A tale of two bills in Colorado
This commentary originally appeared at Big Pivots.
Matters of little consequence often get major time and attention. And vice versa. Two energy bills in the Colorado Legislature this year, one about nuclear energy and the second about electrical transmission, illustrate this.
The first bill, House Bill 25-1040, which is now law, declared that nuclear energy is clean. It proclaims that utilities can meet clean-energy targets with nuclear. It also allows private projects access to financing restricted to clean energy development.
The bill sailed through the Legislature. Gov. Jared Polis signed it into law March 31. For believers, those who want to believe that nuclear energy will be the answer, it was a big win.
To what effect? Likely none. Forget about nuclear waste and safety concerns. Cost of energy from new nuclear plans remains exorbitant.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Some of this was sorted through in a four-hour committee hearing in March. Chuck Kutscher was among several dozen individuals given two-minute slots to testify. He deserved more time. A nuclear engineer by training, he subsequently moved into renewables, retiring from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory several years ago.
At a later meeting in Jefferson County, Kutscher explained why he expects nuclear energy to play no role in Colorado's energy transition. It comes down to cost.
'I like to give credit where credit is due. And the fact is that nuclear power in this country has saved a heck of a lot of carbon dioxide and air pollution emissions,' he said. 'Nuclear provides almost half of U.S. carbon-free electricity, which is pretty impressive.'
As for costs, Kutscher cited two metrics courtesy of Lazard, a financial company that monitors electrical generation. The cost of building new nuclear plants comes in at $8,000 to $13,000 per kilowatt of generating capacity. Solar comes in at $1,400, wind at $2,000.
A broader metric, the levelized cost, includes capital, fuel and operating costs over the life of an energy plant. 'The longer a plant runs, the lower its life-cycle costs, because it's producing more energy,' Kutscher explained. By this measure, nuclear still comes up short: 18 cents a kilowatt-hour compared to solar and wind for 5 and 6 cents.
Might costs drop with a new generation of small modular reactors? SMRs can generate 300 megawatts or less. One was planned in the West, but in 2023 the Utah Associated Municipal Power Systems pulled out of its contract with nuclear company NuScale — because of cost.
If nuclear costs make it a non-starter in Colorado, can renewables deliver us to an emission-free electrical system? The sun vanishes daily, and sometimes winds on our eastern plains die down, even for days. Kutscher sees possible solutions in improving storage technologies and expanded transmission. Transmission can enable electricity to be shared across multiple time zones and weather systems.
Even moving electricity around Colorado more efficiently has value. The second bill, Senate Bill 24-127, proposes to do that. It would require investor-owned utilities to investigate tools called advanced transmission technologies. They will enable more use from existing transmission lines and associated infrastructure.
Larry Milosevich, a Lafayette resident, decided six years ago to devote himself to fewer pursuits. He says he chose the role of advanced technologies for transmission because of its oversized impact. The transmission system developed during the last century has many inefficiencies.
'I would love to see advanced transmission technologies get a little more light,' he says. Why hasn't it happened? 'It doesn't have sex appeal.'
This bill will not solve all problems. 'You need a lot of arrows in your quiver to get there. And it's not one technology that's going to save the day,' says Leah Rubin Shen, managing director of Advanced Energy United, an industry association that advocates for technologies and policies that advance decarbonization.
More transmission will still be needed. Approvals take time. Using these tools can more rapidly expand capacity at lower cost. 'We characterize it as a no-regrets solution,' says Rubin Shen.
State Sen. Cleave Simpson, a Republican from Alamosa, was the primary author of the bill. 'We can increase the capacity and resilience of our infrastructure without having to undertake expensive, large-scale construction projects,' he told committee members at a March meeting.
The committee that day heard from fewer than a dozen witnesses. It passed an amended bill and moved on within 45 minutes. Several weeks before, the same committee heard nuclear testimony for hours.
In a later interview, Simpson described the bill, slimmed greatly in ambition from its original iteration, as 'maybe a tiny step forward, but a doable one.'
