
Australia's Luxury Car Tax could be removed gradually
The Australian reports the Albanese government is assessing a progressive lowering of the controversial tax after car dealers and automakers warned its sudden removal could spark a rapid collapse in vehicle resale values.
The removal of the LCT has been put on the table as the government negotiates with the European Union on establishing a free-trade agreement (FTA).
However, the government reportedly won't scrap the LCT unless it can secure a better deal on agricultural exports to the EU.
This had been a sticking point when previous Australia-EU negotiations on an FTA collapsed in 2023.
Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now.
Axing the LCT will satisfy the EU, which has been pushing for it to be abolished for at least five years.
It also comes as European brands have been confronted by tariffs in the lucrative US market imposed by President Donald Trump.
The Australian reports around 40 per cent ($480 million) of the total $1.2 billion annual LCT revenue is raised from European vehicle sales.
With the LCT removed, the Australian Government will likely need to find a replacement source of revenue, and that could come from a road user charge.
The government has had to contend with a decline in fuel excise revenue as buyers move to more fuel-efficient vehicles, as well as electric vehicles (EVs).
A road user charge could see vehicle owners pay an amount based on the distance they travel, with the revenue in turn being invested in road maintenance and infrastructure.
The LCT adds 33 per cent to any part of a vehicle's price above the LCT threshold.
This is currently $91,387 for fuel-efficient (ie: vehicles with fuel consumption of under 7.0L/100km) and electric vehicles (EVs), and $80,567 for all other vehicles.
Thresholds are set annually by the government and are indexed to the Consumer Price Index (CPI).
From July 1, the definition of a fuel-efficient vehicle is changing to one with fuel consumption of under 3.5L/100km following the passing of the Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Incentives and Integrity) Act 2025.
This change to the tax was implemented to drive uptake of more environmentally friendly models.
Vehicles from Europe are also impacted by a five per cent import tariff, due to the absence of an FTA between Australia and the EU.
But the proposed abolition of the LCT has been met with criticism from at least one of Labor's opponents, on the basis the government would be removing a tax from more expensive vehicles while also getting ready to impose penalties on brands that sell more popular, higher-emitting vehicles such as utes and SUVs as part of its New Vehicle Efficiency Standard (NVES).
"I think it's a bit strange for the first act of a government to be giving a massive free kick to people who can afford very expensive European cars," Nationals Senator Matt Canavan told Sky News.
"Why would we be making very expensive European cars cheaper while we make the average standard vehicles that Australians are struggling to afford more expensive?"
In contrast, the Australian Automotive Dealer Association (AADA), the peak body for car dealers in Australia, has been among the voices domestically calling for the LCT to be scrapped, or at least significantly modified as part of a "wider root and branch review of Australia's automotive taxation regime".
Calling it a "relic of an era when Australia manufactured vehicles" in its pre-budget submission this year, the AADA called for its "complete abolition".
"The LCT was originally introduced as a means of protecting Australia's local vehicle manufacturing industry. With local manufacturing coming to an end in 2017, it just imposes unnecessary additional taxes on many vehicles, particularly more expensive lower emitting and EVs," the body said.
The AADA argues it disincentives customers from buying new, safer and more environmentally friendly vehicles, and also penalises buyers – particularly those in regional areas – who require large SUVs and vehicle accessories that are aimed to improve safety.
Vehicles from a range of mainstream auto brands, such as the Toyota LandCruiser, generate a significant proportion of LCT revenue raised, for example.
"If the total abolition of the LCT cannot be achieved in a timely manner," the AADA argues, "then we propose reforms to the LCT, such as raising the threshold to target truly luxury vehicles and stage a sunset period for LCT, exempt low-emission vehicles and exclude accessories from the calculation of whether a vehicle hits the threshold forpaying the LCT."
Content originally sourced from: CarExpert.com.au
The Australian Government is reportedly considering a gradual phase-out out the Luxury Car Tax (LCT) to minimise the impact on vehicle resale values, rather than axing it in one fell swoop.
