Here's why it's a good thing the government is nationalising petrol
In the 2013 Norwegian winter, I still felt like having a crisp, fresh beer. At about an equivalent of R100 a can, I still wanted that beer. When I found out why it was so pricey, I wanted that beer even more.
It took a while to put the obvious together, but after realising that every bottle store was called Vinmonopolet, it wasn't long before learning that the Norwegian government has a monopoly on selling booze from a shop. It turns out that there's hardly a reason to bother with the sin tax in Norway.
Never mind nationalising banks and mines. Imagine the outrage if South Africa nationalised the breweries and failed to deliver the beer. And you cannot make a delivery without the fuel, now, can you? So, a good step will be taking over the petrol.
Since we've already seen that the state has not been fantastic at running entities, it's something of a relief to learn that this plan to start selling petrol at the pumps is not going to shut down the private sector, but it's also great to know that more money we spend on petrol will be staying in the country.
That's the right direction. You can moan about foreign entities doing things in the homeland, but until you do something about it, Shell will Shell. So let's have more local companies competing to sell us petrol.
ALSO READ: National Petroleum Company's bold plan to secure SA's energy security
But there's a lesson here. While we might not have our own car brand of any renown, battery developer, or hardware chip manufacturer, we've actually done a great job of keeping what we have in-house. Our top banks are South African, as are our major broadcasters. A bulk of our top retailers do their thing from our shores, and those with overseas bosses tend to be doing it better here than there.
We've actually been able to do a lot of good things for ourselves down here. When we've failed, for a big part, it's been because of a single entity or shareholder… the state. But business can work here, so if the state wants to try its hand at filling the gaps left by a fleeing multinational, there's little reason why it shouldn't work outside the governance being bad.
Naturally, there'll be a temptation to say, 'goodie gumdrops, another state entity for us to bail out' , but this is the exciting bit. It's too easy to think they'll get bailed out because bailouts don't just happen. When was the last time you noticed a state entity that didn't hold a monopoly get a bailout?
You don't even remember SA Express — because we had private airlines that could do a better job, there was no way the state could justify throwing money at them. It's not the same as Eskom, which needs to keep the lights on.
That's why the postal service is panicking because couriers are doing their jobs way better and their continued existence may not justify another bailout.
If whatever they call this new local petrol shop is going to fail, it's not going to do it off of our dime. This is one of the few situations where we have little to lose in the game, so best believe it's time to enjoy it.
If the state can make more of its own money and provide less risk to the populace, that's fantastic. If it can enter a profitable and worthy market that we'd need anyway and plug money from leaking overseas, all the better.
What's exciting about this is that they can try it in the knowledge that if they fail, it's not like anybody is going to be waiting to write them a cheque because gone are those days.
NOW READ: Guess who's woken up to the glory of nuclear energy?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
Indian Embassy in Pretoria Celebrates 79th Independence Day, Showcasing Strong India–South Africa Partnership
Bilateral trade between South Africa and India has reached USD 18 billion, making South Africa India's top trading partner in Africa. Image: File The Embassy of India in South Africa celebrated India's 79th Independence Day on 15 August 2025 with patriotic pride, cultural vibrancy, and renewed emphasis on strengthening the India–South Africa partnership. The day's events brought together diplomats, South African dignitaries, parliamentarians, and the Indian diaspora in Pretoria, underscoring the enduring friendship between the two nations. The celebrations began with the hoisting of the tricolour at India House, where around 200 members of the Indian community and friends of India gathered to pay tribute to the nation's freedom fighters. Later in the day, the High Commission hosted a National Day Reception at the chancery. The Honourable Minister of Communications and Digital Technologies, H.E. Solly Malatsi, graced the occasion as the chief guest, representing the Government of South Africa. The South African National Defence Force's National Ceremonial Guard Band captivated the audience with stirring renditions of Indian and South African patriotic songs, setting the tone for an evening of camaraderie and pride. Welcoming the gathering, India's High Commissioner to South Africa, H.E. Prabhat Kumar, reflected on India's remarkable economic journey. 