logo
Trump administration sanctions major Iranian shipping network as it ramps up maximum pressure campaign

Trump administration sanctions major Iranian shipping network as it ramps up maximum pressure campaign

CNN6 days ago
The Trump administration is targeting Iran's oil sales by sanctioning a vast shipping empire that is run by the son of a top political adviser to the country's Supreme Leader, ramping up pressure on Iran following the US strikes on Iran's nuclear sites last month.
'Today, Treasury is sanctioning more than 115 individuals, entities and vessels that make up a vast shipping empire controlled by Mohammed (Hossein) Shamkhani, the son of Ali Shamkhani, a top political advisor to the Supreme Leader,' Deputy Secretary of Treasury Michael Faulkender said.
'Hossein Shamkhani's network, which controls a significant portion of Iran's crude oil exports, has touch points around the world. It's a clear example of Iran's flagrant abuse of the international financial system, helping both the regime and Hossein Shamkhani himself generate billions of dollars.'
US officials said the Hossein network enables global sales of Iranian and Russian crude oil most often sold to China and said the penalties are the most significant sanctions imposed on Iran in recent years.
The move comes as President Donald Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff has privately told people that pursuing Iran nuclear deal talks are no longer a short-term priority for the administration following the US strikes on Iran's nuclear sites, three sources familiar with the discussions said.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the Trump administration will continue to impose a policy of maximum pressure on the Iranian regime 'until Iran accepts a deal that advances regional peace and stability and in which Iran forgoes all aspirations of a nuclear weapon.'
'Today's actions underscore our resolve to target those who enable Iran's illicit oil and petrochemical trade and to cut off the regime's means of funding its destabilizing activities,' Rubio said.
Oil sale profits are a key source of revenue for the Iranian regime, which the Trump administration is seeking to drive down.
At the beginning of the year the Iranians were exporting about 1.8 million barrels per day, and most recent US figures show that Iran is now exporting about 1.2 million barrels per day, a Treasury official said. During the height of the Trump administration's maximum pressure campaign during Trump's first term Iran was exporting hundreds of thousands of barrels a day, the official said.
Following the US strikes on Iran's nuclear sites, the US worked actively behind the scenes through intermediaries to re-start nuclear talks with Iran, CNN reported. But those talks have never been rescheduled, and efforts to re-engage have been put on the back burner.
'They would like to talk. I'm in no rush to talk because we obliterated their site,' Trump said in July.
In some conversations Witkoff has asserted that key infrastructure at the three sites targeted by US airstrikes was destroyed and it would take Iran ten years to be able to begin enriching uranium again, one of the sources said. That assessment from Trump's top envoy appears inconsistent with the Pentagon saying that intelligence indicated that the program itself had been setback 'one to two years.'
CNN has reached out to Witkoff's office for comment.
Different US officials have also given their counterparts different assessments as to how long it could take Iran to begin enriching again in the weeks since those US strikes last month, ranging between three and ten years, sources said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Microsoft Cuts More Jobs in Washington as AI Spending Surges
Microsoft Cuts More Jobs in Washington as AI Spending Surges

Yahoo

time6 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Microsoft Cuts More Jobs in Washington as AI Spending Surges

Microsoft (MSFT, Financials) trimmed another 40 roles in Washington, pushing local cuts since May to 3,160. Worldwide, more than 15,000 jobs have been shed as the company pours record sums into artificial intelligence. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 7 Warning Sign with MSFT. The new reductions are separate from larger rounds earlier this year. Microsoft isn't detailing which teams were hit but says affected staff will receive severance and job?search help. Some have already found other roles inside the company. These moves come as Microsoft spends more than $30 billion this quarter on AI infrastructure a push that CEO Satya Nadella admits can feel at odds with cutting jobs. The company's headcount has held steady at about 228,000, even as it invests heavily in growth areas. Shares rose 2.2% Monday, giving Microsoft a $3.98 trillion market value after briefly topping $4 trillion last week. Investors will be watching how it balances AI bets with workplace stability. This article first appeared on GuruFocus.

