Costa Mesa police bust 2 smoke shops for nitrous oxide sales, as county supports ban
Police officials in a social media post this week shared photos of gas canisters and chargers seized from two Costa Mesa smoke shops. Members of the department's Special Investigations Unit determined employees had not been selling products in accordance with state laws.
Although the retail sale of nitrous oxide — used medically for anesthesia and pain relief, as well as in certain foods such as canned whipped cream in some meringues — is not prohibited in California, its use for recreational purposes is a misdemeanor offense.
Purveyors who sell nitrous oxide, also called NOX or NOS, are required by law to record all transactions, including customers' names and addresses, and make them sign a document highlighting the health risks and laws around sales and uses of the product.
But on Jan. 24, members of Costa Mesa Police Department's Special Investigations Unit visited five smoke shops where nitrous oxide-related products are sold and found two purveyors out of compliance with the law, spokeswoman Roxi Fyad confirmed Friday.
'Investigators randomly chose five smoke shops to contact,' Fyad wrote in an email. 'Two had enforcement action for improperly selling nitrous oxide, and the other three [had been] closed for a significant amount of time, so contact was not made.'
The two stores where citations were issued are located on the 700 block of Baker Street and the the 500 block of W. 19th St. CMPD reported 678 large cylinders and 5,542 small N20 chargers — aka whippets, or whip-its — were seized from one location, while about 183 large cylinders and 1,048 chargers were taken from the other.
The products boasted a variety of flavors, ranging from mango and fruit punch to blue raspberry and coconut. Costa Mesa police reported Tuesday that in addition to the nitrous oxide, several local smoke shops' inventory included other illegal items.
'Detectives also found several of these businesses were unlawfully selling psilocybin and THC-related products, which they also seized and booked into evidence,' CMPD's post read.
The seizures come as the Orange County Board of Supervisors earlier this month unanimously supported an ordinance that would ban the sale of nitrous oxide products in unincorporated areas.
Supervisor Katrina Foley, who introduced the ordinance in a first reading by the panel during a Feb. 11 meeting, said the fact that laughing gas is legally and commonly sold at area smoke shops and liquor stores masks the health risks of ingesting the gas.
'NOX suffocates your brain, and causes serious neurological harm, even death. [But] because NOX is sold like a candy bar at a corner store, consumers falsely assume ingesting it is safe,' Foley said in a statement after the meeting.
'Allowing the sale of nitrous oxide at local shops offers zero benefit to consumers. It only endangers public health.'
A second reading of the proposed ordinance is set for later this month. If approved, the county health officer would be directed to prepare a report and make recommendations on the abuse, use and sales of the substance throughout Orange County and direct county counsel to take legal action as necessary on related matters, according to an agenda report.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
2 hours ago
- Politico
Judge denies DOJ bid to unseal grand jury material in Ghislaine Maxwell case
And, the judge wrote, the only reasonable argument for unsealing the material 'is that doing so would expose as disingenuous the Government's public explanations for moving to unseal.' Maxwell, a convicted sex offender, is serving a 20-year prison sentence for aiding and participating in a sex trafficking ring run by her onetime boyfriend Jeffrey Epstein. Over the past month, the Justice Department has sought to quell outrage from President Donald Trump's supporters over the administration's handling of the so-called Epstein files. In an early July memo, the department concluded that 'no further disclosure' of Epstein-related material would be warranted. But after backlash from the far right, the department took several steps to try to demonstrate that it is seeking to expose additional information about Epstein's crimes, including asking judges to unseal the grand jury transcripts and exhibits in the Epstein and Maxwell cases. A federal judge in Florida last month rejected one of those requests. Another judge in Manhattan is currently weighing a separate request. The Justice Department also interviewed Maxwell for two days last month and transferred her to a less restrictive prison. Both actions have outraged victims of Maxwell and Epstein, who died by suicide in jail in 2019 while awaiting trial. The decision about the grand jury materials is, on its face, a loss for the Justice Department. But it may allow the department to place the blame for keeping the documents private on the judge. The bid to make the material public was always a longshot and, as both the judge and the government acknowledged, the files contained almost no material that would add to the public's understanding of the matter. A spokesperson for the DOJ didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. In his decision, Engelmayer took aim not just at the department's rationale for unsealing, but also at the process by which it went about requesting it. The judge criticized the department for failing to include in the process any of the prosecutors who handled Maxwell's 2021 trial. The members of the trial team would have been most familiar with the material. Instead, only the Justice Department's second-highest-ranking official, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, who subsequently interviewed Maxwell, signed the motion seeking to release the records. Days before the department filed the request to unseal the material, it fired Maurene Comey, one of the last two prosecutors working at the Justice Department who handled the Epstein or Maxwell investigations. And the judge faulted the DOJ for failing to notify victims of Maxwell or Epstein in advance of the request, a factor that many victims have also criticized in letters to the court. The judge noted that although many victims support the effort to unseal the material, their position was based on the 'understandable but mistaken belief that these materials would reveal new information.'
