logo
US strike on Iran raises oil shock, capital flow risks for India's economy

US strike on Iran raises oil shock, capital flow risks for India's economy

Mint22-06-2025
New Delhi: The flare-up in West Asia following US missile strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities has heightened geopolitical tensions and intensified external risks to India's economy, even as many analysts say the escalation may prove short-lived.
At stake for India is the potential fallout from surging oil prices, a widening current account deficit, higher energy and shipping costs fuelling domestic inflation, investor risk aversion, capital outflows, and broader risks to economic growth.
'The bigger impact will be on sentiment. However, oil intensity has been going down structurally. For India too, the share of oil imports in total imports has come down from 21% in 2018 to 16.5% in 2025," said Sachchidanand Shukla, group chief economist at Larsen & Toubro.
Read this | Mint Primer: What if the US joins Israel's war with Iran?
Shukla added that India can absorb oil prices up to $85 a barrel without triggering large macro imbalances. 'There is no need to panic and one needs to keep an eye on how the situation evolves," he said.
In a televised address on Sunday (India time), US President Donald Trump confirmed the direct American assault on Iran's nuclear programme, ending days of speculation about Washington's entry into the Israel-Iran conflict. He warned that further strikes could follow.
'Remember, there are many targets left. Tonight was the most difficult of them all by far, and perhaps the most lethal. But if peace doesn't come quickly we will go to those other targets with precision, speed and skill," Trump said.
Oil price spike the immediate risk
A sustained rise in oil prices remains the most visible risk for India, which relies on imports for nearly 85% of its crude oil needs. Higher global prices can widen India's current account deficit, fuel domestic inflation, trigger risk aversion among investors, and slow down growth.
'Every sustained 10% rise in oil price versus the baseline can lower India's GDP by 15 basis points (bps) and raise inflation measured by Consumer Price Index (CPI) by 30bps. On the other hand, it can reduce global GDP by 15 bps and raise CPI by 40 bps which can impede the rate cut trajectory," explained Shukla.
While crude prices have already risen from $64–65 per barrel to $74–75 since the Israel-Iran conflict erupted on 13 June, some offsetting factors remain in play.
Read this | US attack on Iranian nuclear sites roils oil market, India braces for possible price surge
Experts noted that oil supply from the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries Plus (Opec+) is improving as members unwind voluntary production cuts. Crude output from Opec+ rose by 180,000 barrels per day in May compared to April, according to the cartel's latest monthly oil market report.
This production rebound, experts said, could help cap sharp price spikes, provided the conflict does not escalate further.
'The current flare-up may be short-lived and could even mark a turning point in the West Asia crisis towards its early closure, given the substantial disparity in conventional military capabilities, though the complex regional dynamics suggest multiple pathways for conflict evolution," said Rishi Shah, Partner and Economic Advisory Services Leader, Grant Thornton Bharat.
'As things stand today, there may be regional disturbances but these appear unlikely to translate into a major negative shock for India's economy," said Shah.
On the trade front, while treaty negotiations continue, commercial flows seem to be adapting and progressing despite the tensions, he added.
"Therefore, based on current developments and assuming the conflict remains contained, we expect the net external impact on India's growth trajectory to be relatively muted in the near term — though this assessment remains contingent on the conflict not escalating significantly or disrupting critical energy supply routes," said Shah.
Prolonged conflict could hit growth
Economists warn that a prolonged conflict could have deeper consequences.
'For oil-importing countries like India, this means slightly higher inflation and increased fiscal costs. While we have some buffer, with inflation currently below 4%, expectations have suddenly firmed up," said NR Bhanumurthy, director of the Madras School of Economics.
Bhanumurthy cautioned that the current account deficit could widen not just due to the oil import bill, but also from potential pressure on remittances and capital flows. 'CAD will be a key concern going forward," he said, adding that fiscal support may be needed to absorb part of the oil price shock.
