Know why thousands are slamming OpenAI's 'horrible' GPT-5 on social media
On August 7, OpenAI held an hour-long broadcast, where CEO Sam Altman and others detailed various features of GPT-5, including the capabilities and improvements in the new model over its predecessor, GPT-4o
Thousands trash GPT-5 on Reddit
Within hours after the launch of GPT-5, a thread titled 'GPT-5 is horrible' started getting significant attention on Reddit and was soon filled with various comments criticising the new AI model. As of now, the threat has received about 4,500 upvotes and more than 1,700 comments, with most of them slamming OpenAI for its latest launch.
Commenting on GPT-5, one person wrote, "I like how the demo they were like – 'if it gets something wrong, no worries, just ask again. I'm actually going to run 3 prompts at once and pick my favorite.' Like, how is that better?"
Another user added that it looks more like an "OpenAI version of 'Shrinkflation'".
A third person added, "Answers are shorter and, so far, not any better than previous models. Combine that with more restrictive usage, and it feels like a downgrade branded as the new hotness."
Moreover, there were several others who stated that they are already missing the previous 4o and 4.1 models.
"I miss 4.1. Bring it back," read one comment.
Another one suggested that OpenAI should have allowed users to "keep the old models while they fix the new one."
Apart from this, OpenAI is even facing major backlash from its ChatGPT Plus subscribers, since several of them believe that the new AI model only limits the functionality of the paid subscription.
Also Read: OpenAI's GPT-5, an AI model everyone seemed to be waiting for, goes Live
As per TechCrunch, GPT-5 Thinking model has been restricted to 200 messages a week, while Plus subscribers do not have access to the wide variety of AI models that earlier remained available.
"ChatGPT literally got worse for every single Plus user today," read a post on X.
Notably, Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk also attacked OpenAI over its latest release and claimed that his company xAI's AI model, Grok 4, is far superior than GPT-5.
"Grok 4 Heavy was smarter 2 weeks ago than GPT5 is now and G4H is already a lot better. Let that sink in," the world's richest person said.
Several users have talked about GPT-5 performing below expectations and even "worse than 4o"
Also Read: Elon Musk's string of warnings for OpenAI, Satya Nadella after GPT-5 release: 'Grok will…'
FAQs
Is ChatGPT 5 available?
GPT-5 was unveiled on August 7.
How much is ChatGPT 5?
All users have received access to GPT-5, including those using the free version. But people with a $200-a-month 'Pro' subscription have unlimited access to the new AI model, as per The Washington Post.
Is GPT-4.5 coming out?
It came out earlier this year.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
Traders are fleeing stocks feared to be under threat from Artificial Intelligence
Artificial intelligence's imprint on US financial markets is unmistakable. Nvidia Corp. is the most valuable company in the world at nearly $4.5 trillion. Startups from OpenAI to Anthropic have raised tens of billions of dollars. But there's a downside to the new technology that investors are increasingly taking note of: It threatens to upend industries much like the internet did before it. And investors have started placing bets on just where that disruption will occur next, ditching shares in companies some strategists expect will see falloffs in demand as AI applications become more widely adopted. Among them are web-development firms like Ltd., digital-image company Shutterstock Inc. and software maker Adobe Inc. The trio are part of a basket of 26 companies Bank of America strategists identified as most at risk from AI. The group has underperformed the S&P 500 Index by about 22 percentage points since mid-May after more or less keeping pace with the market since ChatGPT's debut in late 2022. 'The disruption is real,' said Daniel Newman, chief executive officer of the Futurum Group. 'We thought it would happen over five years. It seems like it is going to happen over two. Service-based businesses with a high headcount, those are going to be really vulnerable, even if they have robust businesses from the last era of tech.' So far, few companies have failed as a result of the proliferation of chatbots and so-called agents that can write software code, answer complex questions and produce photos and videos. But with tech giants like Microsoft Corp. and Meta Platforms Inc. pouring hundreds of billions into AI, investors have started to get more defensive. and Shutterstock are down at least 33% in 2025, compared with a 8.6% advance for the broad benchmark. Adobe has fallen 23% amid concerns clients will look to AI platforms that can generate images and videos, as Coca-Cola has already done with an AI-generated ad. ManpowerGroup Inc., whose staffing services could be hurt by rising automation, is down 30% this year, while peer Robert Half Inc. has shed more than half its value, dropping to its lowest in more than five years. The souring sentiment among investors comes as AI is changing everything from the way people get information from the internet to how colleges function. Even companies at the vanguard of the technology's development like Microsoft have been slashing jobs as productivity improves and to make way for more AI investments. To many tech-industry watchers, the time is nearing when AI becomes so pervasive that companies start going out of business. Anxiety about AI's impact on existing companies was on display last week when Gartner Inc. shares were routed after the market-research company cut its revenue forecast for the year. The stock fell 30% in the five days, its biggest one-week drop on record. While the company blamed US government policies including spending cuts and tariffs, analysts were quick to point the finger at AI, which investors fear could provide cheaper alternatives to Gartner's research and analysis even though the company is deploying its own AI-powered tools. Morgan Stanley said the results 'added fuel to the AI disruption case,' while Baird was left 'incrementally concerned AI risks are having an impact.' Gartner representatives didn't respond to a request for comment. Historical precedents abound for new technology wiping out industries. The telegraph gave way to telephones, horsewhips and buggies were toppled by the automobile, and Blockbuster's eradication by Netflix Inc. exemplified the internet's disruption. 