logo
Undimmed United States ‘exceptionalism' seems improbable

Undimmed United States ‘exceptionalism' seems improbable

The Star20-05-2025

WITH heads still spinning from Wall Street's 180 degree turn over the past six weeks, investors are sceptical over still 'exceptional' US stock market valuations that have barely flinched.
Few doubt a de-escalation of Washington's trade war – for the next month or two at least – defused a panic.
The over-caffeinated waxing and waning of recession warnings speaks to that even if US import tariffs are rising regardless.
But the re-inflation of extreme relative US equity valuations can only be warranted if US 'exceptionalism' is truly unscathed.
And here's where the story seems improbable, especially if you assume the administration's stated goal of upending the status quo that existed prior to its term. Business as usual is not part of the policy design.
On the face of it, the S&P 500 is back in positive territory for the year for the first time since February, remarkably less than 4% from its all-time high from February.
The VIX 'fear index' of equity volatility has subsided to the lowest since March and back below its long-term average.
And before you think that's all just a mega-cap tech rebound, the equal-weighted S&P 500 is also back in the black for the year too.
Both had been down 12% to 15% for the year shortly before April 8's 90-day pause on the draconian 'reciprocal tariff' plan of a week earlier.
There are several reality checks to that, however.
The tech-heavy Nasdaq, small-cap Russell 2000 and exchange-traded funds in so-called Magnificent Seven top caps remain in the red for 2025 to the tune of 2% to 6%.
More crucially, the S&P 500 itself is still underperforming MSCI's all-country index by some 3% for the year so far.
And, with the dollar down about 6%, it lags Germany's DAX, the broader eurozone benchmark and Hong Kong's Hang Seng by anywhere between 15% to 30% in dollar terms for 2025.
Double GDP
But it's the valuation rebound that arguably causes most puzzlement with so much of the economic and policy disturbance left unresolved.
The S&P 500's 12-month forward price to earnings multiple has jumped back above 20.
Although still off February heady peaks over 22, it continues to surf almost 20% above its own 30-year average, more than 40% above equivalent European STOXX 600 valuation and more than 60% above the MSCI emerging markets index and Britain's FTSE 100.
That still spells exceptional in most people's books and has to assume those revised US recession warnings remain under wraps and 'value investors' don't get tempted away, or back home, in the case of the trillions of overseas dollars in the market.
'Those with sympathy for the Make America Great Again ambitions and methods could believe US exceptionalism will continue to deliver high returns, with strong capital inflows representing a willingness to hold and increase dollar holdings amongst investors in the rest of the world,' mused Chris Iggo at AXA Investment Managers.
'Recent events might cast some doubts on those assumptions.' Iggo wrote that the only meaningful factor that had improved of late was sentiment and relief, driven in part by announcements of billions of dollars in deals done by President Trump on his Middle East tour last week.
'Sentiment is fickle though. It could turn sour when the reality of weakening economic data becomes evident,' he added.
As to whether US market pricing remains extreme, Iggo cast back to legendary investor Warren Buffett's indicator of excessive valuation being defined by how much overall market cap exceeds a country's gross domestic product (GDP).
Using the Wilshire 5000 as a measure, US equity market cap is now more than 200% of GDP – twice where it was a decade ago, twice that of France or Britain and more than 50% bigger than the same ratio for Japan.
Even if US recession is avoided, the overarching Trump plan to rebalance world trade with higher tariffs, narrower US deficits, a countervailing capital flow reversal, weaker dollar and domestic demand spurs overseas challenge that market exception.
Some point to enduring long-term themes of US tech leadership and innovation. But even if faith in that persists, the current disruption has multiple hurdles over the summer ahead.
July and August stand out as particularly tricky months. Ninety-day tariff pauses on global and Chinese tariff hikes expire in July, the 180-day review of US membership of all multilateral institutions comes up that month too and the deadline for raising the US debt ceiling drifts back onto the radar amid currently fraught budget negotiations.
On top of that, the Federal Reserve's best guess on when tariff rises start to infect inflation in earnest is June – numbers set to be published in July. And even in most investors' best-case scenario of 'only' a 10% universal tariff increase, the risk there is that it resolves little.
'Settling on a 10% tariff might ... be the worst of all worlds-from the perspective of Trump's objectives,' wrote Council on Foreign Relations president Michael Froman.
'It could be too low to raise substantial revenue, too high to avoid pushing up prices, but not high enough to re-industrialise the United States.' — Reuters
Mike Dolan is a columnist for Reuters. The views expressed here are the writer's own.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

American corporate cash levels starting to decline
American corporate cash levels starting to decline

The Star

time3 hours ago

  • The Star

American corporate cash levels starting to decline

NEW YORK: The latest earnings period brought what might be an early warning sign about credit quality for high-grade US companies. Cash levels at blue-chip companies are shrinking when excluding results from the most cash-rich corporations. Among members of the S&P 500 that have posted results, cash levels for the latest quarter fell nearly 1% compared with the last three months of 2024. That's according to a Bloomberg News analysis that focuses on non-financial companies with less than US$30bil of cash. The group's cash holdings, now at US$1.14 trillion, have broadly been declining since the third quarter of 2023, when they peaked at US$1.21 trillion. While companies are still generally performing well, shrinking cash levels can be a sign of business slowing and profits falling. That's a particular concern now as escalating trade wars potentially boost the cost of foreign inputs, weigh on profits, and increase inflation. Bond prices for many US companies leave little room for error. Spreads, or risk premiums, on US high-grade corporate debt averaged just 0.85 percentage points last Friday, the tightest level since March. The average level for the last two decades is closer to 1.5 percentage points. 'It's actually a dangerous position to be in,' said Michael Contopoulos, deputy chief investment officer at Richard Bernstein Advisors. 'If you bring down cash balances and you find yourself having to deal with higher inflation and higher volatility, your debt is going to get punished.' For the biggest cash generators, the story is different. Giants from Meta Platforms Inc to Microsoft Corp and Nvidia Corp generally posted strong earnings this quarter. The top 12 biggest holders of cash saw their holdings rise about 1.4%, to around US$756.7bil. The dozen companies, which also include companies outside of the technology industry like Johnson & Johnson, each have more than US$30bil of cash and marketable securities on their books and hold in total about 40% of the S&P 500's cash. The biggest companies can distort averages, and by some measures many high-grade companies aren't looking great. Leverage levels, for example, have been better about 80% of the time over the last two decades, a UBS Group AG analysis found. But by other measures, companies are still performing well. Investment-grade firms are holding more cash as a share of their assets than they have on average over the past decade, according to data from S&P that analysed North American companies. — Bloomberg