My Honest Opinion of Energy Transfer Stock
My Honest Opinion of Energy Transfer Stock

Yahoo

time6 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

My Honest Opinion of Energy Transfer Stock

Key Points Energy Transfer operates in the midstream sector, using a largely fee-based model. The master limited partnership has a lofty 7.4% distribution yield. There are lower-yielding midstream companies that I prefer over Energy Transfer. 10 stocks we like better than Energy Transfer › I recognize that there are good reasons for investors to buy Energy Transfer (NYSE: ET) today. I can even appreciate that the master limited partnership (MLP) has taken important steps to strengthen its business in ways that should appease the concerns I have about the investment. Yet, I still think alternatives like Enterprise Products Partners (NYSE: EPD) and Enbridge (NYSE: ENB) are better. Here's my honest opinion of why Energy Transfer isn't the best option in the midstream space. What does Energy Transfer do? Energy Transfer helps to move oil and natural gas around the world. It owns a collection of energy infrastructure assets, like pipelines, that generate reliable fee-based income. Without the assets Energy Transfer owns, producers wouldn't be able to get their oil and natural gas to processors and refiners, or the end consumer. From this perspective, Energy Transfer's core business is pretty similar to that of fellow MLP Enterprise Products Partners and Canadian midstream giant Enbridge. But Energy Transfer's distribution yield is 7.4%, versus a yield of 7% for Enterprise and dividend yield of 6% for Enbridge. The yield difference here matters. You are taking a higher risk with Energy Transfer For starters, Energy Transfer is, in some ways, a much more complicated business than Enterprise or Enbridge. They all own a host of assets, but Energy Transfer is also the general partner for two other publicly traded MLPs. That's not the biggest part of its business, but it makes things a bit more difficult to track. This alone wouldn't be enough to stop me from buying Energy Transfer, but it does give Enterprise and Enbridge, which are simpler businesses to understand, an edge in my book. The big problem comes down to trust. Enterprise has increased its distribution annually for 26 consecutive years. Enbridge's dividend has grown for three decades. Energy Transfer cut its dividend in 2020, right when most income investors would have likely wanted dividend consistency given the pandemic and bear market at the time. If this were the only issue, since the dividend is back on the growth path and above where it was before the cut, I might be able to overlook it. But there's more. In 2016, Energy Transfer agreed to buy Williams Companies (NYSE: WMB). But an energy downturn at the time led to management getting cold feet. It scuttled the deal, which might have required taking on a huge amount of debt, a dividend cut, or both. This was probably the right move, but it issued convertible securities as part of the process of killing the deal. The CEO at the time bought a material amount of the convertibles, which appeared as though it would have protected him from a dividend cut if one were needed. Even years later, I still can't help but wonder if insiders get favored more than investors at Energy Transfer. There's no similar event at Enterprise or Enbridge and, thus, I trust these two midstream competitors more. Add it all up, and I can't justify buying Energy Transfer Yes, Energy Transfer has a slightly higher yield than Enterprise and Enbridge. But the added risk I'd be taking on, notably on the trust side of the equation, isn't justifiable in my book. I'm happier with lower yields and more trust. After all, it's not like Enterprise or Enbridge have low yields. They're just lower than Energy Transfer's yield, which makes sense when you consider the risks here. Should you invest $1,000 in Energy Transfer right now? Before you buy stock in Energy Transfer, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Energy Transfer wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $631,505!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,103,313!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,039% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 181% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 4, 2025 Reuben Gregg Brewer has positions in Enbridge. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Enbridge. The Motley Fool recommends Enterprise Products Partners. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. My Honest Opinion of Energy Transfer Stock was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Indian Rupee Weakens Amid 25% Tariff Warning
Indian Rupee Weakens Amid 25% Tariff Warning

Yahoo

time6 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Indian Rupee Weakens Amid 25% Tariff Warning

Indian rupee(INR) slides to a fresh low of ?87.79 after Trump threatens 25% tariffs. The rupee gave up more ground from Monday's ?87.65 close as traders brace for penalties over India's discounted Russian oil imports, echoing a wider emerging-market stumble this week. Trump took to Truth Social to accuse New Delhi of scooping up cheap Russian crude and flipping it for big profits, vowing a substantial tariff hike and even dubbing India a dead economy. India shot back, calling the threats unjustified and unreasonable. India imported 1.7 M bbl/day of crude in Q1, with roughly 40% coming from Russia. If the U.S. follows through, refiners may scramble to buy more Middle Eastern and Atlantic Basin barrels, driving up import bills and domestic fuel prices. A weaker rupee could swell India's $100 billion import bill, pinch corporate margins and stoke will eye the RBI's Aug 8 policy review and any fresh U.S. tariff updates for clues on the next move. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store