Unlike nuclear, not the answer, but a doable one.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16-07-2025
- Yahoo
Spanberger widens lead as Virginia voters prioritize cost of living, personal freedoms
Democratic Rep. Abigail Spanberger (left) and Republican Lt. Gov. Winsome Earle-Sears (right) are facing off in Virginia's 2025 race for governor. A new VCU poll shows Spanberger leading by 12 points among registered voters. (Spanberger photo by Markus Schmidt/Virginia Mercury, Earle-Sears photo by Parker Michels-Boyce for the Virginia Mercury) With fewer than four months to go before Virginians elect a new slate of statewide leaders, a new poll from Virginia Commonwealth University's L. Douglas Wilder School of Government and Public Affairs finds Democrats holding early leads in all three top races — and voters sharply focused on economic pressures and personal freedoms. The latest Commonwealth Poll, conducted June 19–July 3, captures evolving voter sentiment in advance of the 2025 election and suggests momentum has shifted further toward Democratic candidates, particularly among independents. In the closely watched race for governor, former U.S. Rep. Abigail Spanberger, the Democratic nominee, leads Republican Lt. Gov. Winsome Earle-Sears by 12 points, 49% to 37%. That marks an improvement from the Wilder School's previous poll in December 2024, which showed Spanberger ahead 45% to 35%. State Sen. Ghazala Hashmi, D-Richmond, running for lieutenant governor, leads Republican John Reid, a conservative radio host, 46% to 36%. Meanwhile, former Democratic Del. Jay Jones holds a 47% to 38% lead over incumbent Republican Attorney General Jason Miyares. While Democrats lead across the board, the poll also highlights significant uncertainty: nearly half of independents — 47% — remain undecided in all three races. Gov. Glenn Youngkin, who has spent months working to raise his national profile, remains in relatively good standing with his Republican base but is struggling with independents. Among registered voters, 49% said they approve of the job Youngkin is doing, while 39% disapprove. The Republican governor enjoys overwhelming support from his party (84%) but low ratings among Democrats (20%). Independents are split, with 51% disapproving. That marks a slight decline from December, when Youngkin had a 51% approval rating and 38% disapproval. President Donald Trump, who remains the GOP's most dominant figure nationally, is faring far worse with Virginia voters. Just 40% approve of the job he is doing, while 55% disapprove. Trump's numbers highlight a stark partisan divide — he enjoys 84% approval among Republicans but faces near-universal disapproval from Democrats (93%) and strong rejection from independents (66%). When asked to identify the issue most influencing their vote, 28% of Virginia voters named the rising cost of living — far and away the top concern. Women's reproductive rights (14%) and immigration (14%) followed, rounding out the top three. This marks a notable shift from the December 2024 poll, when 58% of voters said the cost of living was their top issue and 14% pointed to K-12 education as their second priority. The change indicates a possible reframing of the 2025 campaign narrative — with economic pressures and civil liberties now front and center as Virginians prepare to choose their next leaders. 'The poll results show a clear message from the voters: Performance matters, and so do priorities. This poll should be a wake-up call,' Wilder, the 66th governor of Virginia and the nation's first elected Black governor, said in a statement. 'Governor Youngkin's slipping numbers among independents and the overwhelming disapproval of Trump make clear that Virginia voters are not buying political spin. They want action on the issues that hit hardest: the rising costs of living, threats to women's rights and immigration policies. The shift from education to economic and personal freedoms shows an engaged electorate.' Wilder added, 'As always has been maintained in this space, money and its influence will play a pivotal role in all of the elections. The people are speaking. The question is: Are the 'leaders' listening?' The Summer 2025 Commonwealth Poll is based on telephone interviews with a representative sample of 809 adults aged 18 and older living in Virginia. Of those, 764 respondents identified themselves as registered voters, and their responses form the basis of the findings referenced in this release. Interviews were conducted via landline (80) and cell phone (729), including 558 respondents who did not have a landline. The poll's margin of error is 4.16 percentage points. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Axios
08-07-2025
- Axios
Porn sites still accessible in Virginia despite age verification law
Many porn sites are still unrestricted years after Virginia passed a law limiting access to them. Why it matters: Virginia was among the first states to require age verification for adult sites, but an Axios review found progress has been slow. By the numbers: Of the top 57 active "porn tube" sites listed on as of Tuesday: Only four asked Virginians for age verification with a government-issued ID, as the 2023 law mandates. 16 were blocked entirely, and 3 just required a click of a button to access. The rest (nearly 65%) were wide open. Flashback: When the Virginia Mercury did the same review a month after the law went into effect in 2023, far more sites were available without restrictions. The big picture: It could signal the uphill battle for other states — like Georgia, South Dakota and Wyoming — after similar legislation went into effect last week. The Supreme Court ruled last month that a Texas law mandating age verification on adult sites doesn't violate the First Amendment. Major adult sites like PornHub and Youporn are choosing to block access in age-verification states instead of complying, saying the law "will put children and your privacy at risk." That's led to people seeking workarounds like virtual private networks (VPNs).
