
Will Trump's budget bill tax Canadians more? What to know about fears
Canadians who invest or own property in the U.S. could soon pay more in taxes if President Donald Trump gets his proposed new spending bill passed by the Senate.
And everyday Canadians, as well as seasoned investors, could be affected.
Not to be confused with Trump's tariff policies, his administration's so-called 'Big, Beautiful, Bill' contains a large amount of tax amendments, with many aimed at nations with what Trump deems 'unfair' foreign tax regimes.
Although specific countries are not mentioned in the bill, there is growing concern being expressed by experts that the wording could let Trump target Canada, among other nations.
'If that happens, that would not be great for Canadian investors in U.S. companies because we could face taxes up to 50 per cent as well as Canadian taxes on owning U.S. Securities,' says cross-border investment adviser Joe Macek at IA Private Wealth.
Story continues below advertisement
'Right now we have a tax treaty with America and we are not double taxed on many of our pension plans. This would include RSPs, pension plans, and those things that have that tax-treaty privilege, that could be affected.'
What are the proposed changes?
If Canada is included in the potential tax changes, then investors who see income generated from holdings in the United States should expect to pay more to receive those funds.
This may include dividends generated from some equities like U.S. stocks, which are a common part of many people's retirement investment portfolios.
A dividend is a form of investment income where a company that offers stock to the public for purchase pays those shareholders additional money depending on the company's performance, and usually every quarter or three-month period.
1:59
Trump threatens more tariffs for Apple, Samsung if smartphones not made in U.S.
For example, Apple's stock is worth approximately $200 USD as of Wednesday morning with the current dividend rate set at $0.26 per share.
Story continues below advertisement
That dividend payment is what would be considered income by this proposed tax amendment if it is being paid to an individual or business based outside of the U.S, like in Canada.
Get daily National news
Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
If an individual has 50 shares valued at about $10,000 in total, that means they will be paid $13 USD every quarter as long as they keep their Apple stock.
The current tax owed on U.S. income such as a dividend is 15 per cent under the taxation treaty between Canada and the U.S. If this scenario involves a Canadian investor in Apple, then that $13 dividend example means they would owe $1.95 in taxes each time the dividend is paid out.
However, under these new tax proposals in Trump's bill, that figure would increase by five per cent each year starting in January 2026 to a total of 50 per cent tax after seven years.
2:06
Snowbird sell-off: New travel requirements, Trump's rhetoric pushing some Canadians out of U.S.
Another example of investment income could be from real estate.
Story continues below advertisement
For example, if a Canadian individual or business owns rental property in the U.S., the monthly rent paid by tenants to those owners would also be subject to these new potential increases.
'Basically all U.S. taxes paid by foreigners are going up five per cent a year,' says cross-border tax lawyer Max Reed at Polaris Tax Council.
'Foreign businesses that operate in the United States are really affected too, including big Canadian multinationals with U.S. subsidiaries.'
Canadians may also see their retirement portfolios impacted if this bill gets passed, as Reed explains,
'Canadian pensions like CPP, teachers, and down from there are mostly all exempt from U.S. tax on a bunch of their U. S. income, and that's getting turned off if the Trump administration applies this, so all of a sudden they will start having some U.S. tax exposure.'
What's behind the proposed change?
As for the motivation behind the tax changes in Trump's spending bill, Reed notes, 'It's really easy to link it to the tariffs…it's the same ideology.'
Story continues below advertisement
Although Trump has shown that he is willing to negotiate on tariffs, the same may not be the case for these new tax laws if passed.
'The implications are going to get a slow burn. And so I think that that makes it a lot more likely to stick than the tariffs, which are just so acute and so shocking,' says Reed.
Reed said while the U.S. does not name Canada, it does refer to any foreign country that imposes a form of digital services tax on U.S. companies — which Canada does.
Canada's digital services tax requires foreign tech giants to pay three-per cent tax 'on certain revenue earned from engaging with online users in Canada if they meet certain conditions,' according to the federal government's webpage about the tax.
