
5 high-yield stock picks to add to your dividend portfolio
Does the prospect of economic uncertainty have you rethinking your portfolio? Perhaps you'd like to collect a little more cash while the economic headwinds are blowing? It's not an unreasonable concern. Plenty of other investors are already thinking more defensively.
To this end, here's a closer look at five high-yielding dividend stocks to consider adding to your portfolio sooner rather than later, until it's clear the worst is behind us.
1. Verizon Communications
Dividend yield: 6.2%
Verizon Communications is, of course, one of the country's biggest wireless service providers, boasting well over 100 million paying customers who collectively handed over nearly $135 billion worth of revenue last year alone. Of that, $18 billion was turned into net income, $11.25 billion of which was dished out to shareholders in the form of dividends. That's in line with the company's long-term norms.
There is an arguable downside here. That's growth ... or lack thereof. The well-saturated U.S. wireless market doesn't offer much in the way of upside potential above and beyond simple population growth. Verizon is finding some inroads within the institutional/private 5G communications space, but that's a highly competitive market. There's just not a ton of expansion to be added here either.
What Verizon may lack in growth potential, however, it more than makes up for in consistency and sheer payout. Nobody's interested in giving up their mobile phones, which supports a sizable forward-looking yield of 6.2% that's based on a dividend that has now been raised for 18 consecutive years. Not bad.
2. Realty Income
Dividend yield: 5.6%
Realty Income isn't a stock in the traditional sense. Rather, it's a real estate investment trust, or REIT. That just means it owns a portfolio of rent-bearing real estate.
REITs trade just like ordinary stocks do, and pay dividends the same way that dividend stocks do, too. And Realty Income brings something else to the table that's pretty unique in addition to its sizable forward-looking yield of 5.6%. That's a monthly dividend payment, as opposed to the quarterly cadence you'll get with most other dividend stocks.
Realty Income's specialty is retailing real estate. In light of the so-called "retail apocalypse" that seems to never end, this focus seems like a liability. But take a step back and look at the bigger picture. While numbers from Coresight Research point out that 7,325 U.S. stores were shuttered last year, 5,970 new stores were opened (or reopened). Realty Income further narrows this gap by serving the strongest survivors in the business. Its top tenants include 7-Eleven, Dollar General, Dollar Tree, and FedEx, just to name a few. Underscoring the quality caliber of its renters is the fact that its occupancy rate currently stands at an industry-beating 98.5%, and only fell to 97.9% in COVID-crimped 2020.
This resilience is one of the reasons the REIT has been able to raise its payout annually for the past 30 consecutive years.
3. SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF
Dividend yield: 4.6%
Speaking of dividend stocks that aren't actually stocks, add the SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (NYSEMKT: SPYD) to your watch list, if not to your portfolio.
An ETF (or exchange-traded fund) is a basket of stocks with a common characteristic. In this instance, these tickers are all part of the S&P 500 High Dividend Index, which tracks the 80 highest-yielding names within the S&P 500.
These include Philip Morris, toymaker Hasbro, AT&T, and Ford Motor Company, for reference. None of these names has a great deal of growth firepower. All of them, however, are healthy dividend payers. Most of them also have a solid track record of dividend growth, even if it's not required for inclusion in the underlying index.
Sure, you can probably find higher dividend yields than the one SPYD offers. The aforementioned Realty Income and Verizon both boast bigger ones, for instance. The SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF is still an incredibly simple way of achieving a well-diversified mix of dividend stocks though, with a little more potential for capital appreciation than Verizon or Realty Income offer.
4. Pfizer
Dividend yield: 6.9%
It's no secret that drugmaker Pfizer (NYSE: PFE) has underperformed since the wind-down of COVID-19, which upended sales of its Paxlovid approved to treat the disease. The company's top line has slipped from 2022's $100 billion to only $64 billion last year, for perspective, and analysts aren't looking for any sales growth this year or next either. That's the chief reason Pfizer shares continue to flounder.
If you can look just a little further down the road, though, some new blockbuster drugs are in the works -- drugs like vepdegestrant, for the treatment of ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer. While it will be competing with plenty of other therapies in this same space, it's noteworthy that the FDA fast-tracked this drug, which is being co-developed with Arvinas.
