Sweetening soft drinks: What to know about sugar, high-fructose corn syrup and their alternatives
For decades, Coke and the makers of other soft drinks have generally used high-fructose corn syrup or artificial sweeteners in their products manufactured in the U.S. But American consumers are increasingly looking for food and drinks with fewer and more natural ingredients, and beverage companies are responding.
PepsiCo and Dr Pepper have sold versions of their flagship sodas sweetened with cane sugar since 2009. Coca-Cola has sold Mexican Coke — which uses cane sugar — in the U.S. since 2005, but it's positioned a trendy alternative and sold in glass bottles. Coke with cane sugar will likely be more widely available.
Here are some frequently asked questions about the sweeteners in U.S. sodas:
What's the difference between cane sugar and high-fructose corn syrup?
Many consumers know that consuming too many sweets can negatively affect their health, but soda drinkers sometimes debate if either cane sugar or high-fructose corn syrup is better (or worse) than the other.
The short answer is that it doesn't make a difference, said Marion Nestle, one of the nation's top nutrition experts and professor emeritus at New York University.
High-fructose corn syrup is made of the simple sugars glucose and fructose in liquid form. Cane sugar, also known as sucrose, is made of glucose and fructose bonded, but quickly split, Nestle explained.
Both are still sugars, with about the same amount of calories.
Whether a can of Coca-Cola contains one or the other, it will still be a sugary drink with about the same amount of calories and the same potential to increase well-documented health problems from obesity and diabetes to tooth decay.
Why did soda companies switch from using sugar to high-fructose corn syrup?
High-fructose corn syrup costs less. According to price data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the wholesale price of HFCS-55, the type of corn syrup most commonly used in beverages, averaged 49.4 cents per pound last year. The average wholesale price of refined cane sugar was 60.1 cents per pound, while the average wholesale price of refined beet sugar was 51.7 cents per pound.
But high-fructose corn syrup has advantages beyond price. According to a 2008 paper in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, high-fructose corn syrup is more stable than sugar when added to acidic beverages, and it can be pumped directly from delivery trucks into storage and mixing tanks.
Why is high-fructose corn syrup less expensive that sugar?
Tariffs are one reason. The U.S. has had barriers on sugar imports almost back to its founding; the first went into place in 1789, according to the Cato Institute, a think tank that advocates free markets.
Since the passage of the Farm Bill in 1981, the U.S. has had a system in place that raises duties on sugar once a certain amount has been imported. The U.S. also has domestic production controls that limit supplies, keeping prices higher.
But high-fructose corn syrup is also cheaper because of the federal government's billions of dollars in subsidies for corn farmers. Loans, direct payments, insurance premium subsidies and surplus crop purchases all lower farmers' costs – and the price of the corn they grow.
Are sugar replacements used in diet sodas safe?
While cutting back on added sugars has documented benefits, replacing them with artificial sweeteners is complicated, too.
Coca-Cola Zero Sugar, introduced in 2017, uses the artificial sweetener aspartame and the natural sweetener stevia in its recipe.
But research suggests that aspartame may be linked to cancer. In 2023, a committee for the World Health Organization determined that aspartame should be categorized 'as possibly carcinogenic to humans.'
While that doesn't mean that diet soda causes cancer, the scientific committee concluded that there may be a possible link between aspartame and liver cancer, and that the issue should be studied further.
The U.S. Food and Drug administration disagreed with the WHO panel, citing 'significant shortcomings' in the research that backed the conclusion.
FDA officials noted that aspartame is one of the most studied food additives and said 'FDA scientists do not have safety concerns' when it is used under approved conditions.
Stevia, a plant-based sweetener, appears to be 'a safe choice,' according to the Center for Science in the Public Interest, an advocacy group.
