US Senate rejects bids to block arms sales to Israel over Gaza
By Patricia Zengerle
Two resolutions that would have blocked arms sales to Israel in response to civilian casualties in Gaza were blocked in the U.S. Senate on Wednesday, although they garnered more support than similar measures earlier this year.
The two resolutions were introduced by Senator Bernie Sanders, a Vermont independent aligned with Democrats. They failed by 73 to 24 and 70 to 27 in the 100-member chamber in voting late on Wednesday night.
Similar measures, also introduced by Sanders, failed by 82-15 and 83-15 in April.
A decades-long tradition of strong bipartisan support for Israel in the U.S. Congress means resolutions to stop weapons sales are unlikely to pass, but backers hope raising the issue will encourage Israel's government and the U.S. administration to do more to protect civilians.
All of the votes for the resolutions came from Democrats, with all of President Donald Trump's fellow Republicans opposed. Sanders said in a statement he was pleased that a majority of the Democratic caucus had backed the effort.
"The tide is turning. The American people do not want to spend billions to starve children in Gaza," Sanders said. "The Democrats are moving forward on this issue, and I look forward to Republican support in the near future."
Senator Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire, the top Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, was one of the Democrats who opposed the Sanders-backed resolutions in April but voted for them this time.
Shaheen said in a statement that Israel has a right to defend its citizens, but added: "it is clear that the Government of Israel has not conducted its military operations in Gaza with the necessary care required by international humanitarian law. It is also clear that the Government of Israel has failed to allow adequate humanitarian assistance into Gaza, resulting in unbelievable suffering."
The resolutions would have blocked the sale of $675 million in bombs and shipments of 20,000 assault rifles.
Senator Jim Risch of Idaho, the Republican chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said in a speech opposing the resolutions that the militant group Hamas was to blame for the situation in Gaza. "It is in the interest of America and the world to see this terrorist group destroyed," he said.
Israel has consistently said its actions in Gaza are justified as self-defence and accuses Hamas of using civilians as human shields, a charge Hamas denies.
The U.S. Senate vote came as France and Canada have indicated they plan to recognize a Palestinian state amid growing international outrage over the dire humanitarian crisis in Gaza. Britain has also said it would recognize the state at September's U.N. General Assembly meeting if the fighting in Gaza had not stopped by then.
Israel's military campaign in Gaza has killed more than 60,000 Palestinians, destroyed much of the enclave and led to widespread hunger. A global hunger monitor has warned that a worst-case scenario of famine is unfolding in the enclave.
The war began after Gaza's dominant Palestinian militant group Hamas carried out a cross-border attack on southern Israel, killing around 1,200 people and taking more than 250 hostages, according to Israeli authorities.
Israel's subsequent air and ground campaign has leveled entire neighbourhoods in Gaza and displaced most of the population of 2.3 million.
Israel says its operations are aimed at dismantling Hamas' military capabilities and securing the release of hostages.
© (c) Copyright Thomson Reuters 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Japan Times
36 minutes ago
- Japan Times
Israeli Cabinet may order complete Gaza takeover
Israel's Cabinet could authorize on Tuesday a complete military takeover of Gaza for the first time in two decades, media reported, despite international pressure for a ceasefire to ease appalling conditions in the besieged Palestinian territory. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is leaning toward an expanded offensive and taking control of the entire enclave after 22 months of war against militant group Hamas, Israeli Channel 12 reported. A senior Israeli source said on Monday that more force was an option following the collapse of indirect ceasefire talks with Hamas. Seizing the entire territory would reverse a 2005 decision by Israel to pull settlers and military out of Gaza while retaining control over its borders — a move right-wing parties blame for Hamas gaining power there. It was unclear, however, whether a potential full takeover of Gaza would entail a prolonged occupation or a short-term operation aimed at dismantling Hamas and freeing hostages. Israel's coalition government is regarded as one of the most right-wing in its history, with the cabinet including parties that seek to annex both Gaza and the West Bank and encourage Palestinians to leave their homeland. The country's military has throughout the war pushed back against the idea of Israel trying to fully occupy Gaza and establish military rule there, which would require it to take over long-term governance. The military has also struggled with manpower issues as the war has dragged on, with reservists being repeatedly called up and putting a strain on capabilities. The conflict was triggered by a Hamas attack on Oct. 7, 2023, when gunmen stormed the border from Gaza, killing more than 1,200 people and seizing around 250 hostages according to Israeli tallies. Israel's military campaign has devastated the tiny, crowded enclave, killing more than 60,000 people according