'A sustained flare-up in the conflict poses upside risks for estimates of crude oil prices, and India's net oil imports and the current account deficit. A $10/bbl increase in the average price of crude oil for the fiscal will typically push up net oil imports by ~$13-14 billion during the year, enlarging the CAD (current account deficit) by 0.3% of GDP," rating agency Icra Ltd had noted in an earlier report.
Oil marketing companies and the government can absorb some of the costs in the short term, Bhanumurthy said. 'There will be fiscal implications, but we do have some fiscal space as we have exceeded fiscal targets in the last two years," he added.
A sharp oil price rise could also weigh on foreign inflows and hurt domestic investment sentiment, he warned.
A similar note of caution was sounded by Madan Sabnavis, chief economist at Bank of Baroda, who said that if crude prices stay above $80 for long, the trade deficit will widen and the rupee will come under pressure.
"Wholesale inflation will rise accordingly, but the impact on retail inflation will depend on how the government manages fuel prices," he said, adding that excise cuts, if implemented to shield consumers, would widen the fiscal deficit — 'one that can be absorbed."
India's current account deficit edged up to $11.5 billion, or 1.1% of GDP, in Q3 FY25 compared to $10.4 billion a year earlier. Retail inflation eased to 2.82% in May, while wholesale price inflation fell to a 14-month low of 0.39%.
Icra Ratings on Friday warned that oil is expected to average between $70 and $80 per barrel in FY26, and any sustained rise beyond current levels could weigh on India's growth outlook.
Shipping watches Hormuz chokepoint
The Strait of Hormuz remains a key chokepoint for global energy and container trade, with Indian shipping companies monitoring the situation closely.
'But operations and movement of ships as of now has remained unaffected in the region. We have not yet received any alerts from either UK Maritime Trade Operations that patrols the area or the Indian Directorate General of Shipping," said Anil Devli, CEO, Indian National Shipowners' Association.
Even before the latest flare-up, some ships had begun avoiding the strait, pushing up freight rates and crew costs amid rising security risks.
Read this | Mint Explainer | Strait of Hormuz: Will Iran shut the vital oil artery of the world?
Any blockade could spike global energy prices, disrupt supply chains, and hit container trade across the Persian Gulf, South Asia, and East Africa. India is also watching its strategic asset in the region — Chabahar Port in Iran — closely.
'Operations at the port, located near Iran's southeastern border with Pakistan, remain unaffected and normal," an India Ports Global Ltd official said.
Meanwhile, Adani Group's Haifa Port in Israel remains fully functional despite the ongoing conflict. 'Earlier strikes caused minor shrapnel damage nearby, but operations were unaffected," another official said.
Haifa handles over 30% of Israel's imports and contributes about 5% to Adani Ports' revenue, though it accounts for less than 2% of cargo volumes.
Rice exporters brace for fallouts
Beyond oil, India's basmati rice exporters are facing uncertainty as Iran, a key buyer, may scale back purchases if tensions persist.
Iran typically imports around 1 million tonnes of basmati rice annually from India, accounting for roughly a fifth of India's total basmati exports by volume. Several shipments are currently lying at Indian ports, with exporters hesitant to dispatch consignments amid growing uncertainty.
"We are in a catch-22 situation. Amid escalation of tension, many of the exporters, whose shipments are lying at port have kept shipments on hold. If the current situation persists, exporters would be on the receiving end," said Satish Goel, President, All India Rice Exporters Association (AIREA).
India's rice exports to Iran rose to $757.3 million in FY25 from $689.8 million a year earlier, accounting for three-fourths of India's total farm exports to the country.
Also read | Javier Blas: An Israel-Iran war may not rattle the oil market
The timing makes the situation especially sensitive — mid-June to mid-July is peak season for exports, just ahead of Iran's domestic harvest. 'This is a peak season, as in the middle of July Iran might temporarily ban shipments to protect their domestic farmers and ensure fair prices for their harvest," Goel added.
'This is a common practice, particularly during the harvest season, and is aimed at supporting local agriculture by reducing competition from foreign imports. The ban is usually lifted once the domestic harvest is sold."
Vijay C Roy and Dhirendra Kumar contributed to this story
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