___
Durbin reported from Detroit. Aleccia reported from Los Angeles.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Factbox-Three years into war, US and Europe keep billions in trade with Russia
(Reuters) -Three years after Russian President Vladimir Putin launched his full-scale invasion of Ukraine, the United States and European Union still import billions of euros worth of Russian energy and commodities, ranging from liquefied natural gas to enriched uranium. India this week lashed out at what it called Western double standards, after facing renewed threats from U.S. President Donald Trump over its surging purchases of Russian crude oil. Here are the main commercial ties that the U.S., Europe, and India maintain with Russia, and their evolution over the last four years: EUROPE IMPORTS FROM RUSSIA Since the beginning of the war, trade between the EU and Russia has drastically contracted due to EU sanctions and import restrictions on some products. Imports from Russia fell by 86% from the first quarter of 2022 through the first quarter of this year, according to the latest data from Eurostat. Imports of goods from Russia in the first quarter of 2025 totaled 8.74 billion euros ($10.11 billion), down from 30.58 billion euros four years earlier. Since January 2022, the EU has imported 297 billion euros' worth of Russian goods. The EU, however, continues to purchase oil, nickel, natural gas, fertilizer, iron, and steel from Russia. * OIL Four years ago, Russia was the largest supplier of petroleum products to the EU, but the EU ban on maritime imports of Russian crude oil reduced its share to 2.01% in 2025 from 28.74% in 2021. Oil imports fell to 1.48 billion euros in the first quarter of 2025 from 14.06 billion euros four years ago. * NATURAL GAS Russia's share in natural gas plummeted to 17% in the first quarter of 2025 from 48% in 2021's first quarter. * IRON AND STEEL Russia's share in non-EU iron and steel imports slumped to 7.71% in the first quarter of 2025 from 18.28% four years ago. * FERTILIZERS As for fertilizers, a sector in which the European Parliament voted in May to impose prohibitive tariffs, Russia remained, as of the first quarter of 2025, the largest exporter to the European Union. Its share fell slightly from 28.15% to 25.62% in the last four years. INDIA IMPORTS FROM RUSSIA In contrast to Europe, India's imports from Moscow surged to $65.7 billion in 2024 from $8.25 billion in 2021, data from the Indian Commerce Ministry website showed. * OIL Crude oil has been the biggest driver of the growth in India's imports from Russia, jumping to $52.2 billion in 2024 from $2.31 billion in 2021. * COAL PRODUCTS India's imports of coal and coal-related products from Russia surged to $3.5 billion from $1.12 billion in 2021. * FERTILIZERS India's fertilizer imports from Russia rose to $1.67 billion in 2024 from $483 million in 2021. U.S. IMPORTS FROM RUSSIA U.S. imports from Russia fell to $2.50 billion in the first half of 2025 from $14.14 billion four years earlier, according to U.S. Census Bureau and U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis data. Since January 2022, the U.S. has imported $24.51 billion of Russian goods. * FERTILIZERS Last year, the U.S. imported around $1.27 billion of Russian fertilizers, up slightly from $1.14 billion in 2021. * URANIUM, PLUTONIUM The U.S. imported enriched uranium and plutonium from Russia worth around $624 million in 2024, down from $646 million in 2021. * PALLADIUM Russia exported palladium to the United States for around $878 million in 2024, down from $1.59 billion in 2021. ($1 = 0.8641 euros) Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Major analyst resets gold price target after shocking economic data
Major analyst resets gold price target after shocking economic data originally appeared on TheStreet. In times of inflation and economic turbulence, some investors turn to gold as a safe haven. Many experts and veteran analysts agree that gold is a solid long-term investment. It usually acts as a hedge amid geopolitical and fiscal challenges. Invest in Gold American Hartford Gold: #1 Precious Metals Dealer in the Nation Thor Metals Group: Best Overall Gold IRA Priority Gold: Up to $15k in Free Silver + Zero Account Fees on Qualifying Purchase 💵💰Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter 💰💵 However, one of the most successful investors of our time, the legendary Warren Buffett, avoids investing in gold. In fact, he considers it useless. But why? He once said gold 'doesn't do anything but sit there and look at you.' While this is literally true (except the looking part) and Buffett's investment strategies shouldn't be questioned, patient investors who have invested in gold in 2024 or at the beginning of 2025 have been rewarded. Compared to the same time last year, gold prices are now more than 40% higher. A considerable jump happened in April. This followed President Donald Trump's tariff announcement on so-called 'Liberation Day,' showcasing gold's dependence on economic and political changes. To understand how impressive a more than 40% return is, we should compare it to other assets, such as stocks or major indexes. For example, the S&P 500 is up 22.05% over the past 12 months. However, such a