to Palestinian health authorities. It has forced nearly all of Gaza's over 2 million people from their homes and caused what a global hunger monitor called last week an unfolding famine. That has caused widespread international anger and prompted several European countries to say they would recognize a Palestinian state next month if there was no ceasefire. Inside Gaza on Tuesday, Israeli gunfire and strikes killed at least 13 Palestinians, local health authorities said, including five people in a tent in Khan Younis and three aid seekers near Rafah in the south. Israeli tanks pushed into central Gaza earlier on Tuesday but it was not clear if the move was part of a larger ground offensive. Palestinians living in the last fifth of the territory where Israel has not yet taken military control via ground incursions or orders for civilians to leave said any new move to occupy the area would be catastrophic. "If the tanks pushed through, where would we go, into the sea? This will be like a death sentence to the entire population," said Abu Jehad, a Gaza wood merchant, who asked not to be named in full. A Palestinian official close to the talks and mediation said Israeli threats could be a way to pressure Hamas to make concessions at the negotiation table. "It will only complicate the negotiation further, at the end, the resistance factions will not accept less than an end to the war, and a full withdrawal from Gaza," he said, asking not to be named. Israel said it would allow merchants to import goods. A source in Gaza said some trucks had already entered carrying chocolates and biscuits for a merchant. It is hoped that essential items such as children's milk, fresh meat and fruits, sugar, and rice could be allowed in, which would alleviate scarcity and drive down prices of what is available in the markets. U.S. Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff said last week he was working with the Israeli government on a plan that would effectively end the war in Gaza. But Israeli officials have also floated ideas including expanding the offensive and annexing parts of Gaza. The failed ceasefire talks in Doha had aimed to clinch agreements on a U.S.-backed proposal for a 60-day truce, during which aid would be flown into Gaza and half of the hostages Hamas is holding would be freed in exchange for Palestinian prisoners jailed in Israel. The Israeli military was expected on Tuesday to present alternatives that include extending into areas of Gaza where it has not yet operated, according to two defense officials.
Yomiuri Shimbun
14 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Netanyahu Fires Attorney General as Domestic Pressure over Gaza Heats up
TEL AVIV – Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's far-right government voted unanimously Monday to dismiss his attorney general, Gali Baharav-Miara, the chief prosecutor in his ongoing corruption case, as he faces growing criticism inside Israel and U.S. impatience over his government's management of the war in Gaza. The vote to remove Baharav-Miara, a frequent critic of the government's policies, marks one of the more significant steps in Netanyahu's years-long effort to exert political influence over the country's legal system. It is also expected to lead to a confrontation between the elected government and the appointed justices on Israel's Supreme Court, who will review and rule on the legality of Baharav-Miara's removal. Immediately after the vote, opposition party Yesh Atid filed a petition to block the move, as did the Movement for Quality Government in Israel, a watchdog group that said the vote would politicize the office of the attorney general. In response, Supreme Court Deputy President Noam Sohlberg issued a temporary order freezing the decision. In a letter to her staff, Baharav-Miara wrote that the government's decision was unlawful. 'Political pressure will not deter us from continuing to perform our duties with statesmanship, professionalism, and integrity,' she wrote. According to a draft resolution released last week, cabinet ministers said the move was necessary because the government had 'no confidence whatsoever' in Baharav-Miara. Netanyahu's supporters say she routinely overstepped, including in March, when she blocked the prime minister's move to fire the head of Israel's internal security service, Ronen Bar. Baharav-Miara said the dismissal was improper because Netanyahu and some of his closest aides were facing several criminal investigations. The political turmoil Monday unfolded as Netanyahu faced renewed pressure to end the war. On Sunday, 19 former Israeli military, security and intelligence chiefs released a video criticizing the government for prolonging the conflict and failing to plan for the day after. Together, they warned Israel that the government was harming the country's security, and urged the prime minister to stop military operations in Gaza and secure a deal to release the remaining hostages. 'There are situations where a black flag must be raised, and we must say, this ends here,' said Moshe Yaalon, a former chief of staff for the Israeli military. 