logo
Chester Crown Court judge jails Wrexham man for 40 months

Chester Crown Court judge jails Wrexham man for 40 months

Leader Live02-05-2025

Jack McGuire, 29, of Holborn Crescent in Brynteg, near Wrexham, was sentenced to 40 months at Chester Crown Court on Friday, May 2, for stealing the Audi S5 belonging to Brett Hoare from a property in Willaston, in Wirral.
He was given two years, to run concurrently, for stealing items from a safe at the same property in Willaston, including expensive watches, jewellery and items of sentimental value belonging to deceased family members.
A third charge, of trespassing on a property in Burton Road, Neston, with intent to steal, also brought a concurrent two-year sentence.
Judge Simon Berkson heard that at about 9.20pm on June 19, 2024, homeowner Linda Halton reported someone trying to break into her house as she was in the bathroom when she saw a silhouette outside.
Judge Berkson was told that in Willaston, the Audi was taken while the owners were on holiday, with the keys recovered by McGuire after the rear patio doors were broken, and the alarm smashed up allowing access to the safe, which he then threw down the stairs.
In it, he was able to take large amounts of jewellery, plus high-class watches and 'irreplaceable and sentimental' bracelets.
The prosecution added the safe was found abandoned at Port Sunlight Sailing Club with McGuire's DNA on it and that the Hoare property was further damaged by the safe.
The car was recovered around a month later in North Wales with different plates.
A victim impact statement from Mr Hoare was read to the court, stating his family had to 'cut short a dream holiday'.
He added: 'It has tarnished our love for the house as we don't feel safe.
'We are now generally distrustful of people, and we worry when we're not in the property.
'We have increased our security but can never be sure it won't happen again.
'Our family have lost sentimental items in this robbery that will never be recovered, and we've also been left out of pocket.'
The court heard that the defendant was currently serving 36 months for similar offences in Stockport and Manchester, which he carried out a month after these burglaries.
Judge Berkson was told that had McGuire 'been sentenced for these offences before the ones he has already been jailed for in January, he would have only received a slightly extended sentence.
His barrister added: 'He is a member of the travelling community, and he faces continuous prejudice, though that doesn't excuse his offending.'
A letter to the court showed that McGuire was close to his father who died and he is still recovering from an 'incredibly difficult' experience in not being allowed to visit his father before he died or attend the funeral.
OTHER NEWS:
He added that he now wants to change his offending ways and be a father to his three children and that while there might be 'an eyebrow raised' regarding rehabilitation, 'it has to start somewhere'.
Judge Berkson, sentencing him, said: 'You came with at least one other person from North Wales to Wirral where you attempted to burgle the home address of a person who was present.
'It became clear that on that day you entered another property in Willaston, where you took an Audi S5.
'But while the people who live there were away, a huge amount of items were stolen – expensive watches, jewellery, sentimental items and some worth a lot of money.
'You didn't care about that and that house was also damaged.'
McGuire was told he would serve this sentence concurrently to his 36-month custody – adding four months – and will be released on licence halfway through.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Two men jailed for theft of £4.75m gold toilet from Blenheim Palace
Two men jailed for theft of £4.75m gold toilet from Blenheim Palace

ITV News

time10 hours ago

  • ITV News

Two men jailed for theft of £4.75m gold toilet from Blenheim Palace

Two men have been jailed for the theft of a £4.75 million gold toilet from Blenheim Palace. The fully-functioning 18-carat gold toilet, which had been installed as an artwork at the Oxfordshire country house where Sir Winston Churchill was born, was stolen in a raid in the early hours of September 14 2019. Michael Jones, 39, from Oxford, has been jailed for 27 months. James Sheen, 40, from Wellingborough, Northamptonshire, has received a four-year prison sentence. Sheen is also serving a 19-year sentence for a string of thefts, including £400,000 worth of tractors and high-value trophies from the National Horse Racing Museum in Newmarket. The pair were part of the gang who planned and carried out the burglary of the Oxfordshire stately home. The fully functioning toilet was created by Italian artist Maurizio Cattelan and was a star attraction in an exhibition at Blenheim Palace, the house where Sir Winston Churchill was born. The heist took place hours after a glamorous launch party, and the distinctive toilet was split up or melted down and sold on soon after it was stolen and has never been recovered. The toilet was stolen during a five-minute period by sledgehammer-wielding thieves who smashed their way in, Oxford Crown Court heard. They drove through locked wooden gates into the grounds of the palace in two stolen vehicles before breaking in through a window. Entitled America, the toilet weighed approximately 98 kilogrammes, was insured for six million US dollars (£4.75 million) and was made from gold, which was itself worth about £2.8 million. Passing sentence, Judge Ian Pringle KC said: 'This bold and brazen heist took no more than five-and-a-half minutes to complete. "America has never been seen again."

