Teenager, 18, is put in charge of Reform-led council after his boss quits for health reasons
George Finch, who only recently switched allegiance from the Conservatives to Reform UK, is now interim leader of Warwickshire County Council - one of the largest local authorities in the Midlands - despite still being in his teens.
He takes over from Reform Councillor Rob Howard, who quit his post with immediate effect just weeks after the party's shock gains in the May local elections saw it form a minority administration in Warwickshire for the first time.
In a brief statement, Mr Howard, who had been at the helm for less than two months, said the decision was made 'with much regret'.
'The role of leader is an extremely demanding role and regretfully my health challenges now prevent me from carrying out the role to the level and standard that I would wish,' he added.
He went on to confirm that Mr Finch, his teenage deputy and fellow Reform UK councillor, would now serve as acting leader until a permanent replacement is chosen.
Mr Finch, councillor for Bedworth Central, now finds himself in charge of a local authority with over £1.5 billion in assets and a revenue budget of around £500 million.
He has not yet commented on the appointment.
He takes over from Councillor Rob Howard, who quit his post with immediate effect just weeks after the party's shock gains in the May local elections saw it form a minority administration in Warwickshire for the first time
Just earlier this month, Mr Howard told the BBC he was 'not intimidated' by the scale of the task at Warwickshire County Council and seemed optimistic about the Reform-led administration's ability to deliver results.
Despite stepping down from the leadership, Mr Howard said he would remain a councillor and continue to represent his local constituents.
'I am honoured and privileged to have held the role, even if only for a short time,' he said.
'I remain committed to my continued role working as a county councillor for the benefit of Warwickshire residents.'
Before joining Reform UK, he was a member of the Conservative Party for just three months.
He reportedly switched allegiance after concluding that Reform would take a tougher stance on illegal immigration — an issue he described as central to his political beliefs.
On the New Reformer website, Mr Finch outlines his views under three core themes: 'Brexit, sovereignty and a strong and united family unit.'
Reform UK, led nationally by Nigel Farage, made unexpected strides in the local elections earlier this year, gaining council seats in areas previously considered solidly Conservative or Labour.
Warwickshire was among the party's most striking victories, with Reform overtaking the Tories as the largest group, though without an outright majority.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
27 minutes ago
- The Independent
Britain urged to let hero Afghans bring their families to UK after major data leak put thousands at risk
The government has been urged to let hero Afghans granted sanctuary in Britain bring their loved ones to the UK after a major data breach put the lives of up to 100,000 people at risk from the Taliban. More than 50 refugee charities and lawyers have written to Yvette Cooper, urging her to make it easier for Afghans who were allowed to relocate to the UK due to British links to bring family members – many of whom are at risk of reprisals – with them. The pleas come after revelations of a 'catastrophic' data leak at the Ministry of Defence in February 2022, which involved the details of thousands of Afghans who said they were in danger from the Taliban and had applied for sanctuary in Britain being shared online. The dataset, inadvertently sent out by a member of the armed forces, included the personal details of applicants to the MoD's Arap resettlement scheme, which allows Afghans who supported British troops to seek sanctuary in the UK. The leak was covered up by a superinjunction, which was lifted in July after The Independent challenged the draconian legal order at the High Court. Ms Cooper has now been told the government 'has no time to waste' if it 'wants to prevent the worst possible consequences of the data leak becoming a dire reality'. Charity workers and solicitors, including from Asylum Aid and modern slavery charity Kalayaan, told Ms Cooper: 'The UK government has a moral responsibility to the Afghan people who continue to suffer, including now as a result of the data leak and have no choice but to seek safety elsewhere. 'The 2022 data breach directly exposed Afghans still in the country to a risk of reprisals they were not even aware of, and the High Court, in lifting the superinjunction, recognised that its imposition may have increased the risks these people face.' The letter continued: 'Poor decision-making could yet again have exposed Afghans to serious harm, with many of these people having clear UK family ties'. They added: 'It is essential that those who were resettled under Arap and ACRS are able to live in safety and are given a fair opportunity to reunite with their families.' Unlike asylum routes, Afghans using Arap cannot sponsor family members to come to the UK under refugee reunion rules. The same applies to those relocated under ACRS, designed to help those who supported British values, such as journalists or women's rights activists. However, some may be able to make a separate immigration application. But charities and rights groups say these family routes are very restrictive and can often involve 'extremely costly application fees and require copious, specific documentation'. Decision-makers often refuse these applications from Afghan families, leading to lengthy appeals. Lib Dem MP Wendy Chamberlain, chair of the all-parliamentary group for Afghan women, said: 'There is already anecdotal evidence of reprisals on family members by the Taliban - the Home Office has no time to waste if the government wants to prevent the worst possible consequences of the data leak becoming a dire reality. 