CPI State conference begins in Salem; CM to participate today
CPI State conference begins in Salem; CM to participate today

The Hindu

time25 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

CPI State conference begins in Salem; CM to participate today

The 26th State conference of the Communist Party of India (CPI) got under way at the Nehru Auditorium here on Friday. CPI State secretary Mutharasan presided over the conference. National secretary K. Narayana garlanded the statue of Mahatma Gandhi and former MLA Palanisamy hoisted the national flag. Chief Minister M.K. Stalin will participate in the conference on Saturday. Amarjeet Kaur, national secretary, said the conference would discuss national and international issues but importantly about Tamil Nadu. 'One year ago, when Prime Minister Narendra Modi addressed BJP cadres, he cautioned them to be aware of Red flags and told them that Left politics is very dangerous for the country. Mr. Modi is carrying forward the agendas of their RSS forefathers, which are against Christians, Muslims, and Left parties. Under the name of Naxals, Mr. Modi is targeting all Red flag bearers,' she alleged. Viduthalai Chiruthaigal Katchi (VCK) leader Thol. Thirumavalavan, who addressed the conference, said to fight against Right-wing politics, the strength of the Left parties should be increased, including the strengthening of all democratic forces. 'How many seats in Assembly and parliamentary elections we are winning is not important. But at the national level, Communist parties and other democratic forces that are against Right-wing politics should be united, which is the need of the hour. The Communist parties should unite these democratic forces, and especially the century-old CPI has a big responsibility,' he said. For democracy to win, the VCK has unconditional tie-up with Left parties. There are many irregularities behind the victory of BJP in various States, he alleged. 'The alliance led by DMK in Tamil Nadu is very strong and we have to be ready to face the irregularities like Special Intensive Revision (SIR),' Mr. Thirumavalavan added. Senior CPI leaders, Tourism Minister R. Rajendran and Congress leader Peter Alphonse also participated.

Hezbollah warns Lebanon ‘will have no life' if state moves against it
Hezbollah warns Lebanon ‘will have no life' if state moves against it

Indian Express

time25 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Hezbollah warns Lebanon ‘will have no life' if state moves against it

Hezbollah raised the spectre of civil war with a warning on Friday there would be 'no life' in Lebanon if the government sought to confront or eliminate the Iran-backed group. The government wants to control arms in line with a US.-backed plan following Israel's military campaign against Hezbollah, which was founded four decades ago with the backing of Tehran's Revolutionary Guards. 'This is our nation together. We live in dignity together, and we build its sovereignty together – or Lebanon will have no life if you stand on the other side and try to confront us and eliminate us,' its leader Naim Qassem said in a televised speech. Israel has dealt Hezbollah heavy blows in the last two years, killing many of its top brass, including former leader Hassan Nasrallah, and 5,000 of its fighters and destroying much of its arsenal. Lebanon's Prime Minister Nawaf Salam said that Qassem's statements carried an implicit threat of civil war, calling them 'unacceptable'. 'No party in Lebanon is authorised to bear arms outside the framework of the Lebanese state,' Salam said in a post on X carrying his statements from an interview with the pan-Arab Asharq Al-Awsat newspaper. The Lebanese cabinet last week tasked the army with confining weapons only to state security forces, a move that has outraged Hezbollah. Qassem accused the government of implementing an 'American-Israeli order to eliminate the resistance, even if that leads to civil war and internal strife'. However, he said Hezbollah and the Amal movement, its Shi'ite Muslim ally, had decided to delay any street protests while there was still scope for talks. 'There is still room for discussion, for adjustments, and for a political resolution before the situation escalates to a confrontation no one wants,' Qassem said. 'But if it is imposed on us, we are ready, and we have no other choice … At that point, there will be a protest in the street, all across Lebanon, that will reach the American embassy.' The conflict between Hezbollah and Israel, which left parts of Lebanon in ruins, erupted in October 2023 when the group opened fire at Israeli positions along the southern border in solidarity with its Palestinian ally Hamas at the start of the Gaza war. Hezbollah and Amal still retain influence politically, appointing Shi'ite ministers to cabinet and holding the Shi'ite seats in parliament. But for the first time in years, they do not hold a 'blocking third' of cabinet posts that in the past enabled them to veto government decisions. Hezbollah retains strong support among the Shi'ite community in Lebanon, but calls for its disarmament across the rest of society have grown.