'From a USD 270 billion economy three decades ago to USD 4 trillion today, India now stands as the world's fourth-largest economy. By 2047, when we celebrate 100 years of independence, India aims to become a USD 30–35 trillion economy. We invite South Africa to be a key partner in this journey,' he said. Ambassador Kumar emphasised that India and South Africa's friendship is rooted in a shared struggle against colonial oppression, inspired by leaders like Mahatma Gandhi and Nelson Mandela. He highlighted ongoing collaborations in digital technology, defence, and energy, as well as thriving people-to-people connections. Bilateral trade has already reached USD 18 billion, making South Africa India's leading trading partner in Africa. He also noted recent milestones in cooperation, including agreements between Eskom and Tata Power, the Gandhi–Mandela Centre of Specialisation in Pretoria providing skills to South African youth, growing defence engagements such as the IBSAMAR maritime exercise, and expanding cultural and tourism exchanges. In his keynote address, Minister Malatsi praised India's achievements and enduring spirit. He began by extending condolences to the people of India for the recent tragic aircraft crash. Reflecting on history, he noted: 'It was here in South Africa that Gandhi refined satyagraha, the philosophy of non-violent resistance, which later inspired Nelson Mandela. These ideals continue to guide our nations in pursuing justice, dignity, and equality.' The minister highlighted India's leadership in technology, space exploration, and innovation. 'India's expertise enriches our bilateral relations, particularly in digital technology and infrastructure, which hold the promise of new opportunities and the hope of improving the lives of millions of South Africans,' he said. The celebration concluded with traditional Indian cultural performances and cuisine, fostering a spirit of cultural exchange and friendship. Closing the evening, Ambassador Kumar affirmed: 'Together, India and South Africa are amplifying the voice of the Global South and building a future of shared prosperity.'
TimesLIVE
3 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Higher funding limits in Political Funding Act 'will promote secrecy'
The proclamation that doubled the disclosure threshold and annual donation limit in the Political Funding Act will deepen secrecy in political funding and make it easier for private interests to influence our politics and for corruption to occur. This is the view of My Vote Counts (MVC) after a proclamation signed by President Cyril Ramaphosa was published in the Government Gazette on Monday. The new annual donation limit will be R30m, up from R15m, and the new disclosure threshold will be R200,000, up from R100,000. 'This is indeed a setback for our democracy. We cannot allow those in power to jeopardise our democracy and water down constitutionally protected rights for their narrow, self-serving interests,' said MVC's project lead on money in politics, Joel Bregman. He said politics required funding and the role parties played in a democratic system was vital. 'But there needs to be a balance between ensuring that parties are adequately funded, and that such funding is regulated and mitigates the risk of undue influence from donors.' Bregman said the immediate impact of a higher disclosure threshold and donation limit was that there would be more secrecy in political funding. 'The details of all donations under R200,000 will not be known to the public. This is an enormous sum for most South Africans and donations of such amounts should be made public knowledge to facilitate scrutiny of parties' relationships with donors and ensure that donors are not receiving anything in return.' He said the state has never provided a legitimate reason all donations should not be disclosed to the public. 'The past four years of disclosure data show that a handful of wealthy individuals dominate our private political funding landscape. Doubling the amount a donor can donate to a party in a year to R30m will give donors an even greater ability to have an outsize influence on our political system.' Bregman said the change would make parties more susceptible to undue influence. 'And because the law does not regulate donations from related parties through the different legal entities they control, wealthy donors can now have an even more significant impact.' Bregman said when the Political Funding Act was first developed in 2017, MVC was concerned that the original limits would dilute the act, but nevertheless celebrated the fact that, for the first time, the country had a law that provided 'a light into the darkness'. MVC said while recognising the act's importance, it was clear that the law had many defects that limited its ability to achieve its objectives. In 2023, the MVC initiated legal proceedings to challenge the constitutionality of the act and the case was heard before a full bench of the Western Cape High Court in February 2025. 'A key component of our challenge is that the original limits were not formulated with reference to empirical evidence and were therefore irrational and unlawful.' MVC asked the court to find the limits unconstitutional and refer them back to parliament for remedying. Judgment is pending. 'Should our case succeed, the amendments to the act will be set aside with full retrospective effect, including the determination of these new limits. While we await judgment, we are considering other legal options to address the president's action.' Bregman said MVC will be writing to Ramaphosa to request that he release the reasons and full record of factors that were considered as he applied his mind to the matter.