Yahoo
05-07-2025
- Yahoo
Yelp's addition of a ‘Black-owned' tag led to a slight drop in business ratings in Detroit
Ned Oliver/Virginia Mercury Matthew Bui, University of Michigan and Cameron Moy, University of Pennsylvania When the online review platform Yelp added a 'Black-owned' tag in 2020, it boosted the visibility of Black-owned restaurants in Detroit. It also caused their ratings to drop, according to our recent study. Both local and nonlocal reviewers who showed awareness of a restaurant's Black ownership rated restaurants 3.03 stars on average. Those who did not acknowledge Black ownership gave a rating of 3.78 stars on average. The tag seems to have caused the average rating to drop by attracting more reviewers who were aware of Black ownership. Technology companies often introduce new features and tools to influence user behavior and make their platforms more usable. Although Yelp intended to support Black communities with the Black-owned tag, the design intervention was harmful to Black restaurant owners in Detroit because Yelp failed to consider platform and community-based factors that significantly shape user interactions. Yelp's user base is predominantly white, educated and affluent. Making Detroit's Black-owned restaurants more visible to Yelp users may have amplified cross-cultural interactions and frictions. For example, non-Black users sometimes mentioned 'slower' and 'rude' service as justifications for lower ratings. Close readings of these reviews hinted at intercultural and communicative clashes. And even businesses that don't select the tag are identified within searches as Black-owned, based on user reviews and relevant links. Yelp doesn't provide a way for the business to opt out of these search results. To examine the local impacts of Yelp's Black-owned tag, we collected over 250,000 Yelp reviews of Black- and non-Black-owned restaurants in Detroit and Los Angeles. We identified Black-owned restaurants through community-sourced lists for Detroit and Los Angeles and then generated a random sample for the non-Black-owned restaurants. We then identified reviews that explicitly noted 'Black ownership' for closer analysis. Detroit's Black-owned businesses saw a greater loss in business compared with 'ownership-unreported' restaurants during the COVID-19 pandemic. This means they also potentially had more to gain from the new tag. We found the awareness of Black ownership on Yelp significantly increased following Yelp's addition of the Black-owned tag in June 2020. A year after the tag was added, reviews in Detroit mentioned Black ownership 4.3% more often than a year before it was rolled out. Detroit Black-owned restaurants also saw a small temporary spike in their number of reviews, largely around the time Yelp added the Black-owned tag. At the same time, the restaurants' average star ratings dropped from 3.91 to 3.88. In contrast, non-Black-owned restaurants' ratings stayed relatively steady at 3.90. This metric is an aggregate of all Detroit restaurants' Yelp reviews over their entire existence, so a .03-star rating change is small but significant. Even minor changes to star ratings affect the number of diners restaurants attract, their earning potential and the likelihood they will sell out of food. Adding obstacles in digital platforms serves to reproduce and amplify inequalities these businesses already face, rather than alleviate them. For example, Black-owned businesses have a harder time getting loans and are relatively underrepresented in Michigan as a whole. These findings may seem surprising given that Detroit is a majority Black city. However, Black users on Yelp are a minority. Keeping in mind the skewed user base of Yelp, we hypothesize the lower reviews for businesses featuring a Black-owned tag reflect existing racial and digital divides in the city. Generally, our study provides additional evidence that digital interventions are not 'one-size-fits-all,' nor is digital visibility inherently positive for all businesses. The Research Brief is a short take on interesting academic work. Matthew Bui, Assistant Professor of Information and Digital Studies, University of Michigan and Cameron Moy, PhD student, Annenberg School of Communication, University of Pennsylvania This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.



