logo
2026 Volvo XC90 Review, Pricing, and Specs

2026 Volvo XC90 Review, Pricing, and Specs

Car and Driver22-05-2025

Overview
The mid-size luxury SUV class is a competitive one, full of stylish entrants with plush cabins, but the Volvo XC90 represents the best of what the segment has to offer. Volvo refreshed the XC90 just last year, which improved its curb appeal and added some modern tech touches inside. A pair of turbocharged four-cylinders is available, with the more powerful of the two—called B6—adding a supercharger to boost performance. A hybrid model is also offered, but we review that model separately. Road manners are refined, and the XC90 communicates a feeling of solidity and stability. All models come with three rows of seats, which is great for families, but the third row is a place where only kids will be happy riding.
What's New for 2026?
Coming off an extensive styling refresh for 2025, the XC90 rolls into 2026 with no significant updates.
Pricing and Which One to Buy
The price of the 2026 Volvo XC90 is expected to start around $60,000 and go up to $72,000 depending on the trim and options.
Core B5
$60,000 (est)
Plus B5
$64,000 (est)
Core B6
$65,000 (est)
Plus B6
$68,000 (est)
Ultra B5
$69,000 (est)
Ultra B6
$72,000 (est) 0 $25k $50k $75k $100k $125k
Volvo allows for a decent amount of personalization when it comes to building the perfect XC90, but to find a good balance of opulence, price, and power we'd suggest starting with the Plus trim, adding the optional 295-hp B6 powertrain, and sticking with the cheaper seven-passenger bench-seat layout instead of paying for second-row captain's chairs.
Engine, Transmission, and Performance
The B5 and B6 powertrains receive help from a 48-volt electric motor. B5 models feature a turbocharged 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine good for 247 horsepower; moving up to the B6 powertrain increases output to 295 horsepower. All-wheel drive and an eight-speed automatic transmission come with every XC90, no matter the trim level or powertrain. As with many vehicles in this class, the Volvo leans noticeably around curves but its steering responses are accurate, and the wheel has a pleasing heft that splits the difference between feather-light and heavyweight. Our test car had the optional air suspension, which provided a pleasant, insulated ride. It also handled most road situations well. Some clattering from the chassis over particularly sharp bumps betrays minor road imperfections, one of only a few grievances with the otherwise graceful XC90.
0–60-MPH Times
We haven't tested the B5 or B6 variants of the XC90 since they gained 48-volt hybrid systems, but Volvo claims the B6 is good for a 6.4-second run to 60 mph while the less powerful B5 is estimated to need 7.3 seconds.
View Exterior Photos
Volvo
Towing and Payload Capacity
Those interested in pulling boats, trailers, and other toys should be aware that not every XC90 is capable of the model's 5000-pound max tow rating. While every XC90 with the 295-hp B6 powertrain can pull that much, XC90s with the base 247-hp B5 powertrain max out at 4000 pounds.
Fuel Economy and Real-World MPG
The EPA hasn't released any fuel economy information for the 2026 XC90 yet, but the 2025 model earned ratings as high as 23 mpg city, 30 mpg highway, and 26 mpg combined. When we get a chance, we'll take the XC90 on our 75-mph highway fuel economy test and update this story with the results. For more information about the XC90's fuel economy, visit the EPA's website.
Interior, Comfort, and Cargo
The XC90's interior is a masterpiece of restraint, featuring an attractive design and high-quality materials that together create a warm ambiance. The XC90 features high-end materials, a handsomely designed dashboard, and several textile upholstery options. All models are offered with either a 5-, 6-, or 7-seat layout. Adults won't be happy in the third row, however, especially if the journey is long. The XC90's wide, boxy silhouette helps in the cargo-hauling department, but interior storage compartments aren't as cavernous as in some competitors.
View Interior Photos
Volvo
Infotainment and Connectivity
All XC90s come with an 11.2-inch infotainment display and a 12.3-inch digital gauge cluster. If you want it, a head-up display is optional. The software interface is derived from Google's Android Automotive system, but Apple CarPlay is standard on both screens for iPhone users. The system features in-dash navigation based on Google Maps and users can interact via voice with the Google Assistant. A ten-speaker stereo system is standard and features a 220-watt amplifier, but two different premium audio setups are available: a 600-watt, 14-speaker Harman/Kardon stereo or a 1410-watt, 19-speaker Bowers & Wilkins setup.
Safety and Driver-Assistance Features
Volvo's commitment to safety is legendary, and its three-row crossover has a loaded roster of driver-assistance technology. For more information about the XC90's crash test results, visit the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) websites. Key safety features include:
Standard automated emergency braking with pedestrian and cyclist detection
Standard lane-departure warning and lane-keeping assist
Standard adaptive cruise control with a lane-centering feature
Warranty and Maintenance Coverage
The XC90 has a merely average warranty plan versus competitors. However, Volvo outdoes them by offering excellent complimentary scheduled maintenance.
Limited warranty covers four years or 50,000 miles
Powertrain warranty covers four years or 50,000 miles
Complimentary maintenance is covered for three years or 36,000 miles
Specifications
Specifications
2025 Volvo XC90
Vehicle Type: front-engine or front-engine and rear-motor, all-wheel-drive, 6- or 7-passenger, 4-door wagon
PRICE
B5, $59,745; B6, $64,645; T8, $74,295
POWERTRAINS
turbocharged and intercooled DOHC 16-valve 2.0-liter inline-4, 247 hp, 266 lb-ft; turbocharged, supercharged, and intercooled DOHC 16-valve 2.0-liter inline-4, 295 hp, 310 lb-ft; turbocharged and intercooled DOHC 16-valve 2.0-liter inline-4, 310 hp, 295 lb-ft + AC motor, 145 hp, 228 lb-ft (combined output: 455 hp, 523 lb-ft; 14.7-kWh lithium-ion battery pack; 6.4-kW onboard charger)
Transmissions: 8-speed automatic or 8-speed automatic/direct drive
DIMENSIONS
Wheelbase: 117.5 in
Length: 195.0 in
Width: 76.1 in
Height: 69.3–69.7 in
Passenger Volume, F/M/R: 53–54/46–47/31 ft3
Cargo Volume, Behind F/M/R: 64–66/34–36/11–13 ft3
Curb Weight (C/D est): 4600–5200 lb
PERFORMANCE (C/D EST)
60 mph: 4.5–7.3 sec
100 mph: 11.3–19.0 sec
1/4-Mile: 13.1–16.0 sec
Top Speed: 112 mph
EPA FUEL ECONOMY, B5/B6 (C/D EST)
Combined/City/Highway: 23–26/20–23/26–30 mpg
EPA FUEL ECONOMY, T8 (C/D EST)
Combined/City/Highway: 27/26/27 mpg
Combined Gasoline + Electricity: 58 MPGe
EV Range: 32 mi
More Features and Specs

