Budget 2025: Young Kiwis, families, react to Kiwisaver, Best Start changes
KiwiSaver is also getting a shake-up, with the Government halving its yearly contribution from $520 to $260, and raising the default employee contribution from 3-4%.
The Student Loan repayment threshold is being frozen at $24,000, rather than rising every year as it used to, meaning borrowers will have to start paying it back at a relatively lower yearly income.
And the Budget Economic and Fiscal Update noted house prices were likely to jump 5.4% by 2026.
The Government has defended the changes, saying tweaks to KiwiSaver would encourage people to save more and have little impact on KiwiSaver balances, while means-testing Best Start would help fund a boost for Working for Families.
The Herald hit the streets of central Auckland to gauge young people's reaction to the Government's spending priorities and announcements, and ask if they would be directly impacted.
'It's kind of sad for people who don't really have much income,' two young parents, who asked not to be named, said of the change to Best Start.
'It would probably be a lot harder to look after the baby [if we did not have the Best Start payment], and just not being able to get him all the things he needs,' said the couple.
'It makes it harder for people who want to just live. I think it's a lot harder on the future generation.
'For younger people growing up, and especially younger families, buying a house ... it's just going to be a lot harder for everyone.'
Others had similar concerns.
'I want to buy a house one day, so the lower the house prices, the better for me,' another young man told the Herald.
Commenting on the Government's KiwiSaver contribution change, a third man said: 'I think, as a young person, it's quite appalling.
'KiwiSaver was meant to be a hope for people like us, investing in our long-term futures.
'I think some of these changes are not exactly optimistic and might actually contribute to more young people leaving this country as we go forward.'
Two more young parents said some of the changes were 'a bit of a shame'.
'It [KiwiSaver] is to the benefit of the Kiwi person, it's a great scheme, and the more money that's in that, the better for all of our retirements. I thought that would be something that the Government could get behind, so it's quite disappointing.
'I guess, you know, they say when we get to a retirement age, there's potentially not going to be enough money for us to retire at the nice age of 65. So I thought the Government would be interested in trying to alleviate that issue by helping out now.'
Raphael Franks is an Auckland-based reporter who covers breaking news and local stories from Tāmaki Makaurau. He joined the Herald as a Te Rito cadet in 2022.
Do you have questions about the Budget? Ask our experts – business editor at large Liam Dann, senior political correspondent Audrey Young and Wellington business editor Jenee Tibshraeny – in a Herald Premium online Q&A here at nzherald.co.nz at 9.30am, Friday, May 23.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
13 minutes ago
- RNZ News
MSD to monitor whether stricter rules for accommodation supplement push people into hardship
Social Development Minister Louise Upston. Photo: VNP / Phil Smith The Ministry of Social Development (MSD) will assess requests for hardship assistance to determine whether new, stricter rules for the accommodation supplement are pushing people to seek help elsewhere. From 2 March next year, payments from all boarders will be included in income assessments to determine whether people qualify for accommodation supplements or temporary additional support, and to calculate how much income-related rent people pay in public housing. At the moment, board payments are only included in this calculation when people have three or more boarders, or when it is their main source of income. Work and Income said that could mean people were paid less in housing subsidies or paid higher income-related rents. A spokesperson for MSD said because the policy change would mean a decrease in the rate of assistance received by some people, there could be an increase in applications for other hardship and housing supports. In earlier analysis, it had suggested that the $150 million the government expected to save over four years could be overstated because of this. "We cannot predict how many people will access hardship assistance and housing support products as a result of the change. As part of internal reporting for this initiative, MSD will monitor hardship assistance to see if it is increasing more than forecasted prior to this change. "If MSD identifies significant changes that may require further investigation (such as significant increases in hardship assistance, above what had been forecasted), MSD will investigate those further and provide advice to ministers." It has been estimated that about 13,200 households with boarders will be affected. Ricardo Mendendez-March, Green Party spokesperson for social development, said people who were receiving the accommodation supplement were already facing unaffordable rents. He said the government had not adequately communicated the impact of the bill. "Poverty is a political choice and this government has chosen to leave thousands of low-income families considerably worse off. The changes to the accommodation supplement are unjustified, particularly in a cost of living crisis. The government is trying to pay for their tax cuts by pushing low-income families into debt or to Work and Income to ask for hardship grants to survive. "Being $100 worse off each week may not mean much to wealthy government ministers, but for many families it's the difference between making ends meet or having to access a foodbank. We know that more families will end up needing to access hardship support because of this bill, putting pressure on families and other parts of the system that are already struggling to keep with the growing material hardship families are experiencing." Social Development Minister Louise Upston said there are various forms of assistance that are available to clients who need help with their housing and living costs and who meet the eligibility criteria. "This assistance will continue to be available to those people who are eligible, after 2 March 2026," she said. The minister acknowledges the changes could be unsettling but said they were necessary to make the system more consistent. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Otago Daily Times
29 minutes ago
- Otago Daily Times
Tax evader leaves $2 million trail of debt
