 10. Shawn Langdon, 6.940, 94.66. Funny Car 1. Matt Hagan, Dodge Charger, 3.861, 332.59; 2. Spencer Hyde, Ford Mustang, 3.865, 333.58; 3. Paul Lee, Charger, 3.890, 299.00; 4. Austin Prock, Chevy Camaro, 3.891, 334.24; 5. Jack Beckman, Camaro, 3.895, 331.45; 6. Hunter Green, Charger, 3.897, 331.12; 7. Ron Capps, Toyota GR Supra, 3.927, 330.96; 8. Chad Green, Mustang, 3.927, 329.18; 9. J.R. Todd, GR Supra, 3.945, 332.43; 10. Daniel Wilkerson, Mustang, 3.952, 296.57; 11. Bob Tasca III, Mustang, 3.959, 321.35; 12. Jason Rupert, Mustang, 3.982, 298.54; 13. Dave Richards, Mustang, 4.027, 316.60; 14. Jeff Diehl, Toyota Camry, 4.066, 316.67; 15. Buddy Hull, Charger, 4.096, 290.57; 16. Cruz Pedregon, Charger, 4.441, 196.44. Not Qualified: 17. Alexis DeJoria, 4.484, 193.85; 18. Tim Gibbons, broke. Pro Stock 1. Greg Anderson, Chevy Camaro, 6.472, 210.41; 2. Dallas Glenn, Camaro, 6.473, 211.00; 3. Greg Stanfield, Camaro, 6.480, 211.66; 4. Aaron Stanfield, Camaro, 6.489, 211.16; 5. Cody Coughlin, Camaro, 6.503, 210.11; 6. Matt Latino, Camaro, 6.505, 210.18; 7. Troy Coughlin Jr., Camaro, 6.513, 210.08; 8. Jeg Coughlin, Camaro, 6.514, 210.31; 9. Mason McGaha, Camaro, 6.534, 209.46; 10. Cory Reed, Camaro, 6.535, 211.10; 11. Erica Enders, Camaro, 6.536, 210.24; 12. Stephen Bell, Camaro, 6.551, 210.57; 13. Deric Kramer, Camaro, 6.570, 211.00; 14. Kenny Delco, Camaro, 6.587, 208.26; 15. Chris McGaha, Camaro, 6.589, 209.46; 16. Joey Grose, Camaro, 6.635, 207.02. Not Qualified: 17. Matt Hartford, 6.761, 183.12. Pro Stock Motorcycle 1. Richard Gadson, Suzuki, 6.702, 200.77; 2. Matt Smith, Buell, 6.740, 200.26; 3. John Hall, Beull, 6.759, 197.28; 4. Gaige Herrera, Suzuki, 6.761, 198.82; 5. Angie Smith, Buell, 6.780, 198.09; 6. Chase Van Sant, Suzuki, 6.860, 196.36; 7. Jianna Evaristo, Buell, 6.916, 196.24; 8. Freddie Camarena, Suzuki, 6.933, 194.04; 9. Clayton Howey, Suzuki, 7.014, 191.76; 10. Brad Hawkes, Suzuki, 7.339, 181.28; 11. Charles Poskey, Suzuki, 7.600, 184.12; 12. Chris Bostick, Suzuki, broke. _____

The Next Supra Will Actually Be A Toyota Rather Than A Reskinned BMW
The Next Supra Will Actually Be A Toyota Rather Than A Reskinned BMW

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

The Next Supra Will Actually Be A Toyota Rather Than A Reskinned BMW

The fifth-generation A90 Toyota Supra has been a pretty curious vehicle since it went on sale for the 2020 model year. At first, folks were excited to be getting a new Supra at all, considering the fact that Toyota discontinued the U.S. model back in 1998. Pretty quickly, though, folks realized it was pretty much just a G29 BMW Z4 with a different body on top. Its engine options, transmissions and running gear were pretty much identical to the Z4. Now, Toyota is said to be rectifying this slight oversight with its next-generation GR Supra. The sixth-generation model is expected to come around sometime in 2027, and it's going to be powered by a Toyota-built turbocharged 2.0-liter inline-four hybrid that is said to put out around 400 horsepower, according to a Best Car report reviewed by Forbes. Right now, the GR Supra uses a BMW B48 inline-four and a B58 inline-six. Granted, these are both very good motors, but they're sort of inauthentic when it comes to a Toyota sports car. Read more: Cheap-Feeling, Underpowered, Or Just Ugly, These Cars Don't Justify Their Price More Than An Engine Engines aren't the only difference between the A90 and whatever comes next for Gazoo Racing. Best Car says it will sit on a rear-wheel-drive platform. There's no word on whether this will be an all-new platform for the automaker or if it'll take an existing one from Lexus. One thing is for sure: it won't be shared with the Z4. That being said, there still might be some sharing among automakers. While it's likely the next Supra will get that aforementioned inline-four, Forbes says it's possible Toyota is testing a Supra prototype fitted with Mazda's turbocharged 3.3-liter inline-six mild-hybrid powertrain found in the CX-70 and CX-90 crossover. In those applications, it makes 340 hp and 369 pound-feet of torque. If I had to guess, it would be tuned to put out a bit more power than that in a possible next-gen Supra. Since the Supra went on sale back in 2019, it has been a bit of a sales success compared to its more expensive, convertible brother — selling over 24,000 units compared to the Z4's 13,000. I know for the most part that people dig the Supra, but it always just felt inauthentic to me. Sure, on paper, the B48 and B58 are probably better than Toyota's equivalent engines, and it's probably the same story with the car's platform, but I don't know. If I'm buying a Toyota, I want a Toyota. It seems the automaker has realized this issue and is working to fix it. Want more like this? Join the Jalopnik newsletter to get the latest auto news sent straight to your inbox... Read the original article on Jalopnik.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store