
SBA Loan Cap May Rise to $10 Million for Manufacturers Under New Bill
Manufacturing companies could soon qualify for bigger Small Business Administration loans. It can't hurt in the effort to bring production back to the U.S., but small business bankers are backing the proposal for a different reason.
On May 2, Rep. Roger Williams (R-TX), Sen. Joni Ernst (R-IA), and Sen. Chris Coons (D-DE) introduced the Made in America Manufacturing Finance Act. The bill would raise the $5 million cap on SBA 7(a) and 504 loans to $10 million, but only for manufacturers (Project 2025, a document that has tracked closely with Trump's plans, called for raising the 7(a) loan cap to $50 million for advanced manufacturers). The 7(a) program offers flexible financing for working capital, equipment, and real estate. The 504 program is typically used for fixed assets like land and large machinery. Both are made by private lenders but backed by the SBA, which guarantees a portion of the loan. SBA Administrator Kelly Loeffler endorsed the proposal, calling it a way to help manufacturers grow and compete. The bill fits within a broader Trump administration push to bring manufacturing back to the U.S., paired with new tariffs meant to reduce dependence on foreign production. (Williams and Ernst chair the small business committees in the House and Senate while Coons is on the Senate committee.)
Bankers say the higher limit may help some manufacturers invest in equipment or expand facilities, but they don't expect a flood of new factories. 'I'm sure there are manufacturers out there that can benefit... but my guess is there aren't a ton of requests out there,' says Jerry Freedman, a principal at Freedom Business Financing, which helps buyers secure SBA loans. With the future and shape of Trump's on-again, off-again tariffs unclear, many lenders say it's too early to expect a reshoring renaissance just yet.
Still, lenders broadly support the bill. Even if it doesn't lead to new factories, they see it as a move toward something they've wanted for years: a higher SBA loan cap for everyone. Of course lenders want a higher cap. They want to make bigger loans, but the ask isn't unreasonable. The current $5 million limit hasn't changed since 2010. If it had been adjusted for inflation, it would be about $7.5 million today.
'While raising the limit isn't a silver bullet to reshore manufacturing, it is definitely an important part of the solution,' says Ray Drew, managing director at Truliant Federal Credit Union and host of The Art of SBA Lending podcast. He says banks often don't make conventional loans in the $5 to $10 million range, especially for new businesses, and SBA lenders are well positioned to fill that gap.
But they haven't been able to, not with the current cap.
'We've had requests previously for larger than $5 million SBA loans that we've had to pass on,' says Chris Hurn, founder of Phoenix Lender Services, which helps banks process and manage SBA loans. He sees the bill as a good first step and a chance to spotlight SBA lending. But Hurn says limiting the change to manufacturers is too narrow. With many Baby Boomers looking to sell their companies, buyers need bigger loans for all kinds of businesses, not just factories.
Freedom Business Financing's Freedman hopes this bill could do just that. 'I think the fact that the SBA administration is on board with increasing the max limit, even if for a small segment of businesses, has to be a good path to an increase of the limit for the overall program for all industries.'
Not everyone is convinced this will lead to broader changes.
Matthias Smith, founder of Pioneer Capital Advisory, which advises small business buyers, agrees the change could help some manufacturers invest in equipment. But he hasn't seen much demand for manufacturing acquisitions, in part because they are hard to finance and require deep industry knowledge. He views the bill as more symbolic than game-changing and unlikely to usher in an increase to borrowing limits especially as the SBA is set to roll back looser pandemic-era rules in favor of stricter credit checks, higher equity requirements, and tougher underwriting standards overall.
'I'd be really surprised if they did increase the limit [broadly] because it seems like they're trying to make it harder for people to participate in the program,' Smith says.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
PolyPeptide Group First Half 2025 Earnings: Revenues Beat Expectations, EPS Lags
Explore PolyPeptide Group's Fair Values from the Community and select yours PolyPeptide Group (VTX:PPGN) First Half 2025 Results Key Financial Results Revenue: €167.1m (up 24% from 1H 2024). Net loss: €26.5m (loss widened by 133% from 1H 2024). €0.80 loss per share (further deteriorated from €0.35 loss in 1H 2024). Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. All figures shown in the chart above are for the trailing 12 month (TTM) period PolyPeptide Group Revenues Beat Expectations, EPS Falls Short Revenue exceeded analyst estimates by 12%. Earnings per share (EPS) missed analyst estimates by 40%. Looking ahead, revenue is forecast to grow 14% p.a. on average during the next 3 years, compared to a 11% growth forecast for the Life Sciences industry in Switzerland. Performance of the Swiss Life Sciences industry. The company's shares are up 25% from a week ago. Risk Analysis Before we wrap up, we've discovered 1 warning sign for PolyPeptide Group that you should be aware of. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Melden Sie sich an, um Ihr Portfolio aufzurufen. Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten


Boston Globe
7 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Was Trump right to send National Guard to Washington, D.C.?
David Bumcrot Belmont Heather Mac Donald cites several shooting incidents in Washington, D.C., including two heinous crimes involving the shooting deaths of innocent young children. Nowhere does she mention how Republicans block every effort at enacting gun-control legislation. Also left out is the number of convicted felons that President Trump has pardoned. Let's stop pretending this isn't just Trump's attempt to initiate martial law. Advertisement Robyn King Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up Ipswich In Trump's political theater, Washington becomes a prop President Trump's National Guard deployment to Washington, D.C. is less about public safety and more about political theater. D.C.'s violent crime rates have fallen sharply since 2023. Cherry-picking a few brutal crimes to paint the city as in crisis ignores the data and serves a narrative, not the truth. If homicide rates alone justified military involvement, other US cities — some worse off than D.C. — would already be occupied by federal troops. The National Guard's limited 'command presence' won't fix longstanding issues of gun violence, juvenile crime, or car theft. Lasting reductions come from targeted policing, intelligence-driven enforcement, and community partnerships — not a 30-day show of force. Advertisement Worse, the move undermines D.C.'s elected leadership and sets a dangerous precedent for federal overreach. Washington's majority-minority residents have endured decades of over-policing. Imposing military oversight without an emergency inflames mistrust, chills cooperation with police, and treats citizens like subjects. Real safety is built, not staged. This deployment is a political stunt masquerading as crime control — and Washington deserves better than to be used as a prop in someone else's campaign. Paul Swindlehurst Londonderry, N.H. For this administration, an easy distraction It seems our president has found the secret for making the Jeffrey Epstein controversy go away: Invade Washington, D.C. It's amazing how short the media's attention span is. They are so easily distracted by the next outrageous thing President Trump and his representatives do or say. There is no follow-up, no accountability — essentially just narration and public relations. Former Trump adviser Steve Bannon was so right: 'Flood the zone,' and you can do anything. Patricia Fabbri Lynnfield
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
EU leaders to hold talks after Trump-Putin talks upend Ukraine ceasefire push
France, Germany, and the UK are set to hold virtual talks on Sunday after the Trump-Putin summit derailed hopes for a Ukraine ceasefire. Trump, who had previously pushed for an immediate halt to fighting, has pivoted toward backing a broader peace agreement – raising alarms in Kyiv and across Europe. As Zelensky heads to Washington, EU powers are seeking to defend their role in the peace process. Follow our liveblog for the latest developments. (FRANCE 24 with AFP, AP and Reuters)