'Right now, we have a government that has been dragged by messianics into an irrational direction,' he added, referring to the far-right members of Netanyahu's coalition. Those members, including several cabinet ministers, oppose negotiating with Hamas and have called on the prime minister to reoccupy Gaza and allow them to rebuild Jewish settlements there. U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff was also in Israel over the weekend to discuss efforts to pressure Hamas. On Saturday, he met with the families of hostages in Hostages Square – the central Tel Aviv plaza where tens of thousands have gathered for weekly protests – to relay a message that the United States was now pursuing a more inclusive hostage release agreement, one that would require Hamas to free all those still in captivity in exchange for a formal end to the conflict. In recent days, Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad, a smaller militant group in Gaza, triggered mass street protests in Tel Aviv after they released videos showing two male hostages emaciated and begging to be saved. Israelis were horrified by the footage of the two hostages: 24-year-old Evyatar David – who was shown shirtless, his bones protruding as he was forced to dig what he said could be his own grave – and Rom Braslavski, 22, who was seen lying on a mattress and pleading for food. Monday's cabinet vote took place 'as our hostages are dying in the tunnels, as Israeli society is tearing itself apart,' Yair Golan, an Israeli opposition politician, said at a demonstration near the Knesset on Monday afternoon. Israel's government, Golan said, 'is not dealing with freeing the hostages, ending the war. … It is not bothered with Israel's safety.' During almost two years of war, military and security officials, as well as the families of hostages, have warned that Israel's ground invasion endangers those still held in Gaza – and that a negotiated agreement is the only way to bring the majority of the hostages home. An Israeli military investigation last year found that operations, 'although gradual and cautious, had a circumstantial influence' on the Hamas militants who killed six hostages in a tunnel where they were being held in Rafah in southern Gaza. But on Monday, Netanyahu projected an image of defiance, praising Israelis 'who fight together and win together' in a post on X. He vowed to 'continue until the enemy is defeated, all the hostages are released, and security is guaranteed for the residents of Israel.' Israeli news media reported late Monday that Netanyahu would convene his security cabinet this week to discuss plans for Gaza. A person familiar with decision-making in the prime minister's office, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak with the news media, said that Netanyahu had decided to 'occupy the Gaza Strip, meaning that military operations will also take place in areas where hostages are being held.' In pursuing moves against the attorney general, and leaning toward more military action in Gaza, Netanyahu 'is acting against the will of the Israeli majority, who want a comprehensive deal today to bring the hostages home and end the war,' said Gayil Talshir, a senior lecturer on political science at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem. 'Today, the prime minister and his government see themselves as above the law.'
Yomiuri Shimbun
14 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Texas House Republicans Vote to Issue Civil Arrest Warrants for Fleeing Democrats
CHICAGO – Texas Republicans on Monday sought to retaliate against Democrats who fled the state, voting to issue civil arrest warrants for dozens of lawmakers who left in an attempt to stymie a GOP effort to redraw the congressional map. Democrats said they were undeterred by the move, and officials will have difficulty arresting them because most are in suburban Chicago and beyond the jurisdiction of Texas authorities. But the warrants demonstrate the seriousness of Republicans' desire to add congressional seats in what is quickly shaping up as a gerrymandering battle between red states and blue states. In response to Texas Republicans, Democratic governors in New York and California are preparing to try to reshape congressional boundaries in their favor. 'We are at war,' New York Gov. Kathy Hochul (D) said Monday at a news conference with some of the Texas Democrats. 'And that's why the gloves are off, and I say bring it on.' Addressing a partially empty chamber Monday afternoon, Texas House Speaker Dustin Burrows (R) said he was prepared to sign the warrants as he accused Democrats of shirking their responsibilities. 'To those who are absent, return now,' he said. After the lawmakers voted, they quickly adjourned until Tuesday. Most of the Democrats in the Texas House exited the state Sunday to prevent Republicans from overhauling the state's map to give themselves five more safe GOP seats at President Donald Trump's urging. Their move was met with immediate criticism from Republicans, including Gov. Greg Abbott, who threatened to try to expel absent Democrats from their posts. Some legal scholars questioned whether courts would go along with any attempt to eject the absent lawmakers from office. 'Democrats hatched a deliberate plan not to show up for work, for the specific purpose of abdicating the duties of their office and thwarting the chamber's business,' Abbott wrote in a letter to Democrats released late Sunday. On Monday, he said in a statement that he was ordering the Texas Rangers to 'immediately investigate fleeing Texas House Democrats for potential bribery and any other potential legal violations connected to their refusal to appear for a quorum.' Each absent Democrat faces a $500 daily fine – an amount that in two weeks would nearly match the annual $7,200 salary that Texas lawmakers are paid. Abbott contended Democrats would violate a bribery law if they raised funds to pay those fines. State Rep. Gene Wu, the chairman of the Democratic caucus in the Texas House, said Democrats were using legal ways to defray their costs while they are away but did not provide details of what they are doing. In the state House, Republicans convened briefly to take Democrats to task. Burrows called the roll. He tugged his beard and clutched his hands as he waited for legislators to register their presence. 