And that's just one. Pfizer got a total of four promising oncology drugs with its 2023 acquisition of Seagen, and now has over 100 clinical trials underway, 30 of which are in phase 3 (late-stage) testing. Indeed, the company believes it's got eight oncology candidates in its developmental pipeline that could become blockbusters by 2030. Little of this long-term upside is being reflected in the stock's present price, however, even though it arguably should be.
More to the point for interested income investors, this pharmaceutical stock's weakness has pushed its forward-looking dividend yield up to nearly 7% at a point where the pharma giant is on the verge of significant prolonged revenue and profit growth.
5. Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF
Dividend yield: 14%
Finally, consider adding a stake in the Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF (NASDAQ: QYLD) to your dividend portfolio.
It's not a stock. It's an exchange-traded fund. And an unusual one at that. While it holds the same tickers that make up the tech-heavy Nasdaq-100 index, serving as an index fund isn't its primary purpose.
Rather, this ETF's purpose is to generate reliable income that's regularly distributed to shareholders by selling covered calls against the ETF's stock holdings. It's an income-generating process called "buy-write," in fact -- you're buying a stock, and then "writing" (or selling) call options on those shares, essentially using them as collateral.
And the process works. Although the income generated by writing covered calls over and over again can be erratic (don't count on that trailing 14% yield going forward), the resulting reliable yields are typically big even if they're not precisely predictable.
There's also a big downside, though. That is, this fund is almost certainly guaranteed to underperform the Nasdaq-100 itself, even after factoring in all of its sizable dividend payments. That's just the nature of selling covered calls -- the strategy doesn't let you fully participate when the market's rallying the most. Writing options is just a means of monetizing stock holdings when they're mostly moving sideways, or losing ground.
Still, with a double-digit yield, even only capturing a portion of the Nasdaq-100's long-term upside isn't a bad bet. It's just arguably not the only dividend-paying investment you'd want to own at any given time, mostly due to its inconsistent payments.
James Brumley has positions in AT&T. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends FedEx, Pfizer, and Realty Income. The Motley Fool recommends Hasbro, Philip Morris International, and Verizon Communications. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The Motley Fool is a USA TODAY content partner offering financial news, analysis and commentary designed to help people take control of their financial lives. Its content is produced independently of USA TODAY.
Should you invest $1,000 in Pfizer right now?
Offer from the Motley Fool: Before you buy stock in Pfizer, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Pfizer wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $652,133!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,056,790!*
Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,048% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 180% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of July 15, 2025

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNBC
39 minutes ago
- CNBC
European wine and spirits makers urge 0% tariffs as EU-U.S. deal leaves sector in the dark
European wine and spirit makers are viewing their exclusion from the newly-etched U.S.-EU trade deal with caution as industry bodies call for a sector specific carve-out. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said Sunday that a framework deal imposing 15% tariffs on EU goods imported to the U.S. did not contain any decision regarding the wine and spirits industry, adding that an agreement for the sector would be examined in the coming weeks. An industry-wide reprieve would provide much-needed relief for the spirits sector, which has been under pressure amid waning consumer spending and shifting consumption habits. Spirits stocks Pernod Ricard, Remy Cointreau, Diageo and Davide Campari ticked moderately higher early Monday on hopes of a carve-out, before uncertainty seeped in, paring gains. Brewers — which are typically less impacted by tariffs given their localized production — traded lower, after Heineken posted better-than-expected first half results but pointed to softening consumer sentiment in the U.S. and Europe. The Comité Européen des Entreprises Vins (CEEV), which represents the European wine industry, called for the sector to be included in the final list of products covered in a proposed zero-for-zero tariff arrangement. "[We] are watching with great anticipation the outcome of the upcoming negotiations regarding the list of products that will be included under the 0-for-0 tariff arrangement, among them some agricultural products" said Marzia Varvaglione, president of CEEV, in a Sunday statement. "We truly believe the trade of wine is of great benefit for both EU and U.S. companies," she added. Under the new U.S.