Indonesia's economic growth likely slowed again in Q2: Reuters poll
Southeast Asia's largest economy likely grew 4.80% in the April-June quarter from a year earlier, slightly below the 4.87% expansion recorded in the first quarter, according to the July 25–August 1 poll of 26 economists. The government is due to announce the figures on Tuesday.
On a quarter-on-quarter basis, gross domestic product (GDP) likely recovered from a 0.98% contraction in the January-March period to 3.70% growth.
"Consumer confidence is waning, industrial activity is slowing and youth unemployment remains high. Real retail sales figures have also been weak throughout the second quarter as households remain cautious about spending due to stagnant real wage growth," said Jeemin Bang, associate economist at Moody's Analytics.
Indonesia's Retail Sales Index contracted 0.3% in April but rose a modest 1.9% in May, indicating subdued household consumption. The government announced an over 24 trillion rupiah ($1.5 billion) fiscal stimulus package in June that included cash handouts and transport subsidies to stoke demand.
Meanwhile, exports rose 11.29% in June, extending a positive trend throughout the second quarter as firms accelerated shipments ahead of a proposed 32% U.S. tariff which was later revised to 19%.
Still, Bang cautioned that although only 10% of Indonesian exports go to the U.S., indirect effects from tariffs on other key trading partners and a weakening global outlook are likely to weigh on growth in the months ahead.
Responding to softening domestic demand and sluggish global trade, Bank Indonesia cut interest rates last month. Governor Perry Warjiyo said the central bank would assess if there was room for further easing.
A separate Reuters poll conducted in July showed economic growth in Indonesia would average 4.8% in 2025, near the lower end of the central bank's forecast range of 4.6% to 5.4%.
That remains well short of the 8% annual growth target President Prabowo Subianto has pledged to achieve during his five-year term, which began last year.
($1 = 16,488 rupiah)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
38 minutes ago
- Times
Trump fires statistics chief over ‘rigged' jobs figures
President Trump has fired the head of the US Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) after claiming jobs figures had been 'rigged' to suggest the economy was performing worse than expected. In a post on his Truth Social platform, Trump accused Erika McEntarfer, the commissioner of the government agency, of manipulating the numbers both before and after last year's presidential election to favour the Democrats over the Republicans. He did not provide any direct evidence to support his claims against McEntarfer, an economist who was nominated for the role by Joe Biden in July 2023. The latest statistics, released on Friday, showed only 73,000 jobs had been added in July, well below the expected figure of 110,000, while the numbers for May and June were revised downwards. 'In my opinion, today's jobs numbers were RIGGED in order to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad,' Trump wrote, insisting that 'the economy is BOOMING under 'TRUMP' '. He added: 'We need accurate Jobs Numbers. I have directed my Team to fire this Biden Political Appointee, IMMEDIATELY. She will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified.' The US labour secretary, Lori Chavez-De Remer, backed the move and claimed that 'a recent string of major revisions have come to light and raised concerns about decisions being made by the Biden-appointed Labor commissioner'. McEntarfer did not directly respond to the allegations but said in a statement on social media: 'It has been the honour of my life to serve as commissioner of BLS alongside the many dedicated civil servants tasked with measuring a vast and dynamic economy. It is vital and important work and I thank them for their service to this nation.' Her role will be taken over by the deputy commissioner of the BLS, William Wiatrowski, until a replacement is nominated by Trump and confirmed by the Senate. The decision to fire McEntarfer was criticised by several Republican senators as well as the previous commissioner of the BLS, William Beach, who was nominated by Trump. Beach said the sacking set a 'dangerous precedent' and described the allegation of faked figures as 'totally groundless'. In a statement issued jointly with another former commissioner, Erica Groshen, he said: 'This escalates the president's unprecedented attacks on the independence and integrity of the federal statistical system.' • Federal Reserve holds interest rates despite Donald Trump pressure The jobs estimates were produced in the same way every month and revisions were carried out every month 'to reflect slower-arriving, more-accurate information', he said, adding that Trump was seeking 'to blame someone for unwelcome economic news'. Rand Paul, Cynthia Lummis and Thom Tillis, the Republican senators, also questioned the reasons for dismissal. Tillis told NBC: 'If she was just fired because the president or whoever decided to fire the director just did it because they didn't like the numbers, they ought to grow up.' The latest report showed the manufacturing sector reported its third consecutive month of job losses, with factory jobs down by 11,000 in July, despite Trump's efforts to use tariffs to encourage companies to manufacture more goods in the US. Government lay-offs also weighed on payrolls, the sector losing 12,000 jobs. The US Department of Labor reported that hiring in May and June was weaker than it had previously stated. Employers added 258,000 fewer jobs across those two months than previously forecast. The unemployment rate rose to 4.2 per cent from 4.1 per cent in June. Trump remained unrepentant as he left the White House on Friday, telling reporters: 'I believe the numbers were phoney, just like they were before the election, and there were other times — so you know what I did? I fired her. And you know what I did? The right thing.'
