Are hiking, camping and fishing trips about to get more expensive in Washington?
This story was originally published on MyNorthwest.com.
It may soon become more expensive to visit Washington state parks.
Senate Bill 5390 would boost the cost of an annual Discover Pass from $30 to $45. State Sen. Derek Stanford is sponsoring the bill. He says the cost of the pass hasn't gone up for a long time and needs to be adjusted for inflation.
The Discover Pass allows annual, unlimited access to millions of acres of state-managed parks and lands.
More from MyNorthwest: Rejoice! Washington celebrates first 6:00 p.m. sunset of 2025
'The Discover Pass fees have not been raised to account for inflation in quite a while,' Stanford said at a public hearing on the bill in January. 'This bill will provide better funding for supporting our parks.'
Jeff Pack, with the group Washington Citizens Against Unfair Taxes, says lawmakers need to explain what people will get for their money in cases like this.
'Instead, it's just 'we need more money.' Well, guess what? I need more money too,' Pack said. 'I'm not an ATM where you just push a button and money comes out.'
Right now, there is no Senate floor vote scheduled for this bill, and it would also need to make it through the House.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
King County Council votes no confidence, urges assessor's resignation amid restraining order
This story was originally posted on The King County Council has no confidence in King County Assessor John Wilson. Members voted unanimously Tuesday, calling on Wilson to resign amid allegations that he stalked and harassed his former fiancée. 'I see it as a pattern, a very dangerous pattern, and certainly not one that we want in our highest levels of government in King County,' King County Council member Girmay Zahilay, running against Wilson for County Executive, said. Multiple local leaders called for Wilson to step down after another restraining order was filed against him. King County Council member Claudia Balducci introduced a motion at last week's council meeting, calling for Wilson's resignation. 'There is a cycle of control and manipulation that underlies domestic violence and stalking and harassing behaviors like we are seeing from our county assessor that I think should cause us to be very assertive in our willingness to stand up and say, 'We don't accept it,'' Balducci said during the council meeting. The council struck down the motion, but Balducci indicated she may reintroduce it. Wilson has since filed an ethics complaint with King County against Balducci, which reads in part: 'This motion relies on unsubstantiated allegations made against me to impugn my reputation, generate more media attention, and undermine my campaign for King County executive.' Balducci and Wilson are both running for the position of King County executive. Wilson told 'The John Curley Show' on KIRO Newsradio Tuesday, 'There's never been any domestic violence.' 'The audacity of her to come at me about domestic violence when she doesn't know my family history,' he added. Wilson also mentioned on the show that Lee Keller, his former fiancée, who filed the temporary restraining order, had mentioned getting it dismissed. 'She's come back each time and said, 'Look, I'm really sorry. I want to make it work.' And this happened even after this, DVRO (domestic violence restraining order), and through an intermediary, she said, 'Will you let John know I so love him. I'm so sorry about this. I'm getting it dismissed,'' he said. However, Keller's attorneys subsequently reached out to the show, telling KIRO Newsradio, 'The restraining order is very active.' Keller also issued an email statement to KIRO Newsradio on Tuesday, defending the order. 'The restraining order against John Wilson remains in place. I will not be changing my mind, despite his repeated efforts to coerce me to dismiss it,' she wrote. 'A hearing on the restraining order will be held on June 30, 2025. I welcome the opportunity to address John's reference to a signed agreement at that time, and inform the court of John's continuing violations of the very active restraining order.' The order was issued by Keller against Wilson on May 13—the second one in a year, according to The Seattle Times. The order requires Wilson to stay 1,000 feet away from his former partner and will remain in effect until his court hearing on June 30, the media outlet stated. Wilson is accused of consistent stalking and harassment. Keller previously filed a restraining order last year, The Seattle Times reported, claiming Wilson falsely accused her former boyfriend of sexual assault and made a false police report. That restraining order lasted seven weeks. In light of the events, Seattle Mayor Bruce Harrell urged Wilson to step down Thursday. 'I am appalled by the stories of County Assessor Wilson's conduct and want to add my voice to the community and elected leaders calling on him to resign his position,' Harrell wrote in a statement, via a news release. 'While he has a right to due legal process, the published allegations are disqualifying for public office. We need to send a clear message to survivors of intimate partner abuse that this type of behavior by people in positions of trust is not tolerated.' Wilson released a statement Tuesday in response to the allegations: 'I had hoped we could respond firmly to the exaggerated allegations made by my former fiancée, Lee Keller. My attorney has advised me to wait until the court takes action on the dismissal motion already signed by the attorneys for both Ms. Keller and me. These one-sided allegations have been treated as if they are proven facts. They are NOT. I will have a statement soon. In the meantime, I will not be hounded or bullied out of office by my two opponents for King County Executive. They have appointed themselves judge, jury, and executioner. They are not. As attorneys themselves, I find their conduct shameful and an appalling rejection of our core democratic principles—namely, due process. As some voters have noted, this is a brazen attempt to remove voters' choice for King County Executive. I will stand before the voters this August for King County Executive. I will continue to advocate for public safety, tax relief, affordable housing, and the tangible actions I will take to advance the public interest. I will not resign as Assessor, and I am proud to stand on my record. No one–especially not my opponents–has fought harder for meaningful tax relief for the working homeowners, renters, and small businesses of King County. Finally, minutes ago, Council member Claudia Balducci proposed a no-confidence motion to the King County Council, calling for my resignation, using the unsubstantiated allegations in the court documents. This represents a clear and troubling misuse of official authority for political gain, and I have filed a complaint with the King County Office of the Ombudsman. I will have more to say about this matter soon.' This story was originally published on May 29, 2025. It has been updated and republished since then. Contributing: Aaron Granillo, KIRO Newsradio