While the news of potential higher taxes may have many Canadians worrying about their retirements or investments, Macek says the best thing to do right now is keep calm and watch what happens next.
'Panic buying and panic selling I don't think has ever served any investor well,' he said.
'Right now, the bill has not passed. So the short answer is: do nothing, and stay patient.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CTV News
23 minutes ago
- CTV News
Iran says to target U.S. bases if conflict breaks out
Iranian domestically-built missile and drone are displayed during the Basij paramilitary force parade in Tehran, Iran, Friday, Jan. 10, 2025. (AP Photo/Vahid Salemi) TEHRAN, Iran — Iran threatened Wednesday to target U.S. military bases in the region if conflict breaks out, while President Donald Trump said he was 'less confident' about reaching a nuclear deal. Amid escalating tensions, a U.S. official said staff levels at the embassy in Iraq were being reduced over security concerns, while the UK Maritime Trade Operations, run by the British navy, advised ships to transit the Gulf with caution. Tehran and Washington have held five rounds of talks since April to thrash out a new nuclear deal to replace the 2015 accord that Trump abandoned during his first term in 2018. Since returning to office in January, Trump has revived his 'maximum pressure' campaign on Tehran, backing nuclear diplomacy but warning of military action if it fails. 'All its bases are within our reach, we have access to them, and without hesitation we will target all of them in the host countries,' Iran's Defence Minister Aziz Nasirzadeh said in response to U.S. threats of military action if the talks fail. 'God willing, things won't reach that point, and the talks will succeed,' the minister said, adding that the U.S. side 'will suffer more losses' if it came to conflict. The United States has multiple bases in the Middle East, with the largest located in Qatar. Iran and the United States have recently been locked in a diplomatic standoff over Iran's uranium enrichment, with Tehran defending it as a 'non-negotiable' right and Washington calling it as a 'red line'. Trump had previously expressed optimism about the talks, saying during a Gulf tour last month Washington was 'getting close' to securing a deal. But in an interview published Wednesday, Trump said he was 'less confident' the United States and Iran could reach a deal, in response to a question on whether he believed he could stop Tehran from enriching uranium. 'A shame' Iran currently enriches uranium to 60 percent, far above the 3.67-per cent limit set in the 2015 deal and close though still short of the 90 per cent needed for a nuclear warhead. Western countries, including the United States and its ally Israel, have long accused Iran of seeking to acquire atomic weapons, while Tehran insists its nuclear programme is for peaceful purposes. Last week, Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said enrichment is 'key' to Iran's nuclear programme and that Washington 'cannot have a say' on the issue. During the interview with the New York Post's podcast 'Pod Force One', which was recorded on Monday, Trump said he was losing hope a deal could be reached. 'I don't know. I did think so, and I'm getting more and more -- less confident about it. They seem to be delaying and I think that's a shame. I am less confident now than I would have been a couple of months ago,' he said. 'Something happened to them but I am much less confident of a deal being made... Maybe they don't wanna make a deal, what can I say? And maybe they do. There is nothing final.' Trump maintained that Washington would not allow Tehran to obtain nuclear weapons, saying 'it would be nicer to do it without warfare, without people dying'. On May 31, after the fifth round of talks, Iran said it had received 'elements' of a U.S. proposal for a nuclear deal, with Araghchi later saying the text contained 'ambiguities'. Iran has said it will present a counter-proposal to the latest draft from Washington, which it had criticised for failing to offer relief from sanctions -- a key demand for Tehran, which has been reeling under their weight for years. On Monday, the United Nations nuclear watchdog began a Board of Governors meeting in Vienna that will last until Friday to discuss Iran's atomic activities and other issues. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) meeting followed a report issued by it criticising 'less than satisfactory' cooperation from Tehran, particularly in explaining past cases of nuclear material found at undeclared sites. Iran has criticised the IAEA report as unbalanced, saying it relied on 'forged documents' provided by its arch-foe Israel. In January 2020, Iran fired missiles at bases in Iraq housing American troops in retaliation for the U.S. strike that killed top Iranian general Qassem Soleimani days before at Baghdad airport. Dozens of U.S. soldiers suffered traumatic brain injuries.