A tax-evading Southland school caterer has left a $2 million trail of debt after her company went bust. Debra Lee Monteith appeared in the Invercargill District Court on Tuesday and was sentenced to 11 months' home detention on a single representative charge of aiding and abetting her company in failing to account for PAYE between March 2021 and February 2024, Inland Revenue said in a release. That just added to her troubles after her company, Lee 19, was put into liquidation in March last year, with questions over third-party loans and operating a lawnmowing business under the company's name, which was running contracts while in liquidation. Her company stopped paying PAYE tax for nearly three years and defaulted on a debt repayment scheme. Inland Revenue had applied to put her in liquidation last year, which was granted. All up, the company had assets of $99,899 and liabilities of $2,048,785. Lee 19 was primarily involved in food catering, including the Ministry of Education's Ka Ora, Ka Ako Healthy School Lunches Programme and catering at the Alliance Lorneville meat processing plant. The latest liquidators' report said Inland Revenue was one of the preferential creditors, who were collectively owed $1,106,877, unsecured creditors were owed $843,336, while secured creditors were owed $181,482. In the latest liquidators report, published in April this year, the director of the company advised the company was operating two businesses: a catering business and a canteen. The director also advised the company had been used to operate her ex-partner's lawnmowing business. Initially, the director advised of an intention to purchase some of the company's assets. Due to the valuations the liquidators received, those purchases were declined by the liquidators. All remaining company assets were sold to one party. The liquidators were also considering a claim for an unrelated third party which had a contract with the lawnmowing business in the name of the company. The contract was still operating after the liquidation, with questions about who was receiving payments. A claim was also issued for an overdrawn current account against the previous director. No response was received. A claim was also made on a third-party loan but no-one could be located and it became uneconomic to pursue. Inland Revenue said in its statement that in 2019, Lee 19 registered as an employer and began paying its workers. The next year, several employees phoned Inland Revenue stating their KiwiSaver deductions were not being paid. No PAYE returns were filed until 2020, when returns for seven PAYE periods were made all at once with $82,894.86 (excluding penalties and interest) immediately due and payable. Monteith entered into an instalment arrangement in 2020 for the debt, but this was cancelled in 2022 because of missed payments. Then the company stopped paying PAYE entirely from March 2021 until February 2024. The PAYE not accounted for over the period totalled $801,928.79. Monteith told Inland Revenue the PAYE was used to keep the company afloat and pay for food costs. Her personal expenses were paid out of the company's finances and her groceries were taken from the company's pantry. Monteith benefited by just over $300,000 between 2020 and 2024, although she was not otherwise taking a salary from the company. Lee 19 also applied for and received more than $780,000 in Covid-19 support money from various schemes. The company, at Monteith's direction, was receiving significant taxpayer support while at the same time not meeting its own tax obligations. Monteith, who ran four other companies since the late 1980s, was made bankrupt in 2013.
RNZ News
31 minutes ago
- RNZ News
RNZ-Reid Research poll: Most New Zealanders don't think Trump's presidency been good for NZ
United States President Donald Trump. Photo: ANNA MONEYMAKER / Getty Images via AFP Just 8.9 percent of New Zealanders feel the second Donald Trump presidency has been good for New Zealand, according to the latest RNZ-Reid Research poll. Supporters of every political party in Parliament took a more negative view of the presidency than positive, though there are still many who are neutral on the man in the Oval Office. On a foreign policy front, Trump's second term has been dominated by the stop-start tariffs, as the US seeks to rebalance what it says has been an uneven trading playing field. New Zealand has not been immune from the tariffs , though whether they are as reciprocal as the White House says has been a source of frustration for the government. In the latest poll, 1008 respondents were asked: "US President Donald Trump has recently completed 100 days in office for his second term. How do you think his presidency has been for New Zealand?" In total, 44.4 percent of voters said the presidency had been bad for New Zealand, while 8.9 percent said it had been good. However, many do not have a view either way, with 35.8 saying they were neutral, while 10.9 percent said they did not know. Broken down to party allegiances, the gap between good and bad was even wider for Labour and Green supporters. Half of Labour voters said it had been bad, compared to 3.3 percent who said it was good. Almost 59 percent (58.7) of Green voters said bad, 4.8 percent said good. In April, Trump announced a 10 percent tariff on New Zealand goods , on top of existing tariffs. Officials swiftly worked to understand how the tariff was calculated, given New Zealand's rate is 1.9 percent. The government's response in the meantime has been to keep its head down, saying a trade war is in nobody's best interests. Labour leader Chris Hipkins said the Trump presidency had not been good for small trading nations like New Zealand. "I think an international trade war between the US and China is bad for countries like New Zealand." Green Party co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick. Photo: RNZ / Reece Baker Green Party co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick said it was partly why the Greens had put together an industrial strategy. "To show that with the international headwinds being what they are, and Donald Trump's punitive tariff measures, that we can take steps locally to build our own economic resilience so that we're not relying on international shareholders, which seems to be the strategy of this government," she said. While 13.6 percent of Te Pati Māori voters said Trump had been good for New Zealanders, those who said he had been bad and those who were neutral were relatively evenly split. While more supporters of government parties also said the presidency had been bad for New Zealand than good, the gaps were tighter, with many also staying neutral. Of National voters, 8.4 percent said it had been good, but more were slightly more neutral than negative. A quarter of ACT supporters were positive, but the remainder were also closely split between bad and neutral. While more New Zealand First voters said bad than good - 28 percent vs 22 percent - the majority take a neutral view. New Zealand First leader Winston Peters. Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii The party is vowing to 'Make New Zealand First Again'. But leader Winston Peters is also the Foreign Affairs minister - and on this, he's also staying neutral. "I'm the foreign minister. I don't talk about other countries' politics, particularly when doing so might harm our country's trading interests," he said. The Prime Minister was also staying diplomatic. "Look, it's not for me to say. I'm just focused on what New Zealand needs to do to sail its boat in what are more turbulent waters, for sure, to make sure that we can realise all the great potential we have in this country. That's what we're focused on," Christopher Luxon said. This poll of 1008 people was conducted by Reid Research, using quota sampling and weighting to ensure representative cross section by age, gender and geography. The poll was conducted through online interviews between 23-30 May 2025 and has a maximum margin of error of +/- 3.1 percent at a 95 percent confidence level. The report is available here . Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
