New Rock Island mayor, council members to be sworn in
Three new elected officials will take office on Monday, May 12 during the Rock Island City Council meeting at 6:45 p.m. Ashley Harris will be sworn in as mayor, Glen Evans as First Ward alderperson and Linda Barnes as Third Ward alderperson, a news release says.
Harris is a Rock Island native and graduate of Rock Island High School. He served in the U.S. Army for four years, fulfilling his tour of duty in Germany. He has been employed as a machinist at John Deere for 22 years and is a member of the UAW. He served on the board of Community Caring Conference before taking a position with CCC as an organizer for four years until 2024, while keeping his full-time job.
'I look forward to proving myself as a true public servant and tapping into the momentum begun by Mayor Mike Thoms,' Harris said. 'I want to ensure a smooth transition and continue to work on projects and plans already in place and address our most pressing issues.'
Evans is an ordained minister with Wings of Faith Ministries and associate minister with Destiny Baptist Church. He also is a member of Laborer's Local 309, serving as auditor from 2016 to 2018. He has served as second vice chairman and chairman of the Rock Island County Republican Party, as a volunteer with Community Caring Conference, managed religious affairs for the Rock Island County NAACP, was former chairman of the Quad Cities Youth Conference, and is a community activist.
Barnes is a longtime resident of Rock Island and has actively served the community as treasurer for the Rock Island County NAACP and as a member of Quad Cities Illinois Chapter of The Links, Incorporated. She has a bachelor's degree in elected studies from St. Ambrose University and a master's degree in public administration.
Barnes retired after 22 years in the city's Finance Department. She began her career with the city in February 2001 as a fiscal technician and was named finance director in 2021.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
23 minutes ago
- Forbes
New York's Challenges In Budgeting For Racial Equity
In 2022, New York City voters added provisions on racial equity to the city charter. But ... More implementation has been slow and halting and required reports not issued. In the November 2022 election, New York voters overwhelmingly approved three amendments to the New York City's charter to 'lay the foundation for achieving racial equity.' But the legally required implementation of the amendments is far behind schedule, and despite its progressive reputation, New York is lagging behind other US cities on comprehensive racial equity policies. New York's charter lays out the city's governing vision, the roles and activities of the Mayor (executive) and City Council (legislative) and establishes standards for city policies. (City courts are mostly governed as part of the state's court system.) In 2021, almost a year after the murder of George Floyd that sparked the Black Lives Matter movement, New York's then-mayor Bill de Blasio appointed a special New York City Racial Justice Commission. The commission was charged with proposing charter amendments to 'root out systemic racism across New York City.' The commission proposed three ballot initiatives, with voters approving them by 70% or more. Underscoring the desire for racial equity, the amendments included a new preamble to the City Charter. It calls out the historic 'violence and systemic inequity that continue to be experienced by marginalized groups.' The preamble says 'collective values' undergirding racial equity created 'duties, obligations, and authorities' that would 'guide the operation of our city government.' The amendments went into law almost immediately, with detailed implementation language written and incorporated into the charter in December of 2022. The new legal requirements require the city to 'undertake a process of citywide and agency planning and reporting with a goal of eliminating racial inequity.' The city's sweeping duties include defining overall city goals and specific strategies, 'throughout the city government's policymaking, operations, and workforce,' including attention to neighborhoods. Performance indicators and revisions to data when necessary also are part of the mandate. All of this is to be specified in a mayoral-issued racial equity plan, with adequate time and feedback from other elected officials and public before it is finalized. And the plan is meant to be coordinated with the city's budget process, along with review by the newly-established independent Commission on Racial Equity (CORE), also created by the charter amendments. To date, Mayor Eric Adams' administration has not issued any racial equity plans, preliminary of otherwise. CORE has been carrying out its own mandated duties, including gathering public input on racial equity priorities, but that process was intended to work with and inform the Mayor's racial equity planning. After missing repeated deadlines for issuing plans to be coordinated with the FY2026 budget process, CORE issued a letter calling on the Mayor to release the preliminary plan 'no later than March 21, 2025.' That call has been echoed by the city's Public Advocate, and the Progressive and the Black, Latino, and Asian Caucuses of the City Council. But as of this writing, there hasn't been a public response, or a racial equity plan, from the Mayor's office. I work on a joint project of the New School's Institute on Race, Power, and Political Economy and the Center for Community Uplift at the Brookings Institution. At the Institute, we analyzed the city's public budget documents to look for attention on racial equity by agency, spending, and other measures. We did a word search for the terms 'race,' 'racial,' 'racial equity,' 'Black,' and 'charter.' We found no systematic attention to racial equity in the hundreds of pages in public budget documents we examined. If the city is linking a racial equity strategy to the budget process, as the charter requires, it is not apparent in the publicly available budget documents. Measuring and pursuing equity is challenging, but it can be done. There is a wealth of practice on how to look at equity for specific policies, from a number of institutions. Our joint New School and Brookings project has conducted specific racial equity analyses as a 'proof of concept' on transit subsidies and on wages paid by nonprofits to human service workers, reviewed racial equity efforts around the nation, looked at local land use decisions and racial equity, and documented racial equity analyses and policies from around the country. The Institute also is developing a pilot framework for assessing equity across a city's budget, with special emphasis on transparency and community input from marginalized communities. Budget equity involves a variety of complex technical issues, but must be driven by a set of values. The Institute's founding director Darrick Hamilton has anchored the work in values and guided our work by saying 'we value what we measure and we measure what we