Indian River Queen shines as rocket sails through clouds and fog: Photo of the Week
You'd never know that by looking at this Photo of the Week. In at, a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket rises over the Indian River through the clouds and fog on Starlink mission 6-83, taking off at 1:02 a.m. May 13 from Pad 39A at NASA's Kennedy Space Center.
"The Indian River Queen, pretty much a Cocoa landmark, had been moved to the north side of Cocoa Village Marina while the south dock was being repaired from Hurricane Milton," he said.
"I saw the paddleboat was back at the south side and contacted the marina to get access."
Access granted, he snagged a cool, quasi-moody shot of two very different types of transportation.
"The strange low clouds and almost 100% humidity added to the scene, giving the photo a ghostly appearance," Denemark said.
This article originally appeared on Florida Today: Rising rocket's light shines on Indian River Queen in Photo of Week
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gizmodo
23 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
Private Spaceflight Enters the Wild West as Trump Slashes Regulations
President Donald Trump is calling for an ease of regulations for commercial spaceflight and streamlining licensing for rocket launches and reentries. The move highly favors companies like SpaceX but could have negative repercussions on environmental habitats surrounding launchpads. On Wednesday, August 13, Trump signed an executive order intended to bolster the spaceflight industry and increase the overall commercial launch cadence. In it, Trump calls on Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy, who is also currently serving as the acting administrator for NASA, to 'eliminate or expedite…environmental reviews for, and other obstacles to the granting of, launch and reentry licenses and permits.' The order also directs Duffy to 'reevaluate, amend, or rescind' safety requirements and conditions for launch and reentry licenses that were written during Trump's first term as president in 2020. 'By slashing red tape tying up spaceport construction, streamlining launch licenses so they can occur at scale, and creating high-level space positions in government, we can unleash the next wave of innovation,' Duffy said in a statement. 'I look forward to leveraging my dual role at DOT and NASA to make this dream a reality.' The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is responsible for granting licenses for space launches and reentries while ensuring public safety and protection of property. For years, SpaceX CEO and founder Elon Musk has expressed dismay over regulatory bodies such as the FAA, complaining that bureaucratic red tape is holding his rocket company back. 'Starships need to fly. The more we fly safely, the faster we learn; the faster we learn, the sooner we realize full and rapid rocket reuse,' SpaceX wrote in a blog last year while awaiting a launch license for Starship's fifth test flight. 'Unfortunately, we continue to be stuck in a reality where it takes longer to do the government paperwork to license a rocket launch than it does to design and build the actual hardware.' On the other hand, local environmental groups in Boca Chica, Texas, the site of SpaceX's Starbase launch facility, have criticized the FAA for regulatory oversight. Starship's inaugural liftoff in April 2023 sent chunks of concrete and metal thousands of feet away from the launchpad, prompting a review of environmental impacts and potential threats to endangered species in the Boca Chica region. Shortly after, conservation groups filed a lawsuit against the FAA for its approval of SpaceX's expanded launch operations in Boca Chica, Texas, without adequate environmental review. The lawsuit claims that the FAA didn't require an in-depth environmental impact statement before approving SpaceX's Starship plans. FAA officials claim that the new order will serve the space economy. 'The FAA strongly supports President Trump's Executive Order to make sure the U.S. leads the growing space economy and continues to lead the world in space transportation and innovation,' FAA Administrator Bryan Bedford said in a statement. 'This order safely removes regulatory barriers so that U.S. companies can dominate commercial space activities.' Environmental experts, on the other hand, disagree. 'This reckless order puts people and wildlife at risk from private companies launching giant rockets that often explode and wreak devastation on surrounding areas,' Jared Margolis, senior attorney for the Center for Biological Diversity, wrote in a statement. 'Bending the knee to powerful corporations by allowing federal agencies to ignore bedrock environmental laws is incredibly dangerous and puts all of us in harm's way.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
AST SpaceMobile Just Revealed New Satellite Launch Plans. How Should You Play ASTS Stock Here?