The Australian reports the Albanese government is assessing a progressive lowering of the controversial tax after car dealers and automakers warned its sudden removal could spark a rapid collapse in vehicle resale values.
The removal of the LCT has been put on the table as the government negotiates with the European Union on establishing a free-trade agreement (FTA).
However, the government reportedly won't scrap the LCT unless it can secure a better deal on agricultural exports to the EU.
This had been a sticking point when previous Australia-EU negotiations on an FTA collapsed in 2023.
Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now.
Axing the LCT will satisfy the EU, which has been pushing for it to be abolished for at least five years.
It also comes as European brands have been confronted by tariffs in the lucrative US market imposed by President Donald Trump.
The Australian reports around 40 per cent ($480 million) of the total $1.2 billion annual LCT revenue is raised from European vehicle sales.
With the LCT removed, the Australian Government will likely need to find a replacement source of revenue, and that could come from a road user charge.
The government has had to contend with a decline in fuel excise revenue as buyers move to more fuel-efficient vehicles, as well as electric vehicles (EVs).
A road user charge could see vehicle owners pay an amount based on the distance they travel, with the revenue in turn being invested in road maintenance and infrastructure.
The LCT adds 33 per cent to any part of a vehicle's price above the LCT threshold.
This is currently $91,387 for fuel-efficient (ie: vehicles with fuel consumption of under 7.0L/100km) and electric vehicles (EVs), and $80,567 for all other vehicles.
Thresholds are set annually by the government and are indexed to the Consumer Price Index (CPI).
From July 1, the definition of a fuel-efficient vehicle is changing to one with fuel consumption of under 3.5L/100km following the passing of the Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Incentives and Integrity) Act 2025.
This change to the tax was implemented to drive uptake of more environmentally friendly models.
Vehicles from Europe are also impacted by a five per cent import tariff, due to the absence of an FTA between Australia and the EU.
But the proposed abolition of the LCT has been met with criticism from at least one of Labor's opponents, on the basis the government would be removing a tax from more expensive vehicles while also getting ready to impose penalties on brands that sell more popular, higher-emitting vehicles such as utes and SUVs as part of its New Vehicle Efficiency Standard (NVES).
"I think it's a bit strange for the first act of a government to be giving a massive free kick to people who can afford very expensive European cars," Nationals Senator Matt Canavan told Sky News.
"Why would we be making very expensive European cars cheaper while we make the average standard vehicles that Australians are struggling to afford more expensive?"
In contrast, the Australian Automotive Dealer Association (AADA), the peak body for car dealers in Australia, has been among the voices domestically calling for the LCT to be scrapped, or at least significantly modified as part of a "wider root and branch review of Australia's automotive taxation regime".
Calling it a "relic of an era when Australia manufactured vehicles" in its pre-budget submission this year, the AADA called for its "complete abolition".
"The LCT was originally introduced as a means of protecting Australia's local vehicle manufacturing industry. With local manufacturing coming to an end in 2017, it just imposes unnecessary additional taxes on many vehicles, particularly more expensive lower emitting and EVs," the body said.
The AADA argues it disincentives customers from buying new, safer and more environmentally friendly vehicles, and also penalises buyers – particularly those in regional areas – who require large SUVs and vehicle accessories that are aimed to improve safety.
Vehicles from a range of mainstream auto brands, such as the Toyota LandCruiser, generate a significant proportion of LCT revenue raised, for example.
"If the total abolition of the LCT cannot be achieved in a timely manner," the AADA argues, "then we propose reforms to the LCT, such as raising the threshold to target truly luxury vehicles and stage a sunset period for LCT, exempt low-emission vehicles and exclude accessories from the calculation of whether a vehicle hits the threshold forpaying the LCT."
Content originally sourced from: CarExpert.com.au
The Australian Government is reportedly considering a gradual phase-out out the Luxury Car Tax (LCT) to minimise the impact on vehicle resale values, rather than axing it in one fell swoop.