Resisting the coercive new global trade order
Resisting the coercive new global trade order

Hindustan Times

time25 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Resisting the coercive new global trade order

How should India respond to the challenges posed by the US tariffs of 50%? Some believe that this crisis presents an opportunity for India to implement deeper economic reforms aimed at enhancing the overall competitiveness of its economy. Others argue that India should intensify its efforts to integrate with non-American economies, such as the EU. Trump has inaugurated a new chapter in the global imperial project, which his successor may continue. Efforts are underway to establish new rules for international trade. (Bloomberg) While these measures are undoubtedly necessary, many Indian analysts overlook a larger issue — the new ideological contestation on the global stage aimed at reshaping international law norms governing world trade. Many believe that US President Donald Trump has upended the rule-based international trading order established by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and the World Trade Organization (WTO). However, there is a prevailing belief that this disruption is temporary. Once Trump leaves office, the status quo would be restored. This view, however, is overly sanguine. There appears to be a bipartisan consensus among both Republicans and Democrats in the US regarding the substance of Trump's actions, even though they may differ in their approach. The Biden administration did little to revive the moribund WTO during its term from 2020 to 2024. Trump has inaugurated a new chapter in the global imperial project, which his successor may continue. Efforts are underway to establish new rules for international trade. This was made clear by ambassador Jamieson Greer, the US Trade Representative. Greer posits that the US has initiated a new 'Trump round' of trade negotiations that, unlike previous rounds at the GATT and WTO, will not rely on consensus-based decision-making. The key elements of this new global trade order include legitimising American coercion for deeper market access, establishing stronger links between trade and non-trade issues like labour, and, most importantly, implementing unilateral enforcement by the US, as opposed to the apolitical dispute settlement system employed by the WTO. If these rules of coercive capitalism become codified as a new international trade order, it could be disastrous for countries in the Global South, including India. Therefore, it is essential to engage in an ideological battle on the global stage against the radical American populist right. It is crucial to understand the intriguing relationship between imperialism and international law. The mainstream belief has been that there is a clear distinction between the imperial past and modern international law. The former is often viewed as a historical anomaly, while the latter is promoted as universal and liberal, representing a narrative of decolonisation and development. However, critical international lawyers argue that international law never severed its ties with its imperial and colonial history. Genealogy, they argue, plays a crucial role in shaping international law norms. Therefore, the expansion of capitalism has played a pivotal role in the growth of international law. As India's foremost international lawyer, B S Chimni, argues, akin to the 'spirit of capitalism' — capitalism's ability to reinvent itself in different phases — there is also a 'spirit of international law'. This spirit allows international law to evolve continually, ably disguising imperial ambitions within the narrative of progress. On one hand, international law presents itself as a universal tool that promotes the global common good and aims to establish a just world order. On the other hand, it also reinforces the imperial agendas of the Global North. The evolution of the multilateral trade order from the establishment of GATT in 1948 to the formation of the WTO in 1995 and beyond reflects the 'spirit of international law.' This rule-based international trade system, influenced by the assertiveness of the decolonised world, made several concessions to developing countries by recognising principles such as non-discrimination, special and differential treatment, preferential market access, and a depoliticized dispute settlement system that aims to resolve trade disputes without resorting to coercive trade diplomacy. Simultaneously, international trade law has promoted and exported American and European norms, leading to their universal adoption. A notable example is the treatment of intellectual property rights (IPR). Economist Robert Reich argues that private property is a fundamental element of the Western capitalist model based on free markets. Over time, the rules governing the protection of private property have expanded to include new types of property, such as IPR. International trade law has played a vital role in establishing binding rules for the global enforcement of IPR through the Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) agreement within the WTO. This framework primarily benefits the corporate interests of countries in the Global North, often at the expense of those in the Global South. Another significant example is agricultural trade. The US and the EU provide substantial subsidies to their agricultural sectors. They managed to include an Agreement on Agriculture in the WTO rulebook, allowing them to continue offering significant subsidies to their farmers. Despite its weaknesses, the WTO systemoffers a platform for deeper engagement and the possibility of reform. It provides an opportunity to mainstream the development argument and hold the Global North accountable in a depoliticised international court. The consensus-based decision-making process has mostly prevented the adoption of rules inimical to the developing world. However, the emerging global trade order appears to be unabashedly imperial, abandoning any pretensions of development and equity and sacrificing the spirit of international law. It unapologetically aims to legitimise unilateralism and coercion, validating the connection between imperialism and international law that critical international lawyers draw. Consequently, the Global South, particularly India, must engage in an ideological battle to defend the existing order. For India, the stakes extend beyond mere market access or a trade deal with the US. India must be at the vanguard in defending the WTO-based international trade system, which, while not perfect, is certainly preferable to the impending new imperial trade order. Prabhash Ranjan is professor and vice-dean (research), Jindal Global Law School, OP Jindal Global University. The views expressed are personal.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store