The Guardian
38 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Good, mad and ugly: the US economy's performance under Trump
According to Donald Trump's White House, the US economy is booming, inflation is dead and jobs are surging. A blizzard of economic reports has cast a pall on such claims in recent days. This week's data on Trump's early economic record was mixed – good, mad and ugly – with jobs numbers so weak he reached for the catchphrase he once used to build himself into a reality TV star: you're fired. The picture is chaotic, with robust headline growth in the world's largest economy, wild swings in trade, and a remarkable slowdown in the labor market. For six months, Trump has staged an extraordinary campaign to overhaul the global economy and extract concessions from Washington's allies and rivals by threatening and imposing steep tariffs on their US exports. But the unpredictable, erratic rollout of this strategy has already had bizarre consequences. On the surface, at least, this week's deluge of data opened with good news: the US economy returned to growth in the second quarter, with gross domestic product (GDP) – a broad measure of economic health – expanding at a rate not seen since last summer. But this followed an unexpected contraction in the first quarter, and underlined some more concerning figures, such as a 15.6% drop in private domestic investment. Businesses have been struggling to keep up with the hour-by-hour jerks and jolts on sweeping economies policies. Yes, there was good growth in the last quarter but in the first six months, the US economy grew at a mediocre 1.2%. The Wall Street Journal called it 'the weirdest GDP report ever'. Delve a bit deeper, and you start to see how the US economy is grappling with a series of extraordinary forces as Trump hammers out his trade strategy. Firms spent much of the first quarter waiting for the president to reveal his plans for tariffs: which countries would be targeted, at what rates, and when. They stockpiled, triggering an unprecedented surge in imports that pushed growth into the red. In the second quarter, however, as Trump started to ramp up his economic attacks, imports tumbled at an equally astonishing pace. Net exports – how much a country exports more than it imports – boosted GDP. This is Trump's least favorite chart. Despite his many public demands, threats and attacks, the Federal Reserve has not yet cut interest rates this year. Why? Jerome Powell, the central bank's chair, has repeatedly argued it should wait and see the impact of the president's trade strategy before moving. Fed officials are worried that inflation – despite Trump's claims that it has collapsed on his watch – has actually remained stubborn, and might rise as a result of his tariffs. This has gone down extremely poorly in the White House, where officials are counting down the weeks until Powell's term as chair ends next May. Data released on Friday fundamentally changed the way US policymakers and politicians think about the economy. Until then, many inside the Fed thought everything was broadly ticking over nicely – and Trump administration officials claimed they were overseeing a boom in activity. But July's employment report revealed far fewer jobs were created that month than economists had expected, and revised down estimates for May and June by an astonishing 258,000. Job creation has stalled. 'Look, this jobs report isn't ideal,' Stephen Miran, chairman of the White House council of economic advisers, told CNN, before suggesting that fading uncertainty around trade and fiscal policy would lead to significant improvement. 'It's all going to get much, much better from here,' he added.