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Is College Worth the Money? Suze Orman Weighs In
For decades, a four-year college degree (bachelor's degree) was a core requirement for most government jobs. But in the last few years, numerous states have dropped this as a requirement for government state jobs. And they're not the only ones eliminating this rigid rule. Tons of companies are ditching the once standard requirement of a bachelor's degree. The trend is expected to continue. Research by Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce projected that in 2031, only 42% of jobs will require at least a bachelor's degree. Learn More: Read Next: Most Americans who pursue a bachelor's degree get a pile of student loan debt with it. We're talking tens of thousands of dollars in debt, on average. Is college worth the money and, in so many cases, the debt? In a recent blog post on her website, Suze Orman weighed in on the matter. The best way to assess whether a college degree is financially worth it is to determine whether it will enable you to make more money than you would without it. What's the return on investment (ROI)? Orman pointed to numbers crunching done by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. 'The median graduate gets a 12.5% annual boost to their income compared to what they would earn if they stopped at a high school diploma,' Orman wrote. 'That's an even better rate of return than what stocks have delivered.' This is an excellent ROI, but there are more things to consider when deciding whether a college degree is worth it. Find Out: It takes four years to get a bachelor's degree, but only if you're pursuing it full time on the university's terms. Many students sign up to get a four-year degree with the intention of graduating in four years, but end up taking six years or more. Delaying graduation is a costly move. 'If you take five years, your lifetime return drops from 12.5% to an average of 9.3%,' Orman wrote. 'Take six years, and it's down to 7%. The issue here is not just the extra cost of being in school those years, but the fact that you're likely not working full time in those years, and even if you are, until you earn a degree, you aren't going to have the credentials that will pay you more.' Orman pointed out something that you may not know about. Every school must publish its 'net price' — the average out-of-pocket cost you pay to attend net of all financial aid. Orman suggested that college may not be worth it if you're paying more than that net price. The key here is to go to a school that offers standout financial aid. 'If you attend a school that doesn't offer you a good aid package, your family will likely need to borrow more, and that can be a long-term hit to financial security,' Orman wrote. Our society spends far too much time hyping elite universities. For example, we're all familiar with Stanford and its laurels. We're less familiar with the cost. For the 2023-24 school year, the cost of attending was $20,577 per quarter. And that's just the cost of tuition — it doesn't include housing and other potential expenses. So, you may really want to get into Stanford, but do you really want to be on the hook for all that money? Orman recommended focusing on schools that are smart financial fits so that you graduate with the smallest amount of debt possible. What's the point of attending a dream school if it turns your adult life into a financial nightmare? More From GOBankingRates 3 Luxury SUVs That Will Have Massive Price Drops in Summer 2025 25 Places To Buy a Home If You Want It To Gain Value 6 Popular SUVs That Aren't Worth the Cost -- and 6 Affordable Alternatives This article originally appeared on Is College Worth the Money? Suze Orman Weighs In Sign in to access your portfolio
New York Times
15 hours ago
- New York Times
OpenAI Seems to Be Making a Very Familiar, Very Cynical Choice
Last spring, Sam Altman, the chief executive of OpenAI, sat in the chancel of Harvard Memorial Church, sermonizing against advertising. 'I will disclose, just as a personal bias, that I hate ads,' he began in his usual calm cadence, one sneakered foot crossed onto his lap. He said that ads 'fundamentally misalign a user's incentives with the company providing the service,' adding that he found the notion of mixing advertising with artificial intelligence — the product his company is built on — 'uniquely unsettling.' The comment reminded me immediately of something I'd heard before, from around the time I was first getting online. It came from a seminal paper that Sergey Brin and Larry Page wrote in 1998, when they were at Stanford developing Google. They argued that advertising often made search engines less useful, and that companies that relied on it would 'be inherently biased towards the advertisers and away from the needs of the consumers.' I showed up at Stanford as a freshman in 2000, not long after Mr. Brin and Mr. Page had accepted a $25 million round of venture capital funding to turn their academic project into a business. My best friend there persuaded me to try Google, describing it as more ethical than the search engines that had come before. What we didn't realize was that in the midst of the dot-com crash, which coincided with our arrival, Google's investors were pressuring the co-founders to hire a more experienced chief executive. Mr. Brin and Mr. Page brought in Eric Schmidt, who in turn hired Sheryl Sandberg, the chief of staff to Lawrence H. Summers when he was Treasury secretary, to build an advertising program. Filing for Google to go public a couple of years later, Mr. Brin and Mr. Page explained away the reversal of their anti-advertising stance by telling shareholders that ads made Google more useful because they provided what the founders called 'great commercial information.' My senior year, news filtered into The Stanford Daily, where I worked, that Facebook — which some of us had heard about from friends at Harvard, where it had started — was coming to our campus. 'I know it sounds corny, but I'd love to improve people's lives, especially socially,' Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook's co-founder, told The Daily's reporter. He added, 'In the future we may sell ads to get the money back, but since providing the service is so cheap, we may choose not to do that for a while.' Mr. Zuckerberg went on to quit Harvard and move to Palo Alto, Calif. I went on to The Wall Street Journal. Covering Facebook in 2007, I got a scoop that Facebook — which had in fact introduced ads — would begin using data from individual users and their 'friends' on the site to sharpen how ads were targeted to them. Like Google before it, Facebook positioned this as being good for users. Mr. Zuckerberg even brought Ms. Sandberg over from Google to help. When an economic downturn, followed by an I.P.O., later put pressure on Facebook, it followed Google's playbook: doubling down on advertising. In this case, it did so by collecting and monetizing even more personal information about its users. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