Space-based operations company AST SpaceMobile (ASTS) recently announced its plan to deploy 45 to 60 satellites into orbit by 2026. With six satellites in orbit — five of which are fully operational and one a test satellite— the company's target is quite hefty. AST SpaceMobile plans to make orbital launches 'every one to two months on average' during this year and the next. The company is also on target to complete 40 satellites equivalent of microns by early 2026 to support multiple space-based cellular broadband services. The company is also set to gain new spectrum priority rights, as it has announced the acquisition of global S-Band spectrum priority rights held under the auspices of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU). More News from Barchart Why This Cannabis Penny Stock Could Be Wall Street's Next Meme Trade Breakout Apple Stock Is Gaining Momentum, Is AAPL Stock a Buy? Peter Thiel-Backed Bullish Is About to IPO. Should You Buy BLSH Stock? Stop Missing Market Moves: Get the FREE Barchart Brief – your midday dose of stock movers, trending sectors, and actionable trade ideas, delivered right to your inbox. Sign Up Now! With such operational strides, how should you play this space giant? About AST SpaceMobile Stock Founded in 2017 and headquartered in Midland, Texas, AST SpaceMobile is a satellite communications company that develops a space-based cellular broadband network designed to connect directly to standard mobile phones without the need for ground-based infrastructure. The company operates low Earth orbit (LEO) satellites, which enable seamless mobile coverage in remote and underserved areas of the world. AST SpaceMobile also has a growing rivalry with SpaceX. The companies compete to deliver space-based internet, with AST targeting phones directly and SpaceX focusing on satellite broadband via Starlink. By partnering with leading mobile network operators worldwide, AST SpaceMobile's operations blend advanced space technology with telecommunications to provide low-latency, high-speed mobile service directly from space. The company currently has a market capitalization of $15.8 billion. ASTS stock has enjoyed significant investor attention over the past year. Over the past 52 weeks, shares have gained 131%. Just for comparison, the broader S&P 500 Index ($SPX) has gained only 18% over the same period. Strong market sentiments led ASTS stock to a 52-week high of $60.95 in July. So far this year, the stock is up by 128%. After plans of the satellite launches were revealed, shares increased 8% intraday. AST SpaceMobile's Topline Is Growing On Aug. 11, AST SpaceMobile reported its second-quarter results for fiscal 2025. The company's quarterly revenues increased by 28% from the prior-year period to $1.16 million. While AST continues to post deep losses, investors have taken note of its operational strides. AST SpaceMobile's attributable net loss climbed 37% year-over-year (YOY) from $72.55 million to $99.39 million. However, its loss per share declined from $0.51 to $0.41 over the same period. Last month, the company closed a private offering of $575 million aggregate principal amount of convertible senior notes due 2032. The financing would be used to scale and develop its operations. As of June 30, 2025, AST SpaceMobile had cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash of $939.4 million, with over $1.5 billion in balance sheet cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash, pro forma for convertible notes offering and sales under the now-terminated at-the-market (ATM) facility. Wall Street analysts expect AST SpaceMobile to reduce its losses in the future. For the third quarter, the company's loss per share is expected to narrow by 29% from the year-ago value to $0.17. Next year, loss per share is forecast to improve by 28% to $0.73. What Do Analysts Think About AST SpaceMobile Stock? Wall Street analysts remain cautiously optimistic about AST SpaceMobile. Recently, analysts at Scotiabank lowered the price target from $45.40 to $42.90. However, the firm did not change its investment thesis and still maintains a 'Sector Perform' rating on ASTS stock. Analysts at BofA Securities initiated coverage on AST SpaceMobile stock with a 'Neutral' rating and a $55 price target. BofA Securities analysts based their prediction on 'early stage, high projected growth," and the 'outyear free cash flow generation nature of the business.' B. Riley Securities is bullish on the company's prospects. Analyst Mike Crawford raised the price target on the stock from $44 to $60, while maintaining a 'Buy' rating, following the company's announcement of its private offering. Wall Street analysts are soundly optimistic about AST SpaceMobile, giving it a consensus 'Moderate Buy' rating overall. Of the nine analysts rating the stock, a majority of six analysts rate it a 'Strong Buy,' while three analysts take a middle-of-the-road approach with a 'Hold' rating. The consensus price target of $47.36 is below current levels. However, the Street-high price target of $60 indicates potential upside of 27%. Key Takeaways There are reasons to be excited about AST SpaceMobile's prospects, as the company remains on track to grow significantly in an emerging space. While the satellite plans are ambitious, they are also fully funded. The company's cash balance also remains at a solid level. Therefore, ASTS stock might be a solid buy now. On the date of publication, Anushka Dutta did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Scientific American