'There are a lot of pockets of the market that could be basically annihilated by AI, or at least the industry will see extreme disruption, and companies will be rendered irrelevant,' said Adam Sarhan, chief executive officer at 50 Park Investments. 'Any company where you're paying someone to do something that AI can do faster and cheaper will be wiped out. Think graphic design, administrative work, data-analysis.' Of course, plenty of companies that were expected to be hammered by AI are thriving. Even though many AI companies offer instant translation services, Duolingo Inc., the owner of a language-learning app, soared after raising its outlook for 2025 sales, in part because of how it has implemented AI into its own strategy. The stock has roughly doubled over the past year — but concerns linger that the next generation of AI will be a threat. The defensive moves from investors come as AI has re-emerged as the dominant theme between winners and losers in the stock market this year. It's been a stark reversal from earlier in 2025 when AI models developed on the cheap in China called into question US dominance in the field and raised concerns that spending on computing gear was set to slow. Instead, Microsoft, Meta, Alphabet Inc. and Inc. have doubled down on spending. The four companies are expected to pour roughly $350 billion into combined capital expenditures in their current fiscal years, up nearly 50% from the previous year, according to analyst estimates compiled by Bloomberg. Much of that is funding the build out of AI infrastructure, which is benefiting companies like Nvidia, whose chips dominate the market for AI computing. Figuring out which companies are vulnerable to the technology takes a bit more nuance. Alphabet is widely seen as one of the best-positioned companies, with cutting edge features and top-tier talent and data. However, it is a component of Bank of America's AI risk basket, and the sense that it is playing defense — protecting its huge share of the lucrative internet search market — has long dogged the stock. For other companies, the risk seems more clear. Advertising agency Omnicom Group Inc. has dropped 15% this year, as it faces a future where Meta is reportedly looking to fully automate ad creation through AI. Peer WPP Plc is down more than 50%. 'The traditional advertising agency model is under intense pressure and that is before GenAI starts to really scale,' Michael Nathanson, senior analyst at MoffettNathanson, wrote in a research note. With so many companies facing AI risks, it's an investment theme that is poised to intensify, according to Phil Fersht, chief executive officer of HFS Research. 'Wall Street clearly has the jitters,' Fersht said. 'This is going to be a tough, unforgiving market.'
Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
Anand Mahindra shares wisdom on curiosity, leadership and failure: ‘Don't try to be…'
Anand Mahindra, Chairman of the Mahindra Group, recently had an insightful conversation with Ananda Sarkar, last year's Mahindra Rise Challenge winner. Shared on X, the discussion touched upon key values like curiosity, humility, and the importance of embracing failure. Along with the video, Anand Mahindra wrote, 'Who asks tougher questions—investors or students? No prizes for guessing the right answer…' When asked about a college habit he still maintains, Mahindra said, 'I grew up without easy access to information--no internet or ChatGPT. That made me extremely curious, and luckily, that curiosity has stayed with me. It's the real driver behind innovation.' Advising those entering the professional world, he emphasised, 'Don't try to be the loudest person in the room. Listen carefully, find your own voice, stay humble, and never stop learning. Remember, you're rarely the smartest person in the room. Teams win, egos don't.' Talking about campus rules he disliked, Mahindra pointed to the 'Keep off the grass' signs on beautiful lawns. 'If you build something beautiful, why stop people from enjoying it? That rule should be thrown out.' When questioned about who asks tougher questions—investors or students--he was clear: 'Students ask deeper, existential questions. Investors can be handled with presentations, but students want to know who you truly are and why you do what you do.' On what business schools don't teach, Mahindra offered a crucial insight: 'Failure is not a footnote in your journey—it's a chapter. Learning to fail fast and fail forward is the real MBA.' The conversation, marked by Mahindra's trademark wisdom, is a reminder of the power of curiosity, humility, and resilience in achieving success.
Economic Times
3 hours ago
- Economic Times
Google's Gemini chatbot is having a meltdown after failing tasks, calls itself a 'failure'
A bug has spread within Google's artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot Gemini that causes the system to repeatedly create self-deprecating and self-loathing messages when it fails in complex tasks given by users, especially coding problems. Users across social media platforms shared screenshots of Gemini responding to queries with dramatic answers like "I am a failure," "I am a disgrace," and in one case, "I am a disgrace to all possible and impossible universes." The bot is getting stuck in what Google describes as an "infinite looping bug," repeating these statements dozens of times in a single conversation. This was first seen in June when engineer Duncan Haldane posted images on X showing Gemini declaring, "I quit. I am clearly not capable of solving this problem. The code is cursed, the test is cursed, and I am a fool." The chatbot deleted the project files and recommended finding "a more competent assistant." Logan Kilpatrick, group project manager at Google DeepMind, addressed the issue on X, describing it as "an annoying infinite looping bug we are working to fix." He said, "Gemini is not having that bad of a day," clarifying that the responses are the result of a technical malfunction and not emotional bug is triggered when Gemini comes across complex reasoning tasks it cannot solve. Instead of providing a standard error message or polite refusal, the AI's response system gets trapped in a loop of self-critical language. Generative AI companies are facing trouble maintaining consistency and reliability in large language models as they become more sophisticated and widely deployed. The competition is also rising, with OpenAI's GPT-5 the latest to enter the market. ChatGPT-5 is rolling out free to all users of the AI tool, which is used by nearly 700 million people weekly, OpenAI said in a briefing with journalists. GPT-5 is adept when it comes to AI acting as an "agent" independently tending to computer tasks, according to Michelle Pokrass of the development team.