significant gain may not happen often enough to make gold the only investment in a person's portfolio. Many experts recommend a diversified portfolio, which means no more than 10% invested in gold. A 40% return over the past 12 months is not bad for a yellow metal that does nothing, but will it continue to go up? Earlier this week, commodities analysts at Citigroup offered their projections. Citi raises gold outlook on harsh U.S. economic instability Citigroup Inc. revised its projections for gold, now expecting it to reach a record high in the short term, influenced by the crumbling U.S. economy, rising inflation, and ever-changing the next three months, gold is expected to trade between $3,300 and $3,600, partly due to U.S. import levies averaging higher than the expected 15% analysts wrote in an Aug. 4 note, as reported by Bloomberg. 'The market has been concerned about a U.S. recession due to high interest rates for the past three years, buying gold to hedge the downside risks,' analysts, including Max Layton, wrote. 'This fear has likely only increased over the past six months given President Trump's largest-in-a-century trade tariff agenda.' In June, the bank projected that gold would trade between $3,100 and $3,500. Now, it is resetting the gold price target, expecting a weaker dollar and inflation challenges to continue in the second half of the year. "U.S. growth and tariff-related inflation concerns are set to remain elevated during 2H'25, which alongside a weaker dollar, are set to drive gold moderately higher, to new all-time highs," the bank said, as reported by Reuters. More Economic Analysis: GOP plan to remove Fed Chair Powell escalates Federal Reserve official gives green light to July rate cut Trump deflects reports on firing Fed Chair Powell 'soon' Former Federal Reserve official sends bold message on 'regime change' After reaching a peak of $3,500 an ounce in April, according to JP Morgan, gold's price has been relatively stable, and Citi's new projections are similar to those of other major analysts. Depressing U.S. outlook unites analysts on gold price projections The majority of Wall Street analysts are bullish on gold prices. Goldman Sachs analysts projected in June that gold would end the year at $3,700 per ounce, based on strong central bank demand, reports Invezz. Reuters' poll of 40 analysts and traders revealed an average forecast of $3,220 per troy ounce, up from the $3,065 they predicted three months ago. A troy ounce is slightly heavier than a standard ounce, equivalent to 31.1 grams, versus 28.35 grams. Moreover, Fidelity International recently said gold could reach $4,000 an ounce by the end of 2025, as the Federal Reserve cuts rates, the dollar declines, and central banks keep adding holdings, reported Bloomberg.J.P. Morgan Research projects prices will average $3,675 an ounce by the final quarter of 2025, rising toward $4,000 per ounce by the second quarter of 2026. U.S. investors who invested in gold might feel slightly conflicted when hearing the news of this commodity's price increase. While they are earning a profit as gold's price rises, the U.S. economy is likely struggling. For example, an investor might seem to have gained 10% on their gold investment, but if the dollar weakened over the same period by 5% due to inflation, the investor's real inflation-adjusted gain would be much less. Or while an investor might be pleased to have profited from a gold investment, they might have lost their job due to labor market challenges caused by a weak economy. Nonetheless, a gain is a gain, especially in times of recession. Key concerns causing higher gold price projections: Inflation; Steep tariffs on exports from many trading partners; Weaker U.S. labor data in the second quarter of 2025; The weakening dollar; Political instability. Gold was trading at $3,383.86 per ounce during Aug. 5's morning analyst resets gold price target after shocking economic data first appeared on TheStreet on Aug 5, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Aug 5, 2025, where it first appeared. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Politico
9 minutes ago
- Politico
The ripple effects of the BLS firing
SLIPPERY SLOPE — The good news for Donald Trump is that the Jeffrey Epstein saga didn't dominate the news cycle today. The bad news? Four days after firing the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the president was still answering questions about sacking the civil servant who served as the stats chief for economic data, and his unproven claims that the latest jobs data was rigged to make him look bad. His party has largely circled the wagons around him. Critics continue to draw some of the most unflattering — and uncustomary — parallels possible. Trump's move, they argue, is placing the world's largest and most advanced economy in the company of basket cases and developing economies. Janet Yellen, the former Treasury secretary and chair of the Federal Reserve, described the firing to the New York Times as 'the kind of thing you would only expect to see in a banana republic.' Others see comparisons to Argentina and Greece, two nations where government meddling with economic data famously led to harsh consequences. In Argentina, former President Nestor Kirchner fired the head of his government's economic data agency and pushed the agency to produce rosier numbers. Argentinians began to doubt the veracity of the numbers, leading to even more pessimism about the country's economic outlook. The government's data was widely dismissed as unreliable, and the International Monetary Fund censured the government for not providing accurate economic data. 