The Australian reports the Albanese government is assessing a progressive lowering of the controversial tax after car dealers and automakers warned its sudden removal could spark a rapid collapse in vehicle resale values.
The removal of the LCT has been put on the table as the government negotiates with the European Union on establishing a free-trade agreement (FTA).
However, the government reportedly won't scrap the LCT unless it can secure a better deal on agricultural exports to the EU.
This had been a sticking point when previous Australia-EU negotiations on an FTA collapsed in 2023.
Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now.
Axing the LCT will satisfy the EU, which has been pushing for it to be abolished for at least five years.
It also comes as European brands have been confronted by tariffs in the lucrative US market imposed by President Donald Trump.
The Australian reports around 40 per cent ($480 million) of the total $1.2 billion annual LCT revenue is raised from European vehicle sales.
With the LCT removed, the Australian Government will likely need to find a replacement source of revenue, and that could come from a road user charge.
The government has had to contend with a decline in fuel excise revenue as buyers move to more fuel-efficient vehicles, as well as electric vehicles (EVs).
A road user charge could see vehicle owners pay an amount based on the distance they travel, with the revenue in turn being invested in road maintenance and infrastructure.
The LCT adds 33 per cent to any part of a vehicle's price above the LCT threshold.
This is currently $91,387 for fuel-efficient (ie: vehicles with fuel consumption of under 7.0L/100km) and electric vehicles (EVs), and $80,567 for all other vehicles.
Thresholds are set annually by the government and are indexed to the Consumer Price Index (CPI).
From July 1, the definition of a fuel-efficient vehicle is changing to one with fuel consumption of under 3.5L/100km following the passing of the Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Incentives and Integrity) Act 2025.
This change to the tax was implemented to drive uptake of more environmentally friendly models.
Vehicles from Europe are also impacted by a five per cent import tariff, due to the absence of an FTA between Australia and the EU.
But the proposed abolition of the LCT has been met with criticism from at least one of Labor's opponents, on the basis the government would be removing a tax from more expensive vehicles while also getting ready to impose penalties on brands that sell more popular, higher-emitting vehicles such as utes and SUVs as part of its New Vehicle Efficiency Standard (NVES).
"I think it's a bit strange for the first act of a government to be giving a massive free kick to people who can afford very expensive European cars," Nationals Senator Matt Canavan told Sky News.
"Why would we be making very expensive European cars cheaper while we make the average standard vehicles that Australians are struggling to afford more expensive?"
In contrast, the Australian Automotive Dealer Association (AADA), the peak body for car dealers in Australia, has been among the voices domestically calling for the LCT to be scrapped, or at least significantly modified as part of a "wider root and branch review of Australia's automotive taxation regime".
Calling it a "relic of an era when Australia manufactured vehicles" in its pre-budget submission this year, the AADA called for its "complete abolition".
"The LCT was originally introduced as a means of protecting Australia's local vehicle manufacturing industry. With local manufacturing coming to an end in 2017, it just imposes unnecessary additional taxes on many vehicles, particularly more expensive lower emitting and EVs," the body said.
The AADA argues it disincentives customers from buying new, safer and more environmentally friendly vehicles, and also penalises buyers – particularly those in regional areas – who require large SUVs and vehicle accessories that are aimed to improve safety.
Vehicles from a range of mainstream auto brands, such as the Toyota LandCruiser, generate a significant proportion of LCT revenue raised, for example.
"If the total abolition of the LCT cannot be achieved in a timely manner," the AADA argues, "then we propose reforms to the LCT, such as raising the threshold to target truly luxury vehicles and stage a sunset period for LCT, exempt low-emission vehicles and exclude accessories from the calculation of whether a vehicle hits the threshold forpaying the LCT."
Content originally sourced from: CarExpert.com.au
The Australian Government is reportedly considering a gradual phase-out out the Luxury Car Tax (LCT) to minimise the impact on vehicle resale values, rather than axing it in one fell swoop.