FTRE INVESTOR ALERT: Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman LLC Announces that Fortrea Holdings, Inc. Investors with Substantial Losses Have Opportunity to Lead Class Action Lawsuit
FTRE INVESTOR ALERT: Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman LLC Announces that Fortrea Holdings, Inc. Investors with Substantial Losses Have Opportunity to Lead Class Action Lawsuit

Malaysian Reserve

time3 hours ago

  • Malaysian Reserve

FTRE INVESTOR ALERT: Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman LLC Announces that Fortrea Holdings, Inc. Investors with Substantial Losses Have Opportunity to Lead Class Action Lawsuit

NEW YORK, June 8, 2025 /PRNewswire/ — Attorney Advertising — Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC, a nationally recognized law firm, notifies investors that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Fortrea Holdings, Inc. ('Fortrea' or 'the Company') (NASDAQ: FTRE) and certain of its officers. Class Definition This lawsuit seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws on behalf of all persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired Fortrea securities between July 3, 2023 and February 28, 2025, both dates inclusive (the 'Class Period'). Such investors are encouraged to join this case by visiting the firm's site: Case Details The complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and misleading statements regarding the Company's business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, the Complaint alleges that Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Fortrea overestimated the amount of revenue the Pre-Spin Projects were likely to contribute to the Company's 2025 earnings; (2) Fortrea overstated the cost savings it would likely achieve by exiting the TSAs; (3) as a result, the Company's previously announced EBITDA targets for 2025 were inflated; (4) accordingly, the viability of the Company's post-Spin-Off business model, as well as its business and/or financial prospects, were overstated; and (5) as a result, the Company's public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times. What's Next? A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to review a copy of the Complaint, you can visit the firm's site: or you may contact Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or his Client Relations Manager, Nathan Miller, of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC at 332-239-2660. If you suffered a loss in Fortrea you have until August 1, 2025, to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as lead plaintiff. There is No Cost to You We represent investors in class actions on a contingency fee basis. That means we will ask the court to reimburse us for out-of-pocket expenses and attorneys' fees, usually a percentage of the total recovery, only if we are successful. Why Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a nationally recognized firm that represents investors in securities fraud class actions and shareholder derivative suits. Our firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors nationwide. Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, X, Facebook, or Instagram. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes. Contact Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC Peretz Bronstein or Nathan Miller 332-239-2660 | info@

US and China set for trade talks in London on Monday
US and China set for trade talks in London on Monday

The Sun

timea day ago

  • The Sun

US and China set for trade talks in London on Monday

WASHINGTON: Three of U.S. President Donald Trump's top aides will meet with their Chinese counterparts in London on Monday for talks aimed at resolving a trade dispute between the world's two largest economies that has kept global markets on edge. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer will represent the United States in the talks, Trump announced in a post on his Truth Social platform without providing further details. China's foreign ministry said on Saturday that vice premier He Lifeng will be in the United Kingdom between June 8 and June 13, adding that the first meeting of the China-U.S. economic and trade consultation mechanism would be held during this visit. 'The meeting should go very well,' Trump wrote. Trump spoke to Chinese President Xi Jinping on Thursday in a rare leader-to-leader call amid weeks of brewing trade tensions and a dispute over critical minerals. Trump and Xi agreed to visit one another and asked their staffs to hold talks in the meantime. Both countries are under pressure to relieve tensions, with the global economy under pressure over Chinese control over the rare earth mineral exports of which it is the dominant producer and investors more broadly anxious about Trump's wider effort to impose tariffs on goods from most U.S. trading partners. China, meanwhile, has seen its own supply of key U.S. imports like chip-design software and nuclear plant parts curtailed. The countries struck a 90-day deal on May 12 in Geneva to roll back some of the triple-digit, tit-for-tat tariffs they had placed on each other since Trump returned to the presidency in January. That preliminary deal sparked a global relief rally in stock markets, and U.S. indexes that had been in or near bear market levels have recouped the lion's share of their losses. The S&P 500 stock index, which at its lowest point in early April was down nearly 18% after Trump unveiled his sweeping 'Liberation Day' tariffs on goods from across the globe, is now only about 2% below its record high from mid-February. The final third of that rally followed the U.S.-China truce struck in Geneva. Still, that temporary deal did not address broader concerns that strain the bilateral relationship, from the illicit fentanyl trade to the status of democratically governed Taiwan and U.S. complaints about China's state-dominated, export-driven economic model. Trump has repeatedly threatened an array of punitive measures on trading partners, only to revoke some of them at the last minute. The on-again, off-again approach has baffled world leaders and spooked business executives. China sees mineral exports as a source of leverage. Halting those exports could put domestic political pressure on the Republican U.S. president if economic growth sags because companies cannot make mineral-powered products. In recent years, U.S. officials have identified China as its top geopolitical rival and the only country in the world able to challenge the United States economically and militarily.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store