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Epstein partner Ghislaine Maxwell's grand jury records to remain sealed
By Luc Cohen NEW YORK (Reuters) -A U.S. judge denied on Monday the Justice Department's bid to unseal records from the grand jury that indicted the late financier Jeffrey Epstein's partner Ghislaine Maxwell on sex trafficking charges, writing that the records did not answer lingering questions from the public about their crimes or Epstein's death. Manhattan-based U.S. District Judge Paul Engelmayer, who reviewed the transcripts of the witness testimony heard by the grand jury and other evidence the panel saw, wrote that the government's assertion that the materials would reveal meaningful new information about Epstein's and Maxwell's crimes was "demonstrably false." "A member of the public familiar with the Maxwell trial record who reviewed the grand jury materials that the Government proposes to unseal would thus learn next to nothing new," Engelmayer wrote. "Insofar as the motion to unseal implies that the grand jury materials are an untapped mine load of undisclosed information about Epstein or Maxwell or confederates, they are definitely not that," the judge wrote. Maxwell is serving a 20-year prison sentence after her 2021 conviction on sex-trafficking charges. Epstein died by suicide in a Manhattan jail cell in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges. He had pleaded not guilty. Neither the Justice Department nor a lawyer for Maxwell immediately responded to requests for comment. President Donald Trump last month instructed Attorney General Pam Bondi to seek the release of the Epstein and Maxwell grand jury material, as he sought to quell discontent from his base of conservative supporters and congressional Democrats over his administration's handling of documents from the cases. Trump, a Republican, had promised to make public Epstein-related files if reelected and accused Democrats of covering up the truth. But in July, the Justice Department said a previously touted Epstein client list did not exist, angering Trump's supporters. Solve the daily Crossword
Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
Texas DA Could Face Prison for Weed Smoking Protest
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A Texas district attorney could face a prison sentence for livestreaming herself smoking marijuana to protest a proposed ban on weed-associated products. Sarah Stogner, a Republican district attorney for Texas's 143rd Judicial District, said she bought the marijuana from New Mexico, where it is legal to do so and transported it to Texas to smoke outside her home in Ward County to make a point. In doing so, she could be arrested on a misdemeanor possession charge. Stogner told Newsweek that she wasn't concerned about being prosecuted because, as a district attorney, she has jurisdiction in the area she smoked in and because juries don't want to prosecute those who possess or even deal marijuana. "I did this to raise attention," she said. "Its silly that our elected officials want to completely ban THC when that's not what our constituents want." Why It Matters Stogner's action follows a sustained conflict about whether to permit certain cannabis products in Texas. THC is an $8 billion industry in Texas, and a number of experts say the drug is beneficial for medicinal reasons. Others warn of safety concerns about the use of THC. In June, Texas Governor Greg Abbott vetoed a proposed ban on cannabis-derived compounds, tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) products. However, similar legislation is to be mooted in a special session item in the state Senate, after it passed the House on Friday. It would ban the sale of products containing THC but would allow the sale of other cannabinoids. THC products that Texas lawmakers were seeking to ban are seen at the Dope Daughters dispensary in Austin on May 29, 2025. THC products that Texas lawmakers were seeking to ban are seen at the Dope Daughters dispensary in Austin on May 29, 2025. AP Photo/Eric Gay What To Know Possessing cannabis in Texas is classed as a Class B misdemeanor. This carries up to 180 days in prison and up to a $2,000 fine. Transporting cannabis across state lines also carries a potential $250,000 fine or a five-year prison sentence, according to the Drug Enforcement Agency. In her video, Stogner addressed Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick, a proponent of banning marijuana. She also posted an image of her smoking marijuana on X and directed it to Patrick, whom she called on to "free the plant." Stogner told The New York Times she lined up a defense lawyer and alerted the local district judge before her stunt. What People Are Saying Matthew Mangino, a former district attorney in Lawrence County, Pennsylvania, told Newsweek: "I don't see Sarah Stogner getting prosecuted by the state of Texas. First, she is a Republican, recently recruited to unseat a Democrat DA in rural Texas. Second, she targeted the lieutenant governor for his support of a THC ban, while Governor Abbott is not seeking a ban on THC, only regulation." Texas Governor Greg Abbott previously told Newsweek: "Texas can and should reasonably regulate consumable hemp products to protect public health and safety. THC products for Texans under 21 should be banned, as should be dangerous synthetic products. We can do that without also eliminating consumer access to adults." Stogner told Austin news station KVUE-TV that she would consider posting similar videos again: "Because it raises awareness, and I'm a nobody from nowhere. With social media and the ability to have a voice, that's how you have a voice." "I'm tired of our elected officials not doing what's best for the people on the ground," she added. "We've got real crimes to prosecute—oilfield theft, rape, murder—and right now, we can't enforce the law as written on marijuana because of testing requirements." "If we want to protect kids, then we need to legalize and regulate it, and we need to tax it, just like we do with alcohol," she said. What Happens Next Whether Stogner faces legal consequences for her protest remains to be seen. Meanwhile, the ban will need to face the Senate and, if passed, Abbott's approval before becoming a law.