Globe and Mail
26 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Wall Street's rally stalls as US stocks post their 1st loss in 4 days
NEW YORK (AP) — Wall Street's rally stalled after stocks climbed back within 2% of their all-time high. The S&P 500 slipped 0.3% Wednesday, marking its first drop in four days. The Dow Jones Industrial Average ended little changed, and the Nasdaq composite lost 0.5%. The action was stronger in the bond market, where Treasury yields eased after a report showed inflation ticked up by less last month than economists expected. That raised expectations for the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates later this year. Markets didn't react much to the conclusion of two days of trade talks between the U.S. and China. THIS IS A BREAKING NEWS UPDATE. AP's earlier story follows below. NEW YORK (AP) — Wall Street's rally is stalling on Wednesday after U.S. stocks climbed back within 2% of their all-time high. The S&P 500 was 0.4% lower in late trading and on track for its first drop in four days. The Dow Jones Industrial Average was down 45 points, or 0.1%, with roughly an hour remaining in trading, and the Nasdaq composite was 0.6% lower. Several Big Tech stocks led the way lower, and a 1.9% drop for Apple was the heaviest weight on the market. It's been listless this week after unveiling several modest upcoming changes to the software that runs its devices. The action was stronger in the bond market, where Treasury yields eased after a report suggested President Donald Trump's tariffs are not pushing inflation much higher, at least not yet. U.S. consumers had to pay prices that were 2.4% higher overall in May than a year earlier. That was up from April's 2.3% inflation rate, but it wasn't as bad as the 2.5% that Wall Street was expecting. A fear has been that Trump's wide-ranging tariffs could ignite another acceleration in inflation, just when it had seemed to get nearly all the way back to the Federal Reserve's 2% target from more than 9% at its peak three summers ago. It hasn't happened, though economists warn it may take months more to feel the full effect of Trump's tariffs. For the time being, many businesses may be pulling products they already had in their inventories rather than passing along higher costs from fresh imports. 'Another month goes by with little evidence of tariffs, but the longer-term inflation challenge they pose remain,' according to Ellen Zentner, chief economic strategist for Morgan Stanley Wealth Management. Financial markets also had only modest reactions to the conclusion of two days of trade talks between the United States and China in London. Trump said Wednesday that China will supply rare-earth minerals and magnets to the United States, while his government will allow Chinese students into U.S. universities in a deal that still needs an agreement by him and by China's leader. Trump also said that 'President XI and I are going to work closely together to open up China to American Trade. This would be a great WIN for both countries!!!' Investors are still hoping for a more sweeping trade deal that would ease tensions between the world's two largest economies. Hopes for such deals between the United States and countries around the world have been one of the main reasons the S&P 500 has charged nearly all the way back to its all-time high after dropping roughly 20% below a couple months ago. Without them, the fear is that Trump's high tariffs could drive the economy into a recession while pushing inflation higher. The S&P 500 is sitting 2.1% below its record. On Wall Street, Chewy dropped 12.5% after the seller of pet supplies reported a weaker profit for the latest quarter than analysts had forecast. Expectations were high after its stock had already rallied nearly 37% coming into the day for the year so far. Tesla swung from a gain in the morning to a loss of 0.4% to continue its shaky run. It's been recovering much of its big losses taken last week after Elon Musk's relationship with Trump imploded, which in turn raised fears about a loss of business for the electric-vehicle company. Musk on Wednesday backed away from some of his earlier comments and said they went 'too far.' In the bond market, the yield on the 10-year Treasury eased to 4.41% from 4.47% late Tuesday. Shorter-term yields, which more closely track expectations for what the Fed will do with overnight interest rates, fell more. Wednesday's better-than-expected reading on inflation raised expectations along Wall Street that the Fed could cut its main interest rate at least twice by the end of the year. The Fed has been keeping interest rates steady so far this year, going on pause after cutting rates at the end of last year. It has been waiting to see how much Trump's tariffs raise inflation because cutting interest rates could push inflation up even more, as they give the economy a boost. 'The Fed could be justified in doing some preemptive rate cuts,' said Brian Jacobsen, chief economist at Annex Wealth Management. 'They were afraid that inflation would rise before growth would slow, but the script has been flipped and they will likely change their tune.' In stock markets abroad, indexes fell across much of Europe and rose in Asia. South Korea's Kospi was one of the best performers and jumped 1.2%.