The Australian reports the Albanese government is assessing a progressive lowering of the controversial tax after car dealers and automakers warned its sudden removal could spark a rapid collapse in vehicle resale values.
The removal of the LCT has been put on the table as the government negotiates with the European Union on establishing a free-trade agreement (FTA).
However, the government reportedly won't scrap the LCT unless it can secure a better deal on agricultural exports to the EU.
This had been a sticking point when previous Australia-EU negotiations on an FTA collapsed in 2023.
Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now.
Axing the LCT will satisfy the EU, which has been pushing for it to be abolished for at least five years.
It also comes as European brands have been confronted by tariffs in the lucrative US market imposed by President Donald Trump.
The Australian reports around 40 per cent ($480 million) of the total $1.2 billion annual LCT revenue is raised from European vehicle sales.
With the LCT removed, the Australian Government will likely need to find a replacement source of revenue, and that could come from a road user charge.
The government has had to contend with a decline in fuel excise revenue as buyers move to more fuel-efficient vehicles, as well as electric vehicles (EVs).
A road user charge could see vehicle owners pay an amount based on the distance they travel, with the revenue in turn being invested in road maintenance and infrastructure.
The LCT adds 33 per cent to any part of a vehicle's price above the LCT threshold.
This is currently $91,387 for fuel-efficient (ie: vehicles with fuel consumption of under 7.0L/100km) and electric vehicles (EVs), and $80,567 for all other vehicles.
Thresholds are set annually by the government and are indexed to the Consumer Price Index (CPI).
From July 1, the definition of a fuel-efficient vehicle is changing to one with fuel consumption of under 3.5L/100km following the passing of the Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Incentives and Integrity) Act 2025.
This change to the tax was implemented to drive uptake of more environmentally friendly models.
Vehicles from Europe are also impacted by a five per cent import tariff, due to the absence of an FTA between Australia and the EU.
But the proposed abolition of the LCT has been met with criticism from at least one of Labor's opponents, on the basis the government would be removing a tax from more expensive vehicles while also getting ready to impose penalties on brands that sell more popular, higher-emitting vehicles such as utes and SUVs as part of its New Vehicle Efficiency Standard (NVES).
"I think it's a bit strange for the first act of a government to be giving a massive free kick to people who can afford very expensive European cars," Nationals Senator Matt Canavan told Sky News.
"Why would we be making very expensive European cars cheaper while we make the average standard vehicles that Australians are struggling to afford more expensive?"
In contrast, the Australian Automotive Dealer Association (AADA), the peak body for car dealers in Australia, has been among the voices domestically calling for the LCT to be scrapped, or at least significantly modified as part of a "wider root and branch review of Australia's automotive taxation regime".
Calling it a "relic of an era when Australia manufactured vehicles" in its pre-budget submission this year, the AADA called for its "complete abolition".
"The LCT was originally introduced as a means of protecting Australia's local vehicle manufacturing industry. With local manufacturing coming to an end in 2017, it just imposes unnecessary additional taxes on many vehicles, particularly more expensive lower emitting and EVs," the body said.
The AADA argues it disincentives customers from buying new, safer and more environmentally friendly vehicles, and also penalises buyers – particularly those in regional areas – who require large SUVs and vehicle accessories that are aimed to improve safety.
Vehicles from a range of mainstream auto brands, such as the Toyota LandCruiser, generate a significant proportion of LCT revenue raised, for example.
"If the total abolition of the LCT cannot be achieved in a timely manner," the AADA argues, "then we propose reforms to the LCT, such as raising the threshold to target truly luxury vehicles and stage a sunset period for LCT, exempt low-emission vehicles and exclude accessories from the calculation of whether a vehicle hits the threshold forpaying the LCT."
Content originally sourced from: CarExpert.com.au
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Sky News AU
a few seconds ago
- Sky News AU
Australian-made rocket company not allowing failure to stop them
Stepmates Studios Mark Nicholson shared his optimistic comments on the recent rocket failure from an Australian made company. 'We're bloody patriots, that's why we're not going to mock this stuff, because this is what we want, we want Australians manufacturing stuff,' Mr Nicholson told Sky News Australia. 'Go Australia, this is the only first step on a long way … we're on the right track this is good.'