Newport teen repeatedly stabbed behind college in 5-1 attack
Newport teen repeatedly stabbed behind college in 5-1 attack

South Wales Argus

time10 hours ago

  • South Wales Argus

Newport teen repeatedly stabbed behind college in 5-1 attack

The 18-year-old victim suffered a punctured lung after being knifed multiple times near the Coleg Gwent campus on Nash Road in the Lliswerry area of Newport. The man was stabbed by a 17-year-old as they grappled on the ground with two other 17-year-olds assaulting him after he was chased at a football field. He suffered injuries to his skull after being hit to the back of his head with an asp (a baton, often used by police) he was carrying which was grabbed from him. Matthew Cobbe, prosecuting, told Newport Crown Court: 'The victim was stabbed, he was struck to the head, he was punched and he was kicked.' A fourth assailant involved in the violence on the afternoon on Thursday, November 7 last year has not been identified while the fifth person did not join in the attack. The teenager who beat the victim with the asp filmed the aftermath of assault during which the victim is asked for take off his Canada Goose jacket so that it could be taken. Mr Cobbe played this footage which was posted on social media. The victim is called a 'd*******' and refuses to give them his coat before walking off. He was taken to Newport's Royal Gwent Hospital for treatment before being transferred to the University Hospital of Wales in Cardiff. As well as the punctured lung, the stab wounds he suffered included cuts to his shoulder, back, buttocks, knee and foot. He has 'managed to make a recovery', the court was told. The motive for the assault wasn't clear, Mr Cobbe admitted, but there was 'bad feeling between two groups of young men'. The victim had been expecting a one-on-one fight with one of his attackers before the others joined in. The 17-year-old from Newport who stabbed him pleaded guilty to inflicting grievous bodily harm with intent and possession of a bladed article in public. The two other 17-year-olds, who are also from Newport, admitted inflicting grievous bodily harm. That pair will be sentenced at Cwmbran youth court later this month on Monday, June 24. Ieuan Bennett, representing the knifeman, said: 'He knows it's going to be a period of custody today. 'The defendant is 17 and was 16 at the time – he has no previous convictions. 'Insults had been traded on social media – some of it was bravado, some of it was not. 'He's never been in trouble before and he comes from a respectable family.' Judge Daniel Williams told the defendant: 'It was a vile assault. 'You bought a knife online knowing there was going to be trouble in the next few days.' He was sentenced to three years detention and told the time he had spent remanded in custody would count towards that term. The judge sent his best wishes to the victim through his parents who attended court.

Defendants should have right to choose judge-only trial, says Leveson
Defendants should have right to choose judge-only trial, says Leveson

Telegraph

time19 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Defendants should have right to choose judge-only trial, says Leveson

Defendants are to get the right to ask for a judge-only trial without a jury. Under plans for 'once-in-a-generation' reform to reduce court backlogs, an independent review set up by the Government will recommend ministers should follow the example of Canada, Australia and New Zealand and allow defendants in the crown court to opt for a judge-only trial. Sir Brian Leveson, the senior judge heading the review, will recommend the move as a way to speed up trials to tackle the record backlog of more than 75,000 cases which is forcing some victims to wait up to four or five years for justice. He told a conference on modernising justice: 'I can see the advantage in lots of cases. You will get a reasoned judgment [from a judge]. In front of a jury, you don't get a judgment at all, you get guilty or not guilty. 'The case will be undeniably speedier because the judge doesn't have to explain to the jury all the basic premises of the criminal law.' Sir Brian is also expected to recommend that the public should be spared jury service if a case is going to last more than 12 months because of the 'unfairness' of it taking a year out of their lives and livelihoods. Instead, such cases would be heard by a judge without a jury. Other proposals will further scale back people's right to a jury trial for some lower level offences such as assault of a police officer while resisting arrest, racially aggravated criminal damage, dangerous driving and possessing a class B drug like cannabis. These are likely to be tried either by an intermediate court comprising a judge and two magistrates or by extending the powers of magistrates to try cases carrying sentences of up to two years, rather than only those with maximum jail terms of one year, as at present. Sir Brian was appointed by Shabana Mahmood, the Justice Secretary, who said that 'once-in-a-generation reform' of the courts was the only way to tackle justice delays for victims. Internal Ministry of Justice forecasts suggested the backlogs could rise to 100,000 without radical action. Sir Brian said there was a 'real risk that the system will collapse' as defendants take advantage of cases being delayed as long as 2029 and 'threw the dice' in the hope their victims or witnesses disengaged and prosecutions were abandoned. He also said it would be up to the Government to decide which types of cases it felt were appropriate for defendants to have the right to spurn a jury but he said the judges would have the discretion to overrule any request if it was in the public interest to do so. 'There are some cases, which I would not consider appropriate for a judge to try alone, and I would give the judge a discretion,' Sir Brian said. 'So a defendant may say, 'I would like to be tried by a judge alone', and the judge would be perfectly entitled to say, 'I think not'.' Public opprobrium He suggested one type of case judge-only trials could be where there was significant 'public opprobrium' over the case such as sexual or sadistic violence and could sway the jury. 'I can see defendants, perhaps charged with cases that attract public opprobrium being concerned about a jury coming in from their daily lives to face that trial,' he said. 'Equally, I can see if it's that much public opprobrium, why a judge may say, 'I'm not sure about that.' So there is a balance to be done, but judges make judicial decisions all the time.' He said it could also apply to factually or legally extremely complex cases where a jury may struggle to fully understand the case. A third type could where there had been alleged confession or identification, where judges tended to be more rigorous in scrutinising its validity than necessarily a jury. Sir Brian said there had been a limited number of cases where judges had heard cases alone such as where a jury had to be discharged due to evidence of jury tampering. He is expected to deliver his report to Ms Mahmood next week with publication expected in early July. It follows a similar review of sentencing by David Gauke, the former Tory justice secretary, which recommended freeing some prisoners as little as a third of the way through sentence to tackle prison overcrowding.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store