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Fact Check: Photo shows Cybertruck-like 1930 Russian 'Tarantaika'?
Fact Check: Photo shows Cybertruck-like 1930 Russian 'Tarantaika'?

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Fact Check: Photo shows Cybertruck-like 1930 Russian 'Tarantaika'?

Claim: A photo authentically shows a 1930 Russian or Soviet "Tarantaika," also known as "Boneshaker." Rating: In late May and early June 2025, online users shared a rumor claiming a photo authentically showed a 1930 Russian or Soviet vehicle called "Tarantaika," or "Boneshaker." For example, users shared this rumor with the caption "1930 Russian/Soviet 'Tarantaika' (Boneshaker)" on Bluesky (archived), Facebook (archived), Instagram (archived) and X (archived). Some commenters under various posts mentioned the alleged vehicle's visible similarities to the Cybertruck, created by Tesla CEO Elon Musk's electric car company. (@ However, the picture did not show a Russian "Tarantaika" or "Boneshaker." A user created the image — a fake — with an artificial-intelligence (AI) tool. Snopes found no evidence that a Russian vehicle known by those names ever existed. In October 2024, Snopes examined the same fake image in another fact check, back when users captioned the photo as allegedly showing a "fully restored 1875 chuckwagon." We traced the roots of the picture to Facebook user Joshohoho, who told us he created the image with the generative-AI platform Midjourney. The user first posted the picture in the Crazed AI and Cursed AI groups on June 24, saying it showed a "Tesla Cybertruck Frontier Edition." They later reposted the image in the Midjourney Official group on June 28 with the caption, "Tesla Cybertruck: Oregon Trail edition." Searches of Bing, DuckDuckGo and Google failed to locate any information about a historic vehicle with the name "Tarantaika." A search for "Boneshaker" found a stock image of a "Bone-shaker" bicycle from France dating back to 1869, displayed at a March 2011 exhibition in Moscow, Russia, according to the Shutterstock image-licensing website. For further reading, a previous fact check examined a photo allegedly showing a crash involving two Tesla Cybertrucks. Anokhin, Nikita. "Moscow March 25 Bike Bone-Shaker France Stock Photo 74604073." Shutterstock, 25 Mar. 2011, DuckDuckGo - Protection. Privacy. Peace of Mind. Google. Liles, Jordan. "Photo Authentically Shows Fully Restored 1875 Chuckwagon?" Snopes, 30 Oct. 2024, Microsoft Bing. Yahoo | Mail, Weather, Search, Politics, News, Finance, Sports & Videos.