Sky News AU
a few seconds ago
- Sky News AU
Trump forcing India to ‘align' with the US in latest tariff call
Centre of the American Experiment President John Hinderaker discusses Donald Trump's strategy of using trade as an 'instrument' of foreign policy. US President Donald Trump has said India will be slapped with a 25 per cent tariff on all exports, as well as a "penalty" tariff for buying Russian weapons and oil. 'One of the things he is trying to do is to isolate Russia and isolate China,' Mr Hinderaker told Sky News host Rita Panahi. 'Trump wants the business here in the US, of course, but I think more importantly, he wants India firmly aligned with the United States in our camp.'


Perth Now
a few seconds ago
- Perth Now
Miners, Flight Centre drag ASX 200 lower
Weaker than expected earnings from Rio Tinto, troubles travelling to the US and tariffs starting to impact listed businesses, all dragged on the ASX during Thursday's trading. On a mixed day on the market, the benchmark ASX 200 on Thursday fell 13.60 points or 0.16 per cent to close the month of July at 8,742.80. The broader All Ordinaries also slipped down 16.40 points or 0.18 per cent to 8,999.00. Australia's dollar traded 0.26 per cent higher to 64.63 US cents. While the overall market dropped, eight of the 11 sectors traded higher, with gains out of the information technology and consumer discretionary sectors offset by the major miners slumping. Technology and consumer discretionary stocks led the gains. NewsWire / Jeremy Piper Credit: News Corp Australia The falls followed Rio Tinto announcing its earnings update after trading on Wednesday, informing the market that first half profits came in at their lowest point since 2020, on the back of falling iron ore prices. BHP fell 2.41 per cent to $39.25, Rio Tinto slumped 3.55 per cent to $111.70 and Fortescue slipped 2.31 per cent to $17.77. IG market analyst Tony Sycamore said even with Thursday's wobbles, July's reputation of being a good month for Australian investors continued in 2025. 'As it enters the home straight, it is poised for a 2.35 per cent gain for the month and on track for a fourth straight month of gains made more memorable by its 1580 points (22 per cent) rally from its early April 7169.2 low,' he wrote in an investment note. Consumer discretionary shares jumped after 11.30am after a surprising bounce in retail sales. Shares in JB Hi-Fi were up 1.30 per cent to 411.70, Harvey Norman gained 1.05 per cent to $5.80 and Lovisa Holdings jumped 2.15 per cent to $34.14 on the retail figures. According to the ABS retail sales gained 1.2 per cent for the month of June, its biggest lift since the end of the Covid lockdowns. AMP economist My Bui said June's retail strength, which came off the back of end of financial year sales and the release of the Nintendo Switch 2, might not be a sign of a strong economy. Despite the falls, eight of the 11 sectors gained on Thursday. NewsWire / Max Mason-Hubers Credit: News Corp Australia 'In addition, the strong June result has benefited from one-off releases and promotions, which is not necessarily a sign of strength,' she said. Overall though, Australia's market was unable to follow a jump on Wall Street, with the S & P 500 futures up more than 1 per cent on the back of major tech companies beating expectations. Microsoft futures are up 8 per cent and Meta surged 11 per cent as the two tech giants smashed quarterly earnings forecasts. In company news, shares in Flight Centre slumped 7.3 per cent to $11.94 after the business missed its guidance. The travel group said a combination of Middle East tensions, additional costs out of Asia and difficult travel conditions in the US added to the unexpected result. Champion Iron slumped 13.12 per cent to $4.17 after brokers downgraded the miner following a weaker-than expected trading update on Wednesday. Luxury retailer Cettire shares plunged 23.5 per cent to $0.26 after the business said it was accessing the impacts of US President Donald Trump's tariffs on the business. Shipments to the United States represent approximately 40 per cent of Cettire's gross revenue.