logo
Bilibili Inc.'s (NASDAQ:BILI) high institutional ownership speaks for itself as stock continues to impress, up 11% over last week

Bilibili Inc.'s (NASDAQ:BILI) high institutional ownership speaks for itself as stock continues to impress, up 11% over last week

Yahoo10-02-2025

Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Bilibili's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
50% of the business is held by the top 13 shareholders
Recent sales by insiders
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Bilibili Inc. (NASDAQ:BILI), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 47% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
And things are looking up for institutional investors after the company gained US$744m in market cap last week. One-year return to shareholders is currently 81% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Bilibili.
Check out our latest analysis for Bilibili
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
We can see that Bilibili does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Bilibili's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Bilibili. With a 12% stake, CEO Rui Chen is the largest shareholder. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 11% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 6.6% by the third-largest shareholder. Interestingly, the third-largest shareholder, Yi Xu is also a Member of the Board of Directors, again, indicating strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 13 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Bilibili Inc.. Insiders own US$1.6b worth of shares in the US$7.7b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 22% stake in Bilibili. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
It appears to us that public companies own 11% of Bilibili. We can't be certain but it is quite possible this is a strategic stake. The businesses may be similar, or work together.
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for Bilibili you should know about.
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sending money to family in foreign countries may be taxed more
Sending money to family in foreign countries may be taxed more

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Sending money to family in foreign countries may be taxed more

Jun. 9—Families hoping to send money to loved ones in other countries may be hit with additional fees from a tax and spending bill proposed by the Trump administration that would slap a 3.5% tax on remittances sent by anyone who is not a U.S. citizen. The "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" passed through the House in May and is now being debated by the Senate. The budget bill has several proposed tax changes, which include taxing money sent from an estimated 40 million non-US citizens — including green card holders, temporary workers and undocumented immigrants — to family and friends in other countries. The bill had a 5% tax but was reduced to 3.5%. The bill is another way the Trump administration is hoping to dissuade immigrants, both documented and undocumented, from coming into the country and moving money out of the U.S. economy. Republicans believe the bill would increase the average take-home pay of U.S. citizens, while Democrats believe the bill and increased taxes are "a transfer of wealth from the working class to the rich," said Daniel Garcia, spokesperson for the Democratic Party of New Mexico. What is a remittance? Remittances refer to sending money from one person to another and is typically done between family members from one country to another. A person living and working in the U.S. would send money to family members typically living in a developing country, where this money is a source of income that contributes to the country's gross domestic product (GDP). Payments are typically sent using an electronic payment service or a money transfer app. Banks, credit unions and money transfer services charge a fee for processing remittances, and fees average 10%, according to the International Monetary Fund. Cryptocurrency exchanges are not as heavily regulated and can be a way to avoid additional taxes and surcharges. "Taxing remittances would amount to a form of double taxation, since migrants already pay taxes in the country where they work," Esteban Moctezuma Barragán, Mexican Ambassador, wrote in a statement. "Imposing a tax on these transfers would disproportionately affect those with the least, without accounting for their ability to pay," Barragán added. However, some believe the 3.5% tax fee would give financial support to public services and is the most "pro-worker, pro-family and pro-American legislation we've seen in decades," said Amy Barela, chairwoman of the Republican Party of New Mexico. "Let's be clear, this measure is not about targeting individuals," she wrote in a statement to the Journal. "It's about ensuring the 3.5% fee, although modest, would also have a very meaningful impact in helping offset costs associated with public services, border security, and community infrastructure — relieving some of the financial pressure on hardworking New Mexicans who continue to bear the burden of an imbalanced system." Crucial source of revenue Mexico is the second-largest receiver of personally wired money behind India, according to the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In 2024, Latin America received $160.9 billion, with the U.S. accounting for 96.6% of all remittances to Mexico. They also make up 20-30% of GDP in countries like El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti and Honduras. "Remittance is a very important source of revenue in our government," said Patricia Pinzón, consul of Mexico. "This would affect Mexican families and the economy in general, but I would say the basic needs of Mexican families is the most worrying thing." However, "whatever happens in one economy will affect the other," said Pinzón. "Our economies are so interrelated that everything that happens here has a consequence in Mexico," she said. "Mexicans will not stop sending money; they'll just look for alternative ways to send it." Mexican migrant workers sent 16.7% of their labor income back to their families, and more than 80% of the income remains in the U.S. economy. The average amount of remittance sent to Mexico is roughly $350 every one to two months, which "could seem like nothing for the U.S., but it's money that a whole family lives on and covers their basics in Mexico," Pinzón said.

Insurance tech firm Slide targets over $2 billion valuation in Nasdaq IPO
Insurance tech firm Slide targets over $2 billion valuation in Nasdaq IPO

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Insurance tech firm Slide targets over $2 billion valuation in Nasdaq IPO

-- Insurance technology company Slide is pursuing a valuation of up to $2.12 billion in its upcoming initial public offering (IPO) on the Nasdaq exchange. The company disclosed the target in a filing on Monday. In collaboration with some of its existing stakeholders, Slide is aiming to raise up to $340 million from the IPO. This move is in line with a recent trend of successful stock market debuts by insurance firms. Barclays and Morgan Stanley have been named as the lead underwriters for the listing. The shares of the company are anticipated to begin trading on the Nasdaq exchange under the ticker symbol "SLDE". Related articles Insurance tech firm Slide targets over $2 billion valuation in Nasdaq IPO Morgan Stanley downgrades Lululemon on weak US growth outlook Tesla shares slip after double downgrade amid Trump feud fallout Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Sitio Royalties downgraded after Viper Energy agrees to acquire co for $19.41/shr
Sitio Royalties downgraded after Viper Energy agrees to acquire co for $19.41/shr

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Sitio Royalties downgraded after Viper Energy agrees to acquire co for $19.41/shr

-- Texas Capital has downgraded Sitio Royalties Corp (NYSE:STR) to Hold from Buy after the company agreed to be acquired by Viper Energy (NASDAQ:VNOM) in an all-stock transaction valued at $19.41 per share. The downgrade comes as analysts no longer see material upside following the announced deal, which values Sitio at about $4.1 billion. Texas Capital also cut its price target on Sitio to $20 from $29, in line with the proposed merger terms. 'We are positive on the transaction,' analysts wrote, citing strategic fit, increased scale, low leverage, and an attractive base dividend breakeven below $20 per barrel WTI. 'The combination creates a must-own Minerals company.' Texas Capital does not expect any competing bids given the lack of well-capitalized public rivals in the space. Viper Energy said the deal will make it the largest public mineral and royalty company in the U.S., with positions in the Permian and other key basins. The transaction is expected to close in the second half of 2025, subject to shareholder and regulatory approvals. Related articles Sitio Royalties downgraded after Viper Energy agrees to acquire co for $19.41/shr Tesla shares gain as Trump wishes Musk 'well' GFL weighs sale in infrastructure arm valued at C$5 billion - Bloomberg Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store