'The Home Office desperately needs to take a pragmatic and compassionate approach to allowing Afghans resettled in the UK to be reunited safely with their families. It is clear that these schemes have been seriously mis-handled, culminating in the recent exposure of the 2022 data leak.' In one recent case highlighted by The Independent, a security guard who worked for the British embassy in Kabul for almost two decades has been unable to bring his two eldest sons to the UK. Hamidullah Fahim and his wife Zaghona were brought to Britain with two young children in December 2023, but he couldn't bring his two eldest sons, who are now in their 20s. He said that his family is struggling with being separated, saying: 'We want to do whatever we can to be reunited with them and to let the Home Office know of the injustice that has been carried out in our case'. Isaac Shaffer, at Refugee Legal Support, said it was 'critical' that the government sped up decision-making on Arap cases in light of the data breach. He explained that most of the people he was helping 'have waited over a year for a final decision on their Arap application and have remained in hiding throughout; in constant fear, and in extraordinarily precarious circumstances', adding: 'Knowledge of this data breach has only exacerbated this fear and uncertainty'. James Tullett, CEO at charity Ramfel, who helped co-ordinate the letter, said: 'The government has acknowledged that the people they have resettled need protection and yet this offer of support comes with the heavy price of separation from family. 'Allowing Afghan families to reunite won't solve all the problems associated with the data leak, but it will make a monumental difference for the affected families'.
BBC News
28 minutes ago
- BBC News
London mayor announces 8,000 new properties completed
The mayor of London has claimed he is tackling the city's housing crisis "head on" as he announced that more than 8,000 new homes have been started via his Land Fund, five years ahead of Sadiq Khan said the fund provided flexibility for City Hall to provide financing for projects, which includes buying land, to "unlock" more mayor also reported that last year saw London complete just over 11,600 homes, with nearly 6,700 of them "affordable homes for social rent and equivalent".The City Hall Conservatives said "this is a clearly a smoke-and-mirrors announcement by the mayor to distract from his housing failures". City Hall said the initial target to start 8,000 homes by March 2030 had now been surpassed, with 8,283 starts as of the end of March May the mayor and the government announced a cut of more than 6,000 homes to the affordable homes programme, for 2021-2026, from the previous range of 23,900 to 27,100 reduction – with a new target range of between 17,800 and 19,000 – represented a cut of 22%.Lord Bailey, City Hall Conservatives' housing spokesman, said: "Khan's own government have set him the target of building 88,000 homes a year, in recognition of the acute housing crisis in London which is driving our rents and mortgages up."Today he's proud to be announcing that he's only met one eighth of that target."We want this government to succeed, for the sake of our city and our country - but Labour have clearly failed."Lord Bailey said "just 2.5% of his promised affordable homes" were completed despite receiving almost £9bn from the last added: "We need to move away from talking about 'housing starts' - you cannot live in a start, only a completion." The Mayor's Land Fund, established by Sir Sadiq in 2017, is made up of more than £736m - with £486m provided by the Ministry of Housing Communities and Local provides various types of investment and has a range of investment opportunities alongside commercial fund has provided land acquisition finance to help the Peabody Trust deliver nearly 1,000 homes on the former Holloway Prison site in Islington; bought surplus land on hospital sites capable of delivering up to 1,000 homes across Enfield and Haringey; and supported City & Docklands with finance for build-to-rent Sadiq said: "We know there is more work to do to fix the housing crisis in London. I'm pleased that the government has committed to work with me to establish the City Hall Developer Investment Fund to unlock further housing in London."I will continue to work closely with them to secure even more national support to help build the level of new housing London needs, as we build a better, fairer London for everyone."Deputy Prime Minister and Housing Secretary Angela Rayner said the housing crisis "has stopped our young people from achieving the dream of homeownership, especially in London".She added: "That's why we welcome the mayor of London pushing ahead to build these homes, and we will continue to work hand-in-hand with him to deliver on our stretching target of 1.5 million homes."