Portions of Jackson Street bridge in St. Paul closed for repairs
Portions of Jackson Street bridge in St. Paul closed for repairs

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Portions of Jackson Street bridge in St. Paul closed for repairs

A stretch of the Jackson Street bridge between Empire Drive and Acker Street, north of Pennsylvania Avenue in St. Paul was closed on Friday until repairs can be made to the bridge piers, the Ramsey County Public Works department announced. The closure is expected to last about three months. The county decided to close the bridge 'out of an abundance of caution' following a routine inspection and consultation with St. Paul. The two-lane, 1930s-era bridge carries an estimated 3,500 vehicles a day. The bridge has been under load restrictions and the county has plans for reconstruction of the bridge in 2028. The county public works department will consult with bridge experts next week to determine repairs needed until the reconstruction occurs. More information will be coming. Snelling and St. Clair intersection fully reopens after construction Forest Lake detours begin as MnDOT undertakes $17M Highway 97 reconstruction project Snelling Ave. and St. Clair Ave. intersection closing intermittently Interstate 494 closure slated for this weekend in Bloomington-Richfield area '100 deadliest days' on roads kick off Memorial Day weekend

Midtown residents claim car restrictions on 34th Street will clog nabes with traffic, worsen their lives
Midtown residents claim car restrictions on 34th Street will clog nabes with traffic, worsen their lives

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Midtown residents claim car restrictions on 34th Street will clog nabes with traffic, worsen their lives

Residents in Midtown Manhattan complain they're getting thrown under the bus by the Adams' administration. The city Transportation Department is proposing banning or restricting cars on 34th Street by creating a busway to speed up bus commutes and truck deliveries between 3rd and 9th Avenues — provoking outrage from residents who fear rerouted traffic will clog their streets and worsen their lives. Motorists would be required to avoid the busway from Third Avenue to 9th Avenue altogether. Other cars or livery drivers who need to enter 34th Street must exit at the next avenue where a turn is permitted. DOT officials said they want to replicate the success of the so-called busway on 14th Street, which reduced congestion, sped up bus travel and curbed accidents. But there is a big difference: 34th Street is an access point for entrance and exits for the Midtown and Lincoln tunnels. Residents in Murray Hill worry that drivers coming out of the Midtown tunnel would be diverted onto their residential local streets. 'It's just going to congest all our side streets,' Murray Hill resident Michael- Ann Rowe said following a June 2 DOT presentation at a Community Board 6 transportation committee meeting last week. Another resident, Andrew Fine, said, 'the collateral damage will be immense. Please just give it up on this project.' The Murray HIll Neighborhood Association is going to bat for residents. 'Limiting access for residents and businesses with entrances on 34th Street, while diverting traffic from this critical corridor onto narrow residential streets would lead to increased congestion, safety hazards, and diminished quality of life in the neighborhood' said Jessica Lavoie,' chair of the MHNA's quality of life committee. There are 28,000 commuters who ride on the MS 34 bus routes and other express routes along the 34th Street corridor daily. There is as already a dedicated bus lane on 34th Street. But the average weekday speed for an MTA bus is 5 miles per hour and sometimes as low as 3 MPH, Joseph Chiarmonte, an analyst with the MTA's NYC Transit said. The transit official said riders on average lose a staggering 750 hours in delays per work day on 34th Street while the buses on 14th Street run 15% faster, with the car ban. Cross-town traffic on 34th, 42nd and other busy Manhattan corridors has been a vexing problem for decades. The crosstown buses run so slow that this reporter even raced against them years ago. Nearly half of vehicles on 34th Street — 47% –are headed off Manhattan to the outer boroughs or outside the city, said Rachel Eisenberg, a DOT senior project manager who gave the presentation. She said DOT will conduct a study of the impact of traffic diversion by restricting car traffic on 34th Street. But critics said DOT was putting the cart before the horse. Lavoie, of the Murray Hill Neighborhood Association, said she was 'deeply surprised' CB6's transportation approved the proposed 34th Busway without such an analysis. 'A plan of this magnitude demands a transparent, data-driven review and meaningful community engagement with local residents and businesses before any further action is taken,' she said. DOT defended the proposal as pro-commuter. '34th Street is one of the city's busiest crosstown corridors, where 28,000 daily bus riders often face speeds as slow as walking, a major pedestrian hub, and is also one of the connections between the tunnels,' a DOT spokesman said. 'This proposal—supported by all three local community boards—aims to deliver faster, more reliable service, just as we did on 14th Street, where bus speeds rose 24% and crashes dropped 42% with no negative impact on businesses. We welcome community feedback as this process moves forward.' The car restrictions on 34th Street could be implemented in late summer or fall, the DOT said in its presentation.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store