'It may sound implausible, but the same erosion of trust can happen to the United States if institutions like the BLS are politicized,' says Argentine economist Martín Uribe. In a statement, the Council of Professional Associations on Federal Statistics wrote that the rationale for firing Erika McEntarfer, the former BLS commissioner, undermines the credibility of federal economic statistics. 'When leaders of other nations have politicized economic data, it has destroyed public trust in all official statistics and in government science,' the statement said. The BLS is already struggling under resource cuts, staff reductions and declining response rates, and those challenges could worsen under a more partisan BLS commissioner, says economist Jed Kolko, who served as under secretary of commerce in the Biden administration. While he stressed that 'we're a very long way' from U.S. economic data being unreliable, Kolko says he worries about the BLS failing to publish thorough data sets that allow analysts to verify its numbers. In that case, decision-makers could be left to rely on private sector data to fill in the gaps. But that alternative faces serious limitations, he says, because private sector data is often checked against the federal government's numbers to ensure it's accurate. 'Once credibility starts to unravel, it is hard to rebuild,' Kolko says. 'And policymakers, investors, businesses, households, all make decisions based on economic data that they need to be able to trust.' The nomination of a partisan BLS commissioner as McEntarfer's successor could make things worse. And it would have knock-on effects at other agencies like the Census Bureau or the Bureau of Economic Analysis if civil servants fear presenting the White House with data that upsets the president, according to Kyle Handley, an adjunct scholar at the Cato Institute who leads UC San Diego's Center for Commerce and Diplomacy. Handley stresses that giving up its edge in data reliability could mean 'ceding ground to other countries' for the U.S. 'A lot of organizations rely on us for government data, like the IMF and the World Bank, and that gives Washington some informational leverage on these international institutions,' says Handley. 'And if they don't think that the U.S. is the gold standard of statistics and data reliability anymore, then that's just another way in which the U.S. will become less of a player.' That's in addition to a likely impact on bond yields resulting from a lack of confidence in economic data, which could further damage the American economy by impeding capital flows into the U.S. The Trump administration's approach to trade policy could also be undermined since it is underpinned by the bet that the U.S. economy can withstand an extended trade war. If trading partners doubt data showing the strength of the U.S. economy, that could weaken the White House's position, says economist Steven Kamin, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute who has worked for the Fed and the White House Council of Economic Advisers. The appointment of a truly independent civil servant to lead the BLS would avoid that worst-case scenario. But even if the firing was just a fleeting burst of anger, says Kamin, trust in the agency will still take a hit. 'If the temporary fit of pique explanation holds, this certainly still degrades the U.S. standing in the world,' says Kamin. 'It reduces the administration's credibility. It reduces the desire of investors to hold U.S. dollar assets, and it reduces the desire of our trading partners to work with us.' Welcome to POLITICO Nightly. Reach out with news, tips and ideas at nightly@ Contact tonight's author at jwendler@ or on X (formerly known as Twitter) at @jacob_wendler. What'd I Miss? — Trump says he will 'probably not' seek a third term: President Donald Trump said Tuesday he would 'probably not' run for a third term. 'I'd like to run,' he said when asked about the possibility on CNBC's Squawk Box. 'I have the best poll numbers I've ever had.' The 22nd Amendment prohibits anyone from being elected president more than twice. That applies to Trump as well, despite his two terms being nonconsecutive. But allies of the president — and Trump himself — have repeatedly floated him serving another term despite that constitutional prohibition. There are possible ways Trump could try to get around this mandate, including repealing the amendment or running for vice president and ascending to the presidency. Trump has previously declined to rule out a third term, saying in March there 'are methods' to assume office again if he wanted to. — Comer issues subpoenas for DOJ's Epstein files, depositions with former officials: The House Oversight Committee on Tuesday issued subpoenas for Department of Justice records on the Jeffrey Epstein investigation, as well as for