2 hours ago
- Scientific American
Trump Cuts Could End U.S. Exploration of the Outer Solar System
In the spring of 2022 the U.S. space community selected its top priority for the nation's next decade of science and exploration: a mission to Uranus, the gassy, bluish planet only seen up close during a brief spacecraft flyby in 1986. More than 2.6 billion kilometers from Earth at its nearest approach, Uranus still beckons with what it could reveal about the solar system's early history—and the overwhelming numbers of Uranus-sized worlds that astronomers have spied around other stars. Now President Donald Trump's proposed cuts to NASA could push those discoveries further away than ever—not by directly canceling the mission but by abandoning the fuel needed to pull it off. The technology in question, known as radioisotope power systems (RPS), is an often overlooked element of NASA's budget that involves turning nuclear fuel into usable electricity. More like a battery than a full-scale reactor, RPS devices attach directly to spacecraft to power them into the deepest, darkest reaches of the solar system, where sunlight is too sparse to use. It's a critical technology that has enabled two dozen NASA missions, from the iconic Voyagers 1 and 2 now traversing interstellar space to the Perseverance and Curiosity rovers presently operating on Mars. But RPS is expensive, costing NASA about $175 million in 2024 alone. That's largely because of the costs of sourcing and refining plutonium 238, the chemically toxic, vanishingly scarce and difficult to work with radioactive material at the heart of all U.S. RPS. The Fiscal Year 2026 President's Budget Request (PBR) released this spring suggests shutting down the program by 2029. That's just long enough to use RPS tech on NASA's upcoming Dragonfly mission, a nuclear-powered dual-quadcopter drone to explore Saturn's frigid moon Titan. After that, without RPS, no further U.S. missions to the outer solar system would be possible for the foreseeable future. On supporting science journalism If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today. 'It was an oversight,' says Amanda Hendrix, director of the Planetary Science Institute, who has led science efforts on RPS-enabled NASA missions such as Cassini at Saturn and Galileo at Jupiter. 'It's really like the left hand wasn't talking to the right hand when the PBR was put together.' Throughout its 400-odd pages, the PBR repeatedly acknowledges the importance of planning for the nation's next generation of planetary science missions and even proposes funding NASA's planetary science division better than any other part of the space agency's science operations, which it seeks to cut by half. But 'to achieve cost savings,' it states, 2028 should be the last year of funding for RPS, and 'given budget constraints and the reduced pipeline of new planetary science missions,' the proposed budget provides no funding after 2026 for work by the Department of Energy (DOE) that supports RPS. Indeed, NASA's missions to the outer solar system are infrequent because of their long durations and the laborious engineering required for a spacecraft to withstand cold, inhospitable conditions so far from home. But what these missions lack in frequency, they make up for in discovery: some of the most tantalizing and potentially habitable environments beyond Earth are thought to exist there, in vast oceans of icy moons once thought to be wastelands. One such environment lurks on Saturn's Enceladus, which was ranked as the nation's second-highest priority after Uranus in the U.S.'s 2022 Planetary Science and Astrobiology Decadal Survey. 'The outer solar system is kind of the last frontier,' says Alex Hayes, a planetary scientist at Cornell University, who chaired the Decadal Survey panel that selected Enceladus. 'You think you know how something works until you send a spacecraft there to explore it, and then you realize that you had no idea how it worked.' Unlike solar power systems—relatively 'off-the-shelf' tech that can be used on a per-mission basis—RPS requires a continuous production pipeline that's vulnerable to disruption. NASA's program operates through the DOE, with the space agency purchasing DOE services to source, purify and encapsulate the plutonium 238 fuel, as well as to assemble and test the resulting RPS devices. The most common kind of RPS, a radioisotope thermoelectric generator, converts the thermal energy released from plutonium 238's natural decay to as much as 110 watts of electrical power. Any excess heat helps keep the spacecraft and its instruments warm enough to function. Establishing the RPS pipeline took around three decades, and the program's roots lie in the bygone cold war era of heavy U.S. investment in nuclear technology and infrastructure. Preparing the radioactive fuel alone takes the work of multiple DOE facilities scattered across the country: Oak Ridge National Laboratory produces the plutonium oxide, then Los Alamos National Laboratory forms it into usable pellets, which are finally stockpiled at Idaho National Laboratory. Funding cuts would throw this pipeline into disarray and cause an exodus of experienced workers, Hendrix says. Restoring that expertise and capability, she adds, would require billions of dollars and a few decades more. 