Daily Maverick
3 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
The man in the three-piece suit — imagery and identities in Mandela's leadership (Part 3)
The use of imagery is well interred within the history of the ANC. When Nelson Mandela came onto the scene, wearing smart suits, it's legitimate to read some of his identity from the clothes that he wore. This is the third in a five-part series on Mandela's leadership. Imagery has always been important in liberation movement politics and history. In the case of the South African Native National Congress (the name of the African National Congress at its inception), the question of dress was always important. Many people responded with ridicule, suggesting that ANC leaders were dressing like their masters to beg the king and his government to provide some reforms that benefited a section of the ANC. Cultural writer John Berger said that the suit emerged as the dress code of the ruling class. What one can legitimately say is that wearing the dress of the ruling class is in a sense a claim for rights which the ANC was making. Likewise, when they sang Rule Britannia, it's important to understand that the ANC was still grappling for its identity as an African organisation. But in the context of competing powers – the Afrikaner Nationalists and the British – the ANC sided with the British and played divide and rule in reverse (a phrase I owe to Professor Peter Limb, a very significant Australian historian of the South African Struggle), with a claim to British subjectivity, meaning the rights of the British men and women. Rule Britannia has such words as 'Rule Britannia, Britannia, rule the waves: Britons never, never, shall be slaves'. In other words, having the rights of the British meant one could not be a slave, one had to be treated equally. The use of imagery is well interred within the history of the ANC. When Nelson Mandela came onto the scene, a man who was very self-conscious about his dress, wearing smart suits and similar attire, it's legitimate to read some of his identity from the clothes that he wore. (On dress and other cultural representations, see Raymond Suttner 'Periodisation, cultural construction and representation of ANC masculinities through dress, gesture and Indian Nationalist influence': Historia 2009, vol. 54, n.1, pp. 51-91). From early in his life Mandela was very conscious of who he was in relation to others – his identity or identities and the imagery that he deployed to reflect these. Given the pre-eminence in leadership that Mandela attained in later life, how he was perceived could have real material effects on the success of the often-fragile transition to democracy. It could impact on the state of conflict, whether or not the violence would increase or be reduced and ultimately eliminated. In the eyes of many white people, Mandela was a dangerous man who threatened their wellbeing, or this idea of Mandela was conjured up to scare the followers of certain organisations. To secure peace Mandela and the ANC had to counter that. On the side of very many black people, Mandela was admired for representing implacable opposition to apartheid domination, manifested through his unrepentant stance in court, after being the founding commander of uMkhonto weSizwe (MK). (This is, of course a perception that is being challenged by a new generation and some commentators who see Mandela as having 'gone soft' and actually having compromised the freedom for which he had fought, a claim that does not stand up against the evidence. This and negotiations need thorough probing, especially examining the tactical and strategic objectives at stake). After 1990, following the release of his comrades, return of exiles and the unbanning of organisations, but also earlier, from prison, Mandela took actions aimed at unblocking the stalemate that had developed between the apartheid regime and the forces of liberation. These were manifested in various agreements but Mandela then, and indeed throughout his life, also deployed symbolic gestures, ways of being, ways of self-representation that communicated messages about what he exemplified. Insofar as he was the primary figure in the leadership of the ANC and many looked to him to give a lead, what he did and how he appeared often mattered as much for the success of steps forward as what was contained in organisational decisions. It used to be wrong, in the organisational self-understanding and practices of the ANC and the SACP, for an individual to loom larger than the organisation, but it was a fact that Mandela may well, at certain times, have enjoyed substantially greater popularity than the ANC itself. In fact, this was largely a result of the ANC's campaigning. It had decided to galvanise international solidarity around Mandela as a leading political prisoner. Conscious of the place he occupied in the international pressure it faced, in 1985 the apartheid regime offered him conditional release, requiring him to renounce violence. But he rejected the offer, making it clear that he and the ANC had not sought violence but responded to the attacks of the apartheid regime. His standing had political effects. How Mandela conducted himself had more significant consequences in many ways than decisions of conferences and National Executive Committees in the period after his release. Mandela was conscious of the need to bear himself and represent himself in a manner that was inclusive and reinforced a peace process. In many ways there was a break with the Mandela of before, especially the man who went to prison. But in many respects the identities and imagery associated with him earlier were not erased but would periodically reappear when required, as when he felt