BBC News
28 minutes ago
- BBC News
Nottingham expansion option explored in councils shake-up
Nottingham City Council is exploring further options to expand the city's boundary amid a consultation to reorganise local government. Residents of the city and the county have been asked to share their views on proposals to replace the existing council structure with two new unitary councils. Two core options currently being considered in Nottinghamshire include Broxtowe, and either Rushcliffe or Gedling, combining with the city council has a preferred option outside of those that would change the existing boundaries of neighbouring boroughs and districts. The two core options currently being considered in Nottinghamshire are known as 1b and 1e. 1b would be a new unitary authority combining Nottingham, Broxtowe, and Gedling, with a second new unitary authority for the rest of Nottinghamshire - Mansfield, Ashfield, Newark and Sherwood, Bassetlaw and Rushcliffe.1e would involve a new unitary authority combining Nottingham, Broxtowe, and Rushcliffe, with a second new unitary authority for the rest of Nottinghamshire - Mansfield, Ashfield, Newark and Sherwood, Bassetlaw and final decision has been made on a single option at this stage, and some councils could still explore additional proposals alongside the two mentioned. Deputy leader for Nottingham City Council, Ethan Radford, confirmed on Tuesday the authority was in favour of an option that would effectively see only parts of neighbouring districts combined with said: "The suggestion that the city expands into the whole of the Rushcliffe district is quite something. "There are areas and villages or towns in there that don't have a shared identity with Nottingham."He said comparatively, people living in areas in Gedling and Broxtowe, "say they live in Nottingham". He added: "Ultimately the end goal here has to be not just lines moved on a map, but services that actually are good value for money that meet the needs of people and create new authorities that actually deliver for people." The preferred option for Nottinghamshire County Council, which has been under the control of Reform since the May elections, is 1b. Council leader Mick Barton, said: "I've always said all along in the early days of this process, that I would go with the evidence and the evidence to me balances up for 1b. "That's just me personally. I'm still having discussions with my own group but I believe 1b is the best option moving forward for the residents of Nottinghamshire."I can't speak for all of the council I can only speak for my own group. He said 1b, which would combine Nottingham, Broxtowe and Gedling, was better "financially" and "per head" in respect of population figures. Leader of the opposition at the county council, Sam Smith, said he and his Conservative shadow cabinet wanted to see more options put forward for public consultation. He suggested a city council expansion that would change the boundaries of surrounding districts and boroughs, using the example of Beeston becoming part of Nottingham, but not the rest of added: "Broxtowe residents right now are not seeing options that keep them out of the city.""We must now see other options coming forward," he added. The deadline for the final proposal must be submitted to the government by 28 November. 'Cities within cities' The reforms have attracted mixed feedback among people living in the Rushcliffe Stuart Holmes believed local government reorganisation was a "waste of time and money". Asked what he thought about West Bridgford potentially combining with the city, he added: "I think it would be bad for West Bridgford, and as far as the city is concerned, they've got bigger problems."Louise Williams, a teacher from West Bridgford, said: "I often wondered why we weren't more part of the city than we tend to be. "It seems to have an exclusivity that I don't necessarily think it needs even though people like the fact that it has an exclusivity."Another resident added that if the city was to expand into areas like West Bridgford, she would hope they would still maintain separate identities. "Cities within cities - that's my idea," she said.