'Have all members registered?' he asked twice. After a moment, he slammed down his oversize gavel and declared, 'Members, a quorum is not present.' From there, he praised those who showed up, condemned those who did not and presided over the vote to issue warrants. Democrats said the moves by Abbott and GOP lawmakers were bluster and emphasized their commitment to staying away for two weeks, when the 30-day special session is slated to end. Fines and threats of arrest won't deter them, they said. 'Do you really think we would be willing to sit there and stay quiet while you stole the voice of our voters? You didn't know us,' state Rep. Ann Johnson (D) said. But Republicans hold the upper hand because Abbott could call more special sessions. Democrats have not said whether they have the wherewithal to repeatedly leave the state for months. From New York, Texas state Rep. Vikki Goodwin (D) watched Monday's floor session from her phone as Republicans voted to arrest her and other Democrats. 'These are people that we work with in the legislature, so it's hard to see them vote to put out arrest warrants for us,' Goodwin said. 'It is a little bit nerve-racking … but it's also such an important issue that I'm willing to take some risks.' In his letter to lawmakers, Abbott cited a 2021 opinion from Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) to contend that courts could determine that Democrats had abandoned their duties and given up their jobs. That would allow Abbott to call special elections to replace them, he said. Abbott could not remove lawmakers on his own and would need the courts to go along with his plan, said University of Notre Dame law professor Derek Muller. While Abbott and other Republicans could argue that the Democrats had abandoned their duties, those lawmakers would have a chance to make the case that they were representing their constituents by denying the majority the quorum it needs to operate, he added. 'This is not a unilateral action of the governor,' Muller said. 'Even if you go to a court, you're going to have to make a showing that I think is going be tough to make.' The escalating dispute kicked off last month when Abbott called a special session at the urging of Trump to redraw the state's map just four years after lawmakers adopted it. Ordinarily, states adopt maps once a decade, after the census details population shifts around the country. How states draw districts helps determine which party has an advantage, and now Texas Republicans want five more seats to bolster the 25 they have. Republicans hope a new map could protect their narrow 219-212 House majority next year in the midterm elections, which typically are tough for the president's party. Trump's agenda is at stake. By leaving, Texas Democrats have thwarted the plan for now. At least two-thirds of the members of the Texas House – 100 of 150 – must be present for lawmakers to take action. That means 51 of the 62 Democrats can block the Republicans from advancing their plans, and 57 have left the state, Democrats said. Misha Lesley-Burkins, of Houston, said she was offended by the Republicans' redistricting plan and supported the Democrats' decision to leave. 'We are in a crisis for our democratic norms,' said Lesley-Burkins, 54, who testified against the redistricting plan twice in recent weeks. 'This is not about a party. This is about doing what is right, and the state of Texas and the governor specifically not kowtowing to the administration in Washington.' At a busy mall on Houston's oil and gas energy corridor – an area in one of the congressional districts that would be reshaped by the proposed boundaries – conservative retiree John Menzies said he supported Republicans' efforts. 'If it empowers more Republicans to have a say, I have no problem with it,' Menzies said. Republicans in Ohio plan to redraw their map soon, and other states could join the fray. Democrats are threatening to retaliate in states they control by drawing new maps of their own if Texas Republicans carry out their plan. On Monday, the Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee called on Democratic state lawmakers to prepare for carving up their states. Democrats in California have said they could hold a special election in November to ask voters to adopt a ballot measure that would give their party more favorable districts next year. California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) said the measure would include a trigger mechanism saying new maps in his state would go into effect only if Texas approves its new map. 'We're not drawing lines to draw lines,' he said at a news conference in Sacramento. 'We're holding the line on democracy, on the rule of law, co-equal branches of government, popular sovereignty.' Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker (D), who is hosting some of the Texas Democrats, said at a Sunday news conference that he's considering all options in his state. But he did not offer any concrete steps he would take to establish new maps before the 2026 elections. In New York, Democrats face challenges because the state constitution requires an independent commission to draw congressional lines, and changing the provision could take years. When Hochul was asked Monday if she supported disbanding or changing that commission, she said, 'yes.'