interviews with a slate of former government officials in connection to the case. Oversight Chair James Comer (R-Ky.) announced that he was summoning nearly a dozen former officials to appear for depositions on the Epstein investigation — a list that includes former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. Former U.S. Attorneys General William Barr, Alberto Gonzales, Jeff Sessions, Loretta Lynch, Eric Holder and Merrick Garland, as well as former FBI Directors Robert Mueller and James Comey were also tapped to give testimony in connection to the case. — Maxwell doesn't want grand jury materials in her case unsealed: Ghislaine Maxwell told a federal judge Tuesday that she opposes the Justice Department's effort to unseal grand jury transcripts in her case, which she described in court papers as a 'broad intrusion into grand jury secrecy.' Maxwell's opposition makes it less likely that a judge will agree to unseal any of the material, which would likely add little to the public's understanding of the matter even if it were to be disclosed. In a court filing Monday night, the Justice Department said that 'much' of the information in the grand jury testimony has already been made public, in part through Maxwell's trial. — Texas AG Paxton will try to expel Texas Democrats if they don't return by Friday: Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton is moving forward with a plan to remove quorum-breaking House Democrats from office, asserting that by leaving the state they have abandoned their positions, his office announced Tuesday. Paxton said he would begin asking Texas courts on Friday to remove the Democrats if they do not return to Austin. The legal process to remove the lawmakers will likely take time. First, Paxton must file a case against each individual absent Democrat in various district courts, a process that would surely lead to appeals and could drag out long beyond the end of the special session on Aug. 19. AROUND THE WORLD CONTRACEPTION INTERVENTION — Lawmakers and NGOs are pressuring Paris and Brussels to intervene and prevent the incineration of nearly $10 million worth of contraceptives owned by the defunded U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) program. The contraceptives, which are currently being stored in Belgium and are set to be destroyed in France, will not be distributed as initially planned due to the reinstatement of a U.S. policy that prohibits sending aid to organizations that provide abortion services, a U.S. State Department spokesperson told the Guardian in July. 'We are asking the European Commission to intervene,' Mélissa Camara, a French Green MEP who sent a letter to Commission President Ursula von der Leyen about this case told POLITICO on Friday. BUDGET INFLUENCER — François Bayrou doesn't do holidays. Luckily, the battle for the hearts and minds of French taxpayers is keeping him occupied. The French prime minister has launched a series of videos, called 'FB Direct,' to convince the public that the €43.8 billion budget squeeze he has planned for next year is not an act of sadism — but an unavoidable move to prevent a budget crisis. 'All politicians are going on a well-deserved vacation. I will not because the days we're going to live through during these weeks of August and early September are absolutely crucial. This is the moment when everything is at stake,' Bayrou said in the first of these videos published on Tuesday. Last month, during a two-hour press conference billed as 'a moment of truth,' the French prime minister unveiled his draconian plans to drastically cut public spending in 2026. DEADLOCK AHEAD — Karol Nawrocki is being sworn in Wednesday for a five-year term as Poland's president, but it's not going to be a happy day for Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk. June's narrow electoral victory by Nawrocki — a nationalist openly allied with U.S. President Donald Trump — delivered a massive body blow to the political prospects of the ruling coalition led by pro-EU centrist Tusk. That threatens to stall the legislative agenda of the EU's fifth-largest country and to slow a push to restore rule of law that led to a breakdown of relations between Warsaw and Brussels. But there are efforts to find common cause between Nawrocki and the centrists in areas like defense — where everyone can agree Russia is the enemy. 'The right-wing opposition candidate's presidential election victory has radically changed Poland's political dynamics, scuppering the liberal-centrist coalition government's plans to reset its reform agenda,' wrote Aleks Szczerbiak, a professor at the University of Sussex who studies Polish politics. Nightly Number RADAR SWEEP PALANTIR DEGREE — A growing number of young people, mostly men, are forgoing college to head straight to Silicon Valley to become entrepreneurs or score a job at a big tech company. The phenomenon reflects Silicon Valley's anti-elitism streak, influenced by tech titan Peter Thiel's disdain for higher education, but has also been exacerbated by the Trump administration's attack on Ivy League schools. Julia Hornstein reports on the young men chasing the myth of the college dropout founder. Parting Image Did someone forward this email to you? Sign up here.