logo
Google to appeal online search antitrust ruling

Google to appeal online search antitrust ruling

Japan Today2 days ago

The judge's decision on potential remedies is expected by August 2025
Google said Saturday it will appeal a ruling against it for anti-competitive practices in online search, a day after urging a U.S. judge to reject the suggestion it spin off its Chrome browser.
"We will wait for the Court's opinion. And we still strongly believe the Court's original decision was wrong, and look forward to our eventual appeal," the tech giant wrote on X.
Google was found guilty in the summer of 2024 of illegal practices to establish and maintain its monopoly in online search by a federal judge in Washington.
The Justice Department is now demanding remedies that could transform the digital landscape: Google's divestiture from its Chrome browser and a ban on entering exclusivity agreements with smartphone manufacturers to install the search engine by default.
It is also asking that the California-based company be forced to share the data used to produce search results on Chrome.
The department's proposal "reserves the right for the government to decide who gets Google users' data. Not the Court," Google said Saturday.
"While we heard a lot about how the remedies would help various well-funded competitors (w/ repeated references to Bing), we heard very little about how all this helps consumers," Google added, referring to the Microsoft-owned search engine.
The firm has proposed much more limited measures, including giving phone manufacturers the possibility to pre-install its Google Play app store but not Chrome or the search engine.
The Friday hearing devoted to arguments marked the end of the trial to determine Google's penalty. The judge's decision is expected by August.
© 2025 AFP

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Silicon carbide chips created to work in extreme heat, radiation
Silicon carbide chips created to work in extreme heat, radiation

Asahi Shimbun

time4 hours ago

  • Asahi Shimbun

Silicon carbide chips created to work in extreme heat, radiation

HIROSHIMA—Researchers said they have developed a durable silicon carbide-based semiconductor that enables electronic devices to function in extreme conditions, such as at crippled nuclear power plants and outer space. The new chip was produced by Hiroshima University and Phenitec Semiconductor Corp. Silicon carbide (SiC), comprising silicon and carbon, has higher thermal and electronic properties than traditional silicon used in chips. SiC semiconductors can operate in temperatures of 500 degrees and after absorbing radiation exceeding 1,000 kilograys. Normal silicon chips are designed to withstand temperatures of 150 degrees and radiation absorption of up to 1 kilogray. Shinichiro Kuroki, professor of electronic systems at the university's Research Institute for Semiconductor Engineering who led the project, underlined the importance of developing such high-performance semiconductors. 'As one of the most urgent tasks, we need to develop chips that can carry out the decommissioning work at the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant,' Kuroki said at a recent news conference. 'The new chips are expected to play an important role in other industrial applications, as well.' The university and Phenitec Semiconductor, which is based in Okayama Prefecture, joined forces in May 2024 to design and make a prototype of the SiC chips. The tie-up reflects a growing urgency to transfer the technology to a private-sector company for mass production for a wide range of products. The front-end, or wafer, process was completed in April, with Phenitec handing the prototype wafer to the university. The project has received funding from the central government as a program aimed at advancing scientific research and development at key universities in local regions. SiC-based semiconductors are also expected to reduce the need for cooling systems in integrated-circuit components in electric vehicles and to be used for space exploration probes, including on Venus. Hiroyuki Ishii, president of Phenitec, hailed the completion of the prototype at the news conference. 'There are several stages toward the production of integrated circuits and we have made a big step forward,' he said. 'We hope to bring the new chips to commercial applications.'

Thai chemical giant Indorama buys into Indian packaging maker
Thai chemical giant Indorama buys into Indian packaging maker

Nikkei Asia

time4 hours ago

  • Nikkei Asia

Thai chemical giant Indorama buys into Indian packaging maker

BANGKOK -- Thai petrochemical company Indorama Ventures has taken a roughly 25% stake in Indian packaging manufacturer EPL from U.S. investment firm Blackstone, tapping rising demand from India's growing population. Indorama is paying an estimated $220 million for the shares. Mumbai-based EPL, which employs around 3,500 people, makes daily necessities as well as specialized products such as plastic tubes for the health care industry.

Trump asks Supreme Court to clear way for federal downsizing plans
Trump asks Supreme Court to clear way for federal downsizing plans

Japan Today

time4 hours ago

  • Japan Today

Trump asks Supreme Court to clear way for federal downsizing plans

FILE - The Supreme Court is seen on Capitol Hill in Washington, Dec. 17, 2024. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File) By MARK SHERMAN President Donald Trump's administration on Monday renewed its request for the Supreme Court to clear the way for plans to downsize the federal workforce, while a lawsuit filed by labor unions and cities proceeds. The high court filing came after an appeals court refused to freeze a California-based judge's order halting the cuts, which have been led by the Department of Government Efficiency. By a 2-1 vote, a panel of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals found that the downsizing could have broader effects, including on the nation's food-safety system and health care for veterans. In her ruling last month, U.S. District Judge Susan Illston found that Trump's administration needs congressional approval to make sizable reductions to the federal workforce. The administration initially asked the justices to step in last month, but withdrew its appeal for technical, legal reasons. The latest filing is one in a series of emergency appeals arguing federal judges had overstepped their authority. Illston's order 'rests on the indefensible premise that the President needs explicit statutory authorization from Congress to exercise his core Article II authority to superintend the internal personnel decisions of the Executive Branch," Solicitor General D. John Sauer wrote in the new appeal. Trump has repeatedly said voters gave him a mandate to remake the federal government, and he tapped billionaire ally Elon Musk to lead the charge through DOGE. Musk left his role last week. Tens of thousands of federal workers have been fired, have left their jobs via deferred resignation programs, or have been placed on leave. There is no official figure for the job cuts, but at least 75,000 federal employees took deferred resignation, and thousands of probationary workers have already been let go. Illston's order directs numerous federal agencies to halt acting on the president's workforce executive order signed in February and a subsequent memo issued by DOGE and the Office of Personnel Management. Illston was nominated by former Democratic President Bill Clinton. Among the agencies affected by the order are the departments of Agriculture, Energy, Labor, the Interior, State, the Treasury and Veterans Affairs. It also applies to the National Science Foundation, Small Business Association, Social Security Administration and Environmental Protection Agency. The Supreme Court set a deadline of next Monday for a response from the unions and cities, including Baltimore, Chicago and San Francisco. Some of the labor unions and nonprofit groups are also plaintiffs in another lawsuit before a San Francisco judge challenging the mass firings of probationary workers. In that case, Judge William Alsup ordered the government in March to reinstate those workers, but the U.S. Supreme Court later blocked his order. © Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store