Telegraph
5 hours ago
- Telegraph
The wealth tax isn't coming, but Labour has other daft plans to take your money
The Government is in trouble. Its inability to persuade backbenchers to accept even modest spending cuts means it badly needs to raise money to fill the gaps caused by its self-harming policies. Tax revenues have dipped below expectations due to poor economic growth, wealthy taxpayers are leaving the country and people are changing their spending and investment patterns. Its failure to make the savings it planned means it has to borrow more, but its year of governing has pushed the cost of borrowing up, too. Many on the left of the party saw an opportunity to pressure Rachel Reeves and have lobbied for a so-called 'wealth tax'. But now that Labour has more or less backed off the idea, what else do they have in store for us? A wealth tax was always a non-starter simply because it is so administratively complex it could not have been introduced before the next election. This would have meant yet more people leaving the UK, taking their wealth with them. Some property markets would see values fall, in turn damaging their potential to create tax revenues. The effect on the economy would be significant. No surprise then that Jonathan Reynolds, Business and Trade Secretary, has ruled out a wealth tax, describing it as 'daft' (which it obviously is) and saying that those demanding one should 'get serious' – meaning it will be left to Jeremy Corbyn's new party to campaign on. But taxation is not the departmental responsibility of Reynolds, so why then can't Reeves make a clear statement? Allowing the speculation to linger looks like a clear attempt to foster a deliberate and irresponsible distraction – that can only mean Labour Treasury ministers are working on other tax plans. To understand what Labour is likely to be planning it is best to examine proposals which have the support of CenTax, the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) and Labour-supporting tax enthusiast Dan Neidle, of Tax Policy Associates, who says 'it makes much more sense to tighten existing taxes, such as capital gains tax and inheritance tax'. It was these groups, led by CenTax, which were successful in persuading Labour to adopt its disastrous assault on non-doms and Reeves's extension of inheritance tax to family firms and farms. The far Left agenda surfacing from them now is focused on raising capital gains tax. But the capital gains tax rises that have already taken place have, as predicted in these pages by many authors, resulted in significant lost revenue. Capital gains tax receipts fell 18pc to £12.1bn in 2023-24 on the year before, even as the annual tax-free allowance was halved from £12,300 to £6,000. Capital gains tax receipts in 2024-25 dropped a further 10pc. If the high-tax zealots do persuade Labour to increase capital gains tax to income tax levels, we can expect a much sharper fall in these receipts. Currently, nobody thinks Labour will be re-elected, meaning everyone would just hold on to assets (equities, properties, etc) for the four or so years Labour remains in power, causing revenues to dry up. CenTax and the other high tax enthusiasts want to charge capital gains tax on all assets at death, but that would result in a tax rate on death of over 54pc. The high death tax rate is the main reason non-doms and entrepreneurs are fleeing Britain. To make it even more punitive would be a significant act of national self-harm. Another idea being mooted is an 'exit tax', an exceptionally foolish idea. Look at what's happening in Norway, where a new exit tax is destroying the country's tech sector – tech firms can no longer attract international talent and capital. London-based Stani Kulechov, of major tech firm Avara, says: 'Every Norwegian tech entrepreneur I know is leaving or has already left.' France once had an exit tax but the negative effect on investment caused it to more or less scrap the policy. The French version came with a 15-year rule – those who left France would be taxed on certain shares or profits unless they kept them for 15 years. In 2018, the French government relaxed this limit to two years, making the tax largely voluntary. The Labour Government must learn from its own experience and from other countries that raising taxes does not always mean higher tax revenues. Ironically it was Dan Neidle who recently said: 'If you tax savings and investment, you get less of it. Less from people in the UK, less from people who leave the UK and less from foreigners. The consequence is a drop in growth.' For once Neidle is right, but is he a stopped clock or has he gone through a Damascene conversion to the low tax cause? Whatever it is, Reeves should look to reduce capital gains tax, allowing people to cash in on unwanted assets and generate revenues she badly needs.