-EU trade deal, a mutual zero tariff rate has been agreed for certain strategic products, including "all aircraft and component parts, certain chemicals, certain generics [drugs], semiconductor equipment." Discussions around other exclusions, meanwhile, remain underway. Chris Swonger, CEO and president of the U.S.'s Distilled Spirits Council, similarly said that he was hopeful for an industry-wide reprieve. "We are optimistic that in the days ahead this positive meeting and agreement will lead to a return to zero-for-zero tariffs for U.S. and EU spirits products," Swonger said in a statement. Alcohol is one of the EU's leading exports to the U.S., accounting for around 9 billion euros ($10.5 billion) in 2024, according to Eurostat data. The U.S., meanwhile, exported 1.2 billion worth of spirits alone to the 27-country bloc in 2024, Distilled Spirits Council data shows. European spirit makers have posted several consecutive quarters of weak sales as the sector has been caught in the crosshairs of trade tensions, while a post-Covid slowdown has suppressed spending. Verushka Shetty, equity analyst at Morningstar, said uncertainty around tariffs would weigh on drinks makers in the near-term, even as firms plan mitigating measures such as price hikes. "We expect a negative impact on margins across our spirits coverage, however we expect the impact to be limited with pricing actions," he wrote in a note. CEEV, meanwhile, forecast that any move to impose tariffs would force European wine makers to increase prices and could "eject" some EU companies from the U.S. market entirely. According to CEEV, the U.S.' previous 10% broad-based tariffs on EU imports, imposed during President Donald Trump's 90-day tariff pause, led to an approximate 12% decline in turnover for wine producers. "While producers may absorb part of the increase to lessen the impact on consumers, this approach is not always feasible or effective," CEEV Secretary General Dr Ignacio Sanchez Recarte told CNBC via email.


Bloomberg
39 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
‘Pretty Neutral' on Stocks to Year's End: Calvasina
00:00 I've got to say, just looking through your note, you do seem a lot more measured than some of your Southside peers who start to dust off their bull case Upside scenario playbook. What has you remaining a little bit more conservative right now? So, look, I mean, markets have run up tremendously and we actually have done this work where we looked back at the market rebound nine months down the road off of things like the 2010 2011 growth scares, 2018, kind of all the big 10% plus drops except for the COVID recession of 2020 that we've seen since the GFC. And we are recovering faster than any of them and we're about where we deserve to be. If you look at the average of those in nine months time in December. So we think markets have already pulled forward a tremendous amount of good news. And that's not to say, you know, that we're feel super bearish from here. We feel pretty neutral, you know, looking at stocks through the end of the year. What do you make of the fact we have recovered so quickly? Is it a change in investor behavior? Is something different this time around from previous rebounds? So I think that what is really unusual is that perhaps far earlier than any point in time that I can remember in my career, people are already looking to next year. And if you go back to June, all I was hearing was 20, 26, 20, 26, 2026. We're done with 2025, you know, and as we're getting all these headlines, you know, on the trade deals, I'm sort of, you know, kind of laughing to myself in my head, like who was worried about the is certainly not any of the people I was talking to in June where there was an assumption that, you know, we didn't really know quite what all the details were, but that things, you know, we were going to get deals done right. There were just not a lot of concerns about tariffs in the meetings, frankly, that I had at the end of the second quarter. What about what you've heard from companies and how much concern they're expressing in this earnings season? I don't think that the corporate sentiment level matches what we've seen from investors and what we've seen priced into markets. And, you know, if you want to just sort of take my opinion out of it, look back at the Duke CFO survey, which came out right before reporting season, and we didn't see the same kind of inflection in sentiment that we had seen in things like the NFIB survey, things like the Eye Survey or even the consumer sentiment surveys. If you look at what we've sort of qualitatively been gathering the last couple of weeks, you know, we kind of just finished week to week one was all about financials and they sounded pretty good. You know, our tagline at the end of that was fine, but not fabulous. Maybe even they were a little bit more guarded than what we've been hearing from investors. Last week, though, we finally got both volume and breadth in terms of, you know, different industries and sectors participating. And it frankly did sound a bit more mixed. You know, we have had, you know, even as of last week, obviously not the news of the weekend, but we did have more clarity. And I was still seeing one company after another talking about fluidity was kind of the big word uncertainty. And certainly, you know, companies were saying things were better than the initial assumptions, but there was still some guarded ness.