Vancouver Sun
32 minutes ago
- Vancouver Sun
BC Ferries deal with Chinese shipyard makes waves in Ottawa
OTTAWA — BC Ferries set off a tidal wave of controversy on Tuesday after announcing a major shipbuilding deal with a Chinese state-owned enterprise, with the ripple effects of the decision reaching Ottawa. Vancouver Island Conservative MP Jeff Kibble raised the issue in Wednesday's question period, accusing the Liberal government of rewarding the provincial carrier for selling out Canada's national interest. 'The Liberals are set to hand over $30 million (in federal subsidies) to BC Ferries while BC Ferries hands over critical jobs, investment and industry to China,' said Kibble. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. BC Ferries said in a press release that it had awarded China Merchants Industry Weihai Shipyards (CMI Weihai) a contract to build four new vessels after a 'rigorous' global bidding process. Company CEO Nicolas Jimenez was quoted in the release as saying that CMI Weihai was the 'clear choice' for the contract given, among other factors, its 'proven ability to deliver safe, reliable vessels on dependable timelines.' Kibble blasted BC Ferries in the House of Commons for buying the ships from China instead of a 'proven Canadian shipbuilder' and pressed the Liberal government to tie federal ferry subsidies to buying Canadian-built ships. Liberal Transportation Minister Chrystia Freeland said that she shared Kibble's concerns about procurement 'at all levels of government' but wouldn't comment directly on the BC Ferries contract, calling it a provincial matter. One politician who hasn't hesitated to criticize the deal is the provincial minister responsible for BC Ferries. B.C. Transportation Minister Mike Farnworth was quick to distance himself from the decision, saying he was worried about the message it sends in the midst of Chinese economic aggression. 'I do have concerns around procuring services from any country that is actively harming Canada's economy through unfair tariffs or other protectionist trade practices. I have shared these concerns with BC Ferries,' Farnworth told the media. Yet, despite his reservations, he ruled out blocking the BC Ferries-CMI Weihai deal. 'BC Ferries is an independent company responsible for its own operational decisions,' said Farnworth. He added that he was 'disappointed' that the contract didn't include more involvement from Canadian shipyards. BC Ferries' head of fleet renewal, Ed Hooper, told Postmedia that no Canadian shipbuilders bid on the contract won by CMI Weihai. Liberal Prime Minister Mark Carney promised to ramp up Canadian shipbuilding during this spring's federal election campaign. The federal government previously awarded the Chinese state-owned company a contract to build a new vessel for east coast ferry operator Marine Atlantic, according to a 2023 filing from Transport Canada. The ship began service between Nova Scotia and Newfoundland in July 2024. Federal Procurement Minister Joël Lightbound didn't respond to an inquiry from the National Post about the BC Ferries-CMI Weihai deal, and didn't indicate whether the federal government would continue to take bids from the company. A spokesperson with Public Services and Procurement Canada told the National Post that CMI Weihai does not appear on the agency's database of active bids. National Post rmohamed@ Get more deep-dive National Post political coverage and analysis in your inbox with the Political Hack newsletter, where Ottawa bureau chief Stuart Thomson and political analyst Tasha Kheiriddin get at what's really going on behind the scenes on Parliament Hill every Wednesday and Friday, exclusively for subscribers. Sign up here . Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here .