betrayed by the primary negotiating party, the apartheid regime. Radicalism, as we saw in this and other instances, does not mean lack of flexibility. Early life Throughout Mandela's early life until after he arrived in Johannesburg, he was very conscious of what he was destined to be, not what he considered as existentially desirable or undesirable for himself or in a human being more generally. This was because he was 'destined' to become a counsellor to the future Thembu King, Sabata Dalindyebo. In consequence of this responsibility, the regent had often told Mandela that it was not for him 'to spend your life mining the white man's gold, never knowing how to write your name'. Shortly after his initiation ceremony, he was driven by the regent to attend the Clarkebury Boarding Institute in the district of Engcobo. For the first time at Clarkebury Mandela encountered a Western, non-African environment. He understood his life to be governed by his lineage, what he owed in respect to people like the regent, what was expected of him and the respect owed to him by virtue of his own position. But Clarkebury was not run on this basis: 'At Clarkebury… I quickly realised that I had to make my way on the basis of my ability, not my heritage. Most of my classmates could outrun me on the playing field and out-think me in the classroom and I had a good deal of catching up to do.' Despite his attempts to meet the criteria for excellence at Clarkebury, he remained psychologically and socially located in a manner that displaced individual agency, for Mandela's life had been preordained: 'I never thought it possible for a boy from the countryside to rival them in their worldliness. Yet I did not envy them. Even as I left Clarkebury, I was still, at heart, a Thembu, and I was proud to think and act like one. My roots were my destiny, and I believed that I would become a counsellor to the Thembu king, as my guardian wanted. My horizons did not extend beyond Thembuland and I believed that to be a Thembu was the most enviable thing in the world.' (My emphasis). Healdtown In 1937, at the age of 19, Mandela joined Justice, the regent's son, at Healdtown in Fort Beaufort. Like Clarkebury, Healdtown was a Methodist mission school. The principal, Dr Arthur Wellington, claimed to be a descendant of the Duke of Wellington who had saved civilisation 'for Europe and you, the Natives'. Mandela joined others in applauding, 'each of us profoundly grateful that a descendant of the great Duke of Wellington would take the trouble to educate natives such as ourselves'. Mandela's pride in being Thembu was not seen to be incompatible with aspiring to British subjectivity, an aspiration that was common to the early bearers of African political thinking in the Cape and even later in the ANC (Raymond Suttner, 'African nationalism' in Peter Vale, Lawrence Hamilton and Estelle Prinsloo (eds), South African intellectual traditions, (UKZN Press, 2014), 125, 129-132). The 'educated Englishman was our model; what we aspired to be were 'black Englishmen', as we were sometimes derisively called. We were taught – and believed – that the best ideas were English ideas, the best government was English government and the best men were Englishmen.' At Healdtown, Mandela mixed with Africans from a range of backgrounds and started to develop a cautious sense that he was part of something wider than the Thembu people, an African consciousness, though this was limited. When Mandela and Justice fled to the Rand to escape forced marriages, Mandela's consciousness was still primarily that of a Thembu, not even an African. The 1950s: Peaceful struggle but preparation for illegality and war During the 1940s a new radical current of thinking emerged under the leadership of the ANC Youth League (YL) and Mandela, although a relative political novice, became part of this. It is interesting to note that radical though they may have been and critical of their predecessors, the dress code of the YL was formal and by no means represented the type of associations that later generations of radicalism would have with casual or military dress. The Youth League dressed very much like their predecessors, with the exception of top hats and bow ties. In fact, some of these individuals like Mandela, especially when he qualified as an attorney, paid considerable attention to their appearance and the suits they wore. Ellen Khuzwayo writes: 'I remember the glamorous Nelson Mandela of those years. The beautiful white silk scarf he wore round his neck stands out in my mind to this day. Walter Max Sisulu, on the other hand, was a hardy down-to-earth man with practical clothing – typically a heavy coat and stout boots. Looking back, the third member of their trio, Oliver Tambo, acted as something of a balance with his middle-of-the road clothes!' This was a period when dress clearly served as a signifier of specific identities, notably masculinities. It was a time when gangsterism was rife in the townships and the main gangs were always distinguished not only by their daring law-breaking, but their flashy clothing. The 1950s was an era that comprised lawyers in suits, defendants in many court cases, volunteers who engaged in mass democratic campaigns collecting demands for what later became the Freedom Charter, just one of a number of mass activities of the time. In some ways, the Fifties, which are generally portrayed as struggling legally and nonviolently, were an interregnum between nonviolent, peaceful activities and the formal adoption of armed struggle by the ANC in 1961. In this period the imagery around Mandela as a boxer, a sport in which he engaged with considerable discipline, prefigured his later becoming a fighter of a different