Business of Fashion
7 hours ago
- Business of Fashion
What Fashion and Beauty Professionals Want From Employers
In the five years since the start of the Covid-19 pandemic, the fashion and beauty industries have navigated significant transformation amid ongoing geopolitical unrest, a turbulent economic climate and the mounting climate crisis. Such change is ushering in a workplace reckoning, with employees across the world reassessing where their professional priorities lie. Needs have changed with the global introduction of remote and hybrid working, a demand for transparency and values-based company missions and goals. To examine these shifts, BoF Careers conducted a survey of our global community from May to June 2025, to better understand what talent is looking for as well as which companies they would most like to work for — and why. More than 1000 members from the global BoF community in 74 countries and territories, representing a variety of seniority levels and age groups, shared their needs and expectations in 2025. The survey finds today's workforce seeks fair compensation and career progression opportunities, greater transparency and ethical leadership, a strong company culture and flexibility over a prestigious name or social capital. The workforce is increasingly holding current and prospective employers accountable for meeting their professional needs — and loyalty is no longer guaranteed. Some 45 percent of working professionals surveyed say they are actively looking for a new job outside of their current employer, and only 15 percent say they are satisfied with their current role. This mirrors broader workforce sentiments from the 2025 State of the Global Workplace report by workplace consulting and research firm Gallup, which found 50 percent of currently employed workers say they are watching for or actively seeking a new job. Moreover, there are now up to five generations in the workplace, with Gen-Z — those born roughly between 1997 and 2012 — often most closely associated with ushering in new expectations and workplace demands. The report deep dives into each cohort's needs today, providing key generational insights, while dispelling stereotypes around the cohorts shaping the workforce today. We combine proprietary survey data with insights from global HR leaders at Prada Group, Adidas, Patagonia and L'Oréal Groupe, as well as expertise from strategists, writers and consultants specialising in leadership and HR. This report is split into 3 sections: Chapter 1: The Macro-Context Explores the broader trends impacting the workplace and driving change in employee behaviour, needs and expectations. Key Insights: Globally, job dissatisfaction is rife — 45 percent of working professionals surveyed say they are actively looking for a new job outside of their current employer. The new digital era is having a profound impact on global workplace operations and the psychology of today's workforce. Constant changes in business priorities amid rapidly shifting macroeconomics and socio-politics leaves the wider workforce uncertain of strategic goals and is leading to employees feeling disengaged. Chapter 2: Talent Expectations Presents the qualitative and quantitative findings from our exclusive survey, offering a detailed view of current employee expectations. Key Insights: Brand prestige captures the attention of prospective talent, but it is not enough to convert candidates further down the talent acquisition funnel — pay and company values are the most important criteria when assessing an employer today Those aged 20-29 — from the Gen-Z cohort — typically register more positive sentiments around pay compared to older professionals. The most important benefit, according to 65 percent of respondents, is 'flexible working policies.' Some 52 percent prefer a hybrid working schedule, with 2 or 3 days in the office. Seventy percent of respondents say transparency is the most important component of an employer's approach to career progression. Chapter 3: Employer Strategies Provides actionable advice for employers and HR teams on how to meet those expectations today to drive recruitment, improve retention and boost productivity. Key Insights: Consistent company values provide clear reasons behind business decisions, setting a stronger guidance for the workforce. Segment employees by mindset, not generation, when appealing to a workplace that consists of five generations with nuanced, complex needs. Employees want their workplaces to engage in critical conversations and community causes. Workplaces should carefully consider what their company can meaningfully commit to, and engage with these topics in an authentic way. Mission statements and inclusive hiring language in job descriptions are not sufficient in convincing talent of a company's commitment to its community. Individuals need to see it to believe it. BoF Careers is our hiring and employer branding platform. We partner with fashion and beauty companies to help them hire and showcase their unique employer brand to our community of top fashion, luxury and beauty professionals. Get in touch with Thesia Yomalita to find out how BoF Careers can support your business.