value.' One of our key findings is that racial equity is not just issuing new policies or spending plans. It must involve political leadership with adequate resources , guidance, and data to city agencies to examine their existing operations along with real community involvement. Existing programs and continuing spending usually are well over 95% of a city's operating budget, so an effective racial equity strategy must focus on existing programs to have a substantial impact. New York has some promising practices. The Department of City Planning, after urging from community organizations and some elected officials, created an online 'Equitable Development Data Explorer' along with a mapping tool to measure housing displacement risk for specific city neighborhoods. The Department of Health and Mental Hygiene candidly states 'our neighborhoods are segregated by race and wealth,' providing community health profiles with over 50 measures by specific neighborhoods. But compared to some other cities, New York's efforts are piecemeal and uncoordinated. Although several cities (Philadelphia, Washington DC, Portland, Dallas) have strong racial equity analytics and practices, Chicago is perhaps the nation's most comprehensive. In his 2025 Budget Overview, Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson foregrounds 'Equity and Engagement,' clearly stating that 'Budget Equity is the process by which all departments account for the progress they are making to advance racial equity.' The city maintains an online 'Chicago Equity Dashboard' with data on key neighborhood indicators, and an online site showing 'Racial Equity Action Plans' for each city agency. Although New York voters spoke strongly in favor of racial equity analysis in coordination with the budget and using it to guide agency management and practices, the city has not met its deadlines. Of course, budget processes and comprehensive management of billions of dollars and many different agencies and policies is difficult and hard work. But the experiences of other large cities, especially Chicago, shows progress can be made. And now all cities must worry about the active hostility to diversity and racial equity coming from the Trump Administration. There will doubtless be many battles around federal funds, mandates, regulations, and court fights around equity in the next few years. That hostility means cities are now the best hope for progress on racial equity. When the city's Racial Justice Commission was charged in 2021 with drafting the ultimately successful ballot measures for racial equity, Darrick Hamilton (named as a commissioner) said 'This city, and this nation, are faced with an unprecedented opportunity to think big.' New York's voter-approved mandate calls for 'a city where the worth, talents, and contributions of all people are valued and recognized' by 'closing of gaps in policy, practice, and allocation of city resources through the prioritization of access, opportunities, and resources to those people and communities with the greatest need.' That indeed presents 'an unprecedented opportunity to think big.' The next few years will show if New York is up to the challenge.
Associated Press
33 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Justice Department drops lawsuit against Trump adviser Peter Navarro
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Justice Department is dropping a lawsuit that it filed against White House trade adviser Peter Navarro, a case in which he was accused of using an unofficial email account for government work and wrongfully retaining presidential records during the first Trump administration, according to a Tuesday court filing. The joint filing by the Justice Department and an attorney for Navarro doesn't explain why they are abandoning a case that was filed in 2022, during President Joe Biden's term in office. The one-page filing says each side will bear their own fees and costs. The lawsuit accused Navarro of using at least one 'non-official' email account — a ProtonMail account — to send and receive emails. The legal action comes just weeks after Navarro was indicted on criminal charges after refusing to cooperate with a congressional investigation into the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol. Navarro served a four-month prison sentence after being found guilty of misdemeanor charges. The civil cases alleges that by using the unofficial email account, Navarro failed to turn over presidential records to the National Archives and Records Administration. The government notified the court of the lawsuit's dismissal a day before U.S. Magistrate G. Michael Harvey was scheduled to preside over a status conference for the case. A Justice Department spokesperson and a lawyer for Navarro didn't immediately respond to emails seeking comment. Navarro served as a trade adviser during President Donald Trump's first term. A longtime critic of trade arrangements with China, he has been named senior counselor for trade and manufacturing for Trump's second administration.
Associated Press
33 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Fed lifts restrictions placed on Wells Fargo in 2018 because of its fake-accounts scandal
NEW YORK (AP) — The Federal Reserve said Tuesday that Wells Fargo is no longer subject to the restraints the Fed placed on the bank in 2018 for having a toxic sales and banking culture. It's a win for Wells Fargo, which has spent nearly a decade trying to convince the public and policymakers that it had changed its ways. 'We are a different and far stronger company today because of the work we've done,' said Wells Fargo CEO Charlie Scharf in a statement. Scharf also announced that each of the 215,000 employees at Wells Fargo would receive a $2,000 award for turning the bank around. Wells Fargo used to have a corporate culture where it placed unreasonable sales goals on its branch employees, which resulted in employees opening up millions of fake accounts in order to meet those goals. Wells' top executives called its branches 'stores' and employees were expected to cross-sell customers into as many banking products as possible, even if the customer did not want or need them. After an investigation by The Los Angeles Times, Wells Fargo shut down its sales culture and fired much of its leadership and board of directors. The fake accounts scandal cost Wells Fargo billions of dollars in fines and lost business, and permanently tarnished its reputation, particularly because the scandal broke only a few years after the Great Recession and financial crisis. It was later revealed that Wells Fargo opened up roughly 3.5 million accounts that were not wanted or needed by customers. In order to push Wells to fix itself, the Federal Reserve took the unusual step of placing Wells Fargo in a program where the bank could grow no larger than it was in 2018. No bank had previously been placed into such a program, known as an asset cap. Since taking over in 2019, Scharf's goal has been to convince the Federal Reserve that Wells Fargo had fixed its toxic banking practices.