'These decisions are made by people that don't fully understand the implications,' says Ryan P. Russell, an aerospace engineer at the University of Texas at Austin. 'Technologically, [RPS] is on the critical path to superiority in space, whether that's military, civilian or industrial applications.' Russell emphasizes that RPS isn't just critical for exploring Uranus, Enceladus and other destinations in the outer solar system—it's also a likely fundamental pillar of the administration's space priorities, such as developing a sustained human presence on the moon and sending astronauts to Mars. While both destinations are relatively close to the sun, the Red Planet's global dust storms can bury solar panels, and the moon's two-week-long lunar nights are cold enough to test the mettle of even the best batteries. The latter situation informed the reasoning that drove NASA's acting administrator Sean Duffy's directive last week to fast-track a lunar nuclear reactor. Abandoning smaller-scale nuclear options such as RPS while aiming for a full-scale reactor is 'like trying to build a house without a two-by-four,' Russell says. 'If you don't have the basic building blocks, you're not gonna get very far.' Another initiative reliant on RPS, NASA confirmed in a statement e-mailed to Scientific American, is the beleaguered Mars Sample Return (MSR) program that the U.S. agency has been jointly pursuing with the European Space Agency. While the White House has proposed nixing MSR, scientists and politicians view bringing Martian samples back to Earth as a key milestone in the modern-day space race against China. Meanwhile other nations are pursuing or preserving their own RPS capabilities, with Europe's sights set on americium 241, a radioisotope with a five-times-longer half-life but a five-times-weaker energy output than plutonium 238. Russia has used RPS for decades, and China and India are also developing homegrown versions of the technology. Notably, despite the administration's push for commercial partners to take up costly space functions such as rocket launches, RPS is unlikely to find much support in the private sector. 'Dealing with [this sort of] nuclear material—that's not something a company is going to do,' Russell says. Going forward, the planetary science community hopes to convince Congress that RPS is 'critical and foundational,' Hendrix says. The Outer Planets Assessment Group (OPAG), which was chartered by and provides independent input to NASA, expressed its concerns to the space agency in findings from a June meeting, writing that the decision would have 'dire implications' for future solar system exploration. White papers prepared by representatives of the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory and NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Goddard Space Flight Center and Glenn Research Center conveyed similar sentiments, noting that nine of the 15 existing and future missions recommended in the latest Decadal Survey use RPS. In short, 'you're just hamstringing your ability to do certain mission configurations and also to get out to and past Saturn if you shut down RPS,' Hayes says. 'You can't argue that scientific prioritization was part of [the White House's] decision process.' Although both the House and Senate have released drafts of the 2026 appropriations bill that preserve top-line funding for NASA, neither explicitly mentions RPS. That means the program would fall under NASA's 'discretionary spending,' a category that scientists and legal experts alike say would be more easily manipulated by a presidential administration looking to enforce its political agenda. In other words, without a clear, direct callout for RPS from congressional appropriators, the Trump administration's plan to shut down the program could more easily come to pass. Hendrix consequently hopes that Congress will add language explicitly funding RPS in its final budget. 'There is a strong interest from Congress in the need for a powerful, deep-space energy source,' says a congressional staffer who is familiar with the NASA budget and was granted anonymity to discuss these issues freely. But 'I don't know that members have quite honed in on [RPS] yet because the worry is so much about [Trump's] intent to cancel a lot of future planetary missions.' Fundamentally, political support for outer solar system missions is a moot point without corresponding support for the ability to get there, explains University of Oregon planetary physicist and OPAG co-chair Carol Paty. The decision to shut down RPS 'seems like a simple line item,' she says. But the implications are 'deeply troubling and concerning. If there are not big missions to drive the community, to drive exploration, to drive training the next generation, where does that leave us?'