type. The image of Mandela as a boxer coexisted with his wearing a suit as a conventional lawyer. It also resonated with his militant image. Letsau Nelson Diale, recruited to the ANC while working as a waiter, read the newspapers: 'The people I worked with said: 'This young man is very clever.' They asked me: 'What's in the Rand Daily Mail?' I told them: 'Mandela is coming to court.' They said: 'He will beat the hell out of the boers. He is going to beat them.'' Here we see this image directly translated in the minds of ordinary waiters and patrons into violent action against the apartheid regime ('the boers'). Mandela: Black man in a white man's court In the first of Mandela's cases, after the banning of the ANC, where he was charged with incitement, having been underground for 17 months, he appeared in Thembu attire. This was at once an assertion of his lineage, deriving from a long line of warrior-leaders, and a declaration of the alien character of the white man's (for it was an almost exclusively male) judiciary. The imagery associated with his dress was used to deny the power and authority of the alien court. He tells the court of the bygone days when men were warriors fighting for their people and their land. He asserts what often tends to be submerged by an overarching African nationalism, his identity as a Thembu. He shows that he was a person with multiple identities, suppressed under apartheid. Mandela took this defiance into court proceedings, where he challenged the right of the court to preside over the case, in applying laws that he, as a black person, had no part in making. It was Mandela the lawyer and also the revolutionary speaking. It was more radical than delegitimising the apartheid state for Mandela refused to recognise the right of a key state institution – the judiciary – to hear his case. Dancing for freedom vs dancing as threat: The toyi-toyi of Mandela and Zuma In the post-1976 period the toyi-toyi emerged as a dance accompanying militant and military action. When Mandela was released from prison, it was a time where many ANC cadres were geared for war and felt disappointment at the onset of negotiations. As indicated earlier, many had not been adequately briefed on this changed direction, for they had been instructed to prepare for insurrection. One of the manifestations of the militaristic orientation then prevailing was the toyi-toyi. The dance was accompanied by aggressive chants with words exhorting people to hit and shoot the enemy. Mandela entered the groups who were dancing with his distinctive 'shuffle dance', smiling to all South Africans, affirming and evoking inclusivity, reaching out and unthreatening, as was the case with military exhortations. Jacob Zuma also deployed the toyi-toyi, notably in his rape trial, but it was very different. Zuma's demeanour was aggressive (then as it is now). After emerging from court Zuma would sing his 'favourite song' – Umshini wam/Bring me my machine gun. Singing about machine guns was itself at one level a manifestation of male power over women, a symbolic representation of the power of the gun – a phallic symbol. The firing of the gun is a well-known representation of ejaculation. In effect the song was a re-enactment of a rape (that the court found did not take place). Unlike Mandela's toyi-toyi-ing, Zuma's was threatening. Mandela's legacy of peace Mandela's gestures were never random and ad hoc. He knew that how he represented himself and how he was understood by others was important, bearing symbolic importance. He did not want a civil war. Whites had to be reassured, while simultaneously having his base constituency among oppressed black people understand that what he wanted to do would lead to political freedom. Graça Machel remarks: 'He knew exactly the way he wanted to come out, but also the way he addressed the people from the beginning, sending the message of what he thought was the best way to save lives in the country, to bring reconciliation.' Many people have remarked on the stolid, sometimes tedious way in which Mandela delivered his speeches. This, he told Richard Stengel, was deliberate in that he wanted to impress upon people that he was serious and could be relied upon and did not resort to rhetoric in order to please. (Nelson Mandela: Portrait of an Extraordinary Man. 2012, page 51). At the same time, in this period, some of what had been part of Mandela's private self became part of his public persona. In Fatima Meer's biography of Mandela, one sees the tenderness towards his children (Higher Than Hope: The Authorised Biography of Nelson Mandela, 1990). One of the features of Mandela as president and retired president has been his obviously unaffected love and gentleness towards children. What we see here is how aspects of his personality that had been submerged under the tough image of guerrilla leader and uncompromising triallist became foregrounded in the context of his changed life conditions. The Mandela who was imprisoned was remembered as a dignified yet angry man. The Mandela who emerged had become sober and evoked gravitas. He would often smile, yet the angry Mandela had not disappeared and could re-emerge where conditions made that necessary. On occasions where he felt betrayed by the last apartheid president, FW de Klerk, Mandela's anger would rise to the surface. In general, however, when we review the imagery surrounding Mandela, we see, as suggested earlier, a series of journeys, where he constantly changes, but without abandoning everything that he has been before. Even in his last days he remained attached to his Thembu identity and was buried near his place of birth. The Mandela who found